1 To
evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of nitrite in metabo
2 To
evaluate the efficacy and ocular and systemic safety of
3 ion, and dosimetry studies were performed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of (64)Cu-DOTA-alendron
4 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of 25- and 50-mg/d dosa
5 24-week, multicenter trial was conducted to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 doses of ABT-126,
6 Purpose To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of a clofarabine-based
7 We therefore aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of a two-drug regimen c
8 The authors sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT-126, a selective
9 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ADS-5102 (amantadine
10 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of allergen-specific im
11 Therefore, we conducted this study to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiarrhythmic drugs
12 rge number of studies are being conducted to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of candidate vaccines a
13 This study sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared w
14 We aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of conditioning with tr
15 Our objectives were to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of coronary sinus aspir
16 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone (DEX)
17 Monitoring these subsets could help to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMF treatment.
18 nalysis of ten randomized clinical trials to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients wi
19 The aim of this randomized trial was to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of early coronary angio
20 Uterine Fibroids 1 and 2 [UF-1 and UF-2]) to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of elagolix at a dose o
21 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of eravacycline compare
22 This study sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in dyslip
23 d, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in pediat
24 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of grass pollen intrade
25 a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in previou
26 We performed a meta-analysis to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive BP reducti
27 We performed a phase 3 study to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous terlipre
28 Herein we prospectively
evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal afliber
29 bel nonrandomized phase 3 trial conducted to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISAV treatment in ma
30 cebo-controlled, phase 3, crossover trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivacaftor alone or i
31 We performed a trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of IW-3718, a bile acid
32 We aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab, an IL-17
33 (This Study Will
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to E
34 a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvi
35 ) study was a global noninferiority trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of lefamulin for the tr
36 Our study aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-concentration at
37 ploratory, randomized, single-blind trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxidectin (8 mg) vs
38 We conducted a trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemothe
39 Our objective was to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ALA for the tre
40 The aim of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemot
41 The objective of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and
42 tructive sleep apnea syndrome.Objectives: To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of pitolisant, a select
43 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg t
44 We aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of riociguat in patient
45 tial lung disease centres in 19 countries to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of riociguat in patient
46 (A Study to
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin in Chil
47 We performed a phase 2 trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of RPC4046 in patients
48 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib (RUX) cr
49 We conducted a trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of scheduled intermitte
50 o-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 3 trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of self-administered su
51 performed a randomized, controlled trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-363856 in adults
52 Longer and larger trials are necessary to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium phenylbutyrat
53 Objectives: To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of solriamfetol (JZP-11
54 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunot
55 Background The VITALITY-HFpEF trial (
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral sGC Stimula
56 latory agencies about developing criteria to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of these devices.
57 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in adul
58 a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with the c
59 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of two individualized r
60 This study is to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginoscopic incisio
61 Hence, we sought to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of VIT in HVA patients
62 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of XG-102 (brimapitide)
63 To
evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zephyr EBVs in patie
64 ary objectives were to assess the safety and
evaluate the efficacy and stability of biochemical and f
65 To
evaluate the efficacy and the mechanisms of action of CD
66 This study aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different GA d
67 The purpose of this analysis was to
evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SRS for VS with re
68 The authors
evaluated the efficacy and durability of a therapist-sup
69 single-arm study (OPTIMIST-2 [NCT02114151])
evaluated the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of simepre
70 s multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, we
evaluated the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combin
71 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of aCT1 in the reducti
72 This study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of an investigational
73 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of buparlisib plus ful
74 This study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined lithotrips
75 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of diet-modulated auto
76 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus war
77 omized, double-blind, multicenter study that
evaluated the efficacy and safety of eravacycline in com
78 allel-group study in five European countries
evaluated the efficacy and safety of F17464, 20 mg twice
79 The phase II single-arm KEYNOTE-052 study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembroli
80 This phase 2, open-label study (MAGELLAN-1)
evaluated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir (GLE) +
81 hese less prevalent genotypes, ENDURANCE-5,6
evaluated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrent
82 multicenter phase II and biomarker study, we
evaluated the efficacy and safety of high-dose bevacizum
83 This multicenter, phase 2 trial
evaluated the efficacy and safety of high-specific-activ
84 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibi
85 mized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we
evaluated the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in pat
86 This randomized, controlled trial
evaluated the efficacy and safety of lutetium-177 ((177)
87 dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipil
88 ate 568 is an open-label phase II trial that
evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus low-
89 icance of this change, TURQUOISE-I, Part 1b,
evaluated the efficacy and safety of OBV/PTV/r + DSV + R
90 In the current study, we
evaluated the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1
91 The EXCEED study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of secukinumab versus
92 This trial
evaluated the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab (AMG 15
93 e 2b, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anti-alpha(4)be
94 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of
95 The present study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of the intravitreal in
96 mized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we
evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective CDK4/
97 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of therapy with the no
98 This study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor on major
99 We
evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, an or
100 This Phase 2 clinical study
evaluated the efficacy and safety of VT-1161 versus fluc
101 risk factors and individual INR control, we
evaluated the efficacy and safety of warfarin treatment
102 Here, we
evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab
103 Remission in Depressed Elderly (PRIDE) study
evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of continuation
104 This systematic review
evaluates the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for chro
105 e authors performed an updated meta-analysis
evaluating the efficacy and safety of CAS versus CEA, gi
106 s of OPUS-3 (NCT02284516), a phase III study
evaluating the efficacy and safety of lifitegrast versus
107 primary results from a blinded phase 3 study
evaluating the efficacy and safety of pre-exposure proph
108 We also did a systematic review of trials
evaluating the efficacy and safety of quarter-standard-d
109 aracterizing those mutations is critical for
evaluating the efficacy and specificity of targeted geno
110 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy,
efficiency, and physiologic conse
111 Here we use stable transgenic lines to
evaluate the efficacies of xCas9 and SpCas9-NG in perfor
112 The aim of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy of (177)Lu-prostate-specific membr
113 Therefore, we sought to
evaluate the efficacy of a high-caloric fatty diet (HCFD
114 omized, placebo-controlled trial in Niger to
evaluate the efficacy of a live, oral bovine rotavirus p
115 a multisite, randomized controlled trial to
evaluate the efficacy of a mobile Web application, Infor
116 m of this randomized controlled trial was to
evaluate the efficacy of a moldable alloplastic graft, P
117 The aim of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy of a multi-analytical approach for
118 Here, we
evaluate the efficacy of a novel brain state-dependent i
119 To
evaluate the efficacy of a nurse-facilitated communicati
120 d controlled clinical trial was performed to
evaluate the efficacy of a post-foaming dental gel conta
121 The primary aim of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy of a single preoperative dose of m
122 This study aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of a specialist training programme
123 This trial aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of adding sirolimus to the standar
124 Here, we
evaluate the efficacy of aligned microvessels to induce
125 cebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to
evaluate the efficacy of antidepressant pharmacotherapy,
126 sults of a bench-scale treatability study to
evaluate the efficacy of bioaugmentation with bioamended
127 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy of bococizumab in patients at high
128 The aim of this study is to
evaluate the efficacy of brain MRI without anesthesia in
129 of vaccines after their delivery would help
evaluate the efficacy of candidate formulations and aid
130 r-deficient AG129 mice and used the model to
evaluate the efficacy of candidate HFMD vaccines.
