ライフサイエンスコーパス: foreign body

1 c factors were: RD at presentation and large foreign body.

2 enia, malignancy, and an indwelling vascular foreign body.

3 ope to confirm the suspected presence of the foreign body.

4 human pathogen, often in association with a foreign body.

5 atment has generally involved removal of the foreign body.

6 d was informed of the possible presence of a foreign body.

7 inded fashion and recorded the presence of a foreign body.

8 a P. aeruginosa infection associated with a foreign body.

9 and biofilm formation on the surface of the foreign body.

10 ers have chorioamnionitis or an intrauterine foreign body.

11 urethra depends on the size and shape of the foreign body.

12 een in isolation radiologist should look for foreign body.

13 nding on the physical characteristics of the foreign body.

14 cessary to rule out the presence of retained foreign bodies.

15 patients with posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies.

16 patients with certain implants and metallic foreign bodies.

17 inflammation, and birefringent intravascular foreign bodies.

18 ous response to inflammation, infection, and foreign bodies.

19 d effective for radiopaque and nonradiopaque foreign bodies.

20 primary enucleation and retained intraocular foreign bodies.

21 with immunocompromised hosts with indwelling foreign bodies.

22 intestinal tract and manifest as symptomatic foreign bodies.

23 tion of both radiopaque and radiotransparent foreign bodies.

24 llent modality for evaluation of radiolucent foreign bodies.

25 sions were performed without implantation of foreign bodies.

26 rgery patients are at high risk for retained foreign bodies.

27 or infection include 1) retained intraocular foreign body, 2) a rural injury setting, 3) delay in pri

28 s were open-globe injury without intraocular foreign body (3201/5719 [56%]).

29 ed regional fatty infiltration, 98% included foreign body, 45% had mural thickening and 20% localized

30 reous traction without RD (11%), intraocular foreign body (5%), and endophthalmitis (3%).

31 Thirty-seven of the patients with retained foreign bodies (69 percent) required reoperation, and on

32 ptures (6 eyes), and conjunctival or corneal foreign bodies (7 eyes).

33 Alloplasts are inert foreign bodies acting as osteoconductive space maintaine

34 The risk of retention of a foreign body after surgery significantly increases in em

35 sions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for

36 Children with an 'impaired' normal (foreign body, allergy, and inflammation) or an expected

37 Patients with retained foreign bodies also had a higher mean body-mass index an

38 (CoNS) form a thick, multilayered biofilm on foreign bodies and are a major cause of nosocomial impla

39 toperative care of patients with intraocular foreign bodies and present a management algorithm.

40 literature on the assessment of intraocular foreign bodies and techniques for their removal.

41 minal radiography was 90% for intraabdominal foreign body and 49% for bowel obstruction.

42 umber of P. aeruginosa on the surface of the foreign body and lesser biofilm formation.

43 g pathogens, cell-cell fusion in response to foreign bodies, and their self-sacrifice as occurs durin

44 on, ventilation, laboratory, diet, activity, foreign body, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

45 is a cellular process by which particles and foreign bodies are engulfed and degraded by specialized

46 Given that many foreign bodies are radiographically undetectable, the ac

47 Both the material and size of the foreign body are considerations in the choice of instrum

48 US can be used effectively to locate wooden foreign bodies as small as 2.5 mm in length.

49 of 88 children with MPP and 26 children with foreign body aspiration (FB) using a Luminex system.

50 Sand and foreign-body aspiration may accompany drowning and near-

51 Using a murine model of foreign body-associated peritonitis, we demonstrated tha

52 We optimized a murine model of foreign body-associated UTI in order to mimic conditions

53 Using a recently optimized murine model of foreign body-associated UTI, we found that the implanted

54 oculum murine skin abscess model including a foreign body at the infection site, strains deleted for

55 significant decrease in the thickness of the foreign body capsule, as compared to that observed in wi

56 minimal scarring and form well-vascularized foreign body capsules.

57 ections: the presence of devitalized tissue, foreign bodies, clots, fluid collections, and contaminat

58 lm X-rays, however, are only useful when the foreign bodies contain radiopaque material (metal, glass

59 manipulation before implantation results in foreign body contamination and increased neointimal hype

60 erves displayed hemorrhage, leukostasis, and foreign body crystallization.

61 omputed tomography (MDCT) revealed a tubular foreign body density, compatible with intestinal perfora

62 In this model, the presence of a foreign body elicits major histological changes and indu

63 Coins are the most commonly ingested foreign body encountered in the pediatric population.

64 ial pathogenesis as well as the mechanism of foreign body entry to a human cell, which may provide in

65 formed on 150 children with MPP or bronchial foreign body (FB) admitted in our hospital.

