ライフサイエンスコーパス: floral

1 The broad expression of homologues of floral ABCE genes in N. colorata might support a similar

2 to strong gain-of-function brassinosteroid, floral abscission, and stomatal patterning phenotypes, r

3 impact, and both plant species richness and floral abundance decreased with the addition of fertilis

4 Higher floral abundance following fire not only increased forag

5 n flowers was lowest late in the season when floral abundance was highest.

6 rch highlights the important balance between floral activators and repressors in coordinating the res

7 r of photoperiodic flowering upstream of the floral activators OsMADS14 and Hd3a, through a mechanism

8 Distyly is an intriguing floral adaptation that increases pollen transfer precisi

9 male and female mosquitoes consume sugar as floral and extrafloral nectar.

10 Riverine floodplains exhibit high floral and faunal diversity as a consequence of their bi

11 only occurring volatile associated with both floral and fecal odors-by a set of 36 tested odorants.

12 rait locus (QTL) distribution) underlying 25 floral and fertility traits.

13 adhesiveness), and volatile (compounds with floral and fruity notes and lower "goat" aroma) properti

14 or honey authentication, with respect to its floral and geographical origin.

15 verall woody aromas which might mask fruity, floral and mineral (gun flint) character.

16 role of pleiotropy in the differentiation of floral and other reproductive traits between two species

17 specific tropical/citrus fruit, kerosene and floral and Tempranillo toasty-woody and red-fruit charac

18 d trade-offs among floral traits and between floral and vegetative traits may influence the distribut

19 relations, while the low QTL overlap between floral and vegetative traits suggests that these trait s

20 garding sensory analysis, greater citrus and floral aromas were perceived for MLF-tank wines, and hig

21 These genes show distinct, floral-biased expression patterns compared to paralogous

22 l division and expansion are responsible for floral bilateral symmetry.

23 a master role for the petunia SEP3 ortholog FLORAL BINDING PROTEIN2 (FBP2).

24 of flavonols and anthocyanins of dry SF and floral bio-residues of saffron (FBR) and their kinetics

25 rgan specification, low temperature-mediated floral bud break, early blooming in winter, and strong c

26 rk shows that winter annuals overwinter as a floral bud in a manner that resembles perennials and hig

27 sitol metabolism was affected differently in floral buds and leaves.

28 The last ciders were also more floral, buttery, acidic and bitter than those made from

29 omeotic MADS-domain proteins that define the floral C- (AG) and D- (SHP1/SHP2, STK) functions.

30 that caused the interspecific differences in floral color and scent have been elucidated in a variety

31 signal matching - apply to the evolution of floral color and scent.

32 may alter pollination through its impact on floral color, with repercussions for plant reproductive

33 ion to evaluate responses of bees to diverse floral communities on 36 farms in Washington, USA, over

34 Floral concentrations of medicinal cannabidiol (CBD) and

35 to optimize longevity in light of competing floral construction and maintenance costs.

36 increased nectar availability in southern US floral corridors.

37 can reduce access to pollen through altered floral cues or morphological structures, but can also re

38 invading natural openings at the base of the floral cup.

39 Recognizing the interdependence of these floral currencies may help identify traits that drive in

40 expression of DOAG1, but not DOAG2, rescues floral defects in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana)

41 tands that were post-outbreak had 62% higher floral density and 68% more floral species during peak b

42 st in-depth transcriptome profiling of early floral development in Aquilegia at four finely dissected

43 ns in lobe number and fusion, reminiscent of floral development in extant species.

44 r as inflorescence meristems, which complete floral development in spring.

45 The earliest phases of floral development include a number of crucial processes

46 es in these species during inflorescence and floral development is essential to understand their role

47 unctional conservation of key genes in early floral development that have been identified in other sy

48 eaf width, inflorescence architecture and/or floral development were affected.

49 pression of many candidate genes involved in floral development were significantly increased, particu

50 on factors are critical in the regulation of floral development, and shifting MADS box protein-protei

51 s of transcriptional regulation during early floral development, but also the potential involvement o

52 ize and infertile due to multiple defects in floral development.

53 d that HvCEN interacts with HvFT1 to repress floral development.

54 with stress and hormone responses as well as floral development.

55 We analyse floral disparity in the environmental and phylogenetic c

56 d us to propose a new hypothesis that global floral dispersal had progressed southward along the Acad

57 l signs, such as earlier blooming or reduced floral display in early melting years.

58 application of resource allocation theory to floral display trait evolution.

59 Floral longevity is a critical component of floral display, yet there is a conspicuous paucity of em

60 However, effects of multi-species floral displays on bees in agro-ecosystems with variable

61 important for explaining patterns of extant floral diversity and examining how altered signaling con

62 pproaches to assess how sensory drive shapes floral diversity.

