ライフサイエンスコーパス: esotropia

1 imary microstrabismus and two with infantile esotropia).

2 (3.4%) cases of overcorrection (consecutive esotropia).

3 s had strabismus (n = 10 exotropia and n = 2 esotropia).

4 nt risk for the development of accommodative esotropia.

5 lly in adult patients to treat accommodative esotropia.

6 ts, aged 18 to 60 months, with accommodative esotropia.

7 outcomes in both infantile and accommodative esotropia.

8 iated with poor vision and large uncorrected esotropia.

9 ring both normal maturation and in infantile esotropia.

10 ties in spatial vision in cases of infantile esotropia.

11 eye movements as in humans with early-onset esotropia.

12 y presented with a one-week history of acute esotropia.

13 ercorrections caused by early recurrences of esotropia.

14 e surgery and for treatment of diplopia from esotropia.

15 ing characterized treatment of diplopia from esotropia.

16 0 were risk factors for exotropia as well as esotropia.

17 (PFS) was performed in 88.2% of patients for esotropia.

18 adduction is common in patients with primary esotropia.

19 in inferior gaze associated with V- pattern esotropia.

20 orty-nine children with acute-onset comitant esotropia.

21 lays that affect motor skills, hypotonia and esotropia.

22 9%) cases of exotropia and 4 (4.9%) cases of esotropia.

23 gery in infant eyes with essential infantile esotropia.

24 ic asymmetry seen in patients with infantile esotropia.

25 at increased risk for developing refractive esotropia.

26 or the treatment of refractive accommodative esotropia.

27 as accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

28 th accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

29 ppeared to have had an infantile/early-onset esotropia.

30 in patients made exotropic after surgery for esotropia.

31 and children and in patients with infantile esotropia.

32 ith high sensitivity for normal (0.91-1.00), esotropia (0.89), and hypotropia (0.90).

33 d after surgery for each type of strabismus: esotropia (0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94), exotropia (0.82, 95

34 ection group, namely 3 for induced V-pattern esotropia, 1 for alternating esotropia, and 1 to correct

35 Twenty patients (50%) had V-pattern esotropia, 12 (30%) exotropia, 4 (10%) orthotropic and f

36 15 patients with strabismic amblyopia due to esotropia, 12 amblyopic eyes of 12 patients with depriva

37 d allowing a 70% positive detection rate for esotropia (14.3; 95% CI, 13.2 to 15.7) being lower than

38 Diagnoses included esotropia (17.8%), exotropia (21.8%), hypertropia (13.5%

39 s (16.5%) (95% CI, 14.5-18.6) had congenital esotropia, 177 (13.5%) (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully acc

40 iologies were paralytic (27.9%), adult-onset esotropia (19.0%), and thyroid eye disease (16.4%).

41 as 70.8 PD ( 5.9 PD) with mean postoperative esotropia 2.5 PD ( 3.5 PD) at 6 months.

42 70.8 PD (+/- 5.9 PD) with mean postoperative esotropia 2.5 PD (+/- 3.5 PD) at 6 months.

43 40.0% (34/85) had strabismus: 17.7% (15/85) esotropia, 22.4% (19/85) exotropia, and 5.9% (5/85) vert

44 ilar proportion to the 1.4% of patients with esotropia (23 of 1614) in whom it was previously reporte

45 (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully accommodative esotropia, 252 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially

46 ilar proportion to the 1.7% of patients with esotropia (27 of 1614) and higher than the 0.2% of contr

47 mm) were performed for similar magnitudes of esotropia (27.9 [13.4] prism diopters [PD] for plication

48 Thirty-six (49.3%) were diagnosed with esotropia, 37 (50.7%) had exotropia.

49 formed in 7 patients with isolated infantile esotropia (5 untreated and 2 previously treated) and in

50 imilar proportion to the 4% of patients with esotropia (64 of 1614) and higher than the 0.4% of contr

51 was 39.5 PD ( 15 PD) with mean postoperative esotropia 9 PD ( 7.9 PD) at 6 months.

52 39.5 PD (+/- 15 PD) with mean postoperative esotropia 9 PD (+/- 7.9 PD) at 6 months.

53 nical features of acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) between adolescents and adults.

