コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ary care (internal medicine, pediatrics, and family practice).
2 lycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in family practice.
3 on issues that are of ongoing importance to family practice.
4 subjects were recruited from a single urban family practice.
5 ) for general surgery to 12.1% ($3746.9) for family practice.
6 s, and data on characteristics of individual family practices.
7 ed experts in neurology (9), cardiology (2), family practice (1), nursing (1), physician assistant pr
8 nty than the 10th-percentile county (eg, for family practice: 10th percentile HHI = 1023 and 90th per
9 e, including 32608 physicians who identified family practice, 129 general practice, 21 family practic
11 Most physicians had a primary specialty in family practice (50.4% [449 of 890]) and internal medici
12 , presence of pus in the nasal cavity) at 58 family practices (74 family physicians) between November
13 of Family Physicians, the American Board of Family Practice (ABFP), and the American Medical Associa
14 courses (31%) were offered by departments of family practice and 14 (11%) by departments of medicine
17 for PACE-UP participants from seven general (family) practices and October 2011 to October 2012 for P
18 recognized specialties--emergency medicine, family practice, and critical care--originated from tren
20 of pediatrics, oncology, internal medicine, family practice, and gynecology, as well as subspecialis
21 13% to 5.2%; p < 0.0001), internal medicine/family practice (appropriate: 51.1% to 70.4%; inappropri
22 are, this article reviews the development of family practice as a specialty, provides a current asses
26 ly morning and evening glucose for review by family practice clinicians who were not blinded to alloc
28 six specialties (anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, and
29 tates in 2009 in anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, ped
30 ed family practice, 129 general practice, 21 family practice-geriatric medicine, and six family pract
33 rial that recruited participants mostly from family practices in Auckland, New Zealand, from April 5,
34 lly from clinical computing systems for 8105 family practices in England (96% of all practices), data
35 inal follow-up October 2014) conducted in 54 family practices in England among 401 adults with acute
36 lly from clinical computing systems for 8105 family practices in England in the first year of the pay
37 ldren (0-18 years of age) from participating family practices in England were identified in the QRese
38 lled trial with centralized randomization in family practices in four regions of the United Kingdom a
39 low-up completed April 2015) conducted in 42 family practices in South and West England, enrolled 576
41 gnosed between 1996 and 2006, drawn from 197 family practices in the United Kingdom General Practice
42 ar physician visits at general pediatric and family practices in Toronto, Canada, from June 2008 to F
43 y, 32764 (91%) identified their specialty as family practice, including 32608 physicians who identifi
44 bers were drawn from psychiatry, psychology, family practice, internal medicine, managed care and pub
45 ms in 6 core specialties (internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery, ped
46 specialties (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, general surgery,
47 conducted (61%) and primary care clinicians (family practice or internal medicine) conducted 10% of v
48 mmunodeficiency syndrome or substance abuse (family practice) or nursing home patients (internal medi
49 e physicians (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, or general practice) from those groups
50 a single clinical site with male and female family practice patients of different ethnic backgrounds
53 OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) and general and family practice physicians had lower rates (OR, 0.78; 95
54 into primary care residencies, particularly family practice programs (20% decrease compared with 199
55 in-training from 17 internal medicine and 23 family practice programs in the Mid- Atlantic area of th
57 tion regarding medical school graduation and family practice residency completion was reported by the
58 e > 1000 United States internal medicine and family practice residency core curricula are scarce, but
63 by a physician nutrition specialist within a family practice residency program can be effective in in
66 il for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs from 1969 through 199
67 Of the 38659 physicians who graduated from family practice residency programs from 1969 through 199
70 tween 0 and 7 for both internal medicine and family practice residents (median, 2.5 and 2.0, respecti
72 ple of community-based internal medicine and family practice residents, unsupervised prescription wri
73 hip, male sex, and taking an elective senior family practice rural preceptorship (the only factor not
77 l practice specialty (OR, 1.54 compared with family practice specialty; 95% CI, 1.10-2.14) were indep
79 ensive care medicine, internal medicine, and family practice that competency in end-of-life care requ
82 ry proficiency between internal medicine and family practice trainees, and suggest the need for revis
84 is cluster randomized clinical trial, 131 UK family practices were randomized between December 1, 201
85 in a rural area and freshman-year plans for family practice) were 78% as likely as PSAP graduates to
86 walking and randomly selected from three UK family practices, were invited to participate in a paral
87 years) identified from a UK-wide database of family practices, who were obese (BMI >/=30 kg/m2) and d
88 ; RR, 4.0), and to have combined a career in family practice with practice in a rural area (21% vs 2%
90 of the quality of care in 42 representative family practices, with data collected at two time points