戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 also display impaired social transmission of food preference.
2 ion of eating and the social transmission of food preference.
3 ation, flies undergo compensatory changes in food preference.
4 viors, such as hedonic eating, and modulates food preference.
5 nteroendocrine hormone levels and also alter food preference.
6 s flexibly according to the female's current food preference.
7 ct actual tooth use are required to work out food preferences.
8 the eating environment to produce phenotypic food preferences.
9 lating concentrations of micronutrients, and food preferences.
10 l memory and memory for socially transmitted food preferences.
11 g, spatial learning and socially transmitted food preferences.
12 er management and the development of healthy food preferences.
13 hoices of agents with similar and dissimilar food preferences.
14 d political systems shape access to food and food preferences.
15 ndocannabinoid systems for the regulation of food preferences.
16    Postingestive nutrient sensing can induce food preferences.
17 choices for them as well as their individual food preferences.
18 h play important roles in shaping children's food preferences.
19 y explained all of the remaining variance in food preferences.
20 nt unique to each individual twin influenced food preferences.
21 llingness to eat certain foods and by strong food preferences.
22         Food texture has enormous effects on food preferences.
23 in the home as a key influence on children's food preferences.
24 ith a high protein status on food intake and food preferences.
25 n, ecology, and culture in determining human food preferences.
26 al differences in taste and perhaps cultural food preferences.
27 x diseases, innate and adaptive immunity, or food preferences, 32 loci were identified at the suggest
28                       In addition to testing food preference, a mechanism of parasite avoidance, we a
29 mory in the rat using social transmission of food preference, a nonspatial memory task.
30 ins is required for the transmission of this food preference: a maternally derived NPF locus is neces
31 vidence that the gut microbiota can modulate food preference across model organisms.
32 ces is fundamentally social: They generalize food preferences across individuals who affiliate, or wh
33 foundation for the continuing development of food preferences across the lifespan, and is shaped by t
34              We then performed olfactory and food preference analysis, as well as metabolic analysis
35  distributed neural mechanisms contribute to food preference and food cravings.
36 in the nucleus accumbens increased palatable food preference and food-seeking behavior.
37 ity to food cues, which may imply changes in food preference and hyperphagia.
38 ior protein restriction induced long-lasting food preference and VTA responses.
39 articipants received information about their food preferences and 2 diet options (low-carbohydrate di
40 ets can be tailored to personal and cultural food preferences and appropriate calorie needs for weigh
41            Whereas extensive examinations of food preferences and body weight have appeared in the ps
42 fferences in taste perception that influence food preferences and dietary behavior with subsequent li
43 ly exposure to sweet tastes predicts similar food preferences and eating behavior in later life and i
44 e on ways in which early learning influences food preferences and eating behavior, which, in turn, sh
45                       Individual patterns of food preferences and eating behaviors emerge and differ
46 eers and food availability, continue to mold food preferences and eating behaviors.
47                 Our evolutionary heritage of food preferences and eating habits leaves us mismatched
48 , smell, and texture of foods help determine food preferences and eating habits.
49                                              Food preferences and food choices of populations are fur
50                                         Both food preferences and food frequencies predicted dietary
51       The objective was to determine whether food preferences and food-frequency scores are associate
52                                Self-reported food preferences and frequencies of food consumption hav
53            The slope of the relation between food preferences and frequency of consumption varied wit
54 roups, nor was any association found between food preferences and gustatory acuity.
55                                 In addition, food preferences and intakes were measured.
56 r, and inspires a new research direction for food preferences and oral diagnostics.
57         For virtually all item pairs tested, food preferences and reported frequencies of consumption
58 erstand how infants and toddlers develop the food preferences and self-regulatory processes necessary
59 lso modulates ongoing behaviors ranging from food preferences and social affiliation with the caregiv
60 nt for infants and children to learn healthy food preferences and targeted actions that enable disadv
61  suggests that the interaction between human food preferences and the environment in which those pref
62                              Weighed intake, food preference, and weight and height data were obtaine
63 etween taste perceptions, taste preferences, food preferences, and food choices and the amount of foo
64 ere adjusted for age, log fat and lean mass, food preferences, and intake during a buffet test meal o
65 t into the development of sensory processes, food preferences, and the formation of social affiliatio
66                                              Food preferences are acquired through experience and can
67 ng habits, but within these boundaries human food preferences are remarkably varied, both within and
68                                Thus, whereas food preferences are seen as embedded within social grou
69 eople to like the same objects, infants view food preferences as meaningfully shared across individua
70 on to new foods and (b) the ability to learn food preferences based on associations with the contexts
71     Overall, no differences were observed in food preferences between the two groups, nor was any ass
72                                     Changing food preferences brought about by westernization that ha
73 e provide evidence that neural regulation of food preference but not ingestion rate may involve direc
74  environment play important roles in shaping food preferences; but the aetiology of variation in non-
75 e their eating behaviour and adopt healthier food preferences by avoiding high-calorie and high-fat f
76 sonance signal change corresponding to these food preferences constituted the food valuation signal t
77      Experiment 1 asked how long an acquired food preference could be remembered.
78 ion resulted in a return to normal palatable food preference despite continued locomotor suppression,
79 hoice in the test for social transmission of food preference, despite showing a normal level of socia
80 e variation in early feedings to investigate food preference development.