54 Acute Acquired Comitant Esotropia (AACE) is a form of acquired esotropia that oc

55 y for treatment of acute, acquired, comitant esotropia (AACE).

56 hreshold was 23.2 (95% CI, 21.0 to 26.5) for esotropia and 13.5 (95% CI, 12.5 to 14.6) for exotropia.

57 hreshold was 20.8 (95% CI, 19.2 to 22.2) for esotropia and 16.3 (95% CI, 15.5 to 17.2) for exotropia.

58 combined with antagonist recession (12 with esotropia and 19 with exotropia; mean [SD] age, 28 [24]

59 4.5 years (range: 1.3 to 8.7 years) (7 with esotropia and 2 with exotropia).

60 combined with antagonist recession (13 with esotropia and 9 with exotropia; mean [SD] age, 38 [21] y

61 sag was associated with divergence paralysis esotropia and asymmetrical LR sag greater than 1 mm with

62 % CI, 1.17-1.29) for the association between esotropia and bipolar disorder to 2.70 (95% CI, 2.66-2.7

63 8, P < .001), and correlation was strong for esotropia and constant deviations (r = 0.74, 95% CI 0.38

64 ion and correlation was strong in those with esotropia and constant deviations.

65 The patient presented with acute esotropia and diplopia with limitation of abduction prec

66 surgery (24.2%) compared with patients with esotropia and exotropia (10.2% and 9.6%, respectively).

67 is revealed a significant difference between esotropia and exotropia (p < 0.001).

68 f agreement were 6.62 PD and 11.25 PD in the esotropia and exotropia groups, respectively.

69 These findings support the possibility that esotropia and exotropia have shared genetic risk factors

70 ponent to strabismus, but it is not known if esotropia and exotropia share genetic risk factors.

71 cutive deviations in the form of consecutive esotropia and exotropia were corrected by means of 26.1P

72 ontal deviations was equally divided between esotropia and exotropia.

73 of medial rectus resection for treatment of esotropia and exotropia.

74 Postoperatively, esotropia and head turn were corrected by a mean of 31.3

75 t common preoperative deviation was combined esotropia and hypertropia (30%).

76 most clearly associated as causal agents for esotropia and intermittent exotropia.

77 luate the surgical outcomes in patients with esotropia and myopia.

78 The medical records of patients with esotropia and their controls were retrospectively review

79 This advantage was not present with esotropia and vertical deviations in this series.

80 duced V-pattern esotropia, 1 for alternating esotropia, and 1 to correct recurrent AHP.

81 % CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially accommodative esotropia, and 181 (13.8%) (95% CI, 12.0-15.8) had exotr

82 mmodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all exotropia revealed interactions betwe

83 Fifteen patients (75%) had primary position esotropia, and all had bilateral abduction deficit.

84 abduction, esotropia in abduction, V-pattern esotropia, and enophthalmos in downgaze.

85 including paralytic and vertical strabismus, esotropia, and exotropia, as defined by International Cl

86 mental retardation, developmental delay, and esotropia, and four of the five affected children develo

87 Refractive status, the angles of esotropia, angles of deviation at near and far, diplopia

88 Age-related distance esotropia (ARDE) in older adults is commonly caused by s

89 two had concomitant and one had "V"-pattern esotropia artificially induced by alternating or unilate

90 cal management and outcomes in children with esotropia associated with high hypermetropia.

91 rmal in the youngest patients with untreated esotropia at 5 months, cumulative abnormal binocular exp

92 ery in the treatment of acute-onset comitant esotropia at 6 months while reducing the duration of gen

93 trol study encompassed all surgical cases of esotropia at Torfe and Negah Hospital between 2016 and 2

94 ation of abduction in downgaze and V-pattern esotropia, augmented IRT could be considered as an effec

95 Preoperative esotropia before resection ranged from 12(Delta) to 30(D

96 Mean preoperative esotropia before treatment by BMR was 39.5 PD ( 15 PD) w

97 Mean preoperative esotropia before treatment by BMR was 39.5 PD (+/- 15 PD

98 Mean preoperative esotropia before treatment by BMR+SRT was 70.8 PD ( 5.9

99 Mean preoperative esotropia before treatment by BMR+SRT was 70.8 PD (+/- 5

100 ral lateral rectus resections for persistent esotropia by a single surgeon from June 2012 to June 201

101 investigate whether children with congenital esotropia (CET) are more likely than controls to develop

102 Similar findings are true for accommodative esotropia; children treated within the first 4 months of

103 rature and in this patient, included ptosis, esotropia, coloboma of the iris, retina, choroid and opt

104 ted more severe myopia and smaller angles of esotropia compared to the adolescents, which may be rela

105 existing strabismus, new-onset accommodative esotropia, concurrent onset of systemic disease, disrupt

106 The esotropia convergence excess pattern group had the large

107 pia divergence insufficiency pattern; or (3) esotropia convergence excess pattern.

