ライフサイエンスコーパス: formaldehyde

1 ), for the selective profiling of endogenous formaldehyde.

2 he C-C triple/double bond and the release of formaldehyde.

3 aqueous reactions between sulfur dioxide and formaldehyde.

4 H, significantly underestimate the levels of formaldehyde.

5 espond to Zn(II), RcnR to cobalt and FrmR to formaldehyde.

6 tu iodination-based oxidative elimination of formaldehyde.

7 nsient exposure to natural concentrations of formaldehyde.

8 NO3)3 and La2O3 were found to be superior to formaldehyde.

9 olymers is the reduction of the carcinogenic formaldehyde.

10 N-methyl group, resulting in the release of formaldehyde.

11 has evolved systems to perceive and detoxify formaldehyde.

12 hemicals, such as chemotherapeutic drugs and formaldehyde.

13 prepared by the reaction of ampicillin with formaldehyde.

14 urified with lanthanum or neodymium oxidizes formaldehyde.

15 cation via reductive amination with isotopic formaldehydes.

16 low target levels of adulterations including formaldehyde (0.074g.L(-1)), hydrogen peroxide (21.0g.L(

17 perimental animals to stable isotope-labeled formaldehyde ([(13)CD2]-formaldehyde) by inhalation and

18 -column addition of isopropanol solutions of formaldehyde, 2,2-dimethylpropanal, ethyl methanoate, an

19 Cr(VI) or Pb(II)) or by organic pollutants (formaldehyde, 2,4-dichlorophenol, benzalkonium chloride)

20 This cycle might also release formaldehyde, a potent protein and DNA crosslinking agen

21 hibited (lower enzyme activity, reduction of formaldehyde accumulation).

22 late with changes to methanol consumption or formaldehyde accumulation.

23 illing breast cancer cells with simultaneous formaldehyde accumulation.

24 cted users' daily average intake of benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein were 39 mug, 32

25 re known to produce toxic byproducts such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein.

26 emental carbon (EC), PM(2.5) organic carbon, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, benzene, toluene, ethylbenze

27 tative determination of six toxic compounds (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, ethyl carbamate, furan, furf

28 1 compounds, including nicotine, nicotyrine, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, glycidol, acrolein, acetol,

29 ional byproducts, including carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, peroxyacetyl nitrate, and oz

30 Saturated carbonyl compounds (e.g., formaldehyde, acetone) and alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehy

31 Formaldehyde activating enzyme (Fae) is required for Ln

32 quired, although methylglyoxal, ammonia, and formaldehyde also participated in the reaction.

33 Together with observations of formaldehyde, an isoprene oxidation product, these measu

34 DNA damage onset most likely arises from formaldehyde, an obligate by-product of oxidative protei

35 The illegal addition of formalin (37% formaldehyde and 14% methanol) to foods to extend their

36 m vaping amounted to as much as 12 mug m(-3) formaldehyde and 2.6 mug m(-3) acrolein.

37 differences across conditions were found for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde (p < 0.01).

38 Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are the dominant HAP conce

39 When power adjustments were permitted, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde levels were higher respect

40 Daily exposure for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde was higher for 17/19 parti

41 other cookstove smoke constituents (such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde) that may be emitted at co

42 nt molecules for prebiotic chemistry such as formaldehyde and ammonia upon degradation, is a likely p

43 for the efficient PEC methanol oxidation to formaldehyde and concomitant hydrogen evolution.

44 to be consistent with those determined using formaldehyde and creatinine fluorometric assay kits.

45 The fixation was carried out with formaldehyde and does not damage lipid membranes.

46 at this benefit is absent in combinations of formaldehyde and epirubicin, which cannot form stable ox

47 und to be active for CO2 and CO reduction to formaldehyde and even methane.

48 establish methods to quantify elevated blood formaldehyde and formaldehyde-DNA adducts in tissues.

49 milarly, the oxidation of methanol generates formaldehyde and formic acid which then condense with me

50 into bromonitromethane, bromochloromethane, formaldehyde and formic acid.

51 with the UV-vis assays for quantification of formaldehyde and hydroperoxides.

52 Further, we use a tandem reversible formaldehyde and irreversible covalent chemical capture

53 is lesions are likely produced by endogenous formaldehyde and malondialdehyde with lysine.

