ライフサイエンスコーパス: experimenter

1 ctually built to prespecified designs by the experimenter.

2 received placebo unbeknownst to them and the experimenter.

3 can be explained by ostensive cues from the experimenter.

4 ick results with minimal investment from the experimenter.

5 r discrimination task were controlled by the experimenter.

6 eward distribution in exchanges with a human experimenter.

7 egy of selecting the box visited last by the experimenter.

8 ions made by either the animal itself or the experimenter.

9 ed by a trustworthy, friendly and empathetic experimenter.

10 ing, and is ergonomically unfavorable to the experimenter.

11 ered in a pattern determined entirely by the experimenter.

12 after demonstration of their function by an experimenter.

13 red to standardised conditions with only one experimenter.

14 and viewing duration were controlled by the experimenter.

15 rope, and then pass the stick forward to an experimenter.

16 inducing response variability unknown to the experimenter.

17 attentional state, which are unknown to the experimenter.

18 or observed the same actions performed by an experimenter.

19 s as a methodological device employed by the experimenter.

20 ing observation of precision grip by a human experimenter.

21 own free choice, or following orders of the experimenter.

22 uring one-to-one social interactions with an experimenter.

23 patients themselves, their families, and the experimenters.

24 some of the theoretical assumptions made by experimenters.

25 d will invite increased 'species hopping' by experimenters.

26 e tasks which are prone to variation between experimenters.

27 Egyptian fruit bats in the presence of human experimenters.

28 d stress susceptibility when handled by male experimenters.

29 the presence, movement and identity of human experimenters.

30 took place several years apart by different experimenters.

31 intensities that were imperceptible to human experimenters.

32 s were compared with those obtained by human experimenters.

33 to 82.4+/-0.7 % over 77.1+/-0.9 % from human experimenters.

34 ion, with yields comparable to skilled human experimenters.

35 Among cigarette experimenters (1 puff), ever e-cigarette use was associa

36 three different purposes: (1) to imitate the experimenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experi

37 This approach offers experimenters a powerful method for uncovering the tempo

38 eudo-passive (subject's hand is moved by the experimenter across a stationary surface).

39 llowing protein dosage to be adjusted by the experimenter across the range of cellular protein abunda

40 Previous studies have shown that when an experimenter actively controls what an individual sees t

41 Hormonal studies using an experimenter-administered cocaine binge model and an esc

42 failed to demonstrate any effects of either experimenter-administered cocaine or food self-administr

43 onounced after self-administered rather than experimenter-administered cocaine, a pattern that was no

44 on of intake of a taste cue when paired with experimenter-administered morphine or cocaine using our

45 or chronic effects on short-term memory, but experimenter administration of WIN in adolescence, at do

46 We show that the sex of human experimenters affects mouse behaviors and responses foll

47 cats had a higher propensity to approach the experimenter after a slow blink interaction than when th

48 However, the experimenter also accidentally dropped the marker on top

49 tic; the methodological approach used by the experimenter and claims about the nature of human behavi

50 tly dreaming) can perceive questions from an experimenter and provide answers using electrophysiologi

51 The subjects were screened from the experimenter and seated in a sound-isolated room in a lo

52 ative behaviour such as eye contact with the experimenter and social smile in response to the social

53 It requires no contact between a human experimenter and tested animals, overcoming the confound

54 that are usually chosen qualitatively by the experimenter and thus vary significantly across studies.

55 imenters, preference for the scent of female experimenters and increased stress susceptibility when h

56 Because these small biases are difficult for experimenters and readers to notice, large experiments d

57 nd observed across laboratories with various experimenters and setups.

58 essed as a single correct decision shared by experimenters and subjects that satisfies internal coher

59 phosgene has drawn broad attention from both experimenters and theoreticians as a prime example of ra

60 the physical presence of female but not male experimenters and was independent of gaze direction and

61 imenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experimenter, and (3) to simply perform the movement.

62 ory evidence is controlled explicitly by the experimenter, and known precisely by the analyst, to cha

63 ined to respond to pointing cues given by an experimenter, and then tested on their ability to locate

64 from the faces of their conspecifics, human experimenters, and natural predators.

65 r small meals, had constant interaction with experimenters, and stayed in an environment with constan

66 Moreover, comparison of the effects of experimenter-applied stressors and psychosocial stressor

67 the rate of non-indicative gestures when the experimenter approaches the location of the hidden food.

68 invasive brain stimulation and to inform the experimenter as well as the participant if a targeted br

69 ats offered by potentially-threatening human experimenters as adults.

