戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  diligent nonoperative care in patients with esophageal perforation.
2 strategies and outcomes in the management of esophageal perforation.
3 rgical, medical, and endoscopic treatment of esophageal perforation.
4 n condition that represents about 15% of all esophageal perforation.
5 ces of stroke-free survival for all types of esophageal perforation.
6                                         Four esophageal perforations (1%) developed after FBD.
7          From 1992 to 2004, 47 patients with esophageal perforation (10 proximal, 37 thoracic) were t
8                       There were no cases of esophageal perforation; 89% (98 of 110) of dilations wer
9 sophageal stents in the management of benign esophageal perforation and in the management of esophage
10                                       Benign esophageal perforation and postoperative esophageal anas
11  patients with human immunodeficiency virus, esophageal perforation, and a delay in diagnosis.
12 erative complications included pneumothorax, esophageal perforation, and gastric perforation.
13 postoperative anastomotic leaks, spontaneous esophageal perforations, and iatrogenic esophageal perfo
14                                              Esophageal perforations are a rare but devastating compl
15                                  Gastric and esophageal perforations are serious complications of the
16                                              Esophageal perforations can rarely result in the develop
17  year) upon 30-day and 90-day mortality from esophageal perforation (EP), paraesophageal hernia causi
18  The relative rarity and unpredictability of esophageal perforation has precluded a randomized or mul
19                                   Iatrogenic esophageal perforation (IEP) is a severe adverse event (
20 n to a judicious, nonoperative management of esophageal perforation in selected patients.
21 phageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients.
22 ) has become a standard treatment method for esophageal perforations in adults.
23 erapeutic armamentarium in the management of esophageal perforations irrespective of its etiology.
24                                              Esophageal perforation is a dreaded complication of atri
25              In 5 of 832 patients (0.6%), an esophageal perforation (n=3) or an esophagopericardial o
26                                              Esophageal perforation occurred only in patients with ca
27 s who were successfully treated with EVT for esophageal perforations of different etiology.
28             Four infants were diagnosed with esophageal perforations on day 7, 32, 35 and 159 of life
29 nagement of patients who present early after esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with limited
30 ren and young adults that raises concern for esophageal perforation or extension of an air leak, resu
31                             The treatment of esophageal perforation remains controversial with a bias
32 cal effectiveness and response to dilations, esophageal perforation, requirement for surgery, and mor
33 ermine possible mechanisms of 17 gastric and esophageal perforations that occurred during laparoscopi
34                  Septic shock and the distal esophageal perforation were successfully treated with co
35 eous esophageal perforations, and iatrogenic esophageal perforations were identified from MEDLINE, EM