戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  1.6% of all patients, most frequently after esophagogastric (4.2%) and hepatopancreaticobiliary (3.6
2                                In metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA), the addition of pr
3 hemotherapy with trastuzumab for resectable, esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).
4 ative treatment for patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).
5 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).
6  improves survival in patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated carc
7 ociated with improved outcomes in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, but treatment combinatio
8 d among patients with second-line metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
9  in the second-line treatment for metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
10                                              Esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EAC) are obesity-associ
11 BRCA-associated histologies, namely lung and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.
12 onditioning, a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (<3% incidence of leak), and
13 astrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for the
14 nd postoperative advantages surround stapled esophagogastric anastomosis compared with the hand-sewn
15                Side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis may reduce operation times a
16                                           An esophagogastric anastomosis was performed in 144 patient
17    Transhiatal esophagectomy with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was performed on approximate
18 astrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.
19 ed blood flow to the gastric fundus prior to esophagogastric anastomosis.
20                       Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which un
21 hepatobiliary AND hepatopancreatobiliary AND esophagogastric AND recovery AND outcomes." Primary outc
22 rt of 449 patients with pancreatic, biliary, esophagogastric, and hepatocellular cancers, resistance
23 in patients who have HER2-negative, advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC).
24 sistance in HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic esophagogastric cancer (mEGC).
25 anitumumab for Advanced and Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer (REAL-3) will evaluate whether th
26                          In 25 patients with esophagogastric cancer and 20 control subjects, receiver
27 ants are enriched in gastric and early-onset esophagogastric cancer and that germline testing should
28 t has the potential to improve survival from esophagogastric cancer by facilitating earlier detection
29 n ex vivo experiments in the headspace above esophagogastric cancer compared with the levels in sampl
30 herapy with 5-FU and cisplatin in resectable esophagogastric cancer improved pathologic complete resp
31               The role of ATM alterations in esophagogastric cancer risk warrants further investigati
32 ion of target volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in esophagogastric cancer through analysis of the ex vivo h
33 s (4.3%; 95% CI, 1.6%-9.1%) with early-onset esophagogastric cancer vs 5 (1.3%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.1%; P
34 , to December 31, 2019, in 515 patients with esophagogastric cancer who consented to tumor and blood
35 tandard of care for patients with resectable esophagogastric cancer.
36 ne (EOC) is a standard treatment in advanced esophagogastric cancer.
37 0.4%-3.1%; P = .08) of those with late-onset esophagogastric cancer.
38 erioperative FLOT chemotherapy in resectable esophagogastric cancer.
39                  A total of 337 patients had esophagogastric cancer: 83 in the surgical group and 254
40 noninvasive mixed-exhaled-breath testing for esophagogastric-cancer detection.
41 nt inhibitors into the treatment paradigm of esophagogastric cancers as well.
42                          Among patients with esophagogastric cancers, only individuals who present wi
43  cancer genes in ovarian cancer, glioma, and esophagogastric carcinoma, respectively.
44  pleural mesothelioma, urothelial carcinoma, esophagogastric carcinoma, sarcoma, or glioblastoma mult
45  these innovations, portosystemic shunts and esophagogastric devascularization remain important and e
46 mmon indications for nonselective shunts and esophagogastric devascularization were medically intract
47 renal shunt (DSRS), nonselective shunts, and esophagogastric devascularization, was taken.
48  more protective against rebleeding than was esophagogastric devascularization.
49 roesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and other esophagogastric diseases.
50  patients with stage IV colorectal (CRC) and esophagogastric (EGC) cancer who were treated with first
51  were found in highest concentrations within esophagogastric-endoluminal air.
52                                    Transoral esophagogastric fundoplication (TF) can decrease or elim
53   Increasing numbers of patients are failing esophagogastric fundoplication and requiring redo proced
54 all bowel, cervical, colorectal, pancreatic, esophagogastric, hepatobiliary, and GI neuroendocrine ca
55 nts with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG) is poor.
56 CC) of the esophagus, adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), or gastric cancer (GC).
57 .0) versus sham on esophageal physiology and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) anatomy.
58                  In some patients, reflux at esophagogastric junction (EGJ) can be seen on the impeda
59          Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is increasing, the earlie
60                              Flow across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is strongly related to op
61                        Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) largely determines esopha
62 etailed analysis of the mechanics leading to esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening during transient
63  TBE accuracy for predicting achalasia/FLIP+ esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction, as d
64 pet (270 degrees wrap) fundoplication on the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure in response to d
65 ip between obesity and the morphology of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure segment using hi
66 f achalasia hinges on demonstrating impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation and aperistals
67                           Obstruction at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) results in esophageal dil
68 ximal stomach above the meal adjacent to the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), referred to as the 'acid
69 tus) provide the sphincter mechanisms at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).
