ライフサイエンスコーパス: field strength

1 ion of the current for certain ranges of the field strength.

2 cillatory frequencies increase linearly with field strength.

3 o be quantified in a xenograft model at this field strength.

4 rrowing the gap and increasing the effective field strength.

5 ic range improve quadratically with magnetic field strength.

6 istic dependence of ion mobility on electric field strength.

7 larizing/hyperpolarizing pulses of very high field strength.

8 ound to be nonlinearly dependent on electric field strength.

9 ll as with cation concentration and electric field strength.

10 many nanoseconds, depending on the electric field strength.

11 a characteristic sigmoidal dependence on the field strength.

12 rements were similar between vendors at each field strength.

13 nificant effect on cognitive function at any field strength.

14 r, sensory perceptions did vary according to field strength.

15 Subjects were blinded to field strength.

16 t on both exosome concentration and electric field strength.

17 only weakly affected by the applied electric field strength.

18 stigators and found to depend on the plasmon field strength.

19 buffer exchange and an increase in electric field strength.

20 es or by changing the effective spin-locking field strength.

21 hip between the Deltag(lum) and the magnetic field strength.

22 roduced by the decay of the coronal magnetic field strength.

23 and did not vary with MRI scanner vendor or field strength.

24 not previously observed using MRI at a lower field strength.

25 t or software tools and work at any magnetic field strength.

26 gth and subsequently supported at ultra-high field strength.

27 ched controls underwent structural MRI at 7T field strength.

28 ssing has been previously limited by scanner field strength.

29 ured with MR elastography across vendors and field strengths.

30 function of acoustic and velocity potential field strengths.

31 s consistent with previous findings at lower field strengths.

32 rs from different vendors and with different field strengths.

33 t different times, thereby probing different field strengths.

34 between 1.0 and 0.12 times recent equatorial field strengths.

35 MI (P<0.001) but not in CMI (P>0.20) at both field strengths.

36 from different vendors and between different field strengths.

37 ive this procedure for the relevant range of field strengths.

38 ast on T(1)-weighted images at high magnetic field strengths.

39 shold within the range of in vivo endogenous field strengths.

40 changes in copper levels by MRI at clinical field strengths.

41 led from one another after contact at higher field strengths.

42 a range of Mg2+ concentrations and electric field strengths.

43 ver coil arrangements, scanners, and imaging field strengths.

44 nd signal-to-noise ratio compared with lower field strengths.

45 I (2) was 99% at both field strengths.

46 res were stable across different vendors and field strengths.

47 ntially more pronounced at 7 T than at lower field strengths.

48 initiated flipping yet required much larger field strengths.

49 olites that would otherwise overlap at lower field strengths.

50 chemiluminescence at relatively low electric field strengths.

51 ing among readers, imager manufacturers, and field strengths.

52 of variance; the within-subject factors were field strength (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 T) and state (stati

53 the application of electric fields at a low field strength (0.4V/cm) constant temperature (65 degree

54 n MRI system was developed that combines low field strength (0.55 T) with high-performance imaging te

55 ions, we show that a series of pulses at low field strength (0.9 to 1.4 V/cm) is sufficient to entrai

56 electrolyte concentrations and weak electric field strengths (0-2 V cm(-1)).

57 the cluster orientation at very low electric field strengths (0.18 V mum(-1) ) is achieved.

58 o determine the impact of different magnetic field strengths (1, 1.5, 3, and 7 T) and the effect of c

59 rformed on three vendor platforms and at two field strengths (1.5 T and 3.0 T).

60 c examination while in MR units of differing field strengths (1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 T), including a mock

61 model accuracy comparing the data by either field strength, 1.5- or 3-T MRI (P > .05).

62 phenomenon has only been observed with large field strengths (~10 kV cm(-1)), an obstacle for technol

63 ) diffusivity were measured at high magnetic field strength (11.7T) and analyzed relative to quantita

64 membranes (20 and 50kDa) and two electrical field strengths (2 and 14V/cm) were used as separation p

65 High field strength (+2 kV/cm) enables rapid second-dimension

66 rged perivascular spaces (ePVSs) in clinical-field-strength (3.0-T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging d

67 time, 4.1 ms; echo times, 0.09/1.09/2.09 ms; field strength, 3 T).

68 antitative diffusometry even at low magnetic field strengths (30 MHz).

69 Larger field strength (400 mV mm(-1)) was required to induce di

70 Employing high-field strength (7 Tesla) fMRI techniques, this study ima

71 We used high-field strength (7-T) fMRI techniques to image the PAG at

72 tic resonance imaging (MRI) at high magnetic field strength (7-tesla).

