ライフサイエンスコーパス: evoked potential

1 ing (visual P1 and 25-Hz steady-state visual evoked potential).

2 spinal cerebrospinal fluid signal and motor evoked potentials).

3 l disparities were measured using the visual evoked potential.

4 from the N20 component of the somatosensory evoked potential.

5 by the preferential looking test and visual evoked potential.

6 ept, evidenced by changes in the N1 auditory evoked potential.

7 elay on full-field, pattern-reversal, visual-evoked potentials.

8 reduction in the amplitude of somatosensory-evoked potentials.

9 scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and visual evoked potentials.

10 ptic long-term potentiation (LTP) of C-fiber-evoked potentials.

11 lution and reduced the amplitude of visually evoked potentials.

12 ry brainstem responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials.

13 d enhanced paired-pulse depression of visual evoked potentials.

14 ding of individual sound transients, such as evoked potentials.

15 nia-like decreases in amplitudes of auditory evoked potentials.

16 er reflected by distinct features of post-CI evoked potentials.

17 assessed using a limb motor score and motor-evoked potentials.

18 tical excitability were assessed using motor-evoked potentials.

19 ed on frequency-tagged steady-state visually evoked potentials.

20 y characterizing changes in firing rates and evoked potentials.

21 hippocampal gyrus activity was indicative of evoked potentials.

22 t of variation, and shorter latency of motor evoked potentials.

23 nation, MRI, nerve biopsy, and somatosensory evoked potentials.

24 luding C-tactile afferents, and pain-related evoked potentials.

25 of cortical components of the somatosensory-evoked potentials.

26 t accompanied by modulations of early visual-evoked potentials.

27 easured by electroencephalogram and auditory-evoked potentials.

28 he early cortical component of somatosensory evoked potentials.

29 nterval 40%-60%) for bilateral somatosensory evoked potential absence, both with a positive predictiv

30 electroencephalography, absent somatosensory-evoked potential, absent pupillary or corneal reflexes,

31 eedback pitch perturbations elicited average evoked potential (AEP) and event-related band power (ERB

32 We compared averaged auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) associated with 1-stream and 2-

33 The amplitude of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in the hippocampus increased tr

34 ge experience on sensory-obligatory auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) was investigated in native-Engl

35 Local field and auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded from primary audi

36 o test this hypothesis, we analysed auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) which were recorded from medica

37 tracortical facilitation (P < .01) and motor-evoked potential amplitude (P < .05) as well as a reduct

38 Late-positive evoked potential amplitude and theta-alpha oscillatory p

39 The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the basel

40 uty cycle, and sonication duration) on motor-evoked potential amplitude were examined.

41 Uncaging-evoked potential amplitudes correlated inversely with sp

42 ignificantly higher postinjury somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes with longer latencies.

43 nscranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

44 nscranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

45 We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential, an oscillatory response of the visual

46 Electrophysiological-evoked potential analysis shows that dCRY mediates UV an

47 hy, electroretinography analysis, and visual-evoked potential analysis.

48 ty to elicit a predefined amplitude of motor-evoked potential and EEG theta activity) and decreased L

49 ociative stimulation induced change in motor-evoked potential and memory formation) after sleep depri

50 mice showed reduced ventral hippocampus-mPFC-evoked potentials and an augmented low-frequency stimula

51 entified those patients with lower extremity evoked potentials and better clinical recovery.

52 such as those measuring small fibre-related evoked potentials and corneal confocal microscopy, might

53 as shown by increased amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and decreased duration of the cortical

54 MENT Using source-imaged steady-state visual evoked potentials and frequency-domain analysis of dicho

55 hypomyelination resulted in markedly delayed evoked potentials and likely contributed to neurologic a

56 er clinical, neurophysiologic (somatosensory-evoked potential), and biochemical prognosticators.

57 evoked electroencephalographic, spinal (ChR2 evoked potential), and electromyographic responses revea

58 iagnostic investigations include MRI, visual evoked potentials, and CSF examination.

59 Stopping latencies, motor evoked potentials, and frontal beta power (13-20 Hz) did

60 ies detected with electroencephalography and evoked potentials, and physiological and biochemical der

61 ation, electroencephalography, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and serum neuron-specific enolase, is

62 uring therapeutic hypothermia, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and serum neuron-specific enolase.

63 trophy of brain microvasculature with visual evoked potential anomalies.

