ライフサイエンスコーパス: extravascular lung water

1 ased alveolar permeability and contralateral extravascular lung water.

2 vimetric method and by direct measurement of extravascular lung water.

3 ting a 169 +/- 166 mL increase in nonindexed extravascular lung water.

4 was performed to record the value of indexed extravascular lung water.

5 iac index, pulmonary blood volume index, and extravascular lung water.

6 ema, which can be assessed by measurement of extravascular lung water.

7 tual extravascular lung water, and predicted extravascular lung water.

8 tment with intravenous beta-agonists reduces extravascular lung water.

9 erval, 0.65-0.94) was larger than for actual extravascular lung water (0.72; confidence interval, 0.5

10 hough the area under the curve for predicted extravascular lung water (0.8; confidence interval, 0.65

11 acid versus hydrochloric acid showed higher extravascular lung water (1,424 +/- 419 vs. 574 +/- 195

12 multiple regression model, the ratio between extravascular lung water and end-expiratory lung volume

13 for lung edema and has been shown to reduce extravascular lung water and improve lung function in mo

14 Recruitment maneuvers reduced extravascular lung water and lung endothelial injury as

15 Extravascular lung water and other markers of lung injur

16 drome, to determine the relationship between extravascular lung water and other markers of lung injur

17 respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) reduced extravascular lung water and plateau airway pressure.

18 lial and epithelial permeability to protein, extravascular lung water, and airway tone.

19 , PaO2/Fio2 ratio, oxygenation index, actual extravascular lung water, and predicted extravascular lu

20 iple logistic regression analysis, predicted extravascular lung water but not actual extravascular lu

21 The change in extravascular lung water correlated to baseline cardiac

22 l showed a pattern consistent with increased extravascular lung water (diffuse, bilateral, symmetrica

23 predicted or actual body weight for indexing extravascular lung water does not lead to independence o

24 In addition, the increase in extravascular lung water during VILI development contrib

25 and subsequently every 6 hours, we recorded extravascular lung water, end-expiratory lung volume, lu

26 nd we quantified lung injury in terms of the extravascular lung water (EVLW) content, filtration coef

27 Measurements of extravascular lung water (EVLW) correlate to the degree

28 hypothesized that it could be improved using extravascular lung water (EVLWi) and plasma biomarkers o

29 o abrogate significantly the accumulation of extravascular lung water evoked by 6-hour exposure to en

30 ody weight, improves the predictive value of extravascular lung water for survival and correlation wi

31 atio were lower in patients with a change in extravascular lung water >/= 10% than in patients with a

32 A change in extravascular lung water >/= 10% was predicted by baseli

33 Predictive values for change in extravascular lung water >/= 10% were evaluated.

34 lly contributed to prediction of a change in extravascular lung water >/= 10%, independent of the pre

35 ung water <10% and patients with a change in extravascular lung water >/= 10%.

36 Traditionally, extravascular lung water has been indexed to actual body

37 lowing endotoxin-induced lung injury reduced extravascular lung water, improved lung endothelial barr

38 al or adult lung, or for the accumulation of extravascular lung water in the injured lung.

39 the low tidal volume group, as was decreased extravascular lung water in the uninstilled lung in the

40 Extravascular lung water increase during fluid loading i

41 Extravascular lung water increased in 17 of 22 liberally

42 Extravascular lung water increased to only 180 +/- 30 mi

43 Extravascular lung water increased with positive periope

44 was 70% in patients with a maximum value of extravascular lung water index >21 mL/kg and 43% in the

45 A maximum value of extravascular lung water index >21 mL/kg predicted day-2

46 distress syndrome episode (maximum value of extravascular lung water index and maximum value of pulm

47 ght, p < 0.001 [t-test] for maximum value of extravascular lung water index and median [interquartile

48 rome might be associated with an increase in extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular pe