73 atial resolution and tissue contrast at high field strength (7.0 T) MR imaging can be used to consist

74 afted capsules were imaged in vivo with high-field-strength (9.4-T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging,

75 By increasing the field strength about iron, odd-electron reactivity was c

76 not increase monotonously with the electric field strength above an optimum E(0), which is in agreem

77 Here we report the existence of a critical field strength above which oppositely charged drops do n

78 we acquired an optimized MRI scan at 7-tesla field strength allowing sensitive investigation of hippo

79 yr(-1), typically during times of decreasing field strength, almost 100 times faster than current cha

80 further subdivided according to the applied field strength and administration of contrast agent.

81 r MR examination, independent of the applied field strength and administration of gadolinium-based co

82 PDFF estimated by MRI scanners of different field strength and at different sites, accurately classi

83 ating Scale, age, gender, magnetic resonance field strength and Dementia Rating Scale interval.

84 Here, we report the effects of differing field strength and frequency as well as chemical inhibit

85 been introduced to quantify the appropriate field strength and frequency for this new adjuvant thera

86 ar reorientation, with dependence on applied field strength and frequency.

87 iral image acquisitions were amenable to low field strength and generated increased signal-to-noise r

88 if the technique can be performed with lower field strength and if changes in fetal or placental oxyg

89 nically-feasible sodium MRI at a moderate 3T field strength and imaging time with fluid attenuation b

90 is trapping can be minimized by lowering the field strength and increasing the time of electrophoresi

91 This technique is independent of field strength and is applicable to a broad range of mol

92 ital (LUMO) energy is governed by the ligand field strength and is related to Lewis acid/base propert

93 manner (the radiologists were unaware of the field strength and prior DSA and MR angiographic results

94 ropriate experimental conditions of magnetic field strength and rotational speed of the capillary.

95 linewidth, an undesirable trade-off between field strength and signal precision occurs.

96 eduction in near-Earth heliospheric magnetic field strength and solar wind speed, and up to a factor

97 resonance spectroscopic imaging at clinical field strength and subsequently supported at ultra-high

98 progressively well with increasing magnetic field strength and that the alignment is effectively pre

99 vides mixed information of both the local EM field strength and the local density of states.

100 cle's trajectory can be tuned by the applied field strength and the patch geometry.

101 s a stark boundary as a function of magnetic field strength and toggle frequency distinguishing the t

102 in the record is an increase in both average field strength and variability that is observed to occur

103 ences, as well as for differences related to field strength and vendor, with repeated-measures analys

104 ectional area determining the local electric field strength and, thus, the local interaction time bet

105 , as well as non-DNP spectra at a variety of field strengths and at temperatures in the range 213-243

106 nts of the DNA at several different electric field strengths and extrapolating the results to zero el

107 control cells, with lesser effects at other field strengths and frequencies.

108 Higher magnetic field strengths and improved signal detectors have allow

109 periment works well over a range of magnetic field strengths and is particularly useful when resonanc

110 By making measurements over a range of field strengths and scan parameters, we tested the key a

111 laxation data measured at different magnetic field strengths and temperatures.

112 head movement nor dynamic change in magnetic field strength) and directional (sensitive to magnetic f

113 nce parameters, spatial resolution, magnetic field strength, and image post-processing, emphasising t

114 peatability across the various manufacturer, field strength, and pulse sequence combinations (n = 10)

115 The overall ICC for all manufacturer, field strength, and sequence combinations (n = 10) was 0

116 tensive (27)Al MQMAS experiments at multiple field strengths, and (1)H MAS NMR experiments, these dat

117 iques is highly reproducible across readers, field strengths, and imaging platforms.

118 of variability between imager manufacturers, field strengths, and pulse sequences.

119 ss measurements across imager manufacturers, field strengths, and pulse sequences.

120 This unique structure presents a high-field-strength anionic coordination site, which confers

121 nt thermostability depending on the electric field strength applied.

122 The rationale for safety concerns at this field strength are discussed as well as potential approa

123 red million volts per centimetre of electric-field strength are required to field-ionize gas species.

124 tative measurements of the evolving magnetic field strength are required to test this.

125 ly in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET im

126 e acquisition of images at variable magnetic field strength as provided by fast field cycling imaging

127 up analysis did not identify MRI sequence or field strength as sources for variability.

128 cularly poorly understood especially at high field strengths as they are rarely encountered at ground

129 tic anisotropy scales with increasing ligand field strength at the iron(II) center.

130 m magneto-rheological fluids by toggling the field strength at varied frequencies.

