戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ment was lower for guided self-care than for family therapy.
2 ded in the study, 58 653 (3.9%) received any family therapy; 334 645 (23.5%) were Black, 1 006 168 (7
3  the 58 653 veterans (3.9%) who received any family therapy, 36 913 (62.9%) received undefined family
4 e asthma control include psychoeducation and family therapy, although alternative models have also be
5 e 85 study participants, 41 were assigned to family therapy and 44 to CBT guided self-care.
6                                              Family therapy and assertive community treatment have cl
7 itive-behaviour therapy can be combined with family therapy and assertive community treatment program
8 mpare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of family therapy and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) guid
9  for manic than depressive symptoms, whereas family therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy were mor
10 n children, and that interventions including family therapy and school-based programs are effective f
11 ve behavioral therapy, systematic behavioral family therapy, and nondirective supportive therapy.
12 (residual symptoms) of patients who received family therapy appeared to improve more than that of pat
13 (i.e., family psychoeducation and behavioral family therapy) are highly effective for reducing famili
14 CT) only, and 282 (0.5%) received behavioral family therapy (BFT) only.
15          However, compared with receiving no family therapy care, veterans had 26% lower odds of comp
16                                Compared with family therapy, CBT guided self-care has the slight adva
17 e conducted a randomized controlled trial of family therapy, delivered to families identified by scre
18        The greatest reductions are shown for family therapy, followed by cognitive behavior therapy (
19       Participants were randomly assigned to family therapy for bulimia nervosa or individual CBT gui
20 on in the guided self-care group than in the family therapy group; however, this difference disappear
21 has tested the effects of emotion-regulation family therapy, group-based emotion-regulation psychothe
22                                     Although family therapy had only one positive effect on patients'
23 resis; behavioral therapy in encopresis; and family therapy in anorexia nervosa.
24  and group psychoeducation, systematic care, family therapy, interpersonal therapy, and cognitive-beh
25                                              Family therapy, interpersonal therapy, and systematic ca
26                                              Family therapy occurred for less than 1% of this populat
27 y therapy, 36 913 (62.9%) received undefined family therapy only, 15 528 (26.5%) received trauma-info
28 d 68% higher for veterans received undefined family therapy (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.63-1.74]).
29 tive behavioral therapy, systemic behavioral family therapy, or nondirective supportive therapy were
30                   Although interventions and family therapy programs relying on psychoeducation were
31 ognitive behavior therapy, systemic behavior family therapy (SBFT), or individual nondirective suppor
32 latively simple, long-term psychoeducational family therapy should be available to the majority of pe
33 ognitive-behavioral therapy techniques, 23%; family therapy techniques, 19%; and psychodynamic therap
34 ognitive-behavioral therapy techniques, 16%; family therapy techniques, 7%; and psychodynamic therapy
35     Women were more likely to endorse use of family therapy techniques, as were those in organization
36                   Compared with receiving no family therapy, the odds of completing individual PTSD t
37                             Only behavioural family therapies were tested across all of our three tar
38                          Different models of family therapy were contrasted.
39                               Two manualized family therapies with 16 one-hour sessions during 9 mont