ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluency

1 in other cognitive abilities (i.e., category fluency).

2 d not reflect altered perceptual or response fluency.

3 ept for tests of immediate recall and verbal fluency.

4 iations were for global cognition and verbal fluency.

5 rated decline in global cognition and verbal fluency.

6 area and its homologue in relation to verbal fluency.

7 this system are involved in subcomponents of fluency.

8 lobal cognition, verbal memory, and category fluency.

9 with digit recall (dual-task) and in letter fluency.

10 ional connectivity compared with nonmnemonic fluency.

11 ween anterior segment involvement and speech fluency.

12 d with less decline in WFT, a test of verbal fluency.

13 rent performance and the subjective sense of fluency.

14 ditory feedback for those with better verbal fluency.

15 o be impaired in this group, phonemic verbal fluency.

16 mation processing and on a measure of verbal fluency.

17 < .05) with the exception of semantic verbal fluency.

18 sures predicted verbal recognition or verbal fluency.

19 niasis relative to women with moderate or no fluency.

20 rs and several other types of disruptions to fluency.

21 neral cognition, verbal memory, and category fluency.

22 k of cognitive decline in the area of verbal fluency.

23 bal function, executive function, and verbal fluency.

24 udinally associated with changes in semantic fluency.

25 ecline with aging: delayed recall and verbal fluency.

26 nce in both phonological and semantic verbal fluency.

27 ) and discuss the role of mixed emotions and fluency.

28 sitively associated with the semantic verbal fluency.

29 .01]), SCAFI Z scores (-0.09 [0.01]), verbal fluency (-0.34 words [0.07]), and ADL (0.64 points [0.04

30 4 [5 studies]), and language tests (category fluency, 0.92 and 0.89 [9 studies]).

31 ated polymer:fullerene blends (at excitation fluencies ~10(15) photons/cm(2) per pulse) is shown to b

32 asks; specifically, the TACT-Visual for both fluency (33.48 +/- 11.83 vs 25.59 +/- 10.27, p = 0.034)

33 greater annualised rate of decline in letter fluency (4.5 +/- 1.3 words/year) than C9N FTLD (1.4 +/-

34 n (18%), memory impairments (12%), decreased fluency (8%) and impaired articulation (5%).

35 ce on word list learning and semantic verbal fluency, a pattern more typical of the cognitive deficit

36 tex was proportional to the change in verbal fluency, a simple index of executive function.

37 e with differential aspects of the patients' fluency abilities.

38 ]; P = .03), lower scores on tests of verbal fluency (adjusted z scores, 0.50 vs -2.02; P = .02), wor

39 related with the percentage change in verbal fluency after anterior temporal lobe resection, such tha

40 y, and figural memory and a trend for verbal fluency (all P < .05).

41 ures of cognitive abilities, except Category Fluency, also were associated broadly with age; of the g

42 ficulty in patients with ALS-FTD on category fluency and a sentence-ordering task that assesses gramm

43 posterior cortical basis, including semantic fluency and ability to copy an intersecting pentagons fi

44 was associated with rate of change in verbal fluency and BIN1 was associated with rate of change in g

45 dicted subsequent decline in phonemic verbal fluency and Clinical Dementia Rating scale plus FTD modu

46 76560(T) was associated with impaired verbal fluency and comprehension in schizophrenia but improved

47 D- on Symbol-Digit Matching, Verbal Category Fluency and Delayed Recall tests.

48 worth also delineating how feelings, such as fluency and emotion, influence mental simulation.

49 of short-term recall and attention, semantic fluency and fund of knowledge, and motor praxis.

50 e frontal aslant tract in relation to verbal fluency and grammar impairment in primary progressive ap

51 ct and grammar deficits suggests that verbal fluency and grammar processing rely on distinct anatomic

52 was the neuroanatomical distinction between fluency and grammatical processing.

53 this review, we examine both RAN and reading fluency and how each has shaped our understanding of rea

54 , which showed weak correlations with verbal fluency and inhibitory control at younger ages that incr

55 A composite cognition measure of verbal fluency and memory and attention constructed from result

56 with even more marked deficits in the verbal fluency and memory domains.

