戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Federal.
2 an provide a stepped-up basis for additional federal action to reduce emissions by 49%-consistent wit
3 (ESA) is implemented: consultation to ensure federal actions do not jeopardize the existence of liste
4 importance of the role of NMFS in preventing federal actions from jeopardizing listed species.
5 cies and NMFS frequently agreed (79%) on how federal actions would affect listed species.
6 integrated into the regulatory process of US Federal agencies (e.g. the FDA's SNP pipeline for tracki
7 Fisheries Service (NMFS) from 2000-2017 show federal agencies and NMFS frequently agreed (79%) on how
8  sessions included 1) perspectives from both federal agencies and nonfederal academic experts, articu
9 ardiovascular health that are of interest to federal agencies and policymakers, professional societie
10 r experience in workforce development across federal agencies and state/local health departments, as
11 ersities, nongovernmental organizations, and federal agencies are actively collaborating to develop a
12  internal deforestation than state PAs since federal agencies consider gains for other jurisdictions.
13 section 7 but also raise questions as to how federal agencies could apply this tool more effectively
14                                        Three federal agencies developed memoranda of understanding to
15 ad to be extinguished or managed by state or federal agencies from 1992 to 2012, and examined geograp
16                                     Numerous federal agencies have begun incorporating these concepts
17 ty Act (EISA) Section 526, which states that Federal agencies should not purchase alternative fuels u
18 nted by the coordinated effort of societies, federal agencies, and industry, such that we are poised
19 s, along with 25 professional organizations, federal agencies, and patient advocacy groups, the Natio
20 at targeted public and private entities (eg, federal agencies, homeless shelters, and school systems)
21 es, public health authorities, and state and federal agencies, led to the rapid identification of an
22 ure that public funds advance the mission of federal agencies.
23 wing the implementation of local, state, and federal air quality policies.
24 d States face multiple challenges in meeting federal air quality standards.
25 ocess designs to assess the applicability of federal air regulations and quantify air pollutant emiss
26 resulting in billions of dollars invested in federal and industrial sponsorships to understanding the
27 rst national registry for CAS cosponsored by federal and industry partners.
28 res, with clearly defined roles for both the federal and local governments in the governance, plannin
29               This article, which integrates federal and organizational guidelines with known risk fa
30 n its quantity (numbers of investigators and federal and private dollars) than on its goals, achievem
31 ts and local spillovers for Brazilian Amazon federal and state agencies.
32   These "peaking units" are exempt from some federal and state air quality rules.
33 nd Medicare and Medicaid spending influences federal and state budgets.
34 ncial settlements between drug companies and federal and state governments resulted in more than $11
35 minal history information was collected from federal and state law enforcement agency records at 3 po
36                   Concern has developed that federal and state laws or regulations prohibit physician
37 ers and sellers, and legal conflicts between Federal and State laws that might provide a brake on the
38                          Recently introduced federal and state legislation propose to address access
39                                           If federal and state policies were aligned to promote prair
40  2019 (COVID-19) case rates and deaths among federal and state prisoners and compares them with corre
41                              The decrease of federal and state support threatens long-term sustainabi
42              Resource managers at the state, federal, and tribal levels make decisions on a weekly to
43 eration of allegations of noncompliance with federal Animal Welfare Act regulations that carry a sign
44 e pharmaceutical spending and to violate the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.
45                                              Federal Area Health Resources Files and Medicare 5% rese
46              In light of the current lack of federal authority for oversight of land use near educati
47  prohibiting higher-altitude flights without federal authorization.
48 Washington SEER Cancer Registry records with federal bankruptcy records for the region.
49                                              Federal barriers and logistical challenges have hindered
50 trast to previous research on the take-up of federal benefits programs, we find that the positive eff
51 stoms Enforcement (ICE) deportation data and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) crime data with da
52                  Here a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation discusses the security i
53 ing pilots, judges, air traffic controllers, Federal Bureau of Investigation employees, and firefight
54 uring a period of 2 to 5 years, according to Federal Bureau of Investigation records.
55 d by intimate partners, as identified in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports,
56 orthern Plateau State into Kaduna, Nasarawa, Federal Capital Territory, and Bauchi.