131 information about colonoscopy indication, to
evaluate the efficacy of colonoscopy in preventing color
132 We performed a randomized trial to
evaluate the efficacy of complete clip closure of large
133 eport the outcome of two studies designed to
evaluate the efficacy of current United Kingdom (UK) imp
134 Purpose To
evaluate the efficacy of deep convolutional neural netwo
135 fraction of cells affected (fa), is used to
evaluate the efficacy of drugs and their combined intera
136 to detect ID-induced brain dysfunction, and
evaluate the efficacy of early iron treatment in prevent
137 ed CRISPR-Cas9 genome-edited Kitaake rice to
evaluate the efficacy of EBE mutations in resistance, so
138 visual function biomarkers are necessary to
evaluate the efficacy of emerging treatments for Stargar
139 eosinophilia in peanut-sensitized piglets to
evaluate the efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPI
140 The authors aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of epoetin alfa treatment on the o
141 The aim of this analysis was to
evaluate the efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 6
142 We performed a retrospective study to
evaluate the efficacy of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (Ig
143 We aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagn
144 The aim of this study is to
evaluate the efficacy of IL-2RAb in reducing acute rejec
145 Tracking these responses in vivo could help
evaluate the efficacy of immune interventions and improv
146 specific antibody concentration in plasma to
evaluate the efficacy of immune responses to different r
147 The aim of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy of iNPWT for the prevention of pos
148 To
evaluate the efficacy of internet-based guided self-help
149 is study utilized a murine melanoma model to
evaluate the efficacy of intratumoral injections of reco
150 native antibacterial strategy.Objectives: To
evaluate the efficacy of intravenous phage therapy for t
151 The purpose of study was to
evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of 2-Met
152 The primary objective was to
evaluate the efficacy of M72/AS01(E) to prevent active p
153 The goal of this work is to
evaluate the efficacy of machine learning algorithms to
154 To illustrate the necessity to
evaluate the efficacy of malaria control measures within
155 lable endpoints of therapy are inadequate to
evaluate the efficacy of many of the new therapeutics.
156 andomized and double-blind clinical trial to
evaluate the efficacy of miltefosine combined with topic
157 To
evaluate the efficacy of Mirococept in reducing delayed
158 The objective was to
evaluate the efficacy of MP-AzeFlu (Dymista((R)) ) vs fl
159 more studies need to be conducted to further
evaluate the efficacy of multifocal IOLs.
160 The present study sought to
evaluate the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA) e
161 This study seeks to
evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy
162 Designing clinical trials to
evaluate the efficacy of new products that reduce HIV in
163 developed and tested in clinical studies to
evaluate the efficacy of NGF inhibition as a form of ana
164 and the studies that have been performed to
evaluate the efficacy of NGF inhibition for chronic musc
165 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as mai
166 To
evaluate the efficacy of nontransplant surgery for pedia
167 The aim of the EXPAND trial was to
evaluate the efficacy of normothermic portable Organ Car
168 results provide an excellent model system to
evaluate the efficacy of novel adjuvants and vaccine dos
169 persistent mouse line with liver fibrosis to
evaluate the efficacy of novel therapies.
170 tion of human hematopoietic stem cells or to
evaluate the efficacy of novel treatment modalities, ste
171 Clinical trials are needed to prospectively
evaluate the efficacy of nutritional interventions on ou
172 The primary objective was to
evaluate the efficacy of omalizumab vs placebo at week 2
173 To
evaluate the efficacy of our approach, our approach was
174 To quantitatively
evaluate the efficacy of our approach, we use modularize
175 The objective of this study is to
evaluate the efficacy of pace mapping in identifying the
176 a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to
evaluate the efficacy of parenteral methotrexate (25 mg/
177 We have now expanded this study to
evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in patients with
178 erghei murine malaria model may be useful to
evaluate the efficacy of PfENT1 inhibitors in vivo and t
179 Thus, the purpose of this study is to
evaluate the efficacy of polishing and glass infiltratio
180 d to better characterize this phenomenon and
evaluate the efficacy of potential interventions.
181 To
evaluate the efficacy of propranolol (3 mg/kg/day) in th
182 We aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of relamorelin on symptoms and gas
183 2013 and 2016 resulted in intense efforts to
evaluate the efficacy of several specific countermeasure
184 This trial aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of sirolimus in addition to cyclos
185 ate that it may be worthwhile to selectively
evaluate the efficacy of SMAC mimetic treatment in CRC p
186 hed an infection model in Syrian hamsters to
evaluate the efficacy of small molecules on both infecti
187 To
evaluate the efficacy of swept -source optical coherence
188 ple juice using fuzzy logic approach, and to
evaluate the efficacy of the acceptable concentration in
189 Purpose To
evaluate the efficacy of the addition of palifosfamide t
190 To
evaluate the efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analys
191 The goal of the study was to
evaluate the efficacy of the CORE process had it been us
192 The purpose of this randomized trial was to
evaluate the efficacy of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Re
193 We aimed to
evaluate the efficacy of the parenteral (intravenous or
194 Our objective was to
evaluate the efficacy of the prenatal supplementation on
195 This may help to
evaluate the efficacy of the surgical intervention by co
196 sed upper airway collapsibility of DS and to
evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for b
197 ys and effective diagnostics are required to
evaluate the efficacy of these treatments.
