ライフサイエンスコーパス: ethics

1 ssumed that Nazi medical authorities spurned ethics.

2 rucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and medical ethics.

3 es with the requirements of the conservation ethics.

4 g where there are questions regarding animal ethics.

5 an unprecedented challenge for research and ethics.

6 providing lectures or courses on publication ethics.

7 the institutional review board for research ethics.

8 providing lectures or courses on publication ethics.

9 views on five issues related to publication ethics.

10 es, disastrous consequences, and breaches in ethics.

11 image of the profession and violate codes of ethics.

12 ibiotic research and development and medical ethics.

13 re based on clinical judgment, evidence, and ethics.

14 Based on literature review and ethics analysis of neurotechnology development efforts,

15 ently omits or segregates content related to ethics and broader impacts of science.

16 ities (e.g. centre of excellence in academic ethics and civility) and actions (e.g. incorporating bul

17 gns that have been criticised for reasons of ethics and clinical relevance.

18 ry Beecher published his foundational paper "Ethics and Clinical Research," bringing to light unethic

19 philosophical currents such as deontological ethics and consequentialism.

20 ome countries, the authors argue that beyond ethics and equity issues, it makes economic sense to inv

21 areness, and consider their implications for ethics and for the nature of consciousness.

22 Ethics and gender were considered.

23 eering, a topic of concern in geoengineering ethics and governance debates.

24 exual harassment with research on behavioral ethics and identifying several practical steps that can

25 rs, the health risks of living donation, the ethics and legality of an organ market, and the economic

26 tions, functional goals and quality of life, ethics and media relations.

27 group to assess the state and future of VCA ethics and policy.

28 The ethics and practicalities of controlled human infection

29 mmunity should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI that promote any use that hel

30 ics Manual covers emerging issues in medical ethics and revisits older ones that are still very perti

31 The Ethics and Society subproject is part of the core resear

32 ators and re-users, (3) disclose data re-use ethics, and (4) encourage increased recognition of publi

33 eing a permanent ICU staff member, degree in ethics, and degree in intensive care.

34 ort articulates a path forward for research, ethics, and governance of clinical applications involvin

35 ffer an action based on scientific evidence, ethics, and human rights that spans multiple governments

36 al challenges, ICU surge capacity, staffing, ethics, and maintenance of staff wellness.

37 We also discuss privacy, ethics, and regulatory considerations, issues of global

38 hem as needed, the relevance of professional ethics, and the need to be wise and not just smart.

39 nd psychology, transplantation, social work, ethics, and transplant administration met and reviewed c

40 Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.

41 Materials and Methods Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.

42 s committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics approval number, S-320/2012), and informed consen

43 Ethics approval was granted by local committee.

44 Ethics approval was granted by South Manchester Research

45 Materials and Methods Ethics approval was obtained from the centralized instit

46 After ethics approval, data were collected from 1799 consecuti

47 After ethics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental imp

48 The study had local research ethics approval.

49 erials and Methods This was a retrospective, ethics-approved study of patients who had undergone lapa

50 Materials and Methods An ethics-approved, retrospective review of prospective dat

51 39, Germany introduced mandatory lectures on ethics as part of the medical curriculum.

52 and discussed with the director of clinical ethics at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.

53 The retrospective study was approved by the ethics board and did not require informed consent.

54 The study was approved by the local ethics board and did not require informed consent.

55 otocol that was approved by a local research ethics board and Health Canada and was compliant with th

56 Study was local research ethics board and Health Canada approved and HIPAA compli

57 re included, which was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained f

58 Research ethics board approval was not necessary because this stu

59 Materials and Methods Research ethics board approval was obtained and all patients sign

60 Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv

61 With Research Ethics Board approval, clinical data obtained from the c

62 SUBJECTS AND Following ethics board approval, second year residents were random

63 Materials and Methods The clinical research ethics board approved chart review, and the requirement

64 The local ethics board approved retrospective study of prospective

65 The institutional research ethics board approved this study and waived informed con

66 The local ethics board approved this study.

67 tudy was obtained from the hospital research ethics board, and the need to obtain informed consent wa

68 de I-IV COPD provided informed consent to an ethics board-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol and under

69 t to be included in this institutional human ethics board-approved prospective study between January

70 s and Methods In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, healthy volunte

71 An ethics board-approved, retrospective study was conducted

72 from 2008 to 2015 was approved by the local ethics board.

73 estern University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

74 trial approved by the institutional research ethics board.

75 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics board.

76 proved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board; informed consent was not required.

