ライフサイエンスコーパス: experimental error

1 not accelerated by this mutation (within the experimental error).

2 g-2 expression was stochastic (as opposed to experimental error).

3 emperature independent (DeltaE(a) = 0 within experimental error).

4 on analysis, agreed with known values within experimental error.

5 d enzyme-free data sets are identical within experimental error.

6 of flexible dihedrals is negligible, within experimental error.

7 V/K)(DCIP) and (D)(V/K)(cytc) equal 1 within experimental error.

8 y of catalytic activity are identical within experimental error.

9 the literature value for this complex within experimental error.

10 with the predictions is comparable with the experimental error.

11 ures and eliminates some standard sources of experimental error.

12 heoretical calculations was confirmed within experimental error.

13 r] units) of the observed variance is due to experimental error.

14 The error of the model is similar to the experimental error.

15 tributed to DNA sequence in fact arises from experimental error.

16 ch matched the experimental 3JCH data within experimental error.

17 ere performed in the absence and presence of experimental error.

18 changes tracked each other identically with experimental error.

19 H degrees and delta G degrees to within the experimental error.

20 ferential scanning calorimetry agreed within experimental error.

21 tural dynamics relaxation time, t(3), within experimental error.

22 ost relatedness from genetic data subject to experimental error.

23 from DTIMS and SLIM were in agreement within experimental error.

24 havior is often dismissed and interpreted as experimental error.

25 es are identical to the original ones within experimental error.

26 mples, the agreement is within the estimated experimental error.

27 the interplay between model nonlinearity and experimental error.

28 rameters based on the literature, with added experimental error.

29 f homozygous loci to minimize the effects of experimental error.

30 nd the two values were found to agree within experimental error.

31 re separation efficiently and robustly to an experimental error.

32 formational equilibria and on propagation of experimental error.

33 active site residues are unperturbed within experimental error.

34 and found to be essentially the same within experimental error.

35 inter-subunit contacts are comparable within experimental error.

36 entirely consistent with one another within experimental error.

37 ulations reproduced experimental data within experimental error.

38 of acetonitrile exchange is accurate within experimental error.

39 ls the predicted mass of a YiiP dimer within experimental error.

40 ppm, and sigma(33) = 229 ppm within +/-3 ppm experimental error.

41 ncomplete data sets and dealing with various experimental errors.

42 on cell growth or binding and handles common experimental errors.

43 tistical significance and may produce type 1 experimental errors.

44 ther time-consuming, laborious, and prone to experimental errors.

45 were either separated by 2-3-fold or within experimental errors.

46 al observability, structural complexity, and experimental errors.

47 ient, and robust against the accumulation of experimental errors.

48 as those of single protein detection within experimental errors.

49 challenging as it is sensitive to even small experimental errors.

50 terms of atomic distances and angles within experimental errors.

51 sufficient to predict tauX* within estimated experimental errors.

52 measured literature values, but gave smaller experimental errors.

53 derestimate nor excessively overestimate the experimental errors.

54 plained by laboratory contamination or other experimental errors.

55 y up to d targets in a sample with at most k experimental errors.

56 experimentally-determined structures within experimental errors.

57 ocess we termed solotransfection, minimizing experimental errors.

58 8.5 for the conformational change is within experimental error (+/-0.5) of the previously reported a

59 mic parameters from DSC measurements (within experimental error) agreed with van't Hoff parameters, c

60 bias and loss of precision that result from experimental error and analysis procedures in real-time

61 n process to reveal insights into sources of experimental error and bias in amplicon-based microbial

62 cRNA-seq data is challenging due to specific experimental error and biases that are unique to this ki

63 alse-positive and -negative levels driven by experimental error and biological variance.

64 Our goal was to unravel the sources of experimental error and develop improved calibration proc

65 investigators and clinical researchers avoid experimental error and ensure high-quality measurements

66 vely, chromatographic methods confer reduced experimental error and improved handling of complex mixt

67 tate higher levels of starting RNA, increase experimental error and potentially introduce bias.

68 ding biological variation among RNA samples, experimental error and variation attributable to phenoty

69 sed to account for and eliminate the various experimental errors and artifacts.

70 The method is robust to experimental errors and does not require the most sophis

71 ance, highly sensitive to sample quality and experimental errors and easily misinterpreted.