198 dermal delivery of powdered allergens and to
evaluate the efficacy of this novel EPIT in peanut-sensi
199 This study aims to
evaluate the efficacy of this prioritization.
200 This retrospective study was performed to
evaluate the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D)-navigate
201 n a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to
evaluate the efficacy of treatment with prednisolone (40
202 We cannot, however,
evaluate the efficacy of treatments without a definition
203 ar sorptive extraction (HS-SBSE) was used to
evaluate the efficacy of two stir bar coatings, poly(eth
204 Clinical trials are currently underway to
evaluate the efficacy of two vaccine candidates and a br
205 Purpose To
evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guide
206 Our aim was to
evaluate the efficacy of under-the-table adjunctive shie
207 The objective of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy of Viscocanalostomy/Phacoviscocana
208 We developed a multiplex protocol and
evaluated the efficacy of 17 of the most commonly used l
209 This study
evaluated the efficacy of a promising potential treatmen
210 Here we
evaluated the efficacy of a short-course glucagon-like p
211 We
evaluated the efficacy of a telephone-based coping skill
212 specifically from extended VacA exposure, we
evaluated the efficacy of administering purified toxin u
213 performant of these siRNAs (siRYR2-U10), we
evaluated the efficacy of an adeno-associated serotype 9
214 This study
evaluated the efficacy of an isothiocyanate-rich moringa
215 esults of numerous clinical trials that have
evaluated the efficacy of angiogenic therapy to revascul
216 We
evaluated the efficacy of AVL-3288 in a Phase 1b, random
217 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of birinapant, a small-molecule m
218 We
evaluated the efficacy of CFNet and G-CNN as compared to
219 The authors
evaluated the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (
220 RFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global randomised studies
evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemother
221 We
evaluated the efficacy of darolutamide for delaying meta
222 This updated Cochrane systematic review (SR)
evaluated the efficacy of different root coverage (RC) p
223 We
evaluated the efficacy of everolimus plus bevacizumab in
224 We
evaluated the efficacy of formulations containing differ
225 1) in a large animal model of chronic PH and
evaluated the efficacy of gene transfer regarding progre
226 the oral cavity of female C57BL/6 J mice, we
evaluated the efficacy of HB-EGF treatment (5 ul of 10 u
227 We
evaluated the efficacy of hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV)
228 We
evaluated the efficacy of infliximab in preventing posto
229 We
evaluated the efficacy of intravenous LOLA in the revers
230 We
evaluated the efficacy of KPT-335 as an anti-RSV drug an
231 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of maternal immunization with an
232 The phase II HORIZON trial
evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone i
233 We
evaluated the efficacy of MK-1775 alone or in combinatio
234 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of MMV665917 in gnotobiotic pigle
235 In the current study, we
evaluated the efficacy of new SPRM, EC313, for the treat
236 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of oral ibrutinib as a host-targe
237 In this study, we have
evaluated the efficacy of our method for retrieval of DN
238 We further
evaluated the efficacy of penfluridol in three different
239 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of PENFS in adolescents with abdo
240 Herein, we
evaluated the efficacy of programmed cell death protein
241 We
evaluated the efficacy of regular provitamin A carotenoi
242 Remission in Depressed Elderly (PRIDE) study
evaluated the efficacy of right unilateral ultrabrief pu
243 resistant viruses can be relatively high, we
evaluated the efficacy of RPV LA to inhibit vaginal tran
244 We
evaluated the efficacy of small-quantity, lipid-based nu
245 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of T cell production from cell po
246 Here, we
evaluated the efficacy of targeting RAS dimerization as
247 In this phase 2 multicenter trial, we
evaluated the efficacy of the combination of bortezomib,
248 This study
evaluated the efficacy of the Placebo-Control Reminder S
249 We
evaluated the efficacy of thermal inactivation (exposure
250 We
evaluated the efficacy of this contraceptive vaginal sys
251 SV to express an immunogenic HBV protein and
evaluated the efficacy of this vector in the prevention
