コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nd substantial costs for both states and the federal government.
2 assessments prepared by agencies of the U.S. federal government.
3 orce crisis from specialty societies and the federal government.
4 r climate change with a case study of the US federal government.
5 in which all health care is paid for by the federal government.
6 of the National Institutes of Health or the federal government.
7 in which all health care is paid for by the federal government.
8 nental United States and not employed by the federal government.
9 om the private sector and about 35% from the federal government.
10 Deutsche Krebshilfe eV and Swiss Federal Government.
11 ns for obesity prevention coordinated by the federal government.
12 erable populations under the auspices of the federal government.
13 ion to science policy positions in state and federal governments.
14 butyrate and its resultant regulation by the federal government, 1,4-butanediol and gamma-butyrolacto
16 clarify operational responsibilities in the federal government, (4) refrain from overstatement of ob
18 ganizations (107/117; 91.4%) than either the federal government (75/117; 64.1%) or pharmaceutical com
19 s to Medicare will be realized only when the federal government addresses the use issue that underlie
21 (AG2PI) will coordinate activities with USA federal government agencies expand public-private partne
22 icult weeks, including how public health and federal government agencies performed, has been both pra
23 ition experts from academic institutions and federal government agencies, led participants in discuss
24 a variety of applications, as reported in US federal government agency documents, provides an underst
25 tent to reduce CONABIO from a multi-ministry federal government agency to a branch within the environ
28 tatistics System (NVSS), administered by the federal government and based on state death certificate
29 ate for sustainable science funding from the federal government and for acceptance of evidence-based
32 such as health care providers, patients, the federal government, and industry to bring this dream to
33 e Supreme Court, a nonpartisan branch of the federal government, are implicated in partisan voting be
35 how scientific research is supported by the federal government, as well as the ways in which science
36 prevalence of diabetes projected to cost the Federal government billions of dollars, the need for int
37 offer concrete actions that the academic and federal government communities can take to address it.
38 n 10 respondents was very confident that the federal government could prevent a nationwide outbreak.
39 ur review of recalls and adverse events from federal government databases reveals sharp inconsistenci
42 iance as a market criterion, while state and federal governments develop SICAR as a de facto enforcem
45 to shrink considerably in size, and that the federal government faces a significant problem in decidi
47 were matched with regions classified by the federal government for mortgage loan servicing based on
48 ries and Congress's decision to prohibit the federal government from directly negotiating prices with
49 high-ranking members of the military and the federal government frowned on a military-owned education
51 warded more than $21 million since 2018; the federal government has committed $25 million per year si
55 ction of human participants in research, the federal government has mandated education and training i
58 physician groups, the manufacturers, and the federal government have instituted self-regulation of ma
59 spending on anticancer therapies, state and federal governments have, over the past decade, enacted
62 ulture's Economic Research Service leads the federal government in data development and research on f
63 ac transplantation has been addressed by the federal government in the past, its implications on the
64 tion and use of EHRs are incentivized by the federal government in the United States, the lack of int
66 ademia, the pharmaceutical industry, and the federal government including the US Food and Drug Admini
67 nal division of power between states and the federal government), individual states hold primary publ
70 educe costs of care and improve quality, the federal government is stimulating adoption of health inf
74 and educational initiatives at the state and federal government level have been undertaken in the pas
75 titutions' ownership (nonprofit, for-profit, federal government, local government, or state governmen
78 by panel working groups were solicited from federal government methodologists, health agency officia
79 ts on preliminary drafts were solicited from federal government methodologists, health agency officia
80 progress in health care; the information the federal government needs to make well-informed decisions
81 ity and rights-oriented advocacy groups, the federal government never issued the special regulations
88 sed demand because of the Delta variant, the federal government resumed control over the supply and a
89 ontext of deportation threat, defined as the federal government's approach to deportation and/or depo
90 y is largely untested and contrasts with the federal government's definition of equity as the "consis
91 es are within or below the range of the U.S. federal government's estimates of the social cost of car
93 -$2848) per patient during 10 years from the federal government's perspective, and results in an incr
94 are exposed to environmental chemicals, the federal government's response relies on scientific evide
96 ary producers of administrative data are the federal government, state governments, and private healt
97 en turbulent, with criticism coming from the federal government, the academic community, and the pres
98 ith other institutes and agencies across the federal government, the NIEHS's strategic ONE Nano progr
99 from the Congressional Budget Office and the federal government, the number of newly insured persons
101 uch, it represents the latest attempt by the federal government to control health care costs through
103 ng the importance of recent efforts from the federal government to increase OPO accountability and tr
104 ration Stork Speed" has been proposed by the federal government to perform a comprehensive evaluation
108 l service capacity are crucial to inform the federal government, training institutions, professional
109 The Swedish Research Council; The Swedish federal government under the LUA/ALF agreement; The Swed
111 ME, supplied to local law enforcement by the federal government via the 1033 Program, reduces crime.
112 tion reduces out-of-pocket expenses, and the federal government views HMOs as a way to contain Medica
114 ors, providers, payers and the United States federal government will provide the best opportunity to