63 evolution concomitant with the generation of floral diversity.

64 Here, we propose the development of a floral economics spectrum (FES) that incorporates the mu

65 significant changes in the levels of fruity/floral esters and terpenols.

66 sequences for plant reproductive success and floral evolution, and thus has the potential to influenc

67 nteractions are predicted to have influenced floral evolution.

68 The risk of floral exposure to frost in the recent past and in the f

69 We identify the master regulator of floral fate, LEAFY (LFY) as a target under dual opposite

70 plants in full sun, receiving 7.5-fold more floral food rewards compared to shade-cultivated plants.

71 Results show that floral form and function may be conserved over large evo

72 PEP activity is required for correct C and D floral functions, which in turn prevents ectopic express

73 ve plants that produce many flowers and have floral generalisation are able to compensate for or avoi

74 e control of seed size, acting downstream of floral homeotic factors.

75 r LDs and short days, whereas HvCEN affected floral homeotic genes only under LDs.

76 tween dark vs light varieties, multi- vs uni-floral honey and producers of the same PDO.

77 up fed honey could not be distinguished from floral honey based on sugar profile, rather by its trace

78 Urban multi-floral honeys contained higher TPC (28.26 +/- 13.63) tha

79 We found that floral richness, not floral identity, was the best predictor of floral visits

80 tant phenotype, a range of genes involved in floral induction and flower development are upregulated

81 ts reveal a cooperative regulation of tomato floral induction and flower development, integrating age

82 d in wild-type plants, but GA still promotes floral induction and the transcription of floral meriste

83 We conclude that distinct bZIPs orchestrate floral induction at the meristem and that FAC formation

84 l member of the Brassicaceae, only undergoes floral induction during vernalization, allowing definiti

85 l promoter CiFT2 even in the presence of the floral inductive signals.

86 formation is controlled by a homolog of the floral inductor FLOWERING LOCUS T, referred to as SP6A.

87 We developed floral-inspired reflector forms and demonstrate their fu

88 The observed floral integration, manifested by a high degree overlap

89 , but also as a direct activator of putative floral integrator/identity genes including GmSOC1, GmAP1

90 l phenolic content (TPC) of single vs. multi-floral Irish and selected international honeys, and whet

91 We measured maximum floral longevity alongside protandry, flower size, flowe

92 Resource availability influenced mean floral longevity and flower number, with genetic variati

93 Evolutionary models of floral longevity are grounded in resource allocation the

94 Floral longevity is a critical component of floral displ

95 umers for clear honey labelling, identifying floral make-ups and the substantial health properties of

96 te metabolism in squash nectaries throughout floral maturation and the associated starch and soluble

97 2 enhance drl1 mutant phenotypes by reducing floral meristem (FM) determinacy.

98 AP2/ERF transcription factor which regulates floral meristem activity.

99 istem periphery and is strong throughout the floral meristem and intersepal regions.

100 yet they, exert different roles in mediating floral meristem determinacy and ovule development, respe

101 s in floral organ identity determination and floral meristem determinacy in the rosid species Arabido

102 es floral induction and the transcription of floral meristem identity genes during vernalization.

103 Furthermore, auxin regulates floral meristem identity genes, such as Matricaria inodo

104 promoted by advanced seasonal expression of floral meristem identity genes.

105 rabidopsis, play a major role in determining floral meristem identity together with FBP4, while contr

106 formed flowers is labile, demonstrating that floral meristem maturation involves the stabilisation of

107 cular fruits due to an increased size of the floral meristem.

108 ndant roles in the specification of axillary floral meristems and lemma identity.

109 ing terpene profiles for clonal propagation, floral metabolite profiling, and trichome-specific trans

110 However, experimental floral misorientation in eight species with radially sym

111 Trees from floral-modified events did not differ significantly (P <

112 Compared to floral morphogenesis, we understand little about the net

113 ich lineages that show apparent conservative floral morphologies even under strong selective pressure

114 Variation in floral morphology among Myrcia clades is exceptionally l

115 Floral morphology and foraging behaviour of the introduc

116 ence for prolific speciation despite uniform floral morphology in a tropical species-rich tree lineag

117 been critical for evolutionary divergence of floral morphology in relation to their pollinators.

118 ution of characters such as sexual system or floral morphology.