66 t to the Emergency Department with a corneal foreign body (FB).

67 No differences in foreign body feeling or quality of life scores were dete

68 arameters included chronic pain, recurrence, foreign body feeling, and quality of life scores.

69 The prosthetic mesh induces a chronic foreign-body fibroblastic response creating scar tissue

70 h the pars plana sclerotomy with intraocular foreign body forceps.

71 The predominant foreign bodies found were titanium and dental cement.

72 Debridement (removal of necrotic tissue and foreign bodies from the wound) at different frequencies.

73 eripheral blood derived macrophage adhesion, foreign body giant cell (FBGC) formation and inflammator

74 esive mechanisms that support multinucleated foreign body giant cell (FBGC) formation.

75 (MCP-1) was demonstrated to be required for foreign body giant cell formation in the foreign body re

76 te) scaffolds containing NSC23766 attenuated foreign body giant cell formation in vivo.

77 is characterized by macrophage infiltration, foreign body giant cell formation, and fibrotic encapsul

78 IL-13 acts independently of IL-4 to promote foreign body giant cell formation, it may trigger a comm

79 ocyte-macrophage fusion provides a model for foreign body giant cell formation.

80 anti-human IL-13 Abs inhibited IL-13-induced foreign body giant cell formation; the fusion-inducing e

81 vascular occlusion and moderate intraluminal foreign body giant cell reaction; the acutely embolized

82 acterized by the presence of macrophages and foreign body giant cells (FBGC), can result in structura

83 The formation of foreign body giant cells (FBGC), which damage the surfac

84 Foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) are inflammatory and de

85 Multinucleated foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) form by monocyte-derive

86 implant interface, generation of destructive foreign body giant cells (FBGCs), and generation of fibr

87 ocyte-macrophage adhesion and fusion to form foreign body giant cells are provided by substrates with

88 ent studies involving mainly osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells have revealed a number of commo

89 ytic macrophages, wound-healing macrophages, foreign body giant cells, and bone-resorbing osteoclasts

90 sia, encapsulation, mononuclear infiltrates, foreign body giant cells, and eosinophilic infiltrates.

91 Although foreign body giant cells, Langhans' giant cells, and ost

92 fuse into multinuclear cells, also known as foreign body giant cells, to respond to the biomaterial

93 nd CD14(+) cells were also present, with few foreign body giant cells.

94 es including macrophages in the formation of foreign body giant cells.

95 adherent cells that included macrophages and foreign body giant cells.

96 Xid mice also failed to form multinucleated foreign body giant cells.

97 ials undergo fusion to form surface-damaging foreign body giant cells.

98 nstrated variable inflammatory reactions and foreign-body giant cell reaction and no angionecrosis or

99 tly as a result of degradation by an ongoing foreign-body giant cell reaction that peaked at 8-12 d p

100 izing pneumonia (OP) pattern developed, with foreign-body giant cells and granulomas.

101 monocyte adhesion and macrophage fusion into foreign-body giant cells while inducing adherent-macroph

102 mplanting small surgical sponges to elicit a foreign body granulation tissue response, or by ligating

103 findings suggest that the eggshell inhibits foreign body granuloma formation long enough for the mir

104 day 4) in the type 2 than for the type 1 or foreign body granulomas.

105 erature on the imaging detection of surgical foreign bodies has focused on retained sponges, even tho

106 The different materials found in foreign bodies have characteristic ultrasonographic patt

107 Intraorbital metallic foreign bodies have varied clinical presentations.

108 sulted a young doctor about a buried corneal foreign body hidden in a small, hard mass that partly co

109 ry diseases, fibrotic alterations induced by foreign body implants, "spontaneous" fibrosis, and tumor

110 in diminished delivery of leukocytes to the foreign body implants.

111 e performed a case-control study of retained foreign bodies in surgical patients in order to identify

112 ray examinations of the orbit to exclude any foreign bodies in the eyeball, as well as pantomographie

113 Coins have long been considered innocuous foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tracts of childre

114 Accidental retention of surgical foreign bodies in the peritoneal cavity is estimated to

115 arthritis presented with the sensation of a foreign body in her right eye; she reported no symptoms

116 Corneal abrasions (13.7%) and foreign body in the external eye (7.5%) were the leading

117 us mirabilis UTIs were more likely to have a foreign body in the lower urinary tract (48% versus 30%

118 Foreign body in the lower urinary tract has a low incide

119 It was hypothesized that the presence of a foreign body in the peritoneal cavity (PC) might alter t

120 including damaged proteins, organelles, and foreign bodies, in a bulk, non-selective or a cargo-spec

121 body insertion; location, type, and size of foreign body; incision size; imaging modality; and succe

122 0.05) without evidence of gingival tissue or foreign body inclusions.