77 ss syndrome, and with approval from research ethics boards, we collected a minimal dataset on patient

78 e existed not only a Nazi version of medical ethics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to

79 iderations demonstrates that the language of ethics can fruitfully be deployed to shed new light on p

80 The language of ethics can help responsible parties get a clearer sense

81 On the basis of substantive ethics, clinical practice, policy, and other concerns ar

82 takeholder consultation involved scientific, ethics, clinical, and administrative leaders.

83 val was granted by South Manchester Research Ethics Committe.

84 as approved by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (Health; Reference Number HD14/42).

85 l (Boston, MA, USA) and the Rwandan National Ethics Committee (Kigali, Rwanda).

86 roved by the UK Ministry of Defence research ethics committee (MODREC 165/Gen/10 and 692/MoDREC/15).

87 evaluation of data was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was waived.

88 study was approved by the Cantonal Research Ethics Committee and informed written consent was obtain

89 s and the Cancer Imaging Archive after local ethics committee and institutional review board approval

90 aised by the independent data monitoring and ethics committee and only five patients were withdrawn f

91 Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee and the local Veterinary Office.

92 case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee and the research department of Nottingh

93 study was approved by the national research ethics committee and was performed with informed consent

94 the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee and with written consent.

95 proval of the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 ethics committee and written consent.

96 etrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent was obtain

97 Materials and Methods Institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta

98 Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta

99 With ethics committee approval and informed consent, mammogra

100 Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed c

101 erformed between 2006 and 2016 with research ethics committee approval and written informed consent f

102 Methods Institutional review board and local ethics committee approval and written informed consent w

103 Materials and Methods The study received ethics committee approval for animal experimentation.

104 otocol had the appropriate national research ethics committee approval for the countries where the st

105 nical trials obtained the appropriate IRB or Ethics Committee approval prior to enrolling any patient

106 No ethics committee approval was needed.

107 Materials and Methods Local ethics committee approval was obtained at all sites for

108 Formal ethics committee approval was obtained for the study, an

109 Local ethics committee approval was obtained, and 34 patients

110 Institutional ethics committee approval was received for this prospect

111 s Written informed consent and institutional ethics committee approval were obtained.

112 The study received ethics committee approval, and all women gave written in

113 With ethics committee approval, data from the Trauma Registry

114 With ethics committee approval, records for 103 consecutive p

115 als and Methods This study had institutional ethics committee approval.

116 elsinki and was performed according to local ethics committee approval.

117 tudy was HIPAA-compliant with local research ethics committee approval.

118 spectively registered on January 12th, 2018; Ethics Committee approved the study (ID: 1.790.088) on O

119 The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived informed

120 Materials and Methods The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived the requi

121 The Lithuanian Regional Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (permission

122 The institutional research ethics committee approved the study, and parental consen

123 The institutional ethics committee approved the study, and written informe

124 Local ethics committee approved the study, with patient inform

125 vided signed consent, and the local research ethics committee approved the study.

126 The institutional ethics committee approved the use of this protocol.

127 The local ethics committee approved this prospective study, and wr

128 Materials and Methods The ethics committee approved this retrospective multicenter

129 The local ethics committee approved this study, and informed paren

130 The local ethics committee approved this study.

131 registered at the Witten/Herdecke University Ethics Committee as 140/2016 and retrospectively registe

132 owel disease, and were judged by the medical ethics committee as not being related to the therapy.

133 Methods This study was approved by the local ethics committee at all participating sites.

134 ealthcare institutional review board and the Ethics Committee at Hopital Albert Schweitzer approved t

135 This study was approved by the ethics committee at the institution.

136 hods The protocol was approved by the French Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments.

137 nimal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee for animal experiments.

138 2019 after receiving authorization from the ethics committee for health research.

139 The study was approved by the ethics committee for studies in humans and the animal ca

140 Approval was waived by the local ethics committee for this retrospective study.

141 nt guidelines and regulations of the medical ethics committee in Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medic

142 The local ethics committee of animal experimentation approved all

143 istry The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qom University of Medical Sciences (

144 y protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the coordinating center on behalf of

145 The ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna app

146 The Ethics Committee of The Transplantation Society convened

147 s This prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Munster (

148 ve data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics

149 Retrospective registration with local ethics committee on 21 March 2019.

150 based cohort study was approved by a medical ethics committee overseen by the national government, an

151 sed cohort study was approved by a dedicated ethics committee overseen by the national government, an

152 st interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-co

153 e research was approved by the institutional ethics committee review board, and the volunteers provid

154 After approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained, we recruited potential re

155 of the same age from 2014 to 2019 (Cantonal Ethics Committee Zurich registry number: KEK-ZH-2017-013

156 With the approval of the local ethics committee, 100 consecutive patients (mean age, 61

157 Following approval by the ethics committee, a long-term supplementation treatment

158 After study approval by the local ethics committee, all participants provided written info

159 The study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and all participants gave written info

160 This study was approved by the ethics committee, and all participants gave written info

161 The study was approved by the regional ethics committee, and all patients gave written consent.

162 Methods The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee, and all patients or their parents gave

163 Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed

164 The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed

165 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was waived.