57 ticularly associated with deficits in verbal fluency and memory functioning.

58 associated with better performance in verbal fluency and memory functions.

59 icantly correlated with postoperative verbal fluency and naming test scores.

60 Phonemic fluency and other frontally based tasks were not associa

61 associations with declarative memory, letter fluency and processing speed tasks.

62 e gone beyond word reading to affect reading fluency and reading comprehension.

63 lated to standardized behavioral measures of fluency and reading.

64 x-Item Screener (SIS) and every 2 years with fluency and recall tasks.

65 plexity, lexical content, speech production, fluency and semantic content.

66 dardized behavioral measures of orthographic fluency and single word reading.

67 examined, but with anomia, reduced phonemic fluency and slowed speech rate the most prominent defici

68 volvement of this anterior-dorsal network in fluency and suggested a preferential role of a posterior

69 D patients showed greater declines in verbal fluency and the MMSE (P < 0.05).

70 on (exp(b)=0.725, p=0.026), language, verbal fluency and visuospatial scores, and MND-FTD (OR=7.57, 9

71 n distinct cognitive domains, such as verbal fluency and working memory, are not underpinned by a sin

72 ns (immediate recall, delayed recall, verbal fluency) and depressive symptoms (EURO-D scale) were con

73 ures of executive function (including letter fluency) and processing speed (visual inspection time an

74 , World List Delayed Recall, Semantic Animal Fluency) and Six-Item Screener (SIS) assessments, admini

75 neral cognition, verbal memory, and semantic fluency) and verbal memory (averaging tests of recall).

76 of memory, reasoning, phonemic and semantic fluency, and a global score that combined all cognitive

77 e function, verbal episodic memory, semantic fluency, and calculation as well as a measure of subject

78 Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), verbal fluency, and Color Trails Test Parts 1 and 2 were applie

79 cognitive function, memory retention, verbal fluency, and dementia severity after adjustment for age,

80 -list learning, percentage retention, letter fluency, and digit span backward tests.

81 Memory, verbal fluency, and executive function were impaired in 13% (12

82 or, processing speed, working memory, verbal fluency, and executive functioning) to assess ante morte

83 ory, attention, language, visuomotor, verbal fluency, and executive functions was administered before

84 rooved pegboard, timed gait, semantic verbal fluency, and finger tapping) were administered every 24

85 attention/working memory, learning, memory, fluency, and motor function.

86 ncome countries, education, literacy, verbal fluency, and motor sequencing confer substantial protect

87 einjury intelligence, motor strength, verbal fluency, and neurobehavioral symptom severity at 1 year

88 ly auditory regions to reductions in reading fluency, and of impaired reading ability to impaired fun

89 e times using tests of verbal memory, verbal fluency, and reasoning.

90 nhibition or selection, set shifting, verbal fluency, and recognition or working memory were included

91 l consumption-consuming expectancies, goals, fluency, and regulatory fit-impact physical consumption.

92 grammatical processing, semantic processing, fluency, and sentence repetition) across PPA variants to

93 ioning, memory, executive function, semantic fluency, and speed of processing were also obtained.

94 cal comprehension, single word retrieval and fluency, and spontaneous speech.

95 cological factors, perceptual and conceptual fluency, and the interaction of multiple components.

96 word test, letter-digit substitution, verbal fluency, and word learning) and a global cognition score

97 CT recipients for executive function, verbal fluency, and working memory.

98 t Battery; lexical fluency (F-A-S), category fluency (animals/minute), digit span (direct and backwar

99 Residential proximity to town and Spanish fluency are associated with greater likelihood of men's

100 al gyrus (LIFG) in phonological and semantic fluency are still controversial.

101 tract correlated with performance in verbal fluency as assessed by the Cinderella story test.

102 ants' tendency to reject enhanced perceptual fluency as evidence of prior study.

103 conditions to interpret enhanced perceptual fluency as evidence of prior study.

104 ortical damage was related to overall speech fluency, as estimated by clinical judgements using the W

105 verbal recall, verbal recognition and verbal fluency assessment.

106 participants individually completed a verbal fluency assessment.