64 er frontocentral sustained negativity in the evoked potential as well as enhanced parietal alpha/low-

65 33 mug/L (p = 0.029), but not somatosensory-evoked potentials, as independent predictors of poor out

66 detection of multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials associated with visual field stimulati

67 requency (30-90 Hz) power, but not in visual evoked potentials, associated with spatial attention sta

68 objective was to examine brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in rat CS as a measure of poss

69 of P100 component of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential, best-corrected visual acuity, optic ne

70 .38), and bilateral absence of somatosensory-evoked potentials between days 1 and 7 (false-positive r

71 ent, whole-body MRI, motor and somatosensory evoked potentials; brain, spinal cord, hindlimb muscles,

72 of isoflurane on barrel cortex somatosensory-evoked potentials but failed to elicit spectral changes

73 The modulation of cortical evoked potentials by spinal cord stimulation was largest

74 been repeatedly reported that C-fiber laser-evoked potentials (C-LEPs) become detectable only when t

75 Recording of free-field cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) responses to speech tokens was i

76 Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) throughout a language task is b

77 he N1 and P2 components of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) evoked by 70, 80, 90, 100, and

78 Mismatch negativity (MMN), an evoked potential calculated by subtracting the response

79 In the optic nerve, visual evoked potentials can indicate demyelination and should

80 scalp EEG/SEEG findings and cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP).

81 n, neuromonitoring modalities (somatosensory-evoked potentials, cerebral oximetry, and transcranial D

82 spectral analysis, and steady-state visually evoked potential collected using electroencephalography

83 duced amplitudes (p < 0.001) of pain-related evoked potentials compared to controls.

84 oth a clear reduction of the earliest visual evoked potential components, the C1 and the N1, and an a

85 (P1) at 60 ms, but no further somatosensory evoked potential components.

86 al silent period, and amplitude of the motor evoked potentials conditioned by cortico-cortical intera

87 n biopsy, corneal confocal microscopy, laser-evoked potentials, contact heat-related potentials and m

88 Robson contrast sensitivity, or sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

89 obson contrast sensitivity, and sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

90 Vestibular sensory-evoked potentials demonstrate severe to profound vestibu

91 Somatosensory evoked potentials demonstrated central slowing supportin

92 Whereas the status of brainstem-evoked potentials did not predict the recovery of sensor

93 ed to the C3-C5 level on (1) diaphragm motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magn

94 early postanoxic coma, whereas somatosensory-evoked potentials do not add any complementary informati

95 icit with absence of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials due to loss of spinal cord neurons, as

96 We recorded motor-evoked potentials during a faked-action discrimination (

97 by PKC inhibitor chelerythrine, and enhanced evoked potentials during costimulation of mGluR1 with 3,

98 In this study, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical (MEPs) and subcor

99 Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcortical s

100 y attenuated the amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by median nerve stimulation.

101 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stim

102 can be probed by the excess latency of motor-evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stim

103 myography, electroencephalography, and motor evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magnetic st

104 e asked to discriminate time intervals while evoked potentials (EPs) elicited by the sound terminatin

105 paired stimulation as quantified by cortical evoked potentials (EPs) in the sensorimotor cortex of aw

106 e characterized electrically elicited visual evoked potentials (eVEPs) in Argus II retinal implant we

107 vation, comparable to the monosynaptic motor-evoked potential evoked by TMS of primary motor cortex.

108 an AP orientation over the latency of motor-evoked potentials evoked by direct activation of cortico

109 r (AP) orientation over the latency of motor-evoked potentials evoked by direct activation of cortico

110 circuit dynamics of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials extracted from concurrent EEG-fMRI dat

111 e conduction latency using full-field visual evoked potential (FF-VEP) versus the unaffected fellow e

112 to characterize spinal cord functional motor evoked potentials (fMEPs).

113 , the P1 component and steady-state visually-evoked potentials): fMRI activation scaled additively wi

114 00-140 ms, coinciding with the P100 visually evoked potential, followed by a driving effect in the fr

115 were favored over median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials for prognostication, although the latt

116 We developed a portable evoked potential framework to extract 'brain vital signs

117 unexperienced observers by measuring visual evoked potentials from 64-channels.

118 cord stimulation caused lasting increases in evoked potentials from both sites, but only if the time

119 Using steady-state visually evoked potentials from electroencephalography in a fear

120 corollary discharge inhibition by recording evoked potentials from midbrain electrosensory nuclei.

