ライフサイエンスコーパス: esophageal pressure

1 hout corresponding changes of end-expiratory esophageal pressure.

2 tient's inspiratory effort from Eadi without esophageal pressure.

3 lue, associated with commensurate changes of esophageal pressure.

4 also recorded, together with subglottic and esophageal pressures.

5 greater than for first-minute measurement of esophageal pressure (0.44, p < 0.05) and tended to be gr

6 End-expiratory esophageal pressure also decreased (P=0.002).

7 Pulmonary mechanics including esophageal pressure and calculations of DP(AW), DP(TP),

8 Esophageal pressure and chest wall elastance-based metho

9 Esophageal pressure and chest wall elastance-based metho

10 Esophageal pressure and chest wall elastance-based metho

11 Esophageal pressure and EMG activity of an extrinsic (hy

12 ral pressure, one based on directly measured esophageal pressure and the other based on chest wall el

13 ral pressure, one based on directly measured esophageal pressure and the other based on chest wall el

14 Real-time measurements of esophageal pressure and tidal volume were integrated wit

15 The mean difference between twitch esophageal pressure and twitch endotracheal tube pressur

16 Airways flow and pressure, esophageal pressure, and Eadi were continuously recorded

17 d on lung mechanics (ExPress, stress index), esophageal pressure, and oxygenation (higher positive en

18 0.04, respectively), whereas MV-RDOS score, esophageal pressure, and respiratory muscle EMG did not

19 Flow, airway pressure, esophageal pressures, and peak electrical activity of th

20 raphic, and ventilatory variables (including esophageal pressure) at both low PEEP and higher PEEP by

21 ese methods, one targeting an end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressure of 0 c

22 ese methods, one targeting an end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressure of 0 c

23 he strategies of targeting an end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressure of 0 c

24 ure in patients with positive end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressures (p <

25 ure in patients with positive end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressures (p <

26 the electrical activity of the diaphragm or esophageal pressure, can be used for diagnosis.

27 genioglossus electromyogram (EMG-GG) and the esophageal pressure deflection (DP) during obstructive a

28 Clinical features, tidal change in esophageal pressure (DeltaPes), tidal change in dynamic

29 rent parameters of effort, such as change in esophageal pressure (DeltaPes), work of breathing (WOB),

30 G was linearly related to the deflections in esophageal pressure (DP) during the last three occluded

31 ry occlusion pressure, plateau pressure, and esophageal pressure during short periods of controlled v

32 as tightly correlated with that derived from esophageal pressure during tidal ventilation and allowed

33 There were no changes in LES or esophageal pressures during the study period in the sham

34 defined as the transpulmonary (airway minus esophageal) pressure during end-inspiratory pause of a t

35 ximum (EMGdi/EMGdi,max), respiratory effort (esophageal pressure expressed as percentage of the maxim

36 demonstrated acute elevations of the gastro-esophageal pressure gradient (>10mmHg) underpinned most

37 requent, significant elevation in the gastro-esophageal pressure gradient was the mechanism of reflux

38 the posterior probability of benefit of the esophageal pressure-guided strategy was 87% (RR, 0.77; 9

39 s modified treatment effect in the EPVent-2 (Esophageal Pressure-guided Ventilation 2) trial, a multi

40 cantly better at 24, 48, and 72 hours in the esophageal-pressure-guided group (P=0.01 by repeated-mea

41 xygen at 72 hours was 88 mm Hg higher in the esophageal-pressure-guided group than in the control gro

42 to measurements of esophageal pressure (the esophageal-pressure-guided group) or according to the Ac

43 Airway pressure and flow, esophageal pressure, hemodynamic variables (cardiac outp

44 e end-expiratory pressure identified through esophageal pressure measurement before and after a recru

45 < 0.05), whereas ExPress, stress index, and esophageal pressure methods gave similar positive end-ex

46 d by the ExPress, stress index, and absolute esophageal pressures methods were unrelated with lung re

47 trial are more reliable than measurements of esophageal pressure or frequency-to-VT ratio during the

48 nificantly associated with the maximal sniff esophageal pressure (p = 0.02).

49 ve stimulation can be used to predict twitch esophageal pressure (Pes(tw)) and twitch transdiaphragma

50 -reintubate orders and contraindications for esophageal pressure (PES) catheter insertion.

