コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ional to the timescale for active nucleosome eviction.
2 hole whose binding results in stable histone eviction.
3 d has been implicated in promoter nucleosome eviction.
4 tone acetylation is important for nucleosome eviction.
5 ning nucleosomes without ensuing histone H2A eviction.
6 es and suppressing cotranscriptional histone eviction.
7 ex promotes transcription through nucleosome eviction.
8 the CTCF binding site, and, eventually, CTCF eviction.
9 e the ATR kinase, showed no overt nucleosome eviction.
10 ake place in the absence of overt nucleosome eviction.
11 , histone variant incorporation, and histone eviction.
12 ubunit is essential for ORC-mediated histone eviction.
13 rtially unwrapped nucleosome without histone eviction.
14 anslation as a consequence of defective eIF6 eviction.
15 d targets to invest more effort in resisting eviction.
16 BAF complexes have different effects on PRC eviction.
17 ls, finding impaired histone acetylation and eviction.
18 a 1.74-fold increase in children's hazard of eviction (95% confidence interval: 1.02, 2.95), and leng
19 including 10 135 births to women who had an eviction action during pregnancy and 78 727 births to mo
24 oned nucleosomes where it induces nucleosome eviction, alters local histone modifications, and remode
25 er households every year are threatened with eviction, an event associated with severe negative impac
27 examining an association between exposure to eviction and at least 1 health outcome, both before age
28 year observations (across 40 states) used US eviction and census data for the years 2002 through 2018
29 NMT3A(R882) cells showed impaired nucleosome eviction and chromatin remodeling in response to anthrac
36 adverse birth outcomes, our results suggest eviction and health may be cyclical and co-constitutive.
38 ates a highly dynamic equilibrium of histone eviction and histone deposition and that there is signif
41 on of the leading edge by driving sequential eviction and intercalation of individual cells away from
42 we identify chaperones that can mediate the eviction and loading of Mst77F on DNA, thus facilitating
43 ficant undercount of individuals impacted by eviction and motivates policies designed to stabilize ho
44 va face a similarly challenging task of SNBP eviction and reassembly of nucleosome-based chromatin.
46 ied by Swi-Snf recruitment, promoter histone eviction and Sas3 and Ada2(Gcn5)-dependent histone H3K14
47 ed a striking correlation between nucleosome eviction and strong activator and acetyl-CoA-dependent t
48 tion of Gcn4 and Tup1 enhances Gcn4 promoter eviction and that multiple Tup1-interacting proteins bec
50 bilizes the nucleosome by preventing H2A-H2B eviction and, thereby, retains the "docking site" for Se
51 out meta-analysis of the association between evictions and child health outcomes, evidence demonstrat
52 listically heterogenous cities in which both evictions and contacts occur more frequently in poorer n
55 their capacity to induce DNA breaks, histone eviction, and relocated topoisomerase IIalpha in living
56 nt nucleosome repopulation that occurs after eviction, and the strongest effects of Ash1 are seen whe
57 eeding competition, dominance behaviour, and evictions, and 3) relative to subordinates, produce offs
58 bility crisis, ongoing racial disparities in evictions, and continuing harm to millions of families,
61 nd its chromatin recruitment, spreading, and eviction are exquisitely regulated via interactions with
62 ion moratoria and show that policies to stem evictions are a warranted and important component of COV
63 adox points to nucleosome destabilization or eviction as a defining feature of the meiotic resection
64 Collectively, our work reports on histone eviction as an immediate cellular response to PARPi trea
65 In models including both housing exposures, eviction associations were attenuated, while estimates f
67 one child in their home were threatened with eviction at an annual rate of 10.4%, twice that of adult
68 hough transcriptional activation and histone eviction at CHA1 depends on Swi/Snf, Swi/Snf recruitment
71 nd by CTCF during latency and underwent CTCF eviction at early times postreactivation in mice latentl
72 uggest that Swi/Snf is important for histone eviction at enhancers and that it also functions as a Po
73 the preinitiation complex (PIC), in histone eviction at inducible and constitutively active promoter
74 utants implicated Gcn5, Snf2, and Ydj1 in H3 eviction at most, but not all, Gcn4 target promoters, wi
77 t not SPT3 or SPT8 impaired promoter histone eviction at the highly remodeled subset of induced genes
80 negative kin discrimination is restricted to eviction attempts of older females capable of resistance
82 a novel activity, which prevents nucleosome eviction but not remodeling mediated by the ATP-dependen
83 involve chromatin remodeling and nucleosome eviction, but whether dysfunctional telomeres undergo ch
86 ssed only in mother cells where a nucleosome eviction cascade along the promoter during the cell cycl
88 ur discovery points to a direct link between eviction-coupled erasure of the ubiquitin mark from ubH2
91 nce behaviour, is associated with infrequent evictions, decreases social centrality within the clan,
94 or limited nest sites was a primary cause of eviction-driven infanticide, and 2) attacks occurred les
95 pitation studies demonstrate that histone H3 eviction during active transcription is decelerated in a