166 Methods The study was approved by a research ethics committee, and participants gave written informed

167 ional study was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the need for patient consent was w

168 quired data was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the requirement for informed conse

169 ve data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee, and the requirement to obtain informed

170 hods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from

171 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was acqui

172 s This prospective study was approved by our ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

173 The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

174 AA-compliant study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

175 This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

176 This in vivo study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

177 case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was waive

178 study was approved by the national research ethics committee, and written patient consent was obtain

179 This is not a conventional ethics committee, frequently giving rise to a board's bu

180 receiving approval from the clinical studies Ethics Committee, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studi

181 r/director of each hospital's adult clinical ethics committee, or a suitable alternate representative

182 dy was approved by the University's research ethics committee, which conforms to the declaration of H

183 ctive case-control study was approved by the ethics committee, which waived the need for patient cons

184 smaller were included in this institutional ethics committee-approved study.

185 d consent to participate in this prospective ethics committee-approved study.

186 re retrospectively included in this regional ethics committee-approved study.

187 analysis was approved by the local research ethics committee.

188 Each treatment was approved by the clinical ethics committee.

189 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

190 by the institutional review board and local ethics committee.

191 The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.

192 trospectively analyzed after approval by the ethics committee.

193 his study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

194 longitudinal trial and approved by the local ethics committee.

195 the study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

196 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.

197 al studies were approved by the local animal ethics committee.

198 The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

199 ospective study was approved by the regional ethics committee.

200 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

201 inistry of Health and by the local competent ethics committee.

202 protocol was approved by the regional animal ethics committee.

203 All procedures were approved by the animal ethics committee.

204 rol study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

205 vely acquired data was approved by the local ethics committee.

206 Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

207 compliant study was approved by the regional ethics committee.

208 Methods Approval was obtained from the local ethics committee.

209 nimal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee.

210 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee; informed consent was obtained from all

211 rious adverse events (SAEs) were reported to ethics committees and a central safety monitor.

212 f the full Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committees and the Society of Critical Care Medic

213 Institutional and regional medical ethics committees approved the study, and all patients s

214 The Ethics Committees at both hospitals and the Institutiona

215 archived protocols approved by six research ethics committees between 13 January 2000 and 25 Novembe

216 rotocols approved between 2000 and 2003 by 6 ethics committees in Canada, Germany, and Switzerland we

217 mendations approved by consensus of the full Ethics Committees of American College of Critical Care M

218 In 2014, the Cancer Prevention and Ethics Committees of ASCO commissioned another update to

219 ective study was approved by the independent ethics committees of Kanton Bern and Kanton Zurich, and

220 The study was approved by the human research ethics committees of the participating hospitals, and in

221 This study was approved by the local ethics committees on human studies, and written informed

222 cluding researchers, regulatory authorities, ethics committees, and policymakers.

223 prospective study was approved by the local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obta

224 nally, journals, funders, sponsors, research ethics committees, regulators, and legislators should en

225 This study was approved by the local ethics committees; informed consent was obtained.

226 cs training intervention designed to enhance ethics communication in university science and engineeri

227 emmas and conflicts; (b) moral efficacy; (c) ethics communication; (d) ethical environment; and (e) o

228 odel designed to look for manifest or latent ethics conflicts and address them.

229 ority had a palliative care consult (15%) or ethics consult (4%) while in the ICU.

230 A representative from the adult ethics consultation service at each of the 50 target hos

231 table alternate representative familiar with ethics consultation services, was identified for study r

232 nflict management include utilizing clinical ethics consultation, and palliative care medicine clinic

233 l policies regarding situations that mandate ethics consultations are variable.

234 ired, and, in some cases, assisted by formal ethics consultations in vexing situations.