123 mplement activation (RCA) can attenuate this foreign body-induced activation, simple and efficient ap

124 ses of acute abdominal pain include ingested foreign bodies, infected congenital anomalies, and perfo

125 Studies using a mouse foreign body infection model demonstrated that the virul

126 different phenotypes of S. epidermidis in a foreign body infection model is most effective in inbred

127 Although foreign body infection models are well-established, limi

128 In a murine model of foreign body infection, the rbf mutations in strain Newm

129 pathogenesis of S. epidermidis experimental foreign body infection.

130 opportunistic pathogen and a major cause of foreign body infections.

131 portunistic pathogen and is a major cause of foreign body infections.

132 terium acnes) is recognized as a pathogen in foreign-body infections (arthroplasty or spinal instrume

133 planations about the development of C. acnes foreign-body infections.

134 unction of PECAM-1 in the chronic process of foreign body inflammation.

135 -death signals concomitant with a localized "foreign-body" inflammatory response.

136 Foreign body ingestion complicated by perforation of the

137 in older children and adolescents, recurrent foreign body ingestion is usually seen in mentally retar

138 Visual outcomes of intraocular foreign body injuries are similar to other series despit

139 Patients with burns, foreign body injury, toxic effects, or late complication

140 foreign bodies; number of repeat episodes of foreign body insertion; location, type, and size of fore

141 Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are an important cause of visual

142 a vitrectomy(PPV) for removal of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs).

143 Preventing retained foreign bodies is critical for patient safety.

144 ly prevention and identification of retained foreign bodies is increasingly important because of moun

145 artifacts and their origin, and of possible foreign bodies is necessary to eliminate them or to redu

146 y embolus or deep venous thrombosis (PEDVT), foreign body left during procedure (FB), iatrogenic pneu

147 Heavy nasopharynx foreign body load and loss of gland protection alters th

148 positive blood cultures, >72 h of fever, or foreign body materials present), a normal echocardiograp

149 In cases of implant failure, implantation of foreign bodies may play a role with subsequent developme

150 Our results showed that a foreign body multinucleate giant cell-type reaction was

151 features were studied including radioopaque foreign body, mural thickness, fatty infiltration or ext

152 Evaluated data included number of foreign bodies; number of repeat episodes of foreign bod

153 multivariate analyses to have an indwelling foreign body (odds ratio [OR]=18.2, 95% confidence inter

154 uded 54 patients with a total of 61 retained foreign bodies (of which 69 percent were sponges and 31

155 rifampin with vancomycin against MRSA in rat foreign body osteomyelitis, suggesting that rifabutin an

156 th and without vancomycin, in a rat model of foreign body osteomyelitis.

157 Accumulation of large foreign body particles in the bulla stimulates granuloma

158 The method of extraction of a foreign body per urethra depends on the size and shape o

159 ngested objects and the most common cause of foreign body perforation of the GI tract.

160 The foreign body reaction (FBR) develops in response to the

161 n of this phenotype suggested to us that the foreign body reaction (FBR) might be altered in thrombos

162 Foreign body reaction (FBR) to implanted biomaterials an

163 In this work, the foreign body reaction (FBR) to small subcutaneous implan

164 site coatings have been shown to prevent the foreign body reaction (FBR) to subcutaneous implants in

165 ials and biomedical devices generally induce foreign body reaction and end up with encapsulation by a

166 ors, due to the reduction of the detrimental foreign body reaction and of consequent potential failur

167 These findings argue against a foreign body reaction as a common mechanism of action of

168 ite is an innovative approach to control the foreign body reaction at the tissue-device interface to

169 In vivo, both shunts were devoid of foreign body reaction but exhibited fibrosis, and GS sho

170 biomaterials implanted in the body induce a foreign body reaction characterized by chronic inflammat

171 capsular thickness, indicative of an altered foreign body reaction in SPARC-null mice, implicates SPA

172 ices (IUDs) has been attributed in part to a foreign body reaction in the endometrium.

173 Foreign body reaction reflects the integration between b

174 n we asked whether SPARC might influence the foreign body reaction to biomaterial implants.

175 The foreign body reaction to implanted biomaterials, charact

176 macrophages increased consistent with a mild foreign body reaction.

177 lead to failure from intimal hyperplasia and foreign body reaction.

178 al within the gingival tissues, initiating a foreign body reaction.

179 cells, foamy macrophages) consistent with a foreign body reaction.