70 Experimenters ask questions both conceptual and numerica

71 Experimenters ask questions both conceptual and numerica

72 Critically, rather than experimenter-assigned labels, we used observers' own rep

73 ichotomized as correct or incorrect based on experimenter-assigned labels.

74 However, experimenters assume an ideal observer model, which capt

75 nter-generated food seeking-placement by the experimenter at the food site), and context (spatial cue

76 e sounds to attract the attention of a human experimenter (attention-getting sounds) differs in grey

77 iple factors some of which can be set by the experimenter based on pilot/preliminary data.

78 Exposure to the scent of male experimenters before ketamine administration activated C

79 These experiments have often relied on the experimenter being able to randomly modulate mechanisms

80 within an attentional condition, but despite experimenters' best efforts, attention likely varies fro

81 Besides being time-consuming and prone to experimenter bias, it is not suitable for studying DNA r

82 tion of the analysis cost and by eliminating experimenter bias.

83 ctual tumor volume and highly susceptible to experimenter bias.

84 ing data thus reducing labour investment and experimenter bias.

85 The task was automated to minimize experimenter bias.

86 dardization, and emphasis on minimization of experimenter bias.

87 of touch was always given by the same female experimenter blind to condition type.

88 ctively controls what an individual sees the experimenter can affect simple decisions with alternativ

89 The inability to blind the experimenter can be circumvented by having an independen

90 y knows when individuals move their eyes the experimenter can change complex moral decisions.

91 pe of setup is also advantageous in that the experimenter can change the sample at any point (tempera

92 data does not give satisfactory results, the experimenter can draw no conclusions regarding the exist

93 refore unclear how well a model chosen by an experimenter can relate neural activity to experimental

94 Using this system, a single computer and experimenter can track diverse behaviors from up to 60 i

95 Experimenters can programmably select 384 recording chan

96 ically studied under conditions in which the experimenter cannot control the composition of the membr

97 mice and rats: health considerations (of the experimenter); choice of species, age, strain and sex; h

98 eption of response delay, appear to be under experimenter control.

99 of the protective effect of both traditional experimenter-controlled and newer operant social-interac

100 shed sensory role and highlight the power of experimenter-controlled changes in temporal strategy, co

101 manipulations of cellular activity following experimenter-controlled delivery of a DREADD-specific li

102 typically focuses on regression models, with experimenter-controlled features as predictors and spike

103 only when elevated intracellular Ca(2+) and experimenter-controlled illumination coincide.

104 isms of the protective effect of traditional experimenter-controlled social interaction procedures on

105 stant VT; (2) subject-controlled VT; and (3) experimenter-controlled VT.

106 An experimenter controls procedure, observes behavior, but

107 In Conception 1, the experimenter controls production rates via exogenous ind

108 ate room within hearing range, and owner and experimenter conversing in the same room as the parrot b

109 the baboons were insensitive to whether the experimenter could actually perceive the food item, and

110 xamples to current thinking clearly show how experimenters could adequately control for the constrain

111 By estimating factors from data, experimenters could test network-inspired hypotheses.

112 ement of the rat at the chocolate site by an experimenter) cues.

113 engage numerous processes and behaviors; (2) experimenter decisions about procedure influence the pro

114 ied the image pairs in accordance with the 5 experimenter-defined categories under conditions of nond

115 sensory cues were associated with arbitrary experimenter-defined categories were well described by m

116 ws can learn to categorise line lengths into experimenter-defined categories.

117 of FC2 neurons induces flies to orient along experimenter-defined directions as they walk forward.

118 ts were due to an impairment in learning the experimenter-defined rule and in applying a learned rule

119 on were due to an impairment in learning the experimenter-defined rule and not in applying a learned

120 signs that compare responses to objects from experimenter-defined stimulus conditions, potentially li

121 sentations that often jumped directly to the experimenter-defined target location.

122 toy, or playing a commercial game) while an experimenter delivered joint attention prompts.

123 nd dopamine (DA) overflow following repeated experimenter-delivered cocaine injections, are often use

124 In animals that could learn ICS, experimenter-delivered stimulation always elicited dopam

125 howed increased 50-kHz USVs before receiving experimenter-delivered ventral tegmental area (VTA) and

126 ombine randomized control with an absence of experimenter demand effects.

127 earch using SOR tasks, especially in the way experimenters design, analyse and interpret object recog

128 depended on which person, the subject or the experimenter, determined the amount of food on the plate

129 wed them to be delivered sequentially and at experimenter-determined times.