54 tential health risks inflicted by endogenous formaldehyde and may inform improved disease prevention

55 avin organocatalysts oxidize nitromethane to formaldehyde and NO(x)-providing a relatively nontoxic,

56 ent with trends in satellite observations of formaldehyde and NO2, but much slower than the explosive

57 oxidative ring expansion in the presence of formaldehyde and other aldehydes to form 5,6-dihydro-7H-

58 ission rates and indoor loss coefficients of formaldehyde and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

59 that oxidizes the pyocyanin methyl group to formaldehyde and reduces the pyrazine ring via an unusua

60 By (13)C, D2-formaldehyde and sodium cyanoborohydride, the reductive

61 st studies have assumed that the reaction of formaldehyde and sulfite was the only atmospheric source

62 se findings identify an unexpected source of formaldehyde and, more generally, indicate that the deto

63 sotopic reagents ((18)O water and deuterated formaldehyde) and requires no postlabeling cleanup or is

64 terfacial tension of reacting methylglyoxal, formaldehyde, and ammonium sulfate aqueous mixtures with

65 (OSCs) by reductive amination with (13)C, D2-formaldehyde, and developed an isotope dilution analysis

66 acteria, that converts methanethiol to H2O2, formaldehyde, and H2S, an activity not previously known

67 rom Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 produces formaldehyde, and not formate, during growth with methan

68 reaction of 1,4-bis(organylphosphino)butane, formaldehyde, and primary amines.

69 r lipoic acid), a melatonin-like isocyanide, formaldehyde, and tacrine derivatives, according to the

70 ch was tested by screening for crosslinks in formaldehyde- and chlorambucil-treated calf thymus DNA.

71 In this reaction, methanol and formaldehyde are used for the reductive functionalizatio

72 The formaldehyde area-specific emission rate (86 +/- 8 mug m

73 The studies identify formaldehyde as a key intermediate and an unexpected pH

74 Using formaldehyde as a model analyte, air-liquid interface cu

75 done in optimal media and only assessed for formaldehyde as a model toxic compound.

76 ylation yielding N-methyl-4-cyanoaniline and formaldehyde as primary products.

77 We used formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory DNA elemen

78 nked open chromatin before (contained in the formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory DNA elemen

79 its Ras-transformed derivative (EpRas) using formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory element (F

80 orm for small molecule screening, we adapted formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements (

81 Many aspects of formaldehyde behavior in cells are unknown or undocument

82 volatile organic carcinogens (VOCs), such as formaldehyde, benzene, and chloroform.

83 We show that acrolein, formaldehyde, benzene, and hydrogen cyanide are the domi

84 nd buffer capacity and not limited to BDD or formaldehyde, but can be generalized to different electr

85 pling with the irreversible sequestration of formaldehyde by 3-hexulose-6-phosphate synthase (Hps) an

86 able isotope-labeled formaldehyde ([(13)CD2]-formaldehyde) by inhalation and performed ultrasensitive

87 esent the first examples of enantioselective formaldehyde C-C coupling beyond aldol addition.

88 Therefore, we report here that formaldehyde can be readily obtained from CO(2) at room

89 roxidation, it is unclear whether endogenous formaldehyde can initiate and/or promote diseases in hum

90 Crosslinking with formaldehyde captured in vivo interactions between FLL2,

91 Formaldehyde caused a dose-dependent inhibition of amilo

92 unts of formaldehyde (CH(2)O) and deuterated formaldehyde (CD(2)O) to efficiently label ng/L amino co

93 The new SIL method requires small amounts of formaldehyde (CH(2)O) and deuterated formaldehyde (CD(2)

94 ses to beta-/delta-staphylobilin isomers and formaldehyde (CH2O).

95 d to be important for its response against a formaldehyde challenge.

96 Endogenous formaldehyde clearance alone is therefore critical for h

97 Optimum conditions included an increased formaldehyde concentration and more robust glycine-quenc

98 will not be as effective at reducing indoor formaldehyde concentrations as it is for other VOCs.

99 Median formaldehyde concentrations of 626 mug/m(3) in e-cigaret

100 ilation on and off, it was demonstrated that formaldehyde concentrations reach a steady state much mo

101 nking by performing experiments with varying formaldehyde concentrations.

102 h the anthracycline's ability to form cyclic formaldehyde conjugates as oxazolidine moieties and that

103 These data suggest that formaldehyde contributes to edematous acute lung injury

104 ilibrium in a neutral aqueous system rich in formaldehyde, controlled by nitromethane.