131 The magnetic field strength B increased across this boundary from app

132 Below 140 km, the median field strength became steady but the short period fluctu

133 conditions of pH, temperature, and magnetic field strength, because changes in conditions can distor

134 However, they do mix when their field strength becomes comparable to electron binding en

135 d on these scaling relationships, an optimal field strength becomes identifiable.

136 After PEF treatment at the electric field strength between 0.2 and 0.5kV/cm, AAO became ther

137 Various PEF treatments using electric field strength between 0.2 and 1.2kV/cm and pulsed elect

138 aximum at f = 50 Hz and saturation effect of field strength (between 30 kA/m and 120 kA/m at f = 50 H

139 orders of magnitude as we tuned the electric field strength by a few percent across resonance.

140 It also examined the potential role of CMR field strength by comparing 1.5-T versus 3.0-T imaging.

141 e obtained in minutes at a moderate magnetic field strength by using dynamic nuclear polarization (DN

142 cally-validated cortical lesions at clinical field strength, by comparing sensitivity and specificity

143 -sized magnetic features, in which the local field strength can greatly exceed that of the global-sca

144 (1)H-MRS at ultra-high field strength can potentially improve the consistency o

145 ed by the progress in parallel imaging, high-field-strength cardiac MR imaging, and other technical a

146 de that RH421 detects intramembrane electric field strength changes arising from charge transport ass

147 rements across all three imager manufacturer-field strength combinations also showed excellent interi

148 opriately adjusting temperature and electric field strength could facilitate their applications in 2D

149 ults herein communicate the highest magnetic field strength data on active zeolite catalyst structure

150 The plateau value is independent of the field strength, disorder strength, carrier concentration

151 At clinical field strengths, double inversion recovery MRI is most s

152 Ex vivo high field strength DTI measurements of fractional anisotropy

153 anet, little is known about Earth's magnetic field strength during that time.

154 ed is increased in proportion to the reduced field strength E/N (N is the carrier gas number density)

155 c field (PEF) treatment at moderate and high field strengths (E=0.8kV/cm & 5kV/cm) prior and during a

156 a function of pulse duration, tau, delivered field strength, ED, and pulse number, n.

157 zeolite HZSM-5 is clearly resolved at 35.2 T field strengths, enabled by recently developed series-co

158 (1) = A' + B'*pO(2)) at all temperatures and field strengths evaluated here.

159 e field to the material (for a peak electric field strength exceeding 2.5 volts per angstrom) in turn

160 This study establishes the use of high-field strength fMRI as a promising technique for reveali

161 several volts to induce sufficient electric field strength for efficient bacteria inactivation.

162 We infer a surface magnetic field strength for the white dwarf in MV Lyrae of betwee

163 ng to explain the observed range of magnetic field strengths for isolated, high-field magnetic white

164 ntials needed to achieve 100's V/cm electric field strengths for rapid electrophoresis.

165 nelle channels, and even sufficient, at some field strengths, for the poration of organelle membranes

166 ield is switched within 12.5 ms to reach any field strength from 50 muT to 0.2 T, providing clinicall

167 Here I obtain an indirect estimate for the field strength from measurements of tidal dissipation.

168 20 cm respectively in the range of magnetic field strengths from 0 to 200 mT.

169 F processing variables studied were electric field strength (from 0.4 to 2.0kV/cm) and number of puls

170 of-saturation profiles at two radiofrequency field strengths gives an estimate for k(off) of 73 s(-1)

171 ical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at low field strength has yet to fully visualize the exocrine,

172 Field strengths have been inferred on T Tauri stars and

173 de (high vs low) was compared with ultrahigh-field-strength high-resolution GRE MR analysis by using

174 Ultrahigh-field-strength high-resolution GRE MR imaging and histop

175 tified as a tumoral pseudoblush at ultrahigh-field-strength high-resolution GRE MR imaging without co

176 Due to limitations in scanner field strength, however, the functional neuroanatomy of

177 reases in g(max) in relative accord with the field strength (i.e., pai-acidity) of the variable ligan

178 se a well-trained operator, those with 1.5-T field strength imaging units, and those with longer time

179 Higher magnetic field strength improves all performance characteristics

180 An estimate of the electric field strength in the CT state yields approximately 25 M

181 We find that the field strength in the local interstellar medium is 3.7-5

182 is still a challenge to obtain the required field strengths in free space from table-top laser syste

183 The derived field strengths in the corona, from 1.05 to 1.35 solar r

184 by standard UV photolithography, with local field strengths in the multi-ten-MV/cm range at kHz repe

185 The EEG changes correlated with electric fields strengths in prefrontal cortices, and no correlat

186 human participants of either sex at 7 tesla field strength, in response to presentations (64 s block

187 Treating fruit mash with a moderate electric field strength increased juice yield and improved juice

188 radually align with the applied field as the field strength increases.