107 e function, verbal and visual memory, verbal fluency, attention and working memory, and social cognit

108 tion (e.g., response competition or response fluency) available for metacognitive decisions.

109 the expressive semantic tests of naming and fluency, average performance was worse in the left- than

110 sing speed (B = -0.175, P = .05), and verbal fluency (B = -0.253, P = .02).

111 stiffness was associated with poor semantic fluency (B = -0.47, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.18, Bonferroni-co

112 ntreal Cognitive Assessment, semantic verbal fluency, Beck Depression Inventory, and Questionnaire fo

113 0-1.17]), worse language intelligibility and fluency (beta -0.032, OR 1.10 [1.02-1.20]), more irritab

114 ological profile with relatively high-verbal fluency but low word list recall distinguished the hippo

115 Caucasian) face reduced their English fluency, but at the same time increased their social com

116 ses, lutein was related to recall and verbal fluency, but the strength of the associations was attenu

117 gaps in the notation enhanced sight-reading fluency by significantly reducing the number of mistakes

118 cond concerns the degree to which processing fluency can explain aesthetic feeling or may simply be o

119 eralization of activation patterns in letter fluency compared to the controls.

120 s targeting reading outcomes (eg, phonemics, fluency, comprehension) and contributory cognitive proce

121 Each fluency condition was compared to self-paced repetition

122 at the collective studies of RAN and reading fluency contribute to our goals of creating optimal asse

123 Moreover, deficits in reading fluency correlated with rsFC alterations among auditory

124 omized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular int

125 Therefore, Fluency covered stent has advantages over the bare stent

126 processing (d = 0.74, p = 0.009) and reading fluency (d = 1.24, p < 0.00005).

127 of the frontal aslant tract underlies verbal fluency deficits in primary progressive aphasia and furt

128 semantic memory might partially account for fluency deficits seen in aging, mild cognitive impairmen

129 with the Color Trail Making Test, FAS verbal fluency, Digit Span, Hooper Visual Organization Test, an

130 ions associated with executive, language and fluency domains.

131 r demographics (e.g., birth country, English fluency, education, socioeconomic status).

132 ility), and Stroop and verbal fluency tests (fluency executive functioning).

133 l stimulus predicts the degree of perceptual fluency experienced when the stimulus is processed a sec

134 ination; Frontal Assessment Battery; lexical fluency (F-A-S), category fluency (animals/minute), digi

135 ons with subsequent memory performance and a fluency factor derived from a neuropsychological battery

136 ndex also predicted performance on a latent "fluency" factor derived from a neuropsychological test b

137 tion (SSC), category naming (CAT) and verbal fluency (FAS), in localizing the Wernicke's area and stu

138 rm gyrus) was predictive of smaller gains in fluency for older children.

139 Category fluency, for example, is generally considered to reflect

140 s1170191) on brain activation using a verbal fluency functional magnetic resonance imaging task.

141 coding tasks (g=-1.50), followed by category fluency (g=-1.31).

142 in working memory, phonological and semantic fluency, general intelligence quotient and reduced MWF i

143 By comparing phonological versus semantic fluency, higher activation was robustly observed in BA 4

144 ains mainly reflect phonology, semantics and fluency; however, these studies did not account for vari

145 tution (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22-2.04), verbal fluency (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.08), and inverted inte

146 Between 1 and 5 years, verbal fluency improved (P = .0002), as did executive function

147 We studied letter and category fluency in 14 high functioning ASD individuals and 14 ag

148 ch and language processing revealed that non-fluency in aphasia is primarily predicted by damage to t

149 ex, is a robust predictor of impaired speech fluency in aphasic patients, even when motor speech, lex

150 al temporal reflexes that generate a greater fluency in associative representations, making them more

151 Studies of fluency in MTL amnesics have yielded mixed results but w

152 hway was associated with measures of reading fluency in neurotypical readers.

153 ain damage that negatively influences speech fluency in patients with aphasia.

154 ciated with intelligence quotient and verbal fluency in patients, and fully mediated group difference

155 Hence, evidence for primacy or fluency in perceiving continuous magnitudes is insuffici

156 tion has consistently been proven to enhance fluency in reading language scripts.