180 iocompatibility, related to the inflammatory foreign-body reaction of the eye against the implant, as

181 Gossypiboma or textiloma is the result of a foreign-body reaction to extraneous material, usually a

182 , although histological examination showed a foreign-body reaction to the microspheres.

183 At histologic evaluation, a marked foreign-body reaction with superimposed thrombosis was d

184 radiation-induced vascular inflammation, or foreign-body reaction, such as synthetic arterial graft.

185 antable biomedical devices is impeded by the foreign-body reaction, which results in formation of a d

186 ikely due to increased thrombogenicity and a foreign-body reaction.

187 s were wound healing problems (n = 270/56%), foreign body reactions (n = 58/12%), wound infections (n

188 metals and plastics, significantly abrogated foreign body reactions and fibrosis when compared with s

189 In certain pathologic conditions, such as foreign body reactions and peripheral inflammatory lesio

190 containing analogs that substantially reduce foreign body reactions in both rodents and, for at least

191 implanted biomaterials often trigger adverse foreign body reactions such as inflammation, fibrosis, i

192 To minimize the foreign body reactions, L1, a brain derived neuronal spe

193 ithout damaging neural tissues or triggering foreign body reactions.

194 improved biomaterial design and will reduce foreign body reactions.

195 lapses and are associated with an indwelling foreign body, receiving vancomycin therapy, and hemodial

196 oids intestinal bypass and implantation of a foreign body; recent data from adult series demonstrate

197 s play a central role in osteoporosis and in foreign body rejection, respectively, the molecular mech

198 0.5%, $32,835), fistula (0.2%, $27,079), and foreign body removal (0.1%, $29,404) were most costly, b

199 ove (OR = 4.244, P-value< 0.001), history of foreign body removal (OR = 1.677, P-value = 0.041), and

200 sion of delayed versus immediate intraocular foreign body removal must be guided by the patient's med

201 Being female, age 35 and above and foreign body removal, were significantly associated with

202 imaging modality; and success or failure of foreign body removal.

203 ime of pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular foreign body removal.

204 We report an unusual case of a foreign body removed from the urinary bladder of a 63-ye

205 ndin (TSP)-2-null mice have an altered brain foreign body response (FBR) characterized by increases i

206 This alloy also exhibits compromised foreign body response (FBR) determined by human peripher

207 ibrous encapsulation resulting from the host foreign body response (FBR) reduce sensor sensitivity to

208 t tissue is associated with development of a foreign body response (FBR), a chronic inflammatory cond

209 soft tissues leads to the development of the foreign body response (FBR), which can interfere with im

210 tion of synthetic biomaterials initiates the foreign body response (FBR), which is characterized by m

211 pathophysiological conditions including the foreign body response (FBR).

212 Reducing the foreign body response and restoring the function of cell

213 decreased intensity and delayed onset of the foreign body response following implantation of drug fre

214 Moreover, attenuation of the foreign body response in intraperitoneal implants in MCP

215 The foreign body response is an immune-mediated reaction tha

216 been described and adds new insights to the foreign body response of the CNS.

217 The foreign body response plays a prominent role in implanta

218 een identified as important mediators of the foreign body response that includes inflammation, angiog

219 Host recognition and immune-mediated foreign body response to biomaterials can compromise the

220 The foreign body response to implantable biosensors has been

221 ng for implantable biosensors to prevent the foreign body response, and thus enhance sensor performan

222 cts generated from rECM bioinks suppress the foreign body response, are pro-angiogenic and support re

223 f a biomaterial into the body elicits a host foreign body response, during which polymorphonuclear le

224 phasis on hydrogels designed to mitigate the foreign body response, provide a suitable extracellular

225 ds also induce granulomas rapidly, through a foreign body response.

226 bial or thrombotic agents as a result of the foreign body response.

227 which was associated with attenuation of the foreign body response.

228 for foreign body giant cell formation in the foreign body response.

229 ARC family of matricellular proteins, in the foreign body response.

230 important modulator of wound healing and the foreign body response.

231 rotection from circulating proteases and the foreign body response.

232 o the implant spanning the acute and chronic foreign body response.

233 ation, combat possible infection or stem the foreign body response.

234 scovery of other materials that mitigate the foreign body response.

235 ePTFE at 3 months had foreign-body response with necrosis and calcification.

236 n about molecular factors that determine CNS foreign body responses (FBRs) in vivo, or about how such

237 Nonetheless, inflammatory foreign body responses leading to pericapsular fibrotic

238 erstanding will shed insight on the cause of foreign body responses, which will lead to improved biom

239 mpromised by host recognition and subsequent foreign body responses.

240 to immune competent mice resulting in absent foreign body responses.