57 to PMCPA rulings and whistleblower-initiated federal cases, it may offer a partial view of exposed of
58  Report Information System maintained by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and t
59 seek to bolster the scientific foundation of federal chemical testing efforts such as ToxCast and the
60 health authority, as well as the head of the Federal Children's Bureau, wrote her parents frequently
61  comparisons using the entirety of the Tox21 federal collaboration chemical screening data, incorpora
62     The recent "incentive auction" of the US Federal Communications Commission was the first auction
63                                     The U.S. federal consortium on toxicology in the 21(st) century (
64 zed costs for each site were obtained from a federal cost transparency database.
65  analyzed in the context of recently updated federal criteria for the protection of aquatic life.
66 sed for each life stage and ecotype based on federal criteria, was influenced by migration timing rat
67  our study suggest that policy makers (e.g., federal crop insurance) and laggards (farmers that are s
68                              Using available federal data sources, we estimated the aggregate cost of
69 efugee/parolee status in Cuba were listed in federal databases for US-bound refugees/parolees; those
70                                 More than 10 federal departments and agencies currently invest in cri
71                                              Federal Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments h
72 its, including all 26 state capitals and the Federal District.
73                                          The Federal DRI committees from each country work collaborat
74 the nutrient nomination process prompted the Federal DRI committees to address previously identified
75 rking Group, consisting of members from both Federal DRI committees, developed an open and transparen
76 ved by the European Medicines Agency and the Federal Drug Administration as an option for sorafenib-r
77 e-1 analogue exendin-4, a well-tolerated and Federal Drug Agency-approved antidiabetic drug, has posi
78 a list of proteins that could be targeted by Federal-Drug-Agency-approved but repurposed drugs, provi
79                                        A new federal effort to strengthen and coordinate nutrition re
80 e political discussions leading up to the US federal elections, and in historical patterns of bill co
81                                     The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recommends el
82               Conclusion A large majority of federal exchange networks contain CoC-accredited hospita
83 tute (NCI) -designated cancer centers within federal exchange networks.
84 ork data and public use files for individual federal exchange plans from the Centers for Medicare and
85 s among low-income immigrants eligible for a federal fee waiver.
86 laces and delivery system reform, increasing federal financial assistance for Marketplace enrollees,
87 umstances under which they prescribed ART in federal fiscal year 2009.
88 polyurethane foam to meet required state and federal flammability standards.
89         The state of the economy, changes in federal food assistance programs, and policies related t
90 th socioeconomic status and participation in federal food assistance programs.
91 or food safety and environmental quality, as federal food safety reforms spread across approximately
92 d AHRs to determine what might happen if the federal formula were applied to a specific state and to
93 provides recommendations for researchers and federal funders to ensure respect for the contributions
94                        In the United States, federal funding agencies and foundations collectively di
95 ed by academic and research institutions and federal funding agencies in the United States.
96                                              Federal funding agencies increasingly support stakeholde
97   Multiple stakeholders, including academia, federal funding agencies, industry, scientific societies
98 mmon Rule under which scientists who receive federal funding conduct research involving human subject
99  United States likely has a story of how the federal funding crisis for biomedical research has affec
100                                              Federal funding for research focused on understanding an
101 lly grasp the extent to which the decline in federal funding has negatively affected the scientific c
102                  Several states responded to federal funding limitations placed on human embryonic st
103 competition, narrower margins, and decreased federal funding, medical schools are becoming increasing
104 .Many research advances are made possible by federal funding.
105 ant socioecological impacts, and half of the federal funds for fire suppression are spent each year i
106 ick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Federal Funds from National Institute of Allergy and Inf
107           Regardless of what legislation the federal government adopts to address health insurance co
108 tatistics System (NVSS), administered by the federal government and based on state death certificate
109 ate for sustainable science funding from the federal government and for acceptance of evidence-based
110 n 10 respondents was very confident that the federal government could prevent a nationwide outbreak.
111                              In 2018, the US federal government finalized the implementation of manda
112 tion and use of EHRs are incentivized by the federal government in the United States, the lack of int
113 ademia, the pharmaceutical industry, and the federal government including the US Food and Drug Admini
114       On January 19, 2017, the United States federal government issued revisions to the Common Rule u
115 and educational initiatives at the state and federal government level have been undertaken in the pas
116                                          The federal government may further undertake a nonvoluntary
117                                    After the federal government refused to allow (and courts blocked)
118 matically affected by proposed United States federal government regulatory initiatives.
119 ealth literacy had greater confidence in the federal government response.