189 eakage of nicked subchromosomal fragments is field strength independent, some high-molecular-weight s

190 The measured field strength is approximately 50 to 70% that of the pr

191 When the field strength is comparable to or greater than the spec

192 he pulse amplitudes increase as the electric field strength is increased.

193 The field strength is proportional to the 0.4th power of the

194 s as a function of frequency offset and B(1) field strength is quantified to obtain the minor-state p

195 reshold for dynamo activity and the magnetic field strength is similar to that observed in the Archea

196 ability to scale to multi-megavolt-per-metre field strengths is demonstrated.

197 We find that field strengths larger than ~10(5) gauss may produce the

198 cles by increasing particle size or external field strength leads to a preference for a particular cr

199 factor-of-2 equator-to-pole increase in mean field strength, leaving the core dynamo process an enigm

200 The presence of a high field strength ligand such as an NHC in the complexes gi

201 We used high field strength magnetic resonance microscopy (muMRI) to

202 ters with different configurations (magnetic field strength, manufacturer, age).

203 ntration ratio (PCr/ATP) was similar at both field strengths (mean +/- standard deviation, 1.48 +/- 0

204 ing, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager.

205 inflammation that can be seen with clinical-field-strength MR imaging and use of the enzyme-sensitiv

206 caling level, no damage was observed at high-field-strength MR imaging or histologic examination 8 da

207 Ultrahigh-field-strength MR imaging permitted detection of selecti

208 adily visualized with positive-contrast high-field-strength MR imaging, micro-CT, and US both in vitr

209 High-field-strength MR microscopy yielded pronounced differen

210 Using high-field strength MRI, we report the novel finding that MDD

211 ial study suggests that high-performance low-field-strength MRI offers advantages for MRI-guided cath

212 luate applications of a high-performance low-field-strength MRI system, specifically MRI-guided cardi

213 Background Commercial low-field-strength MRI systems are generally not equipped wi

214 ween sequences while fixing manufacturer and field strength (n = 8).

215 e sequences across manufacturers (n = 4) and field strengths (n = 5), respectively.

216 Spectrometers now offer the field strengths necessary to visualize mammalian cells b

217 oscopy and the availability of high magnetic field strengths now offer the possibility to record real

218 The pooled mean of ECV was 25.9% at field strength of 1.5 T (95% CI: 25.5%, 26.3%) and 3.0 T

219 the risks associated with MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 tesla for patients who had a pacem

220 dy to assess the safety of MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 Tesla in 1509 patients who had a p

221 or clinically indicated nonthoracic MRI at a field strength of 1.5 tesla.

222 K, the Z1 shim set generated a 1st harmonic field strength of 179 kHz/cm at 70 A, while the Z2 shim

223 crease by at least eightfold at the clinical field strength of 3 T.

224 ved homogeneity over all liver segments at a field strength of 3.0 T.

225 At optimal PEF parameters: electric field strength of 3kV/cm and pulse width of 10mus after

226 he best separation efficiency at an electric field strength of 400 V/cm.

227 ded on all three aporepressors at a magnetic field strength of 600 MHz ((1)H Larmor frequency) were a

228 ion, and in one case we infer a minimum core field strength of approximately 10(7) gauss.

229 The vortex-assisted lysis only requires a field strength of approximately 100 V/cm, yet it efficie

230 urotransmission because, enabled by the high field strength of the animal scanner, we detected a prof

231 The change in field strength of the bis(imino)pyridine coupled with th

232 e terahertz (THz) range requires significant field strength of the light fields.

233 wo replicate examinations, and, finally, the field strength of the MR imaging unit.

234 low rates of 8 mL/min and less, and electric field strengths of 25 V/cm and greater.

235 ponential decay pulses with initial electric field strengths of approximately 13.3 kV/cm and approxim

236 potentials of up to approximately 1500 V and field strengths of up to 3000 V/cm, using a standard Ag/

237 ting grapes using moderate and high electric field strength on the enhancement of CI and TPI of the w

238 e of the sensitivity factors and the plasmon field strength on the wall thickness and the size of the

239 d spin relaxation rates at multiple magnetic field strengths on the C-terminal domain of the nucleopr

240 tly related to either the simulated electric field strength or the distance between the IRE electrode

241 ime, without altering the separation column, field strength, or electrolyte system.

242 oning, NASH diagnosis, fibrosis, or magnetic field strength (P = .65).