252 study the immunopathogenesis of GA and also
evaluated the efficacy of tofacitinib (a Janus kinase 1/
253 We further
evaluated the efficacy of tofacitinib as induction and m
254 In this study, we
evaluated the efficacy of TQ for treatment of Babesia mi
255 We
evaluated the efficacy of treatment with neratinib in pa
256 This study
evaluated the efficacy of twice- and thrice-weekly intra
257 This study
evaluated the efficacy of videoendoscopy in visualizing
258 We
evaluated the efficacy of weekly oral cyclic antibiotic
259 We
evaluated the efficacy of weekly oral cyclic antibiotic
260 We have
evaluated the efficacy of WES, WGS and targeted enrichme
261 This study presents and
evaluates the efficacy of a new accelerated evolution pl
262 This study
evaluates the efficacy of designer receptors exclusively
263 The present study
evaluates the efficacy of Kay repair in a novel ex vivo
264 The present work
evaluates the efficacy of pTx technique on realistic lea
265 issue, we conducted a proof-of-concept study
evaluating the efficacy of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymi
266 strate application of the C-dot-hydrogel for
evaluating the efficacy of a chemotherapeutic substance,
267 d, individually randomized, controlled trial
evaluating the efficacy of a newly developed typhoid con
268 Currently available data
evaluating the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis strate
269 Our analysis of data from a clinical trial
evaluating the efficacy of chemotherapy plus/minus trast
270 ng several drugs, we designed the device for
evaluating the efficacy of compounds (e.g. physostigmine
271 context for observed population changes when
evaluating the efficacy of conservation management plans
272 nd where the next ZIKV outbreak might occur,
evaluating the efficacy of conventional and novel interv
273 SIMPLIFY and D3FEAT are phase 4 trials
evaluating the efficacy of DAA among people with past 6-
274 Pilot studies are
evaluating the efficacy of dual therapy with dolutegravi
275 GELA designed a randomized phase 2 trial
evaluating the efficacy of either rituximab, doxorubicin
276 olled, randomized, fixed-dose clinical trial
evaluating the efficacy of GSK561679, a corticotropin-re
277 were available in a recently completed study
evaluating the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine 400 mg dai
278 re-activity relationship (SAR) was explored,
evaluating the efficacy of its analogs in blocking 4-(me
279 These findings may serve a benchmark role in
evaluating the efficacy of novel interventions for cALD.
280 re searched for randomized controlled trials
evaluating the efficacy of smoking cessation pharmacothe
281 tor cells treatment, further clinical trials
evaluating the efficacy of the intervention in an earlie
282 ween eyes may prove useful for investigators
evaluating the efficacy of unilateral treatments for RP
283 The aim of this study was to systematically
evaluate the efficacy,
outcomes, and complications of ga
284 es associated risk factors and genotype, and
evaluates the efficacy rate of quinacrine in those with
285 risk for developing subclinical AF and will
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and economic value of ora
286 This study's aim was to
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and local tolerability of
287 Purpose To
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and long-term results of
288 Purpose To
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and palliative durability
289 We conducted a randomized trial to
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and side-effect profile o
290 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of intra
291 The aim of this study was to
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of lacos
292 ective clinical study which was conducted to
evaluate the efficacy,
safety, predictability, ocular ab
293 The authors
evaluated the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of cari
294 This phase 3 study further
evaluated the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of valb
295 This systematic review
evaluates the efficacy,
safety and economic impact of du
296 This study
evaluates the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of regi
297 Without well-designed studies
evaluating the efficacy,
safety and cost-effectiveness o
298 randomised clinical trial (TRACII, 2015-18)
evaluating the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of tri
299 We sought to
evaluate the efficacy/
safety of 4 dosing regimens of gra
300 This study was aimed to
evaluate the efficacy,
visual outcome and complications