130 tantia nigra, in a blind design in which the experimenter did not know the pretreatment regime.

131 mization) and double-blinded so patients and experimenters did not know which control configuration w

132 ural activity to external variables that the experimenter directly observed and manipulated, many of

133 to each other is often more potent than what experimenters do to them.

134 ged in 115 spontaneous conversations with an experimenter during fMRI scanning.

135 ged in accurate trade behavior as long as an experimenter enforced the structure of the interaction;

136 was integrated within our method to help the experimenter evaluate the significance of a symmetry-con

137 applied to resolved AC harmonics and rely on experimenter experience to assist in experiment-theory c

138 Modifications of experimenter eye contact influenced participants' eye mo

139 Experimenter eye-contact was either direct or averted.

140 To realise a research project, experimenters face conflicting design and implementation

141 its were associated with less looking at the experimenter for video interactions only.

142 e and optimize the first fully-automated and experimenter-free touchscreen cognitive testing system f

143 ment affected young chimpanzees' choice of 2 experimenters from whom to request food.

144 rvers that prerecorded video sequences of an experimenter gazing left or right were a live video link

145 rary stories, technical expository text, and experimenter-generated "textoids." Recent psychological

146 ng along a runway encountering chocolate) or experimenter-generated (placement of the rat at the choc

147 ted food seeking-running to the food site-or experimenter-generated food seeking-placement by the exp

148 n be explained by naturally occurring and/or experimenter-generated pressure differences.

149 replenished at the self-generated-but not at experimenter-generated-locations.

150 Why do experimenters give subjects short breaks in long behavio

151 s) were investigated as to whether they used experimenter-given cues when responding to object-choice

152 subject species were able to use all of the experimenter-given cues, in contrast to previous reports

153 Two methods assessed the use of experimenter-given directional cues by a New World monke

154 the absence of P11 expression in PA14 in the experimenters' growth conditions.

155 species preferentially selected the box the experimenter had marked intentionally (especially during

156 mmunication task, where participants and the experimenter had to guess, in turn, a word known by the

157 with littermates, novel test conditions, or experimenter handling.

158 assay for social touch in mice, in which the experimenter has complete control to elicit highly stere

159 ues developed in other contexts, as here the experimenter has precise control only over the rotation

160 long trials with no explicit instructions or experimenter help.

161 often uses simplified tasks in which (adult) experimenters help solve the segmentation problem for in

162 female and a young adult male watched as an experimenter hid a miniature model food in 1 of 4 sites

163 ed geometric forms (lexigrams) watched as an experimenter hid an object in the woods outside her outd

164 nclosure for a hidden item after watching an experimenter hide a miniature item in the analogous loca

165 Here parrots watched an experimenter hide two equally desirable foods under two

166 known as "Einstein from noise," in which the experimenter honestly believes they have recorded images

167 ibly used the tokens to obtain foods from an experimenter; however, they did not spontaneously trade

168 dies, therefore, the animals were freed from experimenter-imposed "categories" that typify forced cho

169 Animals then began a 1 month period of experimenter-imposed abstinence to induce heightened dru

170 m those recruited during reinstatement after experimenter-imposed abstinence, or abstinence due to ex

171 self-administration, and again after 30 d of experimenter-imposed abstinence.

172 entanyl relapse, and these studies have used experimenter-imposed extinction or forced abstinence pro

173 from hormone-induced appetite suppression or experimenter-imposed food restriction, is sufficient to

174 ne craving increases after prolonged forced (experimenter-imposed) abstinence from the drug (incubati

175 of experimental conditions by using multiple experimenters improves the reproducibility of research f

176 uctance response when greeting an unfamiliar experimenter in comparison with the control group.

177 k with/without sexist comments from an actor-experimenter in sexism/control conditions.

178 affiliative expression) performed by a human experimenter in their first week of life.

179 Experimenters in 10 laboratories repeatedly targeted Neu

180 o our expectation, the inclusion of multiple experimenters in the heterogenised design did not improv

181 interacted with their infants and with adult experimenters in their native language.

182 participants, this index was able to detect experimenter-induced biases in self-report surveys in a

183 subjects and ventilator-dependent patients, experimenter-induced increases in ventilator tidal volum

184 Here, we show that pairing BTP induced by experimenter-induced movement of the tumor-bearing hindl

185 t being undertaken with the populations that experimenters injure.