235 rvey and listed their triggers for mandatory ethics consultations, 20 trigger scenarios were provided

236 The intervention is a project-based research ethics curriculum that was designed to enhance the abili

237 ntrinsic religiosity or adherence to Islamic ethics do not appear to associate with negative attitude

238 ed a literature review of empirical studies, ethics documents and expert commentaries (2010 to presen

239 Incorporating engineering ethics early during the planning stages of organoid and

240 llenges and controversies of daunting costs, ethics, early diagnosis and health system readiness will

241 h suggests the need for culturally sensitive ethics education and bereavement support in different cu

242 Kiran Jobanputra and colleagues describe an ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of inno

243 ine trials on public health, scientific, and ethics grounds.

244 ation experts and bioethicists to produce an ethics guide.

245 Wiley has updated its publishing ethics guidelines, first published in 2006.

246 with more typical module-based or classroom ethics instruction that is divorced from the everyday wo

247 Proactive ethics intervention involves a trained bioethicist in th

248 zed to either an intervention arm (Proactive Ethics Intervention) (n = 174) or control arm (n = 210).

249 ys, we advocate for the early integration of ethics into neurotechnology.

250 cant independent effects of the frequency of ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral

251 of the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics Manual covers emerging issues in medical ethics a

252 d quality; discusses principles from the ACP Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition, that should apply to all p

253 f an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology prod

254 To shed greater light on the process and ethics of biomarker-based drug development, we conducted

255 What would enhance the speed, validity, and ethics of clinical studies of such countermeasures?

256 frican outbreak, a dilemma emerged about the ethics of conducting randomized placebo-controlled trial

257 We strive to improve the ethics of future work by advocating the creation of new

258 mal models, selecting appropriate endpoints, ethics of informed consent, and regulatory issues.

259 at arose throughout the meeting included the ethics of organoids in developmental biology, bottom-up

260 ed in the scholarly literature assessing the ethics of penile transplantation.

261 essay, Karine Dube and coauthors discuss the ethics of preclinical and clinical studies relevant to a

262 has profound implications for the design and ethics of public policies.

263 view addresses the use, promise, perils, and ethics of social media- and Internet-based data collecti

264 However, concerns have been raised about the ethics of such research, leading to an ongoing debate as

265 Exposure and design issues include the ethics of using a placebo, the potential for overexposur

266 The ethics of VCA have moved past doubts about the morality

267 re, internal medicine, and surgery, nursing, ethics, organ donation and procurement, psychology, law,

268 s are not specifically addressed by existing ethics oversight mechanisms, but these mechanisms might

269 describe an ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of innovation projects in medical human

270 to assure immune status and a public health ethics perspective to inform key considerations in the e

271 rations of the implications of our ideas for ethics, policy, and practice.

272 Four concepts of PCC align with clinical ethics principles and are associated with enhanced patie

273 ere randomly selected from an ongoing study (Ethics Ref 13/SC/0250), manually annotated and used for

274 Respondent's recommendation to an ethics review board and personal preference as a potenti

275 The local ethics review board approved this prospective study of 1

276 s This prospective study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.

277 This retrospective study was approved by an ethics review board, and the requirement to obtain infor

278 ue samples were acquired after institutional ethics review committee approval and informed consent fr

279 some, requiring the intervention of a Senior Ethics Reviewer or advice from external experts familiar

280 study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Lancaster (reference

281 study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee; written informed consent was o

282 ions, the role of social media in scientific ethics, several instructional examples of egregious scie

283 gy, human genetics, paediatric radiology and ethics specialties together with patient representatives

284 and in the context of evolving international ethics standards; and (3) care to assure that approaches

285 ated the relationship between organizational ethics support and distress.

286 Increasing organizational ethics support may be a key approach.

287 mental analysis revealed that organizational ethics support moderated the moral efficacy-voice-moral

288 requency of ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral distress.

289 ethical environment; and (e) organizational ethics support.

290 We discuss issues (e.g., sampling, ethics) that arise when doing research online and point

291 r that is consistent with their professional ethics, the professionals themselves seem to have a poor

292 lity of human acts according to Aristotelian ethics: the object of the act (step 1) and some of its c

293 al issue, we draw on the field of behavioral ethics to structure our review.

294 thics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to students in Nazi Germany.

295 We report a randomized trial of a research ethics training intervention designed to enhance ethics

296 but scholars have started to examine medical ethics under Nazism only in recent years.

297 hical committee for animal care and research ethics was obtained.

298 s and archival sources show that lectures on ethics were an integral part of the medical curriculum i

299 All ethics were approved, and participants provided written

300 ents in the quality of discourse on research ethics within their laboratories and enhanced awareness