157 ledge deficits, but sparing of phonology and fluency in semantic dementia.

158 owed a larger deterioration of letter verbal fluency in STN, especially when off DBS.

159 The persistence of deterioration in verbal fluency in the off STN DBS state was suggestive of a sur

160 We argue that a lack of fluency in these concepts is a major stumbling block for

161 ) was predictive of greater gains in reading fluency in younger children, whereas increased activity

162 rail Making Test Parts A and B, and Category Fluency) in cognitively normal individuals aged 21 to 10

163 on, digit-symbol, Trails-A, Trails-B, verbal-fluency) in older adults, whereas it did not correlate w

164 variance associated with twins' oral reading fluency increased as the quality of their teacher increa

165 Letter fluency indices significantly correlated with fractional

166 I argue that fluency is a key player in the attribution of familiarit

167 simply as 'fluent' or 'non-fluent', however fluency is a multidimensional construct that encompasses

168 that familiarity largely reflects perceptual fluency is examined.

169 Results suggest that orthographic fluency is reflected in both lower-level, sublexical, pe

170 tion (Mini Mental State Examination); verbal fluency (Isaac's Set Test); visual memory (Benton Visual

171 ostructural properties and cognition (verbal fluency language task, VF) and affect (anxiety) in both

172 d subscores for attention and concentration, fluency, language, and visuospatial function), and betwe

173 measures, namely, age >or=72 years, semantic fluency less than 20 words in 90 s and inability to copy

174 patients also exhibited deficits on figural fluency, letter-number sequencing, and backward digit sp

175 us findings using this paradigm, whereby the fluency manipulation increased "oldness" responses to bo

176 ory (range of means, -0.65 to -0.92), verbal fluency (mean, -0.89), and motor dexterity (mean, -2.5).

177 Word fluency measures reflecting expressive language and exec

178 retinopathy with g (and with tests of verbal fluency, mental flexibility, and processing speed but no

179 predicted oldness ratings to old items, and fluency modulated PRC connectivity with other brain regi

180 In category fluency, no between-group differences in lateralization

181 In addition to linguistic knowledge and fluency, nursing requires considerable cultural and prag

182 in naturalisation figures, English language fluency, occupational and income status, health insuranc

183 degrees +/- 2 degrees for the pristine, ion fluencies of 1E11, 3E11, 5E11, 7E11, 1E12 and 3E12 ions

184 Lipids require a minimum laser fluency of 27 W/mm(2) for efficient desorption and detec

185 ted with better memory function and semantic fluency, only in AD patients.

186 During speech production, irrespective of fluency or auditory feedback, the people who stuttered s

187 gical measures of word comprehension but not fluency or grammatical competence, and therefore reflect

188 ession is related to increases in processing fluency or implicit memory.

189 ly for loss of grammaticality, regardless of fluency or speech status.

190 , attention, working memory, verbal semantic fluency, or calculation.

191 the contribution of different mechanisms to fluency, or its lack.

192 ncephalopathy demonstrated reduced cognitive fluency (P = .001).

193 P = .005; Pc = .045) and the semantic verbal fluency (P = .005; Pc = .045) measures.

194 001), naming speed (P < .001), and cognitive fluency (P = .007).

195 selective attention (p < 0.001) and phonemic fluency (p = 0.043).

196 g, digit-symbol-substitution test and verbal fluency (P<0.05), whereas Abeta+ AD patients showed grea

197 tive (P < .05 for all measures except Verbal Fluency, P = .52), and behavioral domain scores (9.4 [11

198 HUFAs reduced the risk of decline in verbal fluency, particularly in hypertensive and dyslipidemic s

199 interrelations between global cognitive and fluency performance, lesion topography, and ultrastructu

200 clusion severity correlated with poor letter fluency performance.

201 CI -2.0 to 1.0), phonemic or category verbal fluency (phonemic fluency test 0.90, -1.3 to 3.1; catego

202 the fundamental role that mental arithmetic fluency plays in the acquisition of higher-level mathema

203 itive measures of phonemic and semantic word fluency predicted performance on the consent standards.

