コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 y of this process under the conditions of an eye bank.
2 e day of surgery, as determined by the local eye bank.
3 ut of these, 68 (45.3%) were reported to the Eye Bank.
4 ocular disease were procured from the local eye bank.
5 ee of ocular disease procured from the local eye bank.
6 States, with donor corneas provided by 23 US eye banks.
7 States, with donor corneas provided by 23 US eye banks.
8 cured from 283,530 corneas and stored in 742 eye banks.
9 e setting of minimum donor cell densities by eye banks.
10 s of normal human corneas were obtained from eye banks.
11 d tests (San Leandro, CA) were obtained from eye banks.
12 ipated, with donor corneas provided by 23 US eye banks.
13 ional reports on corneal transplantation and eye banking.
14 applications in corneal transplantation and eye banking.
17 been received from the Central Florida Lions Eye Bank and stored in preservation medium (Optisol-GS;
18 52 to 75 years of age were obtained from an eye bank and were usually cut in quarters to increase sa
19 survival to 3 months, the ASM will optimize eye banking and open up new perspectives in experimental
21 ctive nature, dataset obtained from a single eye bank, and medical history documentation completed by
23 smission by corneal transplantation, and the Eye Bank Association of America has provided guidance.
25 retrospective review of recoveries at a U.S. eye bank between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023.
31 ssible to obtain pre-symptomatic tissue from eye bank donors to probe how gene expression changes pre
32 g the < 12-hour PMI criterion arrived at the eye bank during current research staffing hours (8 AM-4
33 ing prestripped tissues prepared by a single eye bank during the period September 17, 2013 to July 1,
36 between the prevalence of SCD in UM eyes and eye bank eyes (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.22-1.10)
39 g System (MGS) is a method to evaluate human eye bank eyes and determine the level of age-related mac
40 des a methodology to grade donor tissue from eye bank eyes to correspond to the AREDS classification
44 ery and epithelia from cataractous lenses of eye bank eyes were compared with epithelia from noncatar
51 ty of Wisconsin, including 1985 UM eyes, 517 eye bank eyes, and 155 enucleated glaucomatous eyes.
52 tion was seen in 17 (0.9%) UM eyes, 9 (1.7%) eye bank eyes, and 2 (1.3%) enucleated glaucomatous eyes
54 mine the ability of a new grading system for eye bank eyes, the Minnesota Grading System (MGS), to di
56 information was obtained from the SightLife Eye Bank for donors from June 1, 2012, to June 30, 2015.
57 information was obtained from the SightLife Eye Bank for donors from June 1, 2012, to June 30, 2015.
58 tional study was obtained from the CorneaGen eye bank for donors from June 1, 2012, to June 30, 2016.
61 's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), eye banks have risen to the challenge of preparing tissu
64 Services, St Louis, Missouri; the Iowa Lions Eye Bank, Iowa City; and the Utah Lions Eye Bank, Salt L
65 Following the report of death, the LIONS Eye Bank is informed and the contraindications of cornea
66 the use of donor corneas supplied by foreign eye banks is the effect of the increased donor death-to-
73 hermore, obtaining donor corneal tissues and eye banking, particularly in the developing countries wh
77 splantation, so involvement of clinicians in eye-banking practices and advocacy for pursuing meaningf
83 of the preoperative value determined at the eye bank (range, 2500-2700 cells/mm(2)) was 9.9+/-2.1% (
84 ions Eye Bank, Iowa City; and the Utah Lions Eye Bank, Salt Lake City) and selected were those consid
85 initial guidelines and benchmark values for eye banks seeking to establish and maintain DMEK program
92 lyzed within the time constraints of current eye bank tissue processing, whereas analysis of RPE nece
95 rs 12 to 75 years of age were assigned by 43 eye banks to participants without respect to recipient f
97 Donor materials were prepared at a single eye bank using a standardized technique, which subsequen
98 ECD decreased significantly (P < .001) from eye bank values to 1,818 +/- 362, 1,675 +/- 372, and 1,5
99 complications among 50 donor, recipient, and eye bank variables and restricted mean survival time thr
101 or eyes (108 pairs) from the Minnesota Lions Eye Bank were cut circumferentially at the pars plana to
102 Paired human corneas (nine donors) from an eye bank were used as control; the other corneas were tr