49 The maximum values of extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular pe

50 Extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular pe

51 Extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular pe

52 We tested whether extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular pe

53 There was no difference in extravascular lung water index between those who progres

54 An extravascular lung water index cutoff value on day 1 of

55 Extravascular lung water index had a moderate sensitivit

56 Elevated extravascular lung water index is a feature of early acu

57 The mean extravascular lung water index on day 1 for patients who

58 In multivariate analyses, maximum value of extravascular lung water index or maximum value of pulmo

59 Furthermore, extravascular lung water index predicts progression to a

60 Global end-diastolic index, extravascular lung water index, and stroke volume index

61 f cardiac index, global end-diastolic index, extravascular lung water index, and stroke volume index,

62 Extravascular lung water index, dead space fraction, PaO

63 We tested whether the changes in extravascular lung water indexed for ideal body weight c

64 An increase in extravascular lung water indexed for ideal body weight g

65 During spontaneous breathing trial, extravascular lung water indexed for ideal body weight i

66 taneous breathing trial-induced increases in extravascular lung water indexed for ideal body weight,

67 nary edema were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.99) for extravascular lung water indexed for ideal body weight,

68 ded pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, the extravascular lung water indexed for ideal body weight,

69 Associations between extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

70 50 eligible patients, 132 patients (88%) had extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

71 Peak values for extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

72 Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

73 Perioperative extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

74 We assessed the accuracy of peak extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

75 Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

76 Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

77 Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

78 We aimed to evaluate whether extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weigh

79 Pulmonary vascular permeability and extravascular lung water indexes were significantly lowe

80 Early measurement of predicted extravascular lung water is a better predictor than actu

81 Increased extravascular lung water is a feature of early acute res

82 Extravascular lung water is a quantitative marker of the

83 Increasing extravascular lung water is further reflected by a decre

84 e compared between patients with a change in extravascular lung water <10% and patients with a change

85 er >/= 10% than in patients with a change in extravascular lung water <10%.

86 ding upper limits for fluid resuscitation of extravascular lung water (<10 mL/kg) and global end-dias

87 It is largely unknown why extravascular lung water may increase during fluid loadi

88 Extravascular lung water may prove valuable for diagnosi

89 Here, we tested the prognostic value of extravascular lung water measured by a simple, well vali

90 We explored extravascular lung water measured by single-indicator tr

91 The primary endpoint was extravascular lung water measured by thermodilution (PiC

92 Extravascular lung water (measured with radiolabeled ery

93 Extravascular lung water measurement may be valuable for

94 Accurate extravascular lung water measurements were obtained afte

95 to predicted body weight, females had a mean extravascular lung water of 9.1 (SD=3.1, range: 5-23) mL

96 tion, intrapulmonary shunting, and increased extravascular lung water (p < .05 compared with baseline

97 ng strain (p < 0.001; adjusted R2, 0.18) and extravascular lung water (p < 0.001; adjusted R2, 0.11).

98 ve analysis indicated that EVLWp, Vd/Vt, and extravascular lung water (p = .0005, .009, and .013, res

99 To determine whether extravascular lung water predicts survival in patients w

100 o detect small short-term changes of indexed extravascular lung water secondary to bronchoalveolar la

101 iately after bronchoalveolar lavage, indexed extravascular lung water significantly increased from 12

102 ol, providing semiquantitative assessment of extravascular lung water through B-lines.

103 Our data suggest that indexing extravascular lung water to height is superior to weight

104 lung water is a better predictor than actual extravascular lung water to identify patients at risk fo

105 Indexing extravascular lung water to predicted body weight, inste

106 A baseline predicted extravascular lung water value of 16 mL/kg predicted int

107 Extravascular lung water values were significantly highe

108 ribe and assess the clinical significance of extravascular lung water variations after pulmonary enda

109 cted extravascular lung water but not actual extravascular lung water was a predictor of mortality wi

110 Extravascular lung water was indexed to predicted body w

111 Extravascular lung water was measured using the PiCCO sy

112 bronchoalveolar lavage, the value of indexed extravascular lung water was significantly different fro

113 s of lung injury, and to examine if indexing extravascular lung water with predicted body weight (EVL