119 rious polymorphism with black, red and white floral morphs in the Alpine orchid Gymnadenia rhellicani

120 Floral nectar is a sugary solution produced by nectaries

121 In flowering plants, floral nectar spurs are a prime example of a key innovat

122 Floral nectar spurs are widely considered a key innovati

123 theory predicts close size matching between floral nectar tube depth and pollinator proboscis length

124 Floral nectaries are an interesting example of a converg

125 ated N metabolism in Cucurbita pepo (squash) floral nectaries in order to understand how various N-co

126 uality landscapes (i.e., those with abundant floral/nesting resources) to maintain healthy wild bee p

127 vel conditions, including various metrics of floral/nesting resources, insecticides, weather, and hon

128 s significant for seed fruit, ripe fruit and floral notes.

129 fine-tune stochastic variation in wild type floral number and similar to MFS1, promotes meristem ide

130 alth will benefit from the promotion of high floral numbers to reduce transmission risk, maintaining

131 both measure how much pollution of a learned floral-odor bumblebees can tolerate and identify which s

132 uch as compound inflorescences and a complex floral ontogeny.

133 larly broadly active ancestral ABCE model of floral organ determination in early angiosperms.

134 plant, and exhibited a delay in recovery of floral organ development under prolonged drought stress.

135 ole in shoot apical meristem maintenance and floral organ development, and under intense selection du

136 in functions such as polarity specification, floral organ development, meristem development and auxin

137 classic A-C antagonism of the ABC model for floral organ development.

138 logs together with AGL6 encode classical SEP floral organ identity and floral termination functions,

139 The type II TFs regulate floral organ identity and flowering time, but type I TFs

140 ription factor subfamilies play key roles in floral organ identity determination and floral meristem

141 MADS-box genes, known to regulate floral organ identity, are emerging as important regulat

142 FBP4, while contributing only moderately to floral organ identity.

143 e aspects of floral organogenesis, including floral organ initiation, growth, identity specification

144 Differences in floral organ length determine the pollination efficiency

145 ng defective floral phyllotaxy and increased floral organ merosity, especially supernumerary sepals,

146 Wildtype floral organ number in early formed flowers is labile, d

147 transcriptional repressor that regulates the floral organ number in the third and fourth floral whorl

148 rsweet, such as floral transition in spring, floral organ specification, low temperature-mediated flo

149 In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, floral organogenesis requires AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) and AIN

150 ether, ANT and AIL6/PLT3 regulate aspects of floral organogenesis, including floral organ initiation,

151 factor, is known to control plant growth and floral organogenesis.

152 s beyond its known roles in plant growth and floral organogenesis.

153 ing methods, we isolated EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF FLORAL ORGANS (ENO), an AP2/ERF transcription factor whi

154 synergistically in the development of other floral organs and inflorescence architecture.

155 undation for the subsequent morphogenesis of floral organs and success in reproduction.

156 MtSUP controls not only the number of floral organs in the inner two whorls, but also in the s

157 induce expression of these genes and retain floral organs indefinitely.

158 is (Arabidopsis thaliana), the abscission of floral organs is regulated by two related receptor-like

159 live imaging of the germ cell lineage within floral organs of Arabidopsis using light sheet fluoresce

160 gnals may explain the different abilities of floral organs to form fleshy fruit.

161 The differential competence of floral organs to respond to fertilization signals may ex

162 they are broadly expressed in vegetative and floral organs, but have relatively higher expression in

163 etween the Genomosperma lobed integument and floral organs, we propose that the cupule, integument an

164 blishes boundaries between most P. axillaris floral organs, with the exception of boundaries between

165 mously from differentiating cells in lateral floral organs.

166 uce plant fitness if it leads to 'incorrect' floral orientation and thus reduced visitation or poor p

167 When floral orientation is important for accurate pollination

168 hysiochemical properties varied according to floral origin, and whether hives were in urban or rural

169 linated plants have evolved specially shaped floral parts that act as sonar reflectors, making the pl

170 nes as major regulators of cell division and floral patterning in model core eudicots.

171 nd illustrate the potential for the extended floral phenotype (the phenotype expressed from the genes

172 t of 12 flowering MPG events showed modified floral phenotypes in a field trial in Oregon, USA.

173 Alterations in all of the modified floral phenotypes were stable over 4 yr of study.

174 mutants and ect2/ect3/ect4 exhibit aberrant floral phyllotaxis.

175 eproductive development, including defective floral phyllotaxy and increased floral organ merosity, e

176 e pleiotropically affects meristem identity, floral phyllotaxy and organ initiation and is conserved

177 uld consider nonpollinator biotic agents and floral physiological costs, broadening the drivers of fl

178 t collections to uncover global responses in floral pigmentation linked to ozone and climate change.