51 ent physiological and technical knowledge on esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements in patients recei

52 Esophageal pressure (Pes) monitoring can be performed du

53 Inspiratory effort was estimated by esophageal pressure (Pes) swings.

54 Pharyngeal caliber, airflow, and esophageal pressure (Pes) were simultaneously monitored

55 ment is usually based on recordings of flow, esophageal pressure (Pes), and transdiaphragmatic pressu

56 ic features involve progressive increases in esophageal pressure (Pes), terminated by arousal (AR) as

57 By measuring esophageal pressure (Pes), we sought to characterize inf

58 Ventilation 2) trial, a multicenter trial of esophageal pressure (Pes)-guided PEEP versus empirical h

59 ssure recordings to measure peak inspiratory esophageal pressure (Pesins) during exercise and this wa

60 atory rate, tidal volume, negative change in esophageal pressure, pressure time product, and the airw

61 methods based on lung mechanics or absolute esophageal pressures provide positive end-expiratory pre

62 ngs (DeltaPes), the pressure-time product of esophageal pressure (PTPes), and maximal inspiratory pre

63 ed using two definitions based on changes in esophageal pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure

64 We used esophageal pressure recordings to measure peak inspirato

65 servational Scale [MV-RDOS] scores), P(0.1), esophageal pressure, respiratory muscle EMG, and arteria

66 here was no change in MV-RDOS score, P(0.1), esophageal pressure, respiratory muscle EMG, and gas exc

67 Hourly measurements of airflow, tracheal and esophageal pressures, respiratory system impedance, and

68 ients in acute respiratory failure, elevated esophageal pressures suggest that chest wall mechanical

69 inspiratory effort, and work of breathing by esophageal pressure swings (DeltaPes) and pressure time

70 ip to indices of breathing effort, including esophageal pressure swings (DeltaPes), the pressure-time

71 In conclusion, continuous monitoring of esophageal pressure swings during a spontaneous breathin

72 A trend index that quantified esophageal pressure swings over time was more reliable t

73 anced diaphragmatic thickening and decreased esophageal pressure swings relative to the Venturi mask.

74 nioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative esophageal pressure swings were measured via in-laborato

75 ile inspiratory effort was evaluated through esophageal pressure swings.

76 h PEEP adjusted according to measurements of esophageal pressure (the esophageal-pressure-guided grou

77 per liter of ventilation, negative change in esophageal pressure, the airway occlusion pressure 100 m

78 Negative change in esophageal pressure, the airway occlusion pressure 100 m

79 ay be related to the progressive increase in esophageal pressure throughout a failed weaning trial, w

80 o determine whether repeated measurements of esophageal pressure throughout a trial are more reliable

81 Esophageal pressure, tidal compliance, bladder pressure,

82 Dyssynchrony was quantified by measuring the esophageal pressure time product during the assisted bre

83 The inspiratory effort measured by the esophageal pressure time product increased proportionall

84 roportional assist ventilation led to higher esophageal pressure time product than variable pressure

85 mpliance (r(2) = 0.43; p = 0.03) and isotime esophageal pressure-time product (r(2) = 0.47; p = 0.03)

86 ted well with measures of drive and with the esophageal pressure-time product (within-subjects R(2) =

87 ing derivation and validation datasets using esophageal pressure-time product as the reference standa

88 Esophageal pressure-time product/min decreased from 165

89 ffort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time product/min, and work of breath

90 ffort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time product/min, and work of breath

91 tandard of care, a ventilator strategy using esophageal pressures to estimate the transpulmonary pres

92 tion velocity and latency to high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT) studies to refine t

93 phageal motility provided by high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) as this new techn

94 defined and subclassified by high-resolution esophageal pressure topography, and 10 asymptomatic indi

95 waveform display (not always available), an esophageal pressure transducer (invasive), or a relaxed

96 riate analysis sniff trans-diaphragmatic and esophageal pressure, twitch trans-diaphragmatic pressure

97 stimulation, twitch gastric pressure, twitch esophageal pressure, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure,

98 s syndrome presented significantly increased esophageal pressure variations (25 +/- 9 vs 6 +/- 3 cm H

99 Esophageal pressure variations decreased from 9.8 (5.8-1

100 nula on indexes of respiratory effort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time

101 ere the indexes of respiratory effort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time

102 twitch endotracheal tube pressure to twitch esophageal pressure was 0.93, and that for twitch endotr

103 gmatic pressure was 10.7 cm H2O, mean twitch esophageal pressure was 6.7 cm H2O, and mean twitch endo

104 Peak esophageal pressure was lower (p < .05) during insufflat

105 ndrome in whom airflow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure were recorded during the recruitment

106 generated approximately 60% of their maximal esophageal pressure with each breath until they could no