105 the Ln-switch, no differential expression of formaldehyde conversion genes, downregulation of pyrrolo

106 nking and potent synergy in combination with formaldehyde correlate with the anthracycline's ability

107 that associate with maize psbA mRNA by: (i) formaldehyde cross-linking of leaf tissue followed by an

108 high-salt washes and a brief, low-percentage formaldehyde cross-linking step prior to the high-salt w

109 Fresh cells, formaldehyde-cross-linked cells or cells recovered from

110 etics (CLK) assay, which uses time-dependent formaldehyde-cross-linking data to extract kinetic param

111 results that better define the properties of formaldehyde-cross-linking in budding yeast cells.

112 Notably, we observed that formaldehyde-cross-linking rates can vary dramatically f

113 Formaldehyde-cross-linking underpins many of the most co

114 V RNA-protein complexes preserved in vivo by formaldehyde crosslinking, and coupled with mass spectro

115 However, formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FDH) catalyzed reduction of

116 ction of formaldehyde using NAD(+) dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase.

117 formaldehyde modification as a function of [formaldehyde] demonstrates that FrmR reactivity is optim

118 t a highly selective one-step synthesis of a formaldehyde derivative starting from carbon dioxide and

119 dies revealing that metampicillin contains a formaldehyde-derived cyclic aminal.

120 methyl)glutathione, yet glutathione inhibits formaldehyde detection by FrmR in vivo and in vitro Quan

121 erivatization of samples is not required for formaldehyde detection.

122 and enhance formaldehyde reactivity in vitro Formaldehyde detoxification by FrmA requires S-(hydroxym

123 Furthermore, we find that formaldehyde detoxification in human cells generates for

124 f formaldehyde, permitting expression of the formaldehyde detoxification machinery (FrmA and FrmB, wh

125 logation of pyridine-4-carboxaldehydes using formaldehyde dimethyl thioacetal monoxide (FAMSO), and a

126 useful chemicals including syngas, methanol, formaldehyde, dimethyl ether, heavier hydrocarbons, arom

127 arying degrees (factors of 1.1 to 3.8), with formaldehyde displaying no significant change.

128 on ultrafast time scales in the prototypical formaldehyde dissociation reaction.

129 to quantify elevated blood formaldehyde and formaldehyde-DNA adducts in tissues.

130 ctively engage DNA repair but also imprint a formaldehyde-driven mutation signature similar to aging-

131 We report that adding formaldehyde during biomass pretreatment produces a solu

132 eased by 84%, PM(2.5) EFs increased by 149%, formaldehyde EFs increased by 216%, and benzene EFs incr

133 anisms are exposed to the genotoxic chemical formaldehyde, either from endogenous or environmental so

134 s, and emission measurements showed that the formaldehyde emission was completely suppressed when pyr

135 ed when exposed to air and lead to undesired formaldehyde emissions.

136 cation of specific RNA transcripts following formaldehyde exposure denotes an early process occurring

137 pression patterns emerge for 0.1 and 0.5 ppm formaldehyde exposure, which is reflected in significant

138 barriers for the cycloaddition as well as a formaldehyde expulsion steps were computed, and a multis

139 Endogenous and exogenous formaldehyde (FA) has been linked to cancer, neurotoxici

140 Formaldehyde (FA) is a reactive signaling molecule that

141 Formaldehyde (FA) is a simple biological aldehyde that i

142 Formaldehyde (FA) is an environmental and occupational c

143 the endogenous and environmental carcinogen formaldehyde (FA) that binds to cytosolic and nuclear pr

144 rmation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) by formaldehyde (FA) that forms histone adducts and replica

145 veloped the first photoactivatable donor for formaldehyde (FA).

146 phone was developed to quantitatively detect formaldehyde (FA).

147 s of one-carbon marks on RNA with release of formaldehyde (FA).

148 Therefore, we investigated how formaldehyde fixation influences the photophysical prope

149 We discovered that formaldehyde fixation makes the fluorescence signal, pho

150 The method uses formaldehyde fixation to stabilize protein complexes.

151 NTHi on lectin-derivatized chips followed by formaldehyde fixation, rendering the bacteria an integra

152 open chromatin profiling on both native and formaldehyde-fixed cells.

153 q) for co-mapping of mRNAs and proteins in a formaldehyde-fixed tissue slide via next-generation sequ

154 LP each underwent the aza-Cope reaction with formaldehyde followed by hydrolysis to eliminate unmask

155 elial BEAS-2B cell cultures exposed to 1 ppm formaldehyde for 2 h.

