戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 unlimited graft availability, and comparable esthetics.
2 velopmental anomalies affecting function and esthetics.
3 cal concern affecting both functionality and esthetics.
4 veneered zirconia, while providing necessary esthetics.
5 ssion remains an important problem in dental esthetics.
6 eplace missing teeth to provide function and esthetics.
7 ectomy, which provided improved function and esthetics.
8 ngival enlargement affecting mastication and esthetics.
9  treatment option for enhancement of implant esthetics.
10 leviate root surface sensitivity and improve esthetics.
11  ridge collapse can significantly compromise esthetics.
12 revent ridge collapse and ultimately improve esthetics.
13  occlusion for nutrition intake, and improve esthetics.
14  dimensions showed negative correlation with esthetics.
15 nd between subjectively felt impaired dental esthetics and an interest in orthodontic treatment.
16 se, programmatic control over the placement, esthetics and arrangements of plots while maximizing use
17 nto widespread use because of their superior esthetics and chemical inertness.
18 ning of the alveolar ridge, which compromise esthetics and complicate restoration.
19 es were utilized to capture patient-reported esthetics and dental hypersensitivity for each study too
20 nd dental implants are indicated to optimize esthetics and maintain peri-implant health.
21  socket anatomy can significantly compromise esthetics and motility after enucleation.
22  years, while LCC was associated with better esthetics and patient-reported outcomes than FGG.
23 ce bone and soft tissues, as well as restore esthetics and physiologic functions while restoring self
24 0001), but all other PRO measures, including esthetics and satisfaction, improved similarly for both
25 nts can predictably reconstruct function and esthetics and seemed to maintain stable bone volume arou
26   In addition to their unfavorable effect on esthetics and self-esteem, these conditions also are ass
27                                              Esthetics and the health of oral implants are based upon
28 milar stable peri-implant tissues, favorable esthetics, and clinically negligible contour changes at
29 -reported satisfaction, clinical rankings of esthetics, and control and historical RC results reporte
30                           The cleansibility, esthetics, and mechanical properties of the restoration
31 with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) on CDH, esthetics, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQ
32 tcomes included measures such as discomfort, esthetics, and overall satisfaction; 6-month end point r
33 35 panelists considered the control of pain, esthetics, and patient satisfaction to be "extremely imp
34                             Absence of pain, esthetics, and patient satisfaction were outcome measure
35 one level, clinical peri-implant parameters, esthetics, and patient satisfaction.
36 width (AGW), REC, clinical attachment level, esthetics, and patient-reported outcomes at the 13-year
37 ccal bone thickness, soft tissue parameters, esthetics, and patient-reported satisfaction were record
38 ccal bone thickness, soft tissue parameters, esthetics, and patient-reported satisfaction were record
39 s, buccal bone thickness, clinical outcomes, esthetics, and patients' satisfaction following immediat
40 s, buccal bone thickness, clinical outcomes, esthetics, and patients' satisfaction following immediat
41 anomalies can be corrected so that function, esthetics, and the sense of well-being are restored in a
42 ctions on biocompatibility, curing behavior, esthetics, and ultimate material properties.
43 ion of treatment plans may be necessary when esthetics are critical for success.
44 d not consider patient-reported outcomes and esthetics as part of the overall treatment success asses
45 ze and shape, kinesthesia, and body size and esthetics), cold pain, and auditory and visual processin
46 elevation of the ptotic brow improves eyelid esthetics; conversely, failure to appreciate and to alle
47 osthetic maintenance, adequate function, and esthetics during the five-year period.
48                     Both techniques improved esthetics evaluated by patients, without a difference be
49             Patient assessments of function, esthetics, feel of implant, speech, and self-esteem also
50 sk factors and measures of oral function and esthetics, further enhancing the score's public health a
51                                        Smile esthetics have been shown to play a major role in the pe
52 milar between therapies-site sensitivity and esthetics improved similarly for both therapies-but surg
53 ented low postoperative pain and resulted in esthetics improvements.
54 ve study aims to assess papilla and gingival esthetics in implant-supported rehabilitation of patient
55                           Both groups showed esthetics maintenance after 2 years.
56 ment has mostly come in the area of improved esthetics, marked by the gradual replacement of dental a
57 erences in behavioral ecology, environmental esthetics, neuroscience, and evolutionary and developmen
58  group, all patients were satisfied with the esthetics obtained, and 19 patients (79.1%) were satisfi
59          A proposed major determinant of the esthetics of a smile is the amount of gingival display,
60  palatal surgical approach did not alter the esthetics of the area, and its simplicity is recommended
61  gingivoplasty is often performed to improve esthetics of the grafted site.
62 only factor associated with patient-reported esthetics (OR -3.38, p = 0.022), while KT (OR 0.77, p =
63 nlargement interferes with function, speech, esthetics, or oral hygiene, tissue reduction can be acco
64                                              Esthetics outcome was assessed with VAS and the Question
65 obing depth, mobility, plaque, inflammation, esthetics, pain, and patient satisfaction following peri
66 involvement, mobility, plaque, inflammation, esthetics, pain, and patient satisfaction following peri
67       Soft tissue thickness (STT) influences esthetics, peri-implant, and periodontal health.
68 educed dentin hypersensitivity and increased esthetics satisfaction, with no statistically significan
69  service relevant to urban public health and esthetics: the consumption of littered food waste by art
70 ered outcomes related to pain/discomfort and esthetics were assessed with visual analogue scale after
71          Periodontal clinical parameters and esthetics were evaluated by a calibrated periodontist at
72                            Patient-evaluated esthetics were significantly higher for LCC over FGG (p
73 rticipants' ratings for the impacts of BT on esthetics, with 0 meaning no impact and 10 meaning very