204 was linked to a greater decline in category fluency (prediction I: beta = -0.031, P = 0.012).

205 s associated with slower decline in category fluency (prediction II: beta = +0.026, P = 0.005).

206 ia Functional Index (SCAFI), phonemic verbal fluency (PVF), and the quality of life measures activiti

207 EPORT: Self-expandable, covered stent (Bard, Fluency((R))) was implanted using a single transfemoral

208 reduced PRC activity could reflect increased fluency rather than LTM retrieval per se.

209 ce among foreign-born women included English fluency, recent US residency, and citizenship.

210 Confrontation naming, noun fluency, recognition, and perceptual organization did no

211 Similar phonological, semantic and fluency-related components were found for PSA and PPA.

212 se of old items, the same PRC region showing fluency-related reductions for new items also contribute

213 nts using the Western Aphasia Battery speech fluency scale, diadochokinetic rate, rudimentary auditor

214 ory score 4.4 versus 4.3, p = 0.79; semantic fluency score 15.7 versus 14.0, p = 0.21; calculation im

215 res was detected except for a lower phonemic fluency score with decreasing MSDPS (P = 0.048) and a lo

216 r in combination with DHA (800 mg/d), verbal fluency scores improved significantly in the DHA, lutein

217 FTLD, and regression analysis related verbal fluency scores to atrophy in frontal and parietal region

218 n Mini-Mental State Examination and category fluency scores.

219 ere the Visual Analog Mood Scale, and verbal fluency (semantic and letter) at 7 months post-DBS in th

220 (figure copying) or higher (naming, semantic fluency) semantic demands.

221 rsolateral prefrontal dysfunction and letter fluency showing greater dependence on inferolateral pref

222 rity is thought to arise from attribution of fluency signals.

223 By contrast, deficits in reading fluency significantly predicted impairments in both func

224 sponses were associated with enhanced verbal fluency specifically for drug words.

225 Word-description, verbal fluency, speech duration, speaking volume, and speaking

226 The ACE-R verbal fluency subscore distinguished between PSP and PD with a

227 e propose the ACE-R, particularly the verbal fluency subscore, as a valuable contributor to the diffe

228 on two frontal lobe cognitive tests [Letter Fluency (t = 1.97, P = 0.05, df = 200) and Category Flue

229 (t = 1.97, P = 0.05, df = 200) and Category Fluency (t = 2.15, P = 0.03, df = 200)] as compared with

230 NIRS signals during the verbal fluency task (VFT) was acquired using a 52-channel syste

231 d that the [oxy-Hb] change during the verbal fluency task (VFT) was reduced in patients with ESLD com

232 l oxy-haemoglobin during a Japanese phonetic fluency task can differentiate psychiatric patients from

233 -level-dependent fMRI during an overt verbal fluency task in 85 subjects (44 healthy volunteers and 4

234 e measured by fNIRS during an English letter fluency task is a promising biomarker for MDD.

235 c response measured during an English letter fluency task.

236 ter number of users, the inclusion of verbal fluency tasks and repeat assessments.

237 mispheric differentiation for certain verbal fluency tasks in ASD, consistent with some previous evid

238 e same processes required to complete verbal fluency tasks.

239 -DR) and Word Learning tests, and the Animal Fluency test (AF).

240 symbol substitution (DSS) test, and a verbal fluency test (P < 0.05).

241 ndex (P = .004; Pc = .04); a semantic verbal fluency test (P = .002; Pc = .02); the Letter-Number Seq

242 (p < 0.0087 for all tests) except the Animal Fluency Test (p = 0.4378).

243 on the Boston Naming Test (BNT) and Semantic Fluency Test (SFT), neuropsychological measures of seman

244 Word Association Test (COWAT), and Semantic Fluency Test (SFT).

245 il Making Test (TMT) A and B, and the Verbal Fluency Test (VFT).

246 ymbol Substitution Test (DSST), and the Word Fluency Test (WFT).

247 honemic or category verbal fluency (phonemic fluency test 0.90, -1.3 to 3.1; categorical fluency test

248 fluency test 0.90, -1.3 to 3.1; categorical fluency test 1.1, -0.3 to 2.6), verbal memory (paragraph

249 st, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Word Fluency Test and in global cognition.