121 These infusions were sufficient to block evoked potentials from the lateral dorsal thalamus and l

122 etinography (full field and pattern), visual evoked potentials, fundus autofluorescence IRR, and opti

123 ic flash electroretinogram (FERG) and visual evoked potential (FVEP) also were recorded before lidoca

124 M) latency; i.e. the excess latency of motor-evoked potentials generated by transcranial magnetic sti

125 nsory processing was found for the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), a marker of cardiac interoceptio

126 One index of such process is the heartbeat evoked potential (HEP), an ERP component related to the

127 Heartbeat evoked potentials (HEPs), an indicator of the cortical r

128 produced large augmentation in motor cortex evoked potentials if they were timed to converge in the

129 Photopic ERG, visual evoked potentials, IHC and cell counting indicated relat

130 motor cortex, we examined ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs) in a proximal arm muscle durin

131 y as we report a significant delay in visual evoked potential implicit time in the retina-specific Bm

132 sed disrupted latent inhibition and auditory-evoked potential in mice and rats, respectively, two end

133 cortical engagement, the steady-state visual evoked potential in response to naturalistic angry, fear

134 f this electrode reliably produced a diffuse evoked potential in the head and body of the ipsilateral

135 rve stimulation with recording somatosensory evoked potentials in 138 healthy subjects aged 17-86 yea

136 e subcortical auditory pathway, and cortical evoked potentials in 58 participants elicited to the syl

137 Here we examined motor-evoked potentials in arm muscles elicited by cortical an

138 in the visual cortex, and measured visually evoked potentials in awake male and female mice before a

139 eased the amplitude of the earliest visually evoked potentials in lockstep with the behavioral effect

140 concentration-dependently depressed C-fiber-evoked potentials in rats receiving spinal nerve ligatio

141 dose-dependent suppression of somatosensory-evoked potentials in response to electrical stimulation

142 und that electrosensory stimulation elicited evoked potentials in the midbrain exterolateral nucleus

143 By recording motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in the PrG of patients undergoing brai

144 On each day, motor-evoked potentials in upper limb muscles were first measu

145 Under attention, amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials increased 50-60 ms after stimulation (

146 tude of subcortical, but not cortical, motor-evoked potentials increased in proximal and distal arm m

147 ion, increased ipsilateral TMS-induced motor evoked potentials, increased fMRI responses in the mirro

148 res of network connectivity, corticocortical evoked potentials (indexing effective connectivity), and

149 Human studies with auditory evoked potentials indicate that FXS is associated with a

150 ls to evaluate motor excitability with motor-evoked potentials, input-output (IOcurve) and short-late

151 Motor- and sensory-evoked potentials, intracortical excitability as assesse

152 ed by topographically linked delay of visual evoked potential latency, a functional measure of demyel

153 rmore, the observed reduction of N170 visual-evoked potentials may be a key mechanism underlying 5-HT

154 ty in early visual cortex and early stimulus-evoked potentials measured via EEG (e.g., the P1 compone

155 rly visual cortex and commonly used stimulus-evoked potentials measured via EEG.

156 ior assumptions that fMRI and early stimulus-evoked potentials measured with EEG can be interchangeab

157 Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potential measures are suitable for detection of

158 Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, recruitment curve, and

159 lly limited to M1 through recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude.

160 ion (TMS) each significantly predicted motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes.

161 n of behaving mice to show that the midbrain evoked potential (mEP) faithfully reflects the temporal

162 or cortex, reflected by changes in the motor evoked potential (MEP) following the paired stimulation.

163 s (TS) was applied over M1 producing a motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the relaxed hand.

164 pheric) before acquisition of baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from each site as a me

165 s cortical excitability as measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) alters functional conne

166 EAE31, a locus controlling latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and clinical onset of experimen

167 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and motor threshold were record

168 erve stimulation we examined in humans motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intracortic

169 vicomedullary stimulation, we examined motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intracortic

170 ospinal responsiveness was monitored via TMS-evoked potentials (MEPs) during a 25% MVC.

171 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but not b

172 To test this hypothesis, we examined motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnet

173 e effect of ulnar nerve stimulation on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnet

174 To test this hypothesis, we examined motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnet

175 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by single-pulse transcra

176 primary motor cortex (M1) we examined motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral erector sp

177 on over the leg motor cortex to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the quadriceps femoris muscl

178 threshold test stimulus (TS) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right hand.