96 experienced eviction actions at other times, eviction during pregnancy was associated with lower infa
98 Our studies reveal that H3 incorporation and eviction dynamics identify cells with different cell div
100 households, on average, are threatened with eviction each year; that the highest eviction filing rat
101 reflect cause, government efforts to prevent evictions (eg, right to counsel in housing court) or low
102 r, reported violent crime, impervious areas, evictions, election participation, income, poverty, educ
104 D during pregnancy that were associated with eviction filing and judgment rate trajectories incorpora
105 In adjusted models, higher neighborhood eviction filing and judgment rates, as compared with low
106 ed with eviction each year; that the highest eviction filing rates are not concentrated solely in hig
110 ms the strong dependency on NAP1-mediated H1 eviction for induction of the silent CD40 gene and furth
111 nds to chromatin to promote broad nucleosome eviction for transcriptional activation of many cancer p
113 , inactivation of Gcn5p decreases nucleosome eviction from both GAL1 and a long ( approximately 8 kb)
114 tiple phosphorylation events promote FOXP2's eviction from chromatin and supplant the solubilizing fu
117 g proteins after their ubiquitination at and eviction from chromatin; as a deubiquitinase, specific t
119 thus reveals an unsuspected role of histone eviction from insect sperm chromatin: safeguarding the i
122 duals are specifically targeted for forcible eviction from the group, often suffering severe injury,
126 in-associated mechanism required for RNAPIII eviction from tRNA genes and tuning the physiological re
129 the Swi/Snf complex is required for histone eviction in a manner that is independent of transcriptio
130 ation and enhanced RSC occupancy and histone eviction in coding sequences and stimulates the rate of
131 etylation-mediated nucleosome remodeling and eviction in coding sequences that stimulates transcripti
134 ession of plasmid replication and/or plasmid eviction in multiple orthogonal readouts and potentiated
136 motes chromatin accessibility and nucleosome eviction in spermiogenesis and that loss of histone acet
137 ntiation, revealing a common principle of H3 eviction in the proliferating and endocycling domains of
143 These findings indicate that nucleosome eviction is crucial for robust transcription of highly e
144 le-molecule resolution, and found that H2A.Z eviction is dependent on RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) and
146 ting to an active state including nucleosome eviction is required for activation of protein expressio
148 50 to -0.48; P = .047) and reductions of the eviction judgment rate by -0.25 (95% CI, -0.35 to -0.14;
149 0.22 (1575.19) eviction judgments (mean [SD] eviction judgment rate, 1.89 per 100 households) post-20
150 7.22 (1592.18) eviction judgments (mean [SD] eviction judgment rate, 1.91 per 100 households) pre-201
151 judgments in the post-2014 period (mean [SD] eviction judgment rate, 2.02 [1.81] per 100 households).
152 ed with reductions in eviction judgments and eviction judgment rates; however, these associations wer
153 nty eviction judgments were 477.22 (1592.18) eviction judgments (mean [SD] eviction judgment rate, 1.
154 0 households) pre-2014, and 490.22 (1575.19) eviction judgments (mean [SD] eviction judgment rate, 1.
155 expansion was associated with reductions in eviction judgments and eviction judgment rates; however,
156 ion was associated with reductions in county eviction judgments by -66.49 (95% CI, -132.50 to -0.48;
157 ated, without Medicaid expansion), mean (SD) eviction judgments for treated counties were 534.78 evic
158 eholds), which decreased to 463.67 (1499.39) eviction judgments in the post-2014 period (mean [SD] ev
159 n judgments for treated counties were 534.78 eviction judgments in the pre-2014 period (mean [SD] evi
164 that BAF opposes PRC by rapid, ATP-dependent eviction, leading to the formation of accessible chromat
169 ition by H1 and establish a gene-specific H1 eviction mechanism through an activator->p300->NAP1->H1
172 isaccharide) stand out, due to their histone eviction-mediated cytotoxicity toward doxorubicin-resist
178 dvantage who lived in a state that issued an eviction moratorium and were diagnosed with COVID-19 as
179 ndividuals living in a state that lifted its eviction moratorium experienced higher hazards of a COVI
180 Survey to measure associations between state eviction moratorium protections and mental distress.
182 mortality increased steadily in states after eviction moratoriums expired, and expiration was associa
183 Moderate-certainty evidence was found that eviction moratoriums were associated with reduced COVID-
194 In myeloid leukemia cells, it promotes rapid eviction of EP300/CBP from an enhancer subset marked by
196 hat CHD1 directs short spacing, resulting in eviction of H1 and chromatin unfolding, whereas ISW1 dir
199 al changes, and arginine mutants prevent the eviction of H2A and dissociation of polyubiquitinated DD
200 dependent chromatin disruption reflects both eviction of H2A-H2B dimers and the presence of queued Po
203 active transcription complexes is coupled to eviction of H2A.Z nucleosomes, and disassembly is couple
205 fore propose that the transcription-mediated eviction of H2A/H2B dimers is an important mechanism tha
207 kinetochore correlated with CENP-A seeding, eviction of H3K9me3 and local accumulation of mitotic co
208 n assembly on somatic chromatin by promoting eviction of histone H1 through its N-terminal domain.