179 ults document a rapid phenotypic response of floral pigmentation to anthropogenic climatic change, su

180 om 1941 to 2017 to test whether change in UV floral pigmentation was associated with altered ozone an

181 versity, and species assemblages in both the floral plantings and adjoining apple orchards.

182 Floral plantings are promoted to foster ecological inten

183 Artificially established floral plantings may offset these losses.

184 dings provide promising pathways to optimise floral plantings to more effectively contribute to ecosy

185 assessment of the effectiveness of different floral plantings, their characteristics and consequences

186 tly different between apple orchards and the floral plantings.

187 ERF12 expression encircles incipient floral primordia in the inflorescence meristem periphery

188 The drl paralogs are co-expressed in lateral floral primordia, but not within the FM.

189 ressor, which prevents the activation of the floral promoter CiFT2 even in the presence of the floral

190 Floral recognition was realized in a lower percentage re

191 Concomitant changes in the expression of floral regulator genes suggest that these processes are

192 interactions among and between the conserved floral regulators, TCP and MADS-box TFs, contribute to t

193 Floral reorientation restores pollination accuracy and f

194 atural variation in expression levels of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) leads to differ

195 ndent repression and epigenetic silencing of floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC).

196 ercomplex that promotes transcription of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC).

197 the florigen gene FTa1 and repression of the floral repressor LF Our results establish the conserved

198 rrelating with the induction of the CcMADS19 floral repressor, which prevents the activation of the f

199 ited the highest pathogen loads, with spring floral resources and nesting habitat availability servin

200 llinator communities hinges significantly on floral resources provided by ornamental plants.

201 rips benefited colony reproduction by adding floral resources, but certain plant species also come wi

202 ity composition through cascading effects on floral resources, mediated via mortality of overstory tr

203 utbreak stands and increased availability of floral resources.

204 was used to link FLC expression dynamics to floral response following vernalization.

205 and clarify broader evolutionary patterns of floral reward phenotypes.

206 These effects strongly increase with floral reward productivity and are qualitatively robust

207 a marketplace that involves the exchange of floral rewards for pollination service [1].

208 to lower nitrogen input from ants feeding on floral rewards instead of insect protein gained from pre

209 t are cultivated for their nesting sites and floral rewards.

210 We found that floral richness, not floral identity, was the best predi

211 and eudicots; the molecular basis underlying floral scent biosynthesis; and winter flowering, and hig

212 OBII, that were previously shown to regulate floral scent emission, a trait associated with pollinati

213 ssion of benzaldehyde as a main component of floral scent has been lost in selfing C. rubella by muta

214 Floral scent is one of the most important characters in

215 ve ortholog of the petunia (Petunia hybrida) floral scent regulator ODORANT1 (ODO1), controls the exc

216 el patterns of ecological convergence in the floral scent signal, including an impact of the presence

217 pose that one potential key to understanding floral scent variation in this hypervariable genus is it

218 pene and benzenoid/phenylpropanoid (the main floral scent volatiles) biosynthesis, which may contribu

219 aluate intra- and interspecific variation in floral scent, which is a complex trait of documented imp

220 g pollinators, including reduced emission of floral scent.

221 as indicated that anthropogenic pollution of floral-scent may have negative impacts on bumblebee fora

222 Water lilies have evolved attractive floral scents and colours, which are features shared wit

223 ical compounds and biosynthetic genes behind floral scents suggest that they have evolved in parallel

224 rs offered combinations of sucrose solution, floral scents, and aversive electric shock.

225 ow that artificial sonar beacons inspired by floral shapes streamline the navigation efficacy of sona

226 ons, and how environmental conditions impact floral signal transmission and perception.

227 In plants, the extreme diversification of floral signals has fascinated biologists for over a cent

228 es preference for high quality, non-aversive floral sites.

229 potential case of adaptive pleiotropy among floral size and nectar traits.

230 f PF-H honey was determined depending on the floral source (pentanal, alpha-pinene and benzaldehyde w

231 Discrete floral specialisations do occur, but these are few, pres

232 However, the benefits of regionally rare floral species (i.e. plants found at relatively few site

233 k had 62% higher floral density and 68% more floral species during peak bloom, respectively, than non

234 the meristem to change from a vegetative to floral state.

235 gulates SlWUS expression domains to maintain floral stem-cell homeostasis.

236 Artichoke floral stems (AFS) food waste by-products were examined

237 of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), encoding a mobile floral stimulus that moves from leaves to the shoot apex

238 Although a closed flower may protect the floral structures, this could also cause yield losses by

239 rter stature, reduced seed set, and abnormal floral structures.