156 n, which could impact organisms that require formaldehyde for assimilation.

157 on chromatography, in the presence of CO2 or formaldehyde form mutual, methylene-bridged cross-links

158 oups can be modified to avoid this source of formaldehyde formation but still preserve their catalyti

159 posed nano-sniffer could successfully detect formaldehyde from 0.001 to 100000ng/mL (R(2) = 0.9339) b

160 he first time the production of methanol and formaldehyde from CO hydrogenation on Ni(110) and confir

161 We performed detailed experiments on formaldehyde (H(2)CO) photodissociation and determined f

162 lternative molecular dissociation pathway in formaldehyde (H(2)CO), it has been indirectly observed i

163 example is the unimolecular dissociation of formaldehyde (H2CO), in which the "normal" reaction proc

164 for tropospheric sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) and formaldehyde (HCHO) column mass densities (CMD) are anal

165 Formaldehyde (HCHO) is a simple and highly reactive huma

166 Formaldehyde (HCHO) is the most important carcinogen in

167 ightly coupled to the production and loss of formaldehyde (HCHO), a major hydrocarbon oxidation produ

168 HONO), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ozone (O3), formaldehyde (HCHO), and acetaldehyde (CH3CHO).

169 DX was reduced to form methylenedinitramine, formaldehyde (HCHO), and ammonium (NH(4)(+)).

170 The impact of formaldehyde (HCHO, formed in vehicle exhaust gases by i

171 We found that formaldehyde hemiacetals are a considerable fraction of

172 The formaldehyde hemiacetals derived from these solvents wer

173 The reason for this is that formaldehyde hemiacetals follow other reaction pathways,

174 In the study described herein, the formaldehyde hemiacetals were found at higher levels tha

175 ydrogenase (Mdh), which converts methanol to formaldehyde, highly favors the reverse reaction.

176 y, our graphene-based 3-dimensional thiourea-formaldehyde hybrid exhibited specific capacitance as hi

177 cludes addition of toxic substances, such as formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorite, dichromat

178 ss model, which considered unadulterated and formaldehyde-, hydrogen peroxide-, citrate-, hydroxide-

179 species (ROS) was elevated significantly by formaldehyde in addition to markedly augmented membrane

180 ethylglyoxal relative to carbon monoxide and formaldehyde in agricultural biomass burning plumes inte

181 ternary solutions of both methylglyoxal and formaldehyde in aqueous ammonium sulfate, indicating a m

182 Levels of formaldehyde in food samples were compared with publishe

183 urate methods and the ubiquitous presence of formaldehyde in foods make the detection of illegally ad

184 It could also detect formaldehyde in fruit juice and wine samples indicating

185 ytical performance for the quantification of formaldehyde in human whole blood and of creatinine in s

186 idated for the quantitative determination of formaldehyde in mango, fish and milk.

187 The results obtained analysing formaldehyde in milk samples by the optical sensor and b

188 NMR time-course experiments with excess formaldehyde in solution show formation of another produ

189 c mechanism of FrmR is triggered directly by formaldehyde in vitro Sensitivity to formaldehyde requir

190 Relative to FrmR, RcnR is less responsive to formaldehyde in vitro, and RcnR does not sense formaldeh

191 rmaldehyde in vitro, and RcnR does not sense formaldehyde in vivo, but reciprocal mutations FrmR(P2S)

192 derivatives by condensation of indoles with formaldehyde in water under microwave irradiation.

193 a shock sensor for bioactive compounds (e.g. formaldehyde) in water.

194 tible cotton rat challenge model compared to formaldehyde inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) and live RSV exper

195 accine to a whole-inactivated-virus vaccine (formaldehyde-inactivated HSV-2 [FI-HSV-2]).

196 e stability, but previous methods to measure formaldehyde-induced DPCs were incapable of discriminati

197 n, together with the finding that endogenous formaldehyde-induced DPCs were present in all tissues ex

198 as a potentially novel mechanism underlying formaldehyde-induced tumorigenesis.