186 s entirely unsupervised and requires minimal experimenter input.

187 exposure to novel environments and minimizes experimenter interaction, significantly reducing two of

188 stems are head mounted, run for days without experimenter intervention, and can record and stimulate

189 nal studies of feeding behavior with minimal experimenter intervention.

190 n complete multiple sessions per day without experimenter involvement.

191 tudy autobiographical memory, which prevents experimenter knowledge of what information is being retr

192 nd neurally, observer reports (compared with experimenter labels) explained more variance in activity

193 it smoking among current smokers, and, among experimenters, lower odds of abstinence from conventiona

194 of increasing "silo-ing" of experiments (and experimenters)-many investigators produce and consume re

195 ited box, so that during any given trial the experimenter marked 2 boxes, 1 intentionally and 1 accid

196 Air hunger relief was similar when the experimenter mimicked these VT changes.

197 The experimenter moved the blindfolded participant's left in

198 To achieve this aim, experimenters must harness one challenge faced by all ne

199 Interestingly, however, neither experimenter- nor self-administered chronic cocaine admi

200 chnological advances including social media, experimenters now target and affect whole societies, rel

201 co-orient, visual co-orienting with a human experimenter occurred at a low frequency to distal objec

202 lar events leading to LTP and LTD are known, experimenters often report problems in using standard in

203 Experimenters often wish to relate changes in amyloid fo

204 ents the gorillas selected between two human experimenters, one who could see them and one who could

205 -old performed, either in the presence of an experimenter or alone, an AX-CPT, a task assessing react

206 ing areas of interest that are chosen by the experimenter or other human observers.

207 ent of gaze direction and whether the female experimenter or the subject was moving.

208 aracterized their stress responses to either experimenter- or self-imposed stressors.

209 In two experiments, an experimenter ordered a volunteer to make a key-press act

210 the ARM enables remote testing of mice with experimenters outside the testing room.

211 rception) or when the legs were moved by the experimenter (passive perception).

212 Here we show that if an experimenter passively knows when individuals move their

213 rror neurons (MNs) while monkeys observed an experimenter performing (Action condition) or withholdin

214 acaque PMv while the monkey was observing an experimenter performing a grasping action and orienting

215 cial engagement: one group of infants saw an experimenter performing actions in consecutive trials an

216 med a Go/No-Go grasping task and observed an experimenter performing it.

217 During testing, the experimenter placed a marker on top of the baited box to

218 es (Pan troglodytes) had a direct view of an experimenter placing a food item beneath one of several

219 ts in an incongruent condition, in which the experimenter pointed to or gazed at an unbaited containe

220 lly employ stimulus conditions chosen by the experimenter, potentially obscuring the contribution of

221 Mice showed aversion to the scent of male experimenters, preference for the scent of female experi

222 dren were overall negatively affected by the experimenter presence in terms of latencies but not of a

223 ly when an experimenter was not present, and experimenter presence led to significant sex-dependent d

224 e CS-UCS pairing rate on brain activity, the experimenters presented continuously, intermittently, an

225 sure of mice and rats to male but not female experimenters produces pain inhibition.

226 In a second experiment, this time where an experimenter provided the slow blink stimulus, cats had

227 when the selected response was guided by the experimenter rather than the participant.

228 ely compare candidate objects created by the experimenters, rather than generating their own ideas.

229 me (which can be capped at 15 min) until the experimenter returns so that they can receive another ma

230 d quantum communication schemes depend on an experimenter's ability to retain the coherent properties

231 their own ability to solve the task and the experimenter's ability to solve the task, in light of ac

232 The success of these efforts relies on the experimenter's ability to target arbitrarily small subse

233 cue-giver, and the impact of a change in the experimenter's attentional state during cue presentation

234 Elephants gestured most when both the experimenter's body and face were oriented towards them,

235 to highlight key factors that influence the experimenter's choice of the best strategy for multigene

236 subtle, suggesting that they understood the experimenter's communicative intent.

237 of the testing environment are not under the experimenter's control.

238 video, participants frequently looked at the experimenter's face, and they did this more often when b

239 rmance only on initial probe trials when the experimenter's gaze was not directed at the baited cup.

240 ll make spontaneous inferences about a human experimenter's goal by attending to the environmental co

241 ntation as well as during the observation of experimenter's goal-directed acts (canonical-mirror neur

242 and 3, a model could remove a grape from the experimenter's hand while the witness watched.