240 Floral symmetry and evolutionary history determined HP l

241 We further analyzed the role of floral symmetry and evolutionary history in mediating pa

242 Floral syndromes are complex adaptations to pollinators

243 code classical SEP floral organ identity and floral termination functions, with a master role for the

244 Pigmentation also affects floral thermoregulation, suggesting climate warming may

245 ich demonstrated signatures of selection and floral tissue specificity.

246 ssessment of recent changes in frost risk to floral tissues, using digital records of 475,694 herbari

247 d to relatively few cells buried deep within floral tissues, which makes them difficult to study.

248 t understudied, axis of variation that shape floral trait evolution and angiosperm reproductive ecolo

249 se mechanisms may have facilitated the rapid floral trait evolution observed within Jaltomata, and ma

250 Molecular basis of floral trait variation underlying pollinator shift 698 V

251 pollinator selection, and, therefore, affect floral trait variation.

252 haracterize the major trade-offs and axes of floral trait variation.

253 ive traits may influence the distribution of floral traits across biomes and lineages, thereby influe

254 Understanding how floral traits affect reproduction is key for understandi

255 These results suggest that the floral traits affecting the visiting order of pollinator

256 mic practices on C. arabica and C. canephora floral traits and also helps fill a gap in knowledge abo

257 w coordinated evolution and trade-offs among floral traits and between floral and vegetative traits m

258 Floral traits and rewards are important in mediating int

259 milarities between parallel modifications of floral traits and test for genetic and developmental con

260 ysiological costs, broadening the drivers of floral traits beyond pollinators.

261 incorporates the multiple pathways by which floral traits can be shaped by multiple agents of select

262 (Solanaceae) - that have divergent suites of floral traits consistent with bee and hummingbird pollin

263 have caused substantial divergence in other floral traits due to genetic correlations, while the low

264 We found that most floral traits had a relatively simple genetic basis (few

265 r understanding of how selection acts on key floral traits in taxonomically diverse species, and that

266 mechanical properties of vibrations, and how floral traits may influence the transmission of those vi

267 Floral traits predicted species roles within pollen tran

268 ts, pollen was identified and enumerated and floral traits were measured.

269 nowledge about the effects of shade trees on floral traits, which can be pertinent to other agrofores

270 e will impact the evolutionary trajectory of floral traits.

271 major compound 2PE, we analyzed the plumeria floral transcriptome and found a highly expressed, flowe

272 S69 allele is expressed at a higher level at floral transition and confers earlier flowering than the

273 ults in raised FLC expression and delays the floral transition by 3 weeks but only has a mild effect

274 Thus, GA accelerates the floral transition during vernalization in A. alpina, the

275 demonstrate that plants proceed through the floral transition in early November and overwinter as in

276 ical characteristics of wintersweet, such as floral transition in spring, floral organ specification,

277 mechanism reminiscent of that one underlying floral transition in temperate cereals.

278 However, the function of SPL10 in regulating floral transition is largely unknown.

279 They negatively regulate the floral transition through direct repression of FLOWERING

280 The nut1 phenotype is evident only after the floral transition, and the mutants have difficulty movin

281 ion, trichome branching, leaf morphogenesis, floral transition, stress responses, fruit ripening, and

282 wnstream of SPL10 to execute SPL10-regulated floral transition.

283 RISPR/Cas9 technology delayed growth and the floral transition.

284 Contrary to the expectation that floral visitation would increase monotonically with warm

285 it from limiting the community of generalist floral visitors if the species that remain are more effe

286 t floral identity, was the best predictor of floral visits by bees.

287 cial player in the biosynthesis of the major floral VOC 2PE and other nitrogen-containing volatiles.

288 all of which were also found among plumeria floral VOCs.

289 Petunia x hybrida cv 'Mitchell Diploid' floral volatile benzenoid/phenylpropanoid (FVBP) biosynt

290 ored and fragrant flowers, emits a number of floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

291 loral volatiles, and the emission of a novel floral volatile.

292 esults reveal an unusually high diversity of floral volatiles among populations, species, and clades

293 script did not have as large of an effect on floral volatiles as was observed for PhC3H down regulati

294 noid (FVBP) biosynthesis ultimately produces floral volatiles derived sequentially from phenylalanine

295 her FVBP network transcripts, a reduction in floral volatiles, and the emission of a novel floral vol

296 amic acid amides, phenylacetaldehyde-derived floral volatiles, and tyrosol derivatives.

297 were significantly reduced on the downstream floral volatiles.

298 s, and described as sweet, spicy, fruity and floral were observed.

299 nd act as B-function repressors in the first floral whorl, together with BEN/ROB genes.

300 floral organ number in the third and fourth floral whorls of Arabidopsis thaliana.