ライフサイエンスコーパス: esophageal pH

1 proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) began 24-hour esophageal pH and impedance monitoring and esophagoscopy

2 8 unselected patients, consisting of 24-hour esophageal pH and lower esophageal sphincter manometry.

3 An esophageal pH electrode also was placed and fluoroscopy

4 rom the 49 recordings of 24-hour gastric and esophageal pH from the Stanford study as well as from an

5 annot reduce PPIs should consider ambulatory esophageal pH/impedance monitoring before committing to

6 Control of esophageal pH improved after TF (mean 9.3% before and 6.

7 imilar effect on the percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 [mean reduction: 68.5% (30 mg), 54.2%

8 subjects treated with a PPI, measuring time esophageal pH < 4 will significantly overestimate the pr

9 to perform a cost analysis of the available esophageal pH-metry methods.

10 swallow, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 48-hour esophageal pH monitoring (off PPIs), and high-resolution

11 omatic assessment, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring (using a probe with 2 sensors l

12 At 6 months, patients underwent 48-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

13 agnostic accuracy and reliability of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and how best to interpret pH te

14 All patients underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy before rand

15 nclear, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring are recommended.

16 Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring documented abnormal reflux in 3

17 may strongly affect the results of prolonged esophageal pH monitoring in GERD patients.

18 Twenty-four-hour esophageal pH monitoring led to the understanding of the

19 Esophageal pH monitoring results were classified as norm

20 copic airway survey, bronchoalveolar lavage, esophageal pH monitoring, and a swallowing study.

21 colized nuclear scintigraphy (n=83), 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and stationary manometry (n=14

22 estionnaire, esophagogastricduodenoscopy and esophageal pH monitoring, and use of proton pump inhibit

23 During dual gastric and esophageal pH monitoring, we observed that postprandial

24 a URS questionnaire before dual-probe, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.

25 than IPF underwent dual-channel, ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

26 tion; 2) esophageal motility; and 3) 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

27 ent Heller alone were studied with a 24-hour esophageal pH probe and had a median Johnson-DeMeester s

28 th lower reflux, 36% of subjects with normal esophageal pH studies, and 9% of normal volunteers repor

29 uated by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-hour esophageal pH studies, gastric-emptying tests, electroga

30 Among the 115 children with esophageal pH studies, the prevalence of GER was 43%.

31 stroesophageal reflux disease by an abnormal esophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal he

32 A subgroup had an esophageal pH study before randomization.

33 A 24-hour esophageal pH study should be considered in patients who

34 patients had abnormal results on the 24-hour esophageal pH study.

35 sthma patients without reflux symptoms, 24-h esophageal pH testing is required.

36 Future studies with larger sample sizes and esophageal pH testing should be performed to determine t

37 nts with pathologic acid reflux confirmed by esophageal pH testing undergoing MSA.

38 Patients referred for esophageal pH testing were randomly assigned to WC with

39 symptoms using esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH testing.

40 phic variables did not predict abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients with asymptomatic

41 aphic variables do not predict abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients without reflux sy

42 The prevalence of abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients without reflux sy

43 Dual gastric and esophageal pH tracings were analyzed from 40 dyspeptic p

44 Esophageal pH was measured, and pH data were analyzed an

45 Manometry and esophageal pH were recorded for 30 minutes, after which