179 excitability and RT, such that larger motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured at rest were associate

180 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring can promptly detect

181 ticospinal output, we used the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained by transcranial magnet

182 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before and for 60

183 e dorsal cervical spinal cord in rats; motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from biceps.

184 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained by transcranial m

185 cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded before, and 10 ti

186 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right fi

187 ry motor cortex and the measurement of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), we have previously demonstrate

188 hod for standardized quantification of motor evoked potentials (MEPs).

189 e]) and neurophysiological (changes in motor evoked potentials [MEPs]) assessments were performed pri

190 and sectoral multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials metrics to discriminate glaucomatous f

191 ctral-domain OCT scans and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recordings.

192 ervical level and were correlated with motor-evoked potentials (n = 34).

193 Diego, CA) and in the P100 latency of visual evoked potentials; no changes were detected in visual ac

194 old, the intensity needed to produce a motor evoked potential of 0.5 mV, and the amplitude of the N45

195 and OCA were confirmed with 5-channel visual evoked potentials (optic nerve misrouting).

196 with a decremental extrastimulus (decrement evoked potentials or DEEPs), are more likely to colocali

197 nce of cerebral electrical activity (EEG and evoked potentials) or cerebral circulatory arrest.

198 a linear decline over time, we identified an evoked potential over the anterior frontal region which

199 We simultaneously measured auditory evoked potentials over a large swath of primary and high

200 xes, using source-imaged steady-state visual evoked potentials over a wide range of relative contrast

201 the detection threshold elicited a cortical evoked potential (P1) at 60 ms, but no further somatosen

202 he global BCI multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials parameter was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96)

203 n FC was estimated using steady-state visual evoked potential partial coherence before and 90 minutes

204 Baseline pharyngeal motor evoked potentials (PMEPs) and swallowing performance (re

205 Simple bedside tests and somatosensory-evoked potentials predict poor neurologic outcome for su

206 leus, and synchronization between these task-evoked potentials predicted the stop signal reaction tim

207 FL), and monocular pattern reversal visually evoked potentials (prVEP).

208 Pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) was the most frequently studied

209 re, we could increase the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials recorded from below or just above the

210 results show that the amplitude of the motor-evoked potentials recorded from the real hand is signifi

211 isms, we used electroretinography and visual evoked potential recording in patients, and multi-unit r

212 ting to binocular activation during visually evoked potential recordings was also diminished.

213 he frequency-following response, a sustained evoked potential reflecting synchronous neural activity

214 s larger than bilateral absent somatosensory evoked potential responses.

215 urons, and it reconciles previously puzzling evoked potential results in humans and animals.

216 Moreover, in vivo auditory brainstem evoked potentials revealed delayed conduction of the ves

217 uced long-term potentiation (LTP) of C-fiber-evoked potentials, revealing a constituent role of both

218 Trauma significantly reduced sound-evoked potential (SEP) amplitudes and increased SEP late

219 ) as well as late (N140, P300) somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) amplitudes.

220 nd secondary components of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) before and during movement.

221 The literature regarding somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) gating is commonly cited as a pot

222 gh signal intensity (HSI), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were analyzed by using a logistic

223 cycle of the N20 component of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and the area of high-frequency o

224 microelectrode arrays recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) with an almost twice SNR (signal

225 fMRI, behavioral testing, and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) at spinal and cortical levels.

226 three experiments we recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from 6.5-, 8-, and 10-month-old

227 ynapse, by measuring the extracellular sound-evoked potentials (SEPs) from the antennal nerve while m

228 detailed cortical recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in an ovine model.

229 Median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials showed improved activity upon carbon m

230 We found that motor evoked potentials size increased in spinal cord injury a

231 thmic stimuli elicited multiple steady state-evoked potentials (SS-EPs) observed in the EEG spectrum

232 of the P25/N33, but not other somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components, was reduced during v

233 electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and serum neuron-specific enol

234 neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs).

235 erve at the wrist, we examined somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs; P14/N20, N20/P25 and P25/N33 c

236 ed modulations of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEPs) as a measure of attentional t

237 y distributed pattern of steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses to flickering visual

238 lography (EEG) to assess steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) in human subjects and showed t

239 equency-domain data from steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP).

240 ssessed by recordings of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by each of the flick

241 nontargets and recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by these stimuli.

242 rivalry displays while steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were measured over occipital

243 was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

244 r subject were averaged to produce a Stretch Evoked Potential (StretchEP).