250 Scores on the Word Fluency Test improved more in the exercise (4.1 +/- 0.8)

251 over time in the mean DSST, TMT, and verbal fluency test scores.

252 p Test, Letter-Digit-Substitution Test, Word Fluency Test), mood (Center for Epidemiological Studies-

253 ana University Story Recall Test, the Animal Fluency Test, and the Indiana University Token Test.

254 (SCAFI), the neurocognitive phonemic verbal fluency test, and two quality-of-life measures: the acti

255 2001 were assessed using the Isaacs' verbal fluency test, Benton Visual Retention Test, Trail Making

256 nation, Letter Digit Substitution Task, Word Fluency Test, Stroop test, 15-word Verbal Learning Test,

257 Other outcomes included Word Fluency Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, and Geria

258 The correlation between the brief verbal fluency test, which can be easily administered (crucial

259 xamination Trail-Making Test B, and category fluency test.

260 oning, the Trail Making Test, and the Verbal Fluency Test.

261 range, 0-10), and executive function (Animal Fluency Test; range, >/=0), and cognitive impairment (SI

262 sual-spatial ability), and Stroop and verbal fluency tests (fluency executive functioning).

263 igher scores in phonemic and semantic verbal fluency tests and with lower TMT A time.

264 (DSST), Trail Making Tests (TMT), and verbal fluency tests at the same time points.

265 recall, digit symbol substitution, and word fluency tests were used to assess cognitive performance

266 age processing (semantic and phonemic verbal fluency tests), visuospatial skills (Benton Judgment of

267 stitution Task (DSST), semantic and phonemic fluency tests, and the Stroop Color and Word Test.

268 awing and figure copying, Stroop, and verbal fluency tests.

269 t in performance scores on verbal memory and fluency tests.

270 g a functional segregation of LIFG in verbal fluency that also have implications for the controversia

271 In letter fluency, the ASD group had significantly greater activat

272 RI and a well-validated method to manipulate fluency: the masked priming paradigm.

273 Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to m

274 ive functions, language functions and verbal fluency to ascertain whether functional deficits would r

275 ved the visual study list may have relied on fluency to make some of their recognition decisions.

276 y and predicted behavioral misattribution of fluency to oldness.

277 After covarying for phonemic fluency (total FAS score), the N category impairment was

278 correlations between RSFC in ECN and verbal fluency (VF) in both groups as well as RSFC in DMN and a

279 lking, simple dual task with phonemic verbal fluency (walking while naming words beginning with a sin

280 lex dual task switching with phonemic verbal fluency (walking while naming words, alternating between

281 Poor fluency was associated with regions dorsal to the tradit

282 Overall, mnemonic word fluency was found to elicit greater DMN activity and str

283 nce for a specific role of BA 45 in semantic fluency was found.

284 A worsening of letter verbal fluency was seen in STN.

285 nic variant, speech rate (a common proxy for fluency) was intermediate between the other two variants

286 d word recall, psychomotor speed, and verbal fluency were administered.

287 Phonological processing and reading Fluency were assessed using the Comprehensive Test of Ph

288 education level and lack of English language fluency were associated with poor knowledge of intensive

289 ses linked with this differential perceptual fluency were identified as negative potentials 100-300 m

290 igit Symbol Substitution (DSS), and (c) Word Fluency (WF).

291 culture hindered Chinese immigrants' English fluency, when speaking about both culture-laden and cult

292 ith controls on tests of verbal learning and fluency, while bipolar probands showed performance decre

293 heir performance and abnormalities on verbal fluency, while those with an Affective ToM deficit also

294 ot well understood and the level of improved fluency with speech entrainment varies among individuals

295 omical factors associated with better speech fluency with the aid of speech entrainment during the tr

296 range of accessible print sizes and reading fluency within this range.

297 eficits in executive functions, language and fluency, without dementia.

298 ondary outcomes were memory function, verbal fluency, working memory and executive function.

299 were performance on verbal memory, semantic fluency, working memory, and executive function tests.

300 Verb and phonemic fluency, working memory, cognitive flexibility, immediat