81                              The shifting of food preference driven by nutrient-specific hunger can b
82  In summary, we identified a set of adaptive food preferences during recovery ("recovery behavior"),
83 ity has been well documented, and it affects food preferences (eg, avoidance of cruciferous vegetable
84    Similarly, in rodents, behaviors, such as food preference, exploration of novel contexts, and soci
85 Normal rats exhibited memory of the acquired food preference for at least 3 months after learning.
86 ious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
87     In addition, after the low-protein diet, food preferences for savory high-protein foods were enha
88          In formula-fed infants eating table foods, preferences for the basic tastes reflected the ty
89                                              Food preferences had a moderate genetic basis in late ad
90        This was not caused by alterations to food preference, hypothalamic signaling of neuropeptides
91 tia identified overeating or increased sweet food preference in 80 (78%), new or increased alcohol or
92                  Dietary composition affects food preference in animals.
93 ize mechanisms of diet-induced plasticity of food preference in Drosophila melanogaster, we synthesiz
94 ession to backcross loci that control innate food preference in Drosophila simulans into the genomic
95 ation recognition and social transmission of food preference in Kctd13 mutants.
96 us attributes are combined to infer diet and food preference in the past.
97 ference, to quantify internal consistency of food preferences in Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode w
98 red environmental experiences that influence food preferences in childhood may not have effects that
99 ch tubers, a conclusion further supported by food preferences in fasted animals.
100 hanges in sweet taste perception might alter food preferences in GDM, making dietary compliance diffi
101 e influences of genes and the environment on food preferences in late adolescence are unknown.
102 e palatability of the lipids and investigate food preferences in mice.
103 n of genetic and environmental influences on food preferences in older adolescents.
104 hors investigated the social transmission of food preferences in pine voles (Microtus pinetorum) and
105 abolished preexisting macronutrient-specific food preferences in rats.
106 ntal microwear can be used to infer diet and food preferences in the past, particularly for hominins
107  provides an eating environment that fosters food preferences inconsistent with dietary guidelines, w
108 However, postingestive effects can influence food preferences independently of palatability, although
109 and health ought to take sensory factors and food preferences into account.
110          The test for social transmission of food preference is based on the normal ability of mice i
111 reference in rodents but their role in human food preference is unknown.
112                   The social transmission of food preferences is affected by factors including the le
113        Importantly, infants' reasoning about food preferences is flexibly calibrated to their own exp
114                     Infants' reasoning about food preferences is fundamentally social: They generaliz
115 luding reduced appetite and changes in taste/food preferences, is now recognized as a key driver of t
116 nockdown also blocked social transmission of food preference learning and impaired social recognition
117 d for olfactory-based social transmission of food preference learning, sociality, and social recognit
118 d questionnaire measures of their children's food preferences (liking for vegetables and fruit) and t
119                            The model assumes food preferences match the foods typically purchased by
120  (2 adults and 2 children) while considering food preferences, meal preparation time, and food costs.
121                                          How food-preference memory is acquired, consolidated and sto
122              Conversely, on a formal test of food preference, monkeys with amygdala lesions showed ab
123 gational task and the social transmission of food preference olfactory memory test.
124 e found six loci contributing to D. simulans food preference, one of which overlaps a previously disc
125 as designed using the social transmission of food preference paradigm.
126 motivation to work for a food reinforcer, or food preferences, per se.
127     After a protein deficit, food intake and food preferences show adaptive changes that suggest that
128  odor recognition and social transmission of food preference (STFP) despite eliminating or silencing
129                       Social transmission of food preference (STFP) is a test of olfactory memory tha
130                       Social transmission of food preference (STFP) is an ecologically relevant memor
131      Using a modified Social Transmission of Food Preference (STFP) task, we report that male tgDISC1
132 ade amnesia for the social transmission of a food preference (STFP) within our experimental protocol.
133 recognition (SOR) and social transmission of food preference (STFP), but no LTM 24 h post training.
134                During social transmission of food preference (STFP), mice form long-term memory of fo
135                During social transmission of food preference (STFP), the combination of an olfactory
136  for the acquisition of socially transmitted food preferences (STFPs) in mice.
137                                           In food preference studies using Orange 4 and Blue 1 as a d
138 ge G also works with Blue 1 as a dye pair in food preference studies.
139 l in Con-Ex and can be used as a dye pair in food preference studies.
140 -) mice failed in the social transmission of food preference task, another cognitive paradigm.
141 we tested the effects of glycopyrrolate on a food preference task.
142 n allowed to choose foods alone, either on a food preference test among six different foods or after
143 s intrinsic reward value, as determined from food preference testing.
144 nderlie foraging behavior and performance in food preference tests.
145 o showed a lower incidence of acquired sweet food preference than patients without C9ORF72 mutations.
146 er genetic predispositions are manifested in food preferences that foster healthy diets depends on th
147 s the nutrient value of sugar and influences food preference, the neural circuitry that mediates the
148 ostingestive nutrient stimulation conditions food preferences through striatal dopamine and may be as
149  contrast, parents often perceive children's food preferences to be inborn.
150 her she will constrain her generalization of food preferences to people who speak the same language.
151 y reducing total calorie intake and altering food preference towards a healthy low-fat diet.
152 eating habits (U = 69.5, z = 3.8, P = .001), food preferences (U = 57.0, z = 4.1, P = .001), swallowi
153                                              Food preferences vary substantially among adults and chi
154 ies, and can be paired with Blue 1 to assess food preference via both Con-Ex and EX-Q.
155 rawal, when drug preference was elevated but food preference was decreased.
156                                              Food preference was unaltered, suggesting that the sympa
157  glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and food preference were analyzed.
158                                              Food preferences were a predictor of dietary intakes and
159  alpha- and beta-carotene were measured, and food preferences were assessed by questionnaire.
160                                              Food preferences were measured by using a self-report qu
161 est meal, and their total caloric intake and food preferences were measured.
162 semantic-like memory (social transmission of food preference) were detected from 3 to 4 months of age
163                                      Learned food preferences, which are developed through repeated p
164 ce that IP can be used to alter high-calorie food preferences, which could promote healthier eating h

 
Page Top