245 Cortico-cortical evoked potential studies were performed after repetitive

246 auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, suggesting fatigue of synaptic releas

247 term enhancement of cortico-pharyngeal motor evoked potentials, suggesting the feasibility of a cereb

248 The complete loss of visual evoked potentials supports the hypothesis that cell sign

249 e RBANS total scale score, with auditory P50 evoked potential suppression the key target engagement b

250 tive peak around 100 milliseconds in the TMS-evoked potential (TEP) after a single TMS pulse.

251 We found that TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) changed differently according t

252 Indeed, the frequency profile of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) closely resembles that of oscil

253 Electroretinogram and visual evoked potential tests showed visual pathway involvement

254 ssociated with a reduction in the quality of evoked potentials that led to reduced performance on the

255 sual acuity for Vernier offsets, we recorded evoked potentials to 3 Hz alternations between bar grati

256 asure visual acuity for letters, we recorded evoked potentials to 3 Hz alternations between intact an

257 ied a regularized multivariate classifier to evoked potentials to conspecific vocalizations.

258 We tracked steady-state visual evoked potentials to label distinct visual cortical resp

259 We measured pupil and brain-evoked potentials to stimuli that violated transition st

260 In the present study, human cortical evoked potentials to syllable and phoneme rate modulatio

261 Addition of somatosensory-evoked potentials to this model did not improve prognost

262 We found that in the PFC, evoked potentials to, and neural information about, exte

263 ospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulatio

264 The P100 visual evoked potential (VEP) and P3 event-related potential (E

265 this study was to investigate if the visual evoked potential (VEP) could be used as an unbiased, qua

266 h prolongation and then shortening of visual evoked potential (VEP) latencies in optic neuritis in MS

267 re more demanding than for standard visually evoked potential (VEP) recordings, the eVEP has proven t

268 explore the relationship between the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP), a component of the electroenceph

269 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual evoked potential (VEP), and grading of skin and hair pig

270 ed the resting state EEG (rsEEG), the visual evoked potentials (VEP) and the visual P300 (P3) from 16

271 Pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP), in response to 60' and 15' chec

272 ed 1 and 2 weeks postinjection, and visually evoked potentials (VEPs) and single-cell activity were r

273 Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) following optic neuritis (ON) r

274 ty by measuring visual behavior and visually evoked potentials (VEPs) in binocular visual cortex of t

275 neurons, ensembles of neurons, and visually-evoked potentials (VEPs) in response to task light cues,

276 sthetic and natural vision based on visually evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded in rats implanted with

277 multifocal electroretinography (ERG), visual evoked potentials (VEPs), spectral-domain optical cohere

278 Here we record steady-state visual evoked potentials via electrocorticography to directly a

279 multiple sclerosis (MS), and measurement of evoked potentials (visual, motor, or sensory) has been w

280 oma, including the electroretinogram, visual evoked potential, visual spatial acuity, and contrast se

281 Normal vestibular sensory evoked potential (VsEP) responses and abnormal vestibulo

282 Mutants have deficient vestibular evoked potential (VsEP) responses to jerk stimuli, head

283 We measured vestibular sensory evoked potentials (VsEPs) in alpha9 knockout (KO) mice,

284 Here, we measured vestibular sensory evoked potentials (VsEPs) to directly assess vestibular

285 e first clear effect of monovision on visual evoked potentials was the C1 amplitude reduction, indica

286 Such memory-evoked potentials were characterized by early latencies

287 requency both subcortical and cortical motor-evoked potentials were facilitated without changing intr

288 Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevant musc

289 electroencephalogram and daily somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded during the first 5 days

290 Auditory evoked potentials were similar in OSAS and control subje

291 logical effects (change in heart rate, motor evoked potentials) were observed during any of the proce

292 brain magnetic resonance imaging and sensory evoked potentials, were performed.

293 Indeed, we found an enlarged N1 auditory evoked potential when subjects perceived illusion-ba, an

294 experimentally using the steady-state visual evoked potential where we stimulated the visual cortex w

295 ereby elicited separable steady-state visual-evoked potentials, which were used to examine the effect

296 transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked potentials while healthy humans watched videos of

297 increased with attention (as do steady-state evoked potentials), while the typical suppression was on

298 he present study aimed to measure the visual evoked potentials with a high-density electrode array (6

299 , we stimulated and then recorded electrical evoked potentials within and between three large-scale n

300 ceptual learning of noise is associated with evoked potentials, without any salient physical disconti