70  and specialized populations of cells at the esophagogastric junction (residual embryonic cells and t
71 pic specialized intestinal metaplasia of the esophagogastric junction (SIM-EGJ).
72 nitial laparotomy, followed by harvesting of esophagogastric junction 60 days later.
73  with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and/or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma after local ther
74                   The stage of esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvan
75 ize therapy for patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma was effective, i
76 zed consecutive resections for esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas performed at tw
77 management of most resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas.
78 ; 66 patients (75%) had EGA localized in the esophagogastric junction and 22 in the stomach (25%).
79 3-85.15 years) with biopsy-proved cancer (28 esophagogastric junction and 71 gastric cancers) were ex
80 hronic opioid use with motility disorders of esophagogastric junction and esophageal body peristalsis
81 ectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC)-is essential for
82 e found in 10-26% of gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC).
83 tients undergoing surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers across 20 centers (NCT0
84 thy individuals and patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction cancers with sensitivity and sp
85 of HER2 status in tumor tissue in gastric or esophagogastric junction cancers.
86 is capable of selectively analyzing discrete esophagogastric junction contributors (lower esophageal
87 data for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction demonstrate that lymphadenectom
88       RNA-sequencing analyses linked CM from esophagogastric junction fat of obese patient-induced HI
89                                      CM from esophagogastric junction fat of obese patients caused di
90                                      CM from esophagogastric junction fat of obese patients induced r
91  in short segments of columnar mucosa at the esophagogastric junction has clinical importance but can
92 g FLIP panometry protocol, interpretation of esophagogastric junction opening and contractile respons
93  (FLIP) panometry provides assessment of the esophagogastric junction opening and esophageal body con
94               BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Normal esophagogastric junction opening on FLIP has a high nega
95 e findings supportive of achalasia, abnormal esophagogastric junction opening on FLIP should prompt f
96 re of esophageal emptying disorders, such as esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalas
97 , and the development of diagnoses including esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hyperco
98 70.7% respectively; p < 0.001), particularly esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction disorders.
99 h negative predictive value for disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high-res
100 ents with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction received neoadjuvant therapy.
101            Reduction or normalization of the esophagogastric junction relaxation pressure achieved by
102 that the disease process progresses from the esophagogastric junction to the esophageal body.
103 rapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction using Worldwide Esophageal Canc
104                     Capillary content of the esophagogastric junction was quantified using IHC for va
105 adenocarcinomas arising in the esophagus and esophagogastric junction, 56 Barrett adenocarcinomas, an
106 ders, injection of inert substances into the esophagogastric junction, and electrical stimulation of
107 ssion in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, few studies have assessed the
108 leted nCRT for carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, is not of major importance wit
109 carcinoma of the esophagus (n = 19), cardia (esophagogastric junction, n = 12), or subcardia (n = 6).
110 th resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophagogastric junction, or lower esophagus to either p
111 epends on alleviating the obstruction at the esophagogastric junction, the postintervention contracti
112  the work-up for patients with tumors of the esophagogastric junction.
113 tion of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.
114  for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction.
115 ip of the nasogastric tube was lodged at the esophagogastric junction.
116 supports the diagnosis of a disorder of EGJ [esophagogastric junction] outflow" (median response 8.5;
117 the treatment of patients with esophageal or esophagogastric-junction cancer is not well established.
118 ients with potentially curable esophageal or esophagogastric-junction cancer.
119 risks of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA).
120 significant dose and duration responses) and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (odds ratio =
121 n total, 581 participants with EAC, 213 with esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma, and 332 with
122 ogic subtypes of esophageal malignancy (EAC, esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma, and ESCC) in
123 ssessed and data from 5 index (aortic, major esophagogastric, liver, pancreatic, and pelvic resection
124        BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Patients with esophagogastric outflow obstruction alone and/or nonacha
125                                          For esophagogastric reconstruction, different anastomotic te
126 come indicators and long-term survival after esophagogastric resections.
127 ed vagal control compared with patients with esophagogastric symptoms.
128  VTEs occurred postdischarge (from 17.9% for esophagogastric to 100% for endocrine operations).
129 athy, malnutrition, muscle wasting, ascites, esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage, spontaneous bacteri
130 ic complications in patients with documented esophagogastric varices undergoing OLT.
131 e TEE monitoring during OLT in patients with esophagogastric varices.

 
Page Top