243 No significant influences of higher field strength, postcontrast acquisition, or qualitative

244 ts performed over 310-140 K and two magnetic field strengths provide insights into conformational var

245 age of highly focused and localized electric field strength provided by the micronozzle array over co

246 pillary interactions by exceeding a critical field strength, providing unprecedented control of the b

247 Previous estimates of the field strength range from 1.8-2.5 microG and the field w

248 nd relaxivities were determined at different field strengths ranging from 0.47 to 11.7 T.

249 We propose that the recurrence of low field strengths reflects core flux expulsion promoted by

250 l homojunction with 50% decrease of electric field strength required in the derivation of state trans

251 The threshold field strength required to drive transport, the threadin

252 (continuous, proportional to static magnetic field strength, requiring neither head movement nor dyna

253 ) studies conducted using a 7-Tesla magnetic field strength scanner, taking into account the specific

254 erosis) sites on multimanufacturer and multi-field-strength scans.

255 Small pockets of low magnetic field strength, small radius of curvature, and high elec

256 ion to being able to simulate spectra at any field strength, spin parameters can be adjusted to syste

257 ar, functional MR imaging paradigm, magnetic field strength, statistical threshold, and analysis soft

258 ion revealed changes not visible using lower field strengths, such as hippocampal subfield atrophy in

259 ithin a nanofunnel at sub-threshold electric field strengths, suggesting the utility of nanofunnels a

260 cally improved with the introduction of high-field-strength superconducting magnets, digital RF syste

261 Ancient field strengths that range from those similar to Mercury

262 Even at high electric field strengths the cell remained largely intact and mos

263 ion with the pores, but at sufficiently high field strengths, the T = 3 and T = 4 capsids had the sam

264 hereas the drops coalesce as expected at low field strengths, they are repelled from one another afte

265 ough different outlets to different electric field strength, thus resulting in different impedance si

266 nditions of electrophoresis such as electric field strength, time of electrophoresis, switch time, an

267 ic energy barrier while limiting the driving field strength to a small fraction of the applied electr

268 EF modeling showed the field strength to be uniform in the subtending plane of

269 e was used to compare the simulated electric field strength to histologic findings.

270 on requires restricting the maximum possible field strength to much less than the spectral linewidth

271 fold improvement in the ratio of the maximum field strength to precision, for field magnitudes that a

272 is, (b) avoid the need for multiple magnetic field strengths to extract dynamic parameters, (c) measu

273 insects, however, can approach close to high field strength transmission lines prompting the question

274 At low field strengths, transport of the larger T = 4 capsid th

275 were treated with PEF at different electric field strengths up to 1.2kV/cm.

276 donors in bulk silicon with various electric field strengths up to near avalanche breakdown in high m

277 separation can be performed at high average field strengths (up to 1.6 kV/cm) without encountering t

278 set results from the differences in electric field strength used in the techniques.

279 tremor at different levels of gravitational field strength using a human centrifuge, thereby increas

280 These findings replicated at super-high 7 T field strength using different compounds of sweet and bi

281 had marked heterogeneity across studies with field strength, vendor, and pulse sequence identified as

282 anging the relative strength of the external field strength versus the dipolar interactions between t

283 ICC according to field strength was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.88) at 1.5 T (n

284 )2Fe6(L')m](n+) in which the terminal ligand field strength was modulated from weak to strong (L' = D

285 ifuge to increase head-to-foot gravitational field strength, we were able to control for the increase

286 dic channel and applying a range of electric field strengths, we produce protocells that exhibit repe

287 ogic characteristics, and simulated electric field strengths were assessed.

288 Different MRI scanner vendors and field strengths were included.

289 Electric field strengths were strongest in superficial brain regi

290 esidue-by-residue variations in the magnetic field strengths where TROSY line narrowing is most effec

291 Blood oxygenation was quantified at 3.0-T field strength with a field mapping pulse sequence yield

292 from the measured decrease in gravitational field strength with elevation.

293 ransmission images exhibited areas of low B1 field strength with reduced image contrast.

294 available spectrometers of varying magnetic field strengths with a standard 5 mm probe setup.

295 e forms of BSA detected at elevated electric field strengths (with and without urea).

296 et only approximately 60% of the present-day field strength, with a long-term average virtual axial d

297 onic current with a greatly reduced electric field strength, with particular benefits for live cell i

298 t this curling behavior at least doubles the field strength within shocked prey, most likely ensuring

299 ent and bursting emission, implying that the field strength within the star's outer crust is orders o

300 with experiment for three different magnetic field strengths without adjusting any parameters.