120                  Rather than waiting for the federal government to solve our problems, we urge the ac
121 ME, supplied to local law enforcement by the federal government via the 1033 Program, reduces crime.
122                               The states and Federal government won't give any grants, and we can't r
123 -$2848) per patient during 10 years from the federal government's perspective, and results in an incr
124 such as health care providers, patients, the federal government, and industry to bring this dream to
125 assessments prepared by agencies of the U.S. federal government.
126 r climate change with a case study of the US federal government.
127 iance as a market criterion, while state and federal governments develop SICAR as a de facto enforcem
128 ion to science policy positions in state and federal governments.
129 -target-positive requirement) in the initial federal guidance to public health laboratories was enfor
130 inimum levels of PA (500 MET-min/wk; 2008 US federal guidelines) had modest reductions in HF risk (po
131  liver and >200 cells per muL for kidney per federal guidelines) were eligible to receive a kidney or
132 r strengthen or deregulate the existing main federal gun control law, the Brady Law.
133 ) enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare (U.S. federal health insurance program) from 1996 to 2010.
134 icians and other healthcare professionals in federal health policy.
135  decomposition of data sets collected by the Federal Highway Administration and the California Depart
136            In the 1930s, maps created by the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) nationalize
137 nts admitted to 409 academic, community, and federal hospitals from 2009-2014.
138                                   Successful federal initiatives share a focus on tangible success st
139 search Support at Uppsala University, German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Carlos
140 computational biology as evidenced by the US federal interagency Multi-Scale Modeling Consortium and
141 ce whole-genome sequencing network of state, federal, international, and commercial partners.
142  access to costly prescription drugs, recent federal investigations have raised questions about their
143       Greater harmonization and expansion of federal investment in nutrition science, not a silo-ing
144 trengthened through the establishment of the Federal Joint Committee, a major payer-provider structur
145                   Under the oversight of the Federal Joint Committee, payer and provider associations
146 intments (AOR 1.790; 95% CI 1.573-2.037) and federal K/RPG awards (AOR 4.596; 95% CI 2.355-8.969).
147 ed by losses of older forests due to fire on federal land and continued clearcutting elsewhere.
148 eclines in early-seral-associated species on federal land because of reduced anthropogenic disturbanc
149 lder-forest-associated birds to stabilize on federal land, but to continue declining on private indus
150     Although the NWFP halted clearcutting on federal land, this has so far been insufficient to rever
151  the world, affecting 10 million hectares of federal land.
152 ed to evaluate ecosystem C dynamics in CONUS federal lands at present and in the future under three I
153                                          The federal lands' contribution to the national ecosystem C
154 oiting a natural experiment resulting from a federal law in 1994 that imposed a temporary waiting per
155 EHR. Information blocking, now prohibited by federal law, still remains an obstacle to interoperabili
156       Health insurers, state regulators, and federal lawmakers should offer ways for consumers to lea
157       Sources of evidence included principal federal laws and FDA regulations (1962-2018) and FDA dat
158 ehicles; instead, a top-down scheme (through federal laws) may be called for.
159 emonstrated increased antigay bias following federal legalization.
160 nference produced recommendations leading to federal legislation and programs to alleviate hunger and
161                   Applying this model to the federal legislation of the United States and Germany, we
162 sed recently by a presidential proclamation, federal legislation, advocacy groups, and popular media.
163             Regardless of its outcome at the federal level, policy and management discussions initiat
164  associated firearm laws were enacted at the federal level.
165                                    Projected federal-level implementation of universal background che
166  health authorities at the local, state, and federal levels, as well as the need for rapid disseminat
167 ing consumption of contaminated water at the federal limit, and decreasing serum PFOA after carbon fi
168                In response to a longstanding Federal mandate to minimize the role of geography in acc
169  which inclusion criteria were broadened and federal mandates for representativeness were launched.
170                    Within 2 commercial and 1 federal (Medicare) claims data sources in the United Sta
171 rtment of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and the Federal Ministry for Education and Research of Germany.
172                                     Austria: Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technolog
173  KIDGEM 1140 (project 246781735, to CB), and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMB) (01GM15
174 irs, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Australian D
175 Union, German Centre for Infection Research, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, German Resea
176 Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Semmelweis F
177                                       German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
178         Roche Pharma AG, Mundipharma, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
179 de by multiple partner organizations and the federal Ministry of Health to support strategies and res
180    Global Antibiotic R&D Partnership (German Federal Ministry of Health, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Ne
181 arch Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical
182 ransport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT); Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW
183  including Saccharum spontaneum L., a listed Federal Noxious Weed.
