戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ce flaws does not significantly increase the flexural strength.
2 ystalline C-S-H, renowned for its remarkable flexural strength.
3 healing, resulting in a 27.8% improvement in flexural strength.
4 ns due to their esthetic appearance and high flexural strength.
5 n enhance resistance to both compressive and flexural strengths.
6 ith the coated nanoparticles showed improved flexural strength (10% to 30% higher) and work of fractu
7 Large particles at 2 wt% yielded the highest flexural strength (134.03 +/- 4.65 MPa) and Vickers hard
8                                  The highest flexural strength (195+/-8 MPa) and fracture toughness (
9 undred resin), with enhancements of 13.4% in flexural strength, 25% in tensile strength, and 21.5% in
10 day water-aging, NACP+QADM nanocomposite had flexural strength and elastic modulus matching those of
11 (2)-decorated densified bamboo exhibits high flexural strength and elastic stiffness, with both prope
12  than ChNC resulted in the greatest improved flexural strength and fracture energy by 24% and 28%.
13 bon nanotubes (CNTs) (3DP GC) with both high flexural strength and hierarchical porous structure is r
14 exhibited significantly enhanced tensile and flexural strength and moduli.
15 es were tested for CHX release and recharge, flexural strength and modulus (at 24 hr and 1 mo), surfa
16 y scanning electron microscopy, ISO standard flexural strength and modulus measurements, contact angl
17                                              Flexural strength and modulus, toughness, and fracture t
18 e stabilization of cubic leucite reduced the flexural strength and the number of crack deflections in
19                   Degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength and Vickers hardness were evaluated to
20 strength (50.1 MPa tensile strength, 6.7 MPa flexural strength, and 26.7 MPa compressive strength), h
21 dental porcelain, evaluate its effect on the flexural strength, and characterize its microstructure.
22 ed mineralized trabecular bone volume, lower flexural strength, and histologic evidence of osteomalac
23 ensile strength, tensile modulus, ductility, flexural strength, and Izod impact energy.
24 ties of PCC, including compressive strength, flexural strength, and splitting tensile strength, play
25 WPA) on the flow time, compressive strength, flexural strength, and thermal conductivity of mortars.
26 ute to its high mechanical tensile strength, flexural strength, and toughness.
27 splays a three-fold elevation in tensile and flexural strength, as compared to pure epoxy resin, with
28  compromised, although a slight reduction in flexural strength associated with the nanogel-modified i
29 ne conditions, and increased compressive and flexural strength at 28 and 56 days compared to the cont
30 lly matched glass would increase the biaxial flexural strength (BFS).
31 atrix increased the compressive strength and flexural strength by 65%, and 74%, respectively, after 2
32 critical role of the 1D CNTs in the enhanced flexural strength by increasing the friction and adhesio
33 e toughness of common glasses, while keeping flexural strengths comparable to transparent polymers, s
34 s exhibited a significantly lower (p < 0.05) flexural strength compared with rapidly cooled specimens
35                                The composite flexural strength, elastic modulus, hardness, and degree
36                                          The flexural strength first increased, then plateaued with i
37 ased composites exhibit significantly higher flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness and lo
38     The NPUA-based resins exhibit the higher flexural strength, flexural modulus, hardness, and hydro
39  0.3% GO-MMt demonstrated superior values of flexural strength, followed by RBC + 0.5% GO-MMt (p < 0.
40                             The mean biaxial flexural strength for the group corresponding to 22.2 wt
41 nocomposites, including water-aging effects, flexural strength, fracture toughness, and three-body we
42 ive strength from 46.36 MPa to 49.81 MPa and flexural strength from 10.5 MPa to 11.47 MPa, indicating
43                                          The flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) were no
44 a-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the flexural strength (FS), surface hardness, fracture tough
45       These optimal loadings were tested for flexural strength (FS), water sorption (WS) and solubili
46                                          The flexural strength in MPa (mean +/- SD; n = 10) was 86 +/
47 hisker composite with 70% filler level had a flexural strength in MPa (mean +/- SD; n = 6) of 248 +/-
48                                          The flexural strengths in MPa (mean +/- SD; n = 6) of DCPA-w
49 hermally reduced Gr-rGO-reinforced GFRPs the flexural strength increased by 15.7% and 14.4%, tensile
50 ronmental, and electronic systems where high flexural strength is preferred.