108 isual acuity, refractive error, and angle of esotropia did not affect the surgical outcome.

109 than performance of activities at near after esotropia-diplopia surgery (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6

110 f deviation: (1) basic esotropia (ETBA); (2) esotropia divergence insufficiency pattern; or (3) esotr

111 , the finding that the youngest infants with esotropia do not differ significantly from normal sugges

112 metry found in older patients with infantile esotropia does not represent an arrest of maturation but

113 sified retrospectively as having early-onset esotropia (EOE) and 150 subjects were classified as havi

114 Twelve observers with early-onset esotropia (EOE), 30 children with untreated amblyopia, a

115 ubjects were classified as having late-onset esotropia (EOE), depending on whether symptoms of (or tr

116 artile range, 3-7) for 106 723 children with esotropia (ET) and 54 454 children with exotropia (XT).

117 cquired strabismus characterized by distance esotropia (ET) and cyclo-vertical deviation, affecting o

118 was a significant correction in the angle of esotropia (ET) from 39+/-17Delta (14-55Delta) to 12 +/-

119 lous binocular sensory function in infantile esotropia (ET) has led to the idea that visual evoked po

120 Esotropia (ET) in infancy may initially manifest as a sm

121 l consecutive exotropia (NCX) occurs when an esotropia (ET) spontaneously converts to exotropia (XT)

122 In cases of existing esotropia (ET) this procedure also markedly reduced the

123 Effect on primary position esotropia (ET), abnormal head posture (AHP), limitation

124 near-distance angles of deviation: (1) basic esotropia (ETBA); (2) esotropia divergence insufficiency

125 Patients with high AC/A accommodative esotropia; evidence of stereopsis, binocularity (on Wort

126 te association between each strabismus type (esotropia, exotropia, and hypertropia) and anxiety disor

127 s well as subsequent classification (normal, esotropia, exotropia, hypertropia, hypotropia), with ref

128 ironmental factor, inheritance, risk factor, esotropia, exotropia, strabismus, squint, convergent str

129 ere confusion between the type of deviation (esotropia/exotropia) and/or the surgical procedure (rece

130 0,464 cases, 954,921 controls) and subtypes (esotropia/exotropia).

131 74% with moderate, and 88% with severe PVL (esotropia: exotropia ratio 3.5:1).

132 and American cohorts, but a somewhat higher esotropia:exotropia ratio than those that, to our knowle

133 The esotropia:exotropia ratio was 5.4:1 (95% CI, 3.4:1 to 7.

134 Effect on primary position esotropia, face turn, amount of V-pattern and limitation

135 l deviation appear to be linked to infantile esotropia from before its onset.

136 Age-specific incidence curves for congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially acco

137 orthotropia in most patients in both groups, esotropia gradually recurred in 10 DE patients (22%) aft

138 The medical records of 32 patients with esotropia greater at distance seen during a 17-year peri

139 Esotropia greater at distance than at near can be relate

140 he ICC was 0.962 (range: 0.902-0.986) in the esotropia group and 0.862 (range: 0.651-0.950) in the ex

141 In the esotropia group, the amount of ocular deviation measured

142 Residual esotropia >8Delta occurred in 4 cases (11.7%), all had s

143 Beneficiaries with esotropia had an 84% increased odds of POAG (aOR: 1.84;

144 ry study, 23% of children with accommodative esotropia had an affected first-degree relative, and 91%

145 age at surgery, most patients with infantile esotropia had asymmetrical MVEPs after surgery.

146 Adult-onset basic esotropia had higher rates of motor and sensory success

147 a dichoptic method to simulate a small angle esotropia had no effect on the contrast sensitivities re

148 h normal infants and patients with infantile esotropia had robust nasal-temporal asymmetries in motio

149 reated within the first 4 months of constant esotropia have better outcomes.