184 portant for advancing the evidence to inform federal nutrition and related health programs, policies,
185 istance Program (SNAP), which is the largest federal nutrition assistance program in the United State
186 onducting systematic reviews (SRs) to inform federal nutrition policy and programs.
187  The need and opportunities for strengthened federal nutrition research are clear, with specific iden
188  sustainability implications; 2) the current federal nutrition research landscape and existing mechan
189 ditional complementary actions to accelerate federal nutrition research were identified at the USDA.
190 s for further strengthening and coordinating federal nutrition research, including corresponding adva
191  government and other published documents on federal nutrition research; held various discussions wit
192 that establishment of annual and/or seasonal federal O(3) standards is needed to more adequately prot
193                                        Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Swiss School of Public
194 nd December 2018 after implementation of the federal Open Payments transparency program in 2013.
195                                   Those with federal or state insurance coverage only had higher mort
196 ral gas emissions may affect compliance with federal ozone standards.
197  Innovators, BRAIN funding agencies, and non-Federal partners are working together to develop strateg
198          For internal impacts, estimates for federal PAs and indigenous lands are higher than for sta
199 ficant or are not robust; however, for Para, federal PAs and indigenous lands feature both internal i
200                       One hypothesis is that federal PAs avoid more internal deforestation than state
201                 Across all these tools, only federal PAs lower deforestation internally and nearby.
202 eakage for indigenous lands but blockage for federal PAs, suggesting a stronger external signal from
203 centive Program (QIP) is the first mandatory federal pay for performance program launched on January
204 n aged 50-74 years with dense breasts from a federal payer perspective and a lifetime horizon.
205 nd mortality and found that meeting the 2013 federal Physical Activity Guidelines resulted in a 35% r
206 ds seized during operations of the Brazilian Federal Police, totalizing 88 samples.
207             We highlight the need to enforce federal policies that record both officer and civilian i
208                                       Recent federal policy changes attempt to expand veterans' acces
209                           Background: Recent federal policy changes attempt to expand veterans' acces
210 ry care physician (PCP) is unknown, although federal policy holds PCPs accountable for reducing readm
211 c review questions were prioritized based on federal policy, program, or guidance needs, potential to
212                                              Federal policymakers have made patient satisfaction a co
213 a unique frontline perspective to share with federal policymakers regarding how programs and policies
214  length of stay, and populations living in a federal poverty area, had higher all-cause and infection
215 iddle income (>1 and <4), or at or below the federal poverty level (</=1).
216 sidies in the Marketplaces [income 139%-250% federal poverty level (FPL)] and middle-income patients
217 e points was observed for children below the federal poverty level (P < .05).
218 igible nonparticipant (income </=130% of the Federal Poverty Level [FPL]), and higher-income nonparti
219 ercentage of population at less than 200% of federal poverty level compared with the fourth quartile
220 ded pregnancy among those who were below the federal poverty level or cohabiting were two to three ti
221 ic functioning, households below 150% of the federal poverty level should be targeted for additional
222 whose families earned 200% or more above the federal poverty level were more likely to report vision
223 ousehold's poverty status (percentage of the federal poverty level).
224 as the percent of residents living below the federal poverty level, after accounting for age, race/et
225 y to live in households earning below the US federal poverty level, lack health insurance, and live i
226 se incomes were between 100% and 199% of the federal poverty level, those who did not have a high sch
227 rty, defined as the percent living below the federal poverty level.
228 ars of age and had incomes below 138% of the federal poverty level.
229 rt agencies serving families at or below the federal poverty level.
230 uninsured and living at least 200% below the federal poverty level.
231 usehold incomes between 100% and 300% of the federal poverty level.
232 usted for family size as a percentage of the federal poverty level.
233 hose population income exists at or near the federal poverty level.
234 mon income eligibility limit was 500% of the federal poverty level.
235 panic Mexican-Americans) and income [</=185% federal poverty line (FPL), 186-400% FPL, and >400% FPL]
236  and a household income below 138% of the US federal poverty line (FPL).
237 f Latino/a residents, those living below the federal poverty line and with high household densities h
238 A quarter of American Indians live below the federal poverty line, and thus, low socioeconomic status
239            We propose the establishment of a federal program, analogous to AIDS Drug Assistance Progr
240 ralization-eligible immigrants qualify for a federal programme that waives the cost of the citizenshi
241          In January, 2020, state, local, and federal public health agencies investigated the first ca
242                                              Federal public reporting and payment programs have incre
243 valuate health care system performance under federal quality, reporting, and value-based programs.