241 ns, has been implicated in tissue repair and foreign body responses.

242 mputational modeling discloses the nature of foreign body responses.

243 h alginate derivatives capable of mitigating foreign-body responses in vivo and implanted into the in

244 de bypass grafting and can provoke long-term foreign-body responses.

245 reaction due to permanent implantation of a foreign body, restriction of vascular vasomotion due to

246 ients with penetrating wounds with suspected foreign bodies retained in the wound are often seen in e

247 the lens insertion, lid eversion revealed a 'foreign body' retained beneath her right upper eyelid, w

248 e asymptomatic (3/4, 75%) or associated with foreign body sensation (1/4, 25%).

249 perianal pain (63 %), weight loss (31 %) and foreign body sensation (22 %).

250 s at day 42 in itching (nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P = 0.0418), and eye dis

251 symptoms of dry eye, vision fluctuation, and foreign body sensation after LASIK and PRK at postoperat

252 eral face, neck and ear pain, stinging pain, foreign body sensation and dysphagia can be observed wit

253 tion of the conjunctiva, blurred vision, and foreign body sensation in his left eye.

254 ymptoms of dry eye, visual fluctuations, and foreign body sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and

255 A 69 year-old male had blurred vision and foreign body sensation OD for several weeks.

256 ptoms and severity, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation over baseline in the early postop

257 ymptoms of dry eye, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation returned to their baseline, preop

258 e: headaches, severe photophobia, persistent foreign body sensation, and migration of ink staining.

259 rescein staining of the cornea, reduction in foreign body sensation, and reduction in burning sensati

260 the presence of burning sensation, tearing, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia and photo

261 tional VAS items (burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation, eye discomfort, photophobia, pai

262 A patient suffering from foreign body sensation, frequent blinking and bilateral

263 Most of the patients reported no foreign body sensation, glare, or other side effects wit

264 20/40-20/250) and patient symptoms included foreign body sensation, tearing, redness, and/or pain.

265 ion, redness, tearing, photophobia, pain and foreign body sensation.

266 , dry eye severity, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation.

267 A 37-year old AIDS patient presented with foreign body sensation.

268 oacrylate adhesives have been shown to cause foreign-body sensation, local inflammatory reaction, and

269 on or necrosis), and postoperative symptoms (foreign-body sensation, pain).

270 ides excellent information about intraocular foreign body size, shape and location.

271 immunocompromised hosts or in patients with foreign bodies, such as catheters, where treatment has g

272 egates of foreign material consistent with a foreign body tattoo.

273 e algorithm according to which we manage the foreign bodies that are located in the posterior segment

274 n to apoptotic cells, macrophages can engulf foreign bodies that vary substantially in size from a fe

275 During removal of the foreign body, the doctor inspected the corneal incision

276 e of immunosuppression and the presence of a foreign body to the establishment of infection.

277 So, lead foreign body took an unusual trajectory impacting the gl

278 dentical culture conditions, and resulted in foreign body-type giant cell formation.

279 f anorganic bovine bone were present, but no foreign body-type giant cells were identified.

280 an intimate association with multinucleated foreign body-type giant cells.

281 Biopsy in all cases showed foreign body-type granulomas.

282 Foreign body types included metal (n = 40), plastic (n =

283 Presence of foreign bodies was assessed using PLM.

284 The presence of the foreign body was confirmed on computed tomography and wa

285 The foreign body was identified as an artificial fishing wor

286 The foreign body was located in the vitreous - 11 cases (52.

287 Ten foreign bodies were 2.5 x 1.0 mm (length x diameter); 10

288 and specificity for detection of 2.5-mm-long foreign bodies were 86.7% and 96.7%, respectively.

289 and specificity for detection of 5.0-mm-long foreign bodies were 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively.

290 Foreign bodies were found more commonly in I-RLs (n = 13

291 At the SEM level, radiopaque foreign bodies were identified in 34 of the 36 biopsies.

292 Seventy-six foreign bodies were inserted into the arm (n = 69), neck

293 Patients with retained foreign bodies were more likely than controls to have ha

294 Wooden foreign bodies were randomly placed in the plantar soft

295 gnificantly increased risk of retention of a foreign body were emergency surgery (risk ratio, 8.8 [95

296 Metallic and other foreign bodies which may be found on and in patients' bo

297 of the anatomic issues related to esophageal foreign bodies will be addressed.

298 Macrophages protect their host by engulfing foreign bodies within phagosomes that rapidly develop in

299 Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and foreign bodies within the patient's body may be confused

300 ght lateral pterygoid plate by a penetrating foreign body (wooden twig) in an adult male who presente