51 illed denture bases demonstrated the highest flexural strength (MD = -1.11, 95% CI [-1.29, -0.93], p
52 ite with a filler mass fraction of 55% had a flexural strength (mean +/- SD; n = 6) of 196+/-10 MPa,
53                                          The flexural strength (mean+/-SD; n = 10) was 86+/-20 MPa fo
54                                          The flexural strength, modulus, and resilience were signific
55 particulate-filled compounds (p < 0.001) for flexural strength, modulus, work of fracture, strain at
56                                              Flexural strength/modulus increased significantly for bo
57 re characterized by evaluating their 3-point flexural strength (n = 6), modulus of elasticity (n = 6)
58 e validation experiments yielded the maximum flexural strength of 78.52 MPa, the maximum ultimate ten
59 crostructure, crack deflection patterns, and flexural strength of a leucite-reinforced porcelain.
60 ved carbon nanomaterial, the compressive and flexural strength of cement samples are enhanced by 24%
61 gs of 0.02 to 0.06 wt.%, the compressive and flexural strength of concrete composites increases by 28
62                                          The flexural strength of hydrated OWC samples was increased
63 ent distribution, apatite/collagen ratio and flexural strength of mineralized dentin treated with GA
64 PEI) binder for silica sand that doubled the flexural strength of parts to 6.28 MPa compared with tha
65 ughness, DeltaE, surface micro-hardness, and flexural strength of the 3D printed dentures were measur
66                                          The flexural strength of the aluminas was determined with th
67                                              Flexural strength of the compact is not only determined
68  with the control ones, the reduction of the flexural strength of the heat-treated, impregnation/heat
69 crostructure, crack deflection patterns, and flexural strength of the material.
70                                     The mean flexural strength of the rubidium-exchanged material was
71                       The nanocomposites had flexural strengths of 70-120 MPa, after 84-day immersion
72 thalate (PET) to enhance the compressive and flexural strengths of these mortars.
73 2.4% of increase in compressive strength and flexural strength respectively, due to fiber-paste inter
74  powder, as evidenced by its compressive and flexural strengths, respectively.
75                                     Plots of flexural strength S versus indentation load P show a ste
76 after 7 days and 61.90% after 56 days, while flexural strength showed a 66.17% increase after 7 days
77 es a simple and effective method to evaluate flexural strength sigma(F) and fracture toughness K(C).
78           Dentin beams were used for 3-point flexural strength (sigma) test.
79 g with enhanced fracture toughness (KIC) and flexural strength (sigmaf) of the composites by ~75% (5.
80 d at 1150 degrees C exhibited a mean biaxial flexural strength significantly higher than that of all
81 lts showed that at 0.50% JF and 10% CCA, the flexural strength, splitting tensile strength and compre
82 ctate and powder:liquid ratio (p < 0.001) on flexural strength, strain-at-peak-load, work-of-fracture
83 ough compressive strength, split-tensile and flexural strength tests.
84 al symmetric unit cells showed 13-35% higher flexural strength than octet cell cored counterpart.
85 istinct advantages: i) an intrinsically high flexural strength that enables their large-scale applica
86 ry infiltration, resulting in an increase in flexural strength to 52.7 MPa.
87 ths, similar tensile strengths, and superior flexural strengths to those of NAC after 90 days.
88 hane to the commercial cement led to similar flexural strength, toughness, and conversion at 72h comp
89 owever, lower correlations were observed for flexural strength-toughness and flexural toughness-MOR w
90 amic content, leading to a trade-off between flexural strength (varying from 89 to 800 MPa) and fract
91 xy) phenyl]-propane (BisGMA) were tested for flexural strength, viscosity, and water sorption.
92            The particle size, mechanical and flexural strength was also determined.
93  such as Young's modulus, shear modulus, and flexural strength were calculated for selected complexes
94 litting tensile strength, bond strength, and flexural strength with a maximum increase of 34.5%, 35%,
95 asured shear stress concentration factor and flexural strength with the fracture toughness of concret
96                                              Flexural strength, work-of-fracture, and fracture toughn