150 New developments pertaining to infantile esotropia have helped clarify the pathophysiology of the

151 onkeys with small- and large-angle infantile esotropia have striking maldevelopments of binocular (di

152 l augmented VRT was effective in controlling esotropia, head turn, and limited abduction associated w

153 Younger age, esotropia, hyperopia, and botulinum injection were assoc

154 Esotropia, hyperopia, and botulinum injection were indep

155 nant form of strabismus was infantile-onset: esotropia in 54%, exotropia in 26%, and dyskinesia in 10

156 The etiology of the MFS was esotropia in 58 (92.1%), anisometropia in 2 (3.2%), and

157 clude limited depression worse in abduction, esotropia in abduction, V-pattern esotropia, and enophth

158 consider factors that may predict refractive esotropia in an individual and therefore help identify t

159 ection may be an effective tool in resolving esotropia in certain patients with restrictive strabismu

160 ery in the treatment of acute-onset comitant esotropia in children.

161 ge was defined as 0-8 prism diopters (PD) of esotropia in exotropic patients and within 4 PD of ortho

162 ion, similar to that observed in concomitant esotropia in maximal adduction.

163 eat esotropia <50 PD and BMR+SRT for greater esotropia in patients with MBS-associated abduction limi

164 Improvement of esotropia in prism diopter (PD), head turn in degrees, a

165 ction in the previously operated eye causing esotropia in the abductive field (mean deviation = 18 pr

166 The angles of esotropia in the adolescent group were significantly lar

167 ed effective for preoperative measurement of esotropia in these cases.

168 els, and exotropia was easier to detect than esotropia in white and black models.

169 ecompensated esophoria (DE) is a progressive esotropia in younger adults.

170 udies that were not limited to children) and esotropia (in 1 study of adults and 2 of children).

171 Congenital esotropia increased the odds of developing a psychiatric

172 itant strabismus, with a focus on congenital esotropia, intermittent exotropia, and adult strabismus.

173 le surgery for the correction of large-angle esotropia is associated with a high success rate.

174 e (approximately 25 degrees) infantile-onset esotropia (large-eso).

175 tcomeMeasure: Success of surgery, defined as Esotropia <15 prism diopters (pd) at postoperative week

176 BMR proved sufficient to treat esotropia <50 PD and BMR+SRT for greater esotropia in pa

177 for the correction of large-angle infantile esotropia may be associated with a favorable long-term m

178 Paralytic esotropia may be caused by lateral rectus superior compa

179 tification of risk factors for accommodative esotropia may help to determine which children with hype

180 , 11 (73%) patients had residual small angle esotropia (mean = 7 prism diopters) in ipsilateral extre

181 aneous prism and cover test (SPCT); constant esotropia of >=6 Delta at distance or near by SPCT; or d

182 sian) were simulated to have strabismus from esotropia of 21 prism diopters () to exotropia of 21.

183 In humans, esotropia of early onset is associated with a profound a

184 ralysis, three with nonparalytic concomitant esotropia of similar angle, and 15 healthy controls.

185 peropic spectacles at 6 month or later after esotropia onset (p = 0.02).

186 Shorter time interval between esotropia onset and receiving hyperopic spectacles is as

187 At 36 months, the median time from esotropia onset to any intervention was 6.5 months witho

188 Longer delay from esotropia onset to treatment was an independent risk fac

189 Average age of esotropia onset was 1.3 years.

190 ived hyperopic spectacles within 6 months of esotropia onset, 92.3% developed sensory fusion, compare

191 ding the total number of AACE cases by total esotropia operations and total strabismus operations.

192 Whether esotropia or exotropia develops in the presence of these

193 ined metric outcomes for 2 surgeons treating esotropia or exotropia for diplopia control or reconstru

194 Small-angle esotropia or hypertropia may result from common involuti

195 nfantile, partially accommodative, and basic esotropia over eleven years and had at least one year of

196 a 7.8-fold increased risk for accommodative esotropia over nonanisometropic patients.

197 2) showed strabismus, most of them (N = 160) esotropia. Overall, 1,370 (7.70%) of participants had my

198 ficant for exotropia (P = .0002) but not for esotropia (P = .4).