72 rofiles fit the experimental data within the experimental error, and traditional optimization methods

73 ons of expression data, where the systematic experimental errors are repeated in many data sets.

74 o be formed, was found to be the same within experimental error as in the MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-boroVal

75 availability of starting materials, and the experimental error associated with the use of distinct c

76 he B-B distances are nearly identical within experimental error at 1.790(5), 1.792(5), and 1.786(6) A

77 t of adequate quality to distinguish, within experimental error, between downhill folding and folding

78 of the D14C variant (E(m) = -427 mV) within experimental error, but the potentials of D14C/C56S and

79 imes are quantitatively accounted for within experimental error by 5-6 distinct conformers comprising

80 wer experiments and minimizes the effects of experimental errors by using information on the entire r

81 This is confirmed, within the experimental error, by the available X-ray structures of

82 d, after a very careful analysis to rule out experimental errors, conclude that more sophisticated th

83 ng either method gave similar results within experimental error, confirming the validity of the two i

84 iation which, together with other sources of experimental error, creates over-dispersed data.

85 (O(2) ) saturation values that were (within experimental error) equal to or above systemic arterial

86 demonstrate for the first time that, within experimental error, every NP collision is successful and

87 nce quantum yields were identical within the experimental error, except for the +3 charged complex wi

88 elease of pigments was negligible within the experimental error for all investigated scenarios, with

89 bond distances are indistinguishable within experimental error for similarly sized trivalent lanthan

90 t identical, barrier width and height within experimental error for the H(*) abstraction both within,

91 brium stability of CRABP I was less than our experimental error (i.e., < or = 1.2 kcal/mol).

92 e independent of pH within the limits of the experimental error, i.e., 9.8 +/- 0.2 MHz.

93 -C bonding, with a coverage that was, within experimental error, identical to that of the CH3-termina

94 This value is, within experimental error, identical to the value of 6.3 derive

95 and folding/unfolding kinetics yield, within experimental error, identical values for the free energy

96 between 25 and 45 degrees C that is, within experimental error, identical.

97 is also consistent with Poisson-distributed experimental error in aliquoting starting copies, a theo

98 .3 at 25.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C is unity within experimental error in all three cases, indicating the ab

99 f two-state ratiometric biosensors given the experimental error in measuring their signal.

100 not all genes of high variability stem from experimental errors in microarray experiments.

101 Here, we discuss sources of experimental errors in NGS and how replicates can be use

102 s both degraded samples (missing values) and experimental errors in producing and/or reading a genoty

103 The experimental errors in the k(a), k(d), and K(D) paramete

104 he proposed docking method is robust against experimental errors in the RDCs and computationally effi

105 These deviations are comparable to experimental errors in these properties.

106 Whilst experimental error, including map resolution and the pre

107 [3Fe-4S]0 clusters are also the same within experimental error, indicating that the protein may be e

108 technologies often unintentionally introduce experimental error into RNA sequencing data.

109 than previously thought, attributable to the experimental error introduced by the electrode seal cond

110 Due to it being time-consuming and prone to experimental errors, it is urgent to develop a low-cost,

111 We find that, within experimental errors, Kolmogorov scaling of the accelerat

112 stributed between several mRNA clusters, but experimental error limits statistical significance.

113 Nevertheless, within the experimental error, nearly the same exchange rates were

114 tion time from one type of site is within an experimental error of 7 s for both silica substrates.

115 They also are within experimental error of a cluster of structures observed i

116 grees, and 47 degrees, respectively, with an experimental error of about +/-5 degrees.

117 The oxidation potential of NM is within experimental error of the oxidation potential measured f

118 led material (kCHOH/kCDOD = 4.88) was within experimental error of the product of the two individual

119 iation is 25 +/- 4 s-1 at 10 mM Mg2+, within experimental error of the rate constant of 17 +/- 5 s-1

120 en and (18)O isotope effects that are within experimental error of the wild-type enzyme and that the

121 fected by the superclamp mutation within the experimental error of these experiments.