244 d bias in PM2.5 measurements using the EPA's Federal Reference and Equivalent Methods (FRM and FEM);
245 intervals in triplicate and colocated with a federal reference method sampler at three sites and for
246 e findings do not suggest that similar scale federal reforms designed to demilitarize police would ha
247 mpanies that, according to company policy or federal regulation, do not ship cigarettes to consumers.
248                                  The Code of Federal Regulations 21CFR680.3(e) states that when measu
249  exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24).
250 pose To assess U.S. hospital compliance with federal regulations and patient ease of access to imagin
251 perate in the United States (U.S.), and U.S. federal regulations do not require containment features
252 ffects of waterpipe smoking and there are no federal regulations regarding its use.
253                                      Code of Federal Regulations, and state legislative codes.
254 fees and processing times are compliant with federal regulations, patient access to imaging studies i
255                                  In light of federal regulations, these findings suggest that labelin
256 to OAT in California are more stringent than federal regulations.
257 ncompliance; and 3) ensuring compliance with federal regulations.
258 proposed changes to the Common Rule (Code of Federal Regulations: Protection of Human Subjects title
259 linicians, patients and caregivers, and U.S. federal research funding organizations.
260 ecurity using indicators from the Census and Federal Reserve Bank in US counties for the years 2000 a
261 cally for youths can improve coordination of federal resources as well as implement best-practice mod
262 nd characterization due to its potential for federal scheduling and current legal status within the U
263                      With approvals from the Federal Select Agent Program and the Centers for Disease
264 nd held in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as wel
265      A substantial portion (20%) of the 24 h federal standard for particulate pollution exceedance ev
266  of age living in a model region in Germany (federal state of Bavaria, 3.5 million inhabitants in thi
267 novation, Science and Research of the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Cancer Research
268                                      But, as federal, state and local governments begin opening busin
269 nitiatives often require coordination across federal, state, and local agencies.
270 wild pig damage management program involving federal, state, and local government authorities directe
271 e, steps in development, and challenges that federal, state, and local governments will need to addre
272 t their generalizability; and advocating for federal-, state-, and local-level policy changes that re
273        Sixty-three facilities from 14 German Federal States provided clinical data for a total of 246
274 wever, including emissions from neighbouring federal states(5,6).
275 y focused on the capital cities of Brazilian federal states, and the fact that HIV-1C infections incr
276 identified in a nationwide data set from the Federal statistical Office of Germany from 1 January 200
277 the basis of age and sex, as provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany.
278 on of the pharmaceutical patents pursuant to federal statutory authority and principles of eminent do
279          Increased commodity crop prices and federal subsidies for biofuel crops, such as corn and so
280 the application of credits from the existing federal tax code 45Q, a minimum incentive gap of roughly
281 ies considered, with application of the U.S. federal tax credit 45Q to qualifying facilities.
282                             In addition, the federal tax credit 45Q was applied for qualifying facili
283 tization of funding sources and retention of federal tax incentives were identified as key elements.
284  state attending the Haematology clinic of a federal tertiary health institution in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
285              One vehicle was tested over the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycle on seven biodiesel an
286 er limits, vehicles to meet 1 mg/mi over the federal test procedure (FTP).
287 ortant end points not currently evaluated by federal testing programs, including altered mammary glan
288  2015 data, respectively, or 32-56 times the Federal Tier 2 and Tier 3 standards of 0.05 g/mile.
289  9,270 chemicals tested in the United States federal Tox21 research consortium in 971 high-throughput
290 f the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), state attorneys general,
291 March regardless of our estimated effects of federal travel restrictions.
292 at Hospital Universitario Walter Cantidio of Federal University of Ceara.
293  was conducted in the University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao (HU-UFMA), located in the
294 keratoplasty at Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo were reviewed.
295 esearch and Education Center of the Siberian Federal University.
296 n both countries rely on a network of state, federal, university, and private industry cooperatorspur
297  as PCB 11, which alone exceeded the 64 pg/L federal water quality standard for the sum of PCBs in tw
298                               At a time when federal WIC funding is threatened, this study provides s
299 t of the Alaska Maritime Wildlife Refuge and Federal wildlife managers want grazing to cease, presuma
300 observed hydrocarbon enhancements fall below federal workplace standards, results may indicate a link

 
Page Top