199 en (39%) patients had exotropia, 11(61%) had esotropia (P = 0.346) and vertical deviation was found i

200 or congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all ex

201 xty healthy term infants and 34 infants with esotropia participated.

202 al difference among the success rates of all esotropia patients with different refractive errors.

203 as a cause of primary nonsyndromic comitant esotropia (PNCE).

204 t leading to strabismus without exotropia or esotropia predominance.

205 Constant, large-angle esotropia present in the first few months of life may be

206 6 months (mean 14.5 months) and the angle of esotropia ranged from 65 to 100 PD (mean 72 PD).

207 and 73 visits of 54 patients with infantile esotropia, ranging in age from 2 months to 5 years.

208 The "AACE/esotropia" ratio and the "AACE/total strabismus" ratio w

209 A 3-year-old boy with esotropia received a botulinum toxin A injection into th

210 Nineteen patients with esotropia received bupivacaine injections in the lateral

211 e causally related to the onset of infantile esotropia remains a mystery.

212 P, the former frequently induces a V-pattern esotropia requiring reoperation.

213 ren, with right and left fully accommodative esotropia, respectively, pointed at targets located cent

214 Significantly greater reduction in esotropia resulted from BMR+SRT than from BMR (P = .036)

215 ery in adults with comitant nonaccommodative esotropia resulted in good motor and sensory outcomes.

216 Congenital esotropia, similar to those with intermittent exotropia

217 14 recessions, 1 resection) for exotropia or esotropia simultaneous with GDD placement (13 Baerveldt,

218 smic monkey had infantile-onset, small-angle esotropia (small-eso approximately 2 degrees) induced by

219 Regardless of the pattern of esotropia, strabismus surgery in adults with comitant no

220 nferior oblique (IO) muscle overaction after esotropia surgery.

221 ly treated) and in 3 patients with infantile esotropia syndrome associated with mild neurological dis

222 a 70% positive detection rate was higher for esotropia than for exotropia (P < .001 for both).

223 itant Esotropia (AACE) is a form of acquired esotropia that occurs in patients without significant hy

224 e strabismic animals had early-onset natural esotropia (the visual axes deviated nasally), normal vis

225 In children with accommodative esotropia, the critical period for susceptibility of ste

226 Average time between the onset of esotropia to spectacle correction was 7.2 months.

227 Average duration between onset of constant esotropia to strabismus surgery was 28.1 months.

228 pic, two had naturally occurring "A"-pattern esotropia, two had concomitant and one had "V"-pattern e

229 and VR measurements of 3.55 +/- 8.33 PD for esotropia (upper and lower LOA 19.89, -12.78 PD) and 17.

230 Postoperatively, average correction of esotropia, V-pattern, face turn and limited abduction we

231 The average esotropia was 39.0 +/- 9.6 diopters.

232 Average esotropia was 43.36 PD in near fixation and 42.61 PD in

233 The etiology of esotropia was categorized into three groups based on the

234 Esotropia was easier for lay observers to detect than ex

235 Esotropia was larger, and diplopia was less frequently r

236 eal hypoplasia was found in 73 cases (100%); esotropia was predominant in all grades.

237 Preoperative esotropia was significantly greater in DE at 21 +/- 10De

238 Esotropia was the most common diagnosis (n = 181,195, 52

239 Esotropia was twice as frequent as exotropia, and 2 part

240 Overall, surgeries on patients with esotropia were more likely to be successful than on thos

241 tropia) and four with convergent strabismus (esotropia) were compared to those from four normally rea

242 time in normal infants and in patients with esotropia who had received successful, timely correction

243 of patients 18 to 60 years old with comitant esotropia who underwent strabismus surgery at a tertiary

244 ly members were defined as affected; two had esotropia with an accommodative element; and three under

245 eloped nystagmus and large-angle alternating esotropia with cross-fixation.

246 rove outcomes in children with accommodative esotropia with high AC/A.

247 Strabismus surgery for esotropia with high hypermetropia has high rate of surgi

248 eceived strabismus surgery for accommodative esotropia with hypermetropia larger than spherical equiv

249 All patients presented with large angle esotropia with spectacle correction.

250 ession surgery at 2 years old for persistent esotropia, with significant improvement.

251 ffective treatment for large-angle infantile esotropia, with stable results over time.