122 ters in this new predictive model are within experimental error of those of the previous models, sugg

123 ys nucleophile has been removed, were within experimental error of those with the native enzyme, indi

124 rates than normal library phage, most within experimental error of wild-type M13 propagation, suggest

125 nce approximately 0.13 A shorter (but within experimental error) of the experimental value found in t

126 e enhancement of k(0) is independent, within experimental error, of which of the two PNA strands cont

127 that examine the effect of assay design and experimental error on the ability to accurately determin

128 The effect of experimental error on the deduced orientational distribu

129 the intuitive understanding of the effect of experimental error on the qualitative accuracy of the in

130 +/-400 cal/mol bandwidth (expected from the experimental error), one can conclude that the system is

131 nately, such links can also be the result of experimental error or artifacts.

132 beads during interactions was linear within experimental error over the physiological range of force

133 5) from water into membranes was zero within experimental error over the temperature range of 5 degre

134 he P-A difference is sufficiently small that experimental error prevents accurate assessment of F.

135 its feasibility, anticipate the most likely experimental errors, quantify their potential impact, an

136 the noisy storage model, accounting for all experimental error rates and finite size effects.

137 The model accurately reproduces experimental error rates and predicts kinetic parameters

138 s of nucleotides in a human genome, even low experimental error rates yield many errors in variant ca

139 ed from these analyses were identical within experimental error regardless of whether the decays were

140 btained for nucleation and for growth within experimental error, regardless of which of six physical

141 eaction networks due to branches, cycles and experimental errors results in a large number of combina

142 Non-biological experimental error routinely occurs in microarray data c

143 dentical with the wild-type structure within experimental error, significant differences in the confo

144 ction, measurement strategy and dealing with experimental error sources.

145 Most of these values were found to be within experimental error, suggesting that previous approximati

146 at 25 and 42 degrees C are identical within experimental error, suggesting that the conformation of

147 s of sites whose time constants agree within experimental error, suggesting that the strong adsorptio

148 esent a serious problem if the occurrence of experimental errors surreptitiously affects the reliabil

149 5 degrees C) and found to be the same within experimental error (t(1/2) = 20.5 h).

150 d cytidine were found to be identical within experimental error (t1/2 approximately 20 years, 37 degr

151 determined mass of 20 791 Da matched within experimental error that predicted by the sequence of the

152 Within experimental error, the activation volumes and equilibri

153 Within experimental error, the covalent complex that blocks the

154 - 0.4) x 10(10) M(-1) s(-1) that was, within experimental error, the same as that measured when Br(*)

155 While most of the differences were within experimental error, the switch linker between the variab

156 To within the experimental errors, the measured efficiency is consiste

157 Key features are the representation of experimental errors, the normalization of measurement un

158 With experimental errors, the suppressed relaxation dispersio

159 d phenomenon arises: due to computational or experimental error there is a great probability that con

160 Within experimental error these guanosine derivatives exhibit t

161 Within the experimental errors, these mole fractions agree with the

162 use of a nonaqueous matrix solution allowed experimental error to be minimized to within 1% RSD.

163 an observed for SeCN(-) but identical within experimental error to the complete structural randomizat

164 that for changes corresponding to the actual experimental error to which these parameters have been d

165 was shown to be chemically identical within experimental errors to NIST SRM 2779, demonstrating that

166 e pK(a) from 9.29 to 7.46 (close, and within experimental error, to that for the wild type).

167 s are identical in kind and quantity, within experimental error, to those observed in the decay of al

168 In these measurements the experimental errors, up to the 50% phosphorylation state

169 ures of the heme groups are described within experimental error, using the set composed of only the l

170 tal structures and to minimize the effect of experimental errors, we examined only CASP14 target prot

171 Further, we use camera feedback to reduce experimental errors, we remove optical vortices and inve

172 mutants in the set, no changes greater than experimental error were found in the corresponding equil

173 he chimeric particle remain unchanged within experimental error when compared to the wild-type alpha3

174 ientation of the domains remained within EPR experimental errors when the restraints were later remov

175 inding to both promoters is identical within experimental error while the temperature dependence diff

176 shows the extent to which a small amount of experimental error will vitiate the performance of such

177 d the concentration determined agreed within experimental error with the concentration determined by

178 a two-photon excitation source agree, within experimental error with the theoretical PCHs calculated

179 sperse latex nanoparticles agreed within the experimental error with those measured by using scanning

180 finities of TAM(HOPO)(2) ligands were within experimental error, with TAM(o-phen-1,2-HOPO)(2) exhibit

181 e quantum yields that were invariant, within experimental error, with the heavy atom.