209 say, we demonstrate that Rad26p promotes the eviction of histone H2A-H2B dimer and prevents the reass
210 e fact that Rtt109p regulates the deposition/eviction of histone H2B in addition to its role in stimu
211 Here, we show that Rtt109p promotes the eviction of histone H3 from a fast inducible yeast gene,
212 revealed that the SWI/SNF complex catalyzed eviction of histones from the Gal4-bound nucleosomes.
215 PTBP1 proceeded to assemble an EDC with the eviction of hnRNP proteins, the late recruitment of SR p
216 deler, is required for activation-associated eviction of Htz1 specifically from promoters of the Thr4
219 erance instead results from premature thymic eviction of immature autoreactive CD8 thymocytes into th
224 eads to hyperstimulation of ATPase activity, eviction of nucleosomal H2A-H2B, and deposition of H2A.Z
225 that deletion of the HBR domain impairs the eviction of nucleosomes at the promoters and open readin
226 ption in vivo are typically characterized by eviction of nucleosomes from chromatin and are experimen
228 likely in SAGA, stimulates modification and eviction of nucleosomes in transcribed coding sequences
229 urthermore, we observe transcription-coupled eviction of nucleosomes on strong TSSs during intraeryth
232 graders, with treatment leading to chromatin eviction of POU2AF1 and IRF4 and decreased IRF4 signalin
233 dCENP-A in M/G1 phase, which depends on the eviction of previously deposited H3/H3.3-placeholder nuc
236 onse to hyperosmotic shock induces the rapid eviction of Rgc2 from Fps1 and consequent channel closur
237 sassembly of the preinitiation complexes and eviction of RNA Pol II from histone genes by a mechanism
239 deling enzyme can catalyze the ATP-dependent eviction of Sir3p from recombinant nucleosomal arrays, a
241 on is not implicated in TC-NER, and moderate eviction of Spt5 and promotion of error-free transcripti
242 matid resolution during mitosis required the eviction of such H1S/T18ph by the chaperone SET, with th
243 between yeast and human Rev1, including the eviction of template G from the DNA helix and the pairin
244 rotein 1 (NAP1), cooperates with CBP/p300 in eviction of the acetylated histones from the chromatin t
245 MED1 for dephosphorylation, resulting in the eviction of the AR-MED1 complex from chromatin and loss
246 ression is induced by physiological signals, eviction of the core transcriptional machinery was accom
248 recruitment promotes histone acetylation and eviction of the histone octamer from the chromatin-assem
254 lide a nucleosome past a TF, with concurrent eviction of the TF from the DNA, and the TF did not sign
255 Furthermore, TSA treatment resulted in the eviction of the transcription factor nuclear factor-1 fr
256 itously, as well as the impact of nucleosome eviction on transcription genome-wide, is poorly underst
268 Furthermore, we show that the stimulated eviction or reduced deposition of histones by Rtt109p pr
270 osition and mechanisms underlying nucleosome eviction or retention are poorly understood, including s
271 date of the population of US renters facing eviction, our study reveals a significant undercount of
272 otype, Spt6 inactivation caused localized H3 eviction over 1-2 nucleosomes at 5' ends of Ty elements.
273 acetylation, Swi-Snf recruitment and histone eviction proceed, but transcription is reduced, suggesti
275 omes, it remains unclear which stages of the eviction process are associated with mental distress amo
277 judgments in the pre-2014 period (mean [SD] eviction rate, 2.25 [2.18] per 100 households), which de
280 t CD40 gene and further demonstrates that H1 eviction, seeded by activator-p300-NAP1-H1 interactions,
281 fecting FACT reduce the transient nucleosome eviction seen at these promoters during a normal cell cy
283 the marked effect of DNA nicking on histone eviction that underscores the powerful potential of topo
284 Transcriptional activation caused histone eviction throughout the GAL1-YLR454W ORF, except at 601,
285 dition to its role in stimulating histone H3 eviction, thus providing insight into chromatin assembly
288 at dominant female meerkats employ stressful evictions to suppress reproduction among their probable
291 es correlated with the efficiency of RNAPIII eviction upon nutrient perturbation and required the tra
295 ion or residence in a neighborhood with more evictions was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes
297 In this period, nearly 40% of tenants facing eviction were ordered to leave their residences because
298 , 26.26 [5.76] years) who experienced 99 517 evictions were identified during the study period, inclu
299 However, it is absent in public housing evictions, where timing rules are significantly laxer, a
300 demonstrated the deleterious associations of eviction with a range of developmental periods and domai