コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sis to the second-line antituberculosis drug ethionamide.
2 amic studies are needed for pyrazinamide and ethionamide.
3 ere levofloxacin, amikacin, capreomycin, and ethionamide.
4 ikacin, 97.4% for capreomycin, and 88.9% for ethionamide.
5 eron encoding a monooxygenase that activates ethionamide.
6 s have the potential to activate the prodrug ethionamide.
8 pecificity was over 95% for all drugs except ethionamide (91.4%), moxifloxacin (91.6%) and ethambutol
9 erculosis (Mtb) that reduces the efficacy of ethionamide, a second-line antitubercular drug used to c
11 ld allow a fourfold reduction in the dose of ethionamide administered while retaining the same effica
12 tients were included in the cohort receiving ethionamide and 4244 in the cohort receiving linezolid.
13 l of second-line drugs bioactivation such as ethionamide and has been shown to impair the sensitivity
14 ere resistant to the anti-tuberculosis drugs ethionamide and isoniazid were isolated and found to map
15 100 person-months with a fluoroquinolone and ethionamide, and 4.4 per 100 person-months with a fluoro
16 EthA, the bacterial monooxygenase activating ethionamide, and is thus largely responsible for the low
18 observed with substitution of linezolid for ethionamide as a part of an all-oral 9-month regimen.
19 isk of AEs was higher in contacts prescribed ethionamide as compared to ethambutol adjusting for age,
20 r ethambutol, clofazimine, streptomycin, and ethionamide as regression graded considerably more resis
21 ed on a larger scale and confirmed as potent ethionamide boosters on M. tuberculosis -infected macrop
22 g design and in vitro/ex vivo evaluations of ethionamide boosters on the targeted protein EthR and on
24 floxacin, moxifloxacin, amikacin, kanamycin, ethionamide, clofazimine, linezolid, delamanid, and beda
26 and high-dose L alone or in combination with ethionamide (Et), amikacin (A), and Z given for 2 or 7 m
31 t DA-CB has a general MoA related to that of ethionamide (ETH), a mycolic acid inhibitor that targets
32 to isoniazid (INH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), ethionamide (ETH), and second-line injectable drugs (SLI
33 ity to detect resistance to isoniazid (INH), ethionamide (ETH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), and second-li
34 rt treated with a 9-month regimen containing ethionamide for four months, was compared with a cohort
35 d putative resistance markers in katG, ethA (ethionamide), gyrA and gyrB (fluoroquinolones), and pncA
37 (i) coresistance to INH and a related drug, ethionamide; (ii) thermosensitive lethality; and (iii) a
40 Linezolid is an acceptable alternative to ethionamide in this shorter regimen for treatment of mul
43 twork analyses on cerulenin, chlorpromazine, ethionamide, ofloxacin, thiolactomycin and triclosan.
44 I 1.1-6.0]), ofloxacin (aOR: 2.5 [1.6-3.9]), ethionamide or prothionamide (aOR: 1.7 [1.3-2.3]), use o
45 [1.7-4.3]), ofloxacin (aOR: 2.3 [1.3-3.8]), ethionamide or prothionamide (aOR: 1.7 [1.4-2.1]), use o
47 binations of moxifloxacin with pyrazinamide, ethionamide, or ethambutol were more active than pyrazin
48 ciated with use of certain fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, or prothionamide, and greater total number
49 mycin, capreomycin, ofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ethionamide, para-aminosalicylic acid, cycloserine, and
50 mycin, capreomycin, ofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ethionamide, para-aminosalicylic acid, linezolid, and cy
51 ifference was observed between linezolid and ethionamide regimens for treatment success (aRR = 0.96,
53 ical studies suggested that the mechanism of ethionamide resistance in mshA mutants was likely due to
57 fective in mycothiol biosynthesis, were only ethionamide-resistant and required catalase to grow.
58 compared to phenotypic DST, ranging from 33 (ethionamide) to 94% (rifampicin), while specificity rema
61 South African tuberculosis program replaced ethionamide with linezolid as part of an all-oral 9-mont