243 cipants' attention is diverted away from the experimenter's hypothesis, rather than the highly reflec

244 that subjects understood something about the experimenter's intentions.

245 o elaborates her gestures in relation to the experimenter's pointing, which enables her to find food

246 s successfully interpreted pointing when the experimenter's proximity to the hiding place was varied

247 But all studies to date are limited by the experimenter's selected stimuli, which are generally pho

248 (Action MNs), but one-third also encoded the experimenter's withheld action (Inaction MNs).

249 actors such as the presence of an unfamiliar experimenter seem to modulate cognitive control performa

250 not only their understanding of what a human experimenter sees, but also what information they use to

251 In this approach, experimenters select animal models based on experimental

252 Experimenter sex can thus affect apparent baseline respo

253 te a hypothesis-driven approach in which the experimenter specifies a hierarchy of time-continuous re

254 f 15 fast-food meals that were chosen by the experimenter (study 2) in a randomized, controlled trial

255 resentation of evidence is controlled by the experimenter, suggesting that the way in which confirmat

256 onditions were used in different phases: the experimenter tapping on the correct object, gazing plus

257 -olds are given a marshmallow and told by an experimenter that they can eat it immediately or wait fo

258 performed the actions, taking turns with the experimenter (the Interleaved condition).

259 Among experimenters, the percentage of students who said they

260 noncanonical amino acids via GCE allows the experimenter to ask questions inaccessible to traditiona

261 This allows the experimenter to compute posterior probabilities of diffe

262 re particularly useful because they allow an experimenter to control the timing and levels of gene ex

263 lectrical microstimulation, which allows the experimenter to manipulate the activity of small groups

264 nerated movement) than when they expected an experimenter to move their own hand (externally generate

265 ying perception with VR is that it allows an experimenter to probe perceptual processing in a more na

266 es in plant extracts, the method allowed the experimenter to rapidly check the various steps involved

267 lyze gene expression that often restrict the experimenter to studying only a few mRNA species, wherea

268 valuated further monetary transfers from the experimenter to themselves and to the other participant,

269 uction of the optical compartment allows the experimenter to vary the optical pathlength using specia

270 It is impossible to blind the experimenter to which treatment is active, it is difficu

271 d key analysis tools, making it possible for experimenters to address long-standing questions regardi

272 biological datasets, and it serves to direct experimenters to areas of low data coverage or with high

273 de a convenient tool for neuroscientists and experimenters to complete experimental datasets, explore

274 munoprecipitation (competition ChIP) enables experimenters to measure protein-DNA dynamics at a singl

275 Such 'all-optical' techniques enable experimenters to probe the effects of functionally defin

276 nal pipeline available on GitHub that allows experimenters to seamlessly generate SPRITE interaction

277 antitative contributions of the sex of human experimenters to study outcomes in rodents may improve r

278 We advise experimenters to use a new protocol, a modified optical

279 ciability has directed the attention of many experimenters toward the possible biological correlates

280 st is very cheap to run and requires minimal experimenter training, yet seems sensitive to a variety

281 associated with pain rating, discrimination, experimenter trust and extranociceptive aspects of pain

282 In experiment 2, the experimenter used supportive questioning to help keep pa

283 We evaluated a computer-controlled virtual experimenter (VEx) to avoid these issues.

284 nd that mice habituated more quickly when an experimenter was not present, and experimenter presence

285 at the variation introduced by the different experimenters was not as high as the variation introduce

286 As experimenters, we often assume that subjects represent t

287 the risk of bias (for example, ensuring that experimenters were naive to the conditions and reporting

288 Experimenters were unable to train demonstrator bees to

289 Short-term AAS "experimenters" were also largely indistinguishable from

290 keys selectively retrieved the grape from an experimenter who was incapable of seeing the grape rathe

291 incapable of seeing the grape rather than an experimenter who was visually aware.

292 , or the GAL4-UAS system, which provides the experimenter with spatial control over transgene express

293 cols described can be easily performed by an experimenter with stem cell culture experience and take

294 the heat-shock promoter, which provides the experimenter with temporal control over transgene induct

295 ions from retina to midbrain tectum provides experimenters with a good model for assessing the functi

296 Among experimenters with conventional cigarettes, ever use of

297 This protocol, which is readily adoptable by experimenters with previous training and experience in m

298 recision grip of an object carried out by an experimenter, with somewhat fewer showing modulation dur

299 The experimenter wore mirrored goggles that observers believ

300 atistical challenges, in particular when the experimenter would like to test hypotheses about paramet