199 Filtering and formaldehyde inhibition confirmed the biological nature

200 Formaldehyde intake from 100 daily puffs was higher than

201 Formaldehyde interacts with anthracyclines to enhance an

202 We show that formaldehyde is a common substrate of ALDH2 and ADH5 and

203 Unsaturated oxidative formaldehyde is a noxious aldehyde in cigarette smoke th

204 Formaldehyde is a reactive carbonyl species (RCS) that i

205 The conversion of carbon dioxide to formaldehyde is a transformation that is of considerable

206 erable significance in view of the fact that formaldehyde is a widely used chemical, but this convers

207 Endogenous formaldehyde is abundantly present in our bodies, at aro

208 Formaldehyde is an environmental and occupational chemic

209 Formaldehyde is an important precursor to numerous indus

210 onstrating that XoxF1-mediated production of formaldehyde is essential.

211 Notably, formaldehyde is generated from oxidative decomposition o

212 situ, since cotreatment with doxorubicin and formaldehyde is highly cytotoxic to dox-resistant tumor

213 Here, formaldehyde is obtained as dimethoxymethane, its dimeth

214 Formaldehyde is one such compound that can irreversibly

215 Specifically, formaldehyde is released from H(2)C(OSiPh(3))(2) upon tr

216 yridines, 2-pyridylamines or arylamines, and formaldehyde is reported.

217 Also, since formaldehyde is the byproduct of biochemical reactions f

218 hich UV-Vis spectrum changed in contact with formaldehyde, is presented.

219 ter plate format, a stop reagent, containing formaldehyde, is used.

220 actions with acidic permanganate enhanced by formaldehyde (KMnO4-COH), acidic cerium (IV) and rhodami

221 These results demonstrate that formaldehyde loss rates must be taken into account to co

222 re, we show that fluorescent malondialdehyde-formaldehyde (M2FA)-lysine adducts are immunogenic witho

223 While such high steady state levels of formaldehyde may be derived by enzymatic reactions inclu

224 Thirty-five melamine-formaldehyde (MF) monolithic materials with bimodal pore

225 mber of FrmR molecules per cell and modeling formaldehyde modification as a function of [formaldehyde

226 pectra showing different ratios of (13)C, D2-formaldehyde-modified and H2-formaldehyde-modified compo

227 os of (13)C, D2-formaldehyde-modified and H2-formaldehyde-modified compounds.

228 eaction monitoring (MRM) to detect (13)C, D2-formaldehyde-modified OSCs by ultrahigh-performance liqu

229 generated from the disproportionation of two formaldehyde molecules).

230 s such as nitrite, 4-nitro-2,4-diazabutanal, formaldehyde, nitrous oxide, formate, and ammonia corres

231 However, the mechanistic effects of formaldehyde on lung fluid transport are still poorly un

232 Formaldehyde (on average 135 mug m(-3)) and acrolein (28

233 mouse and chicken cells that cannot detoxify formaldehyde or that lack DNA crosslink repair.

234 mostly from PG, while other compounds (e.g., formaldehyde) originated from both.

235 ofuran analog was proposed to be involved in formaldehyde oxidation in Alphaproteobacteria.

236 However, formaldehyde oxidation via 2,6-dichlorophenol-indophenol

237 tric electrochemical molecular redox probes, Formaldehyde oxidative latent probe (FOLP) and dihydroxy

238 oxidative latent probe (FOLP) and dihydroxy-formaldehyde oxidative latent probe (HFOLP), for the sel

239 c acid (TFA) with two Criegee intermediates, formaldehyde oxide and acetone oxide, decrease with incr

240 ation en route to regioisomeric allyliridium-formaldehyde pairs, yet single constitutional isomers ar

241 specifically inactivated in the presence of formaldehyde, permitting expression of the formaldehyde

242 till limited to the wet processing of phenol-formaldehyde polycondensation, which involves soluble to

243 graphene oxide with a redox active thiourea-formaldehyde polymer, yielding a multifunctional hybrid

244 ic acid coordination polymer or a resorcinol-formaldehyde polymer.

245 We applied CAP-C to formaldehyde prefixed mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs)

246 detect native chromatin conformation without formaldehyde prefixing.

247 In particular, Formaldehyde Probe 573 (FAP573), based on a resorufin sc

248 als are a considerable fraction of the total formaldehyde produced in electronic cigarette that canno

249 )-C(80) with an excess of N-ethylglycine and formaldehyde provided tris- and tetra-fulleropyrrolidine

250 However, whether formaldehyde provokes modifications of RNAs such as 8-ox

251 The sensor was tested for formaldehyde quantification in milk, as its deliberate a

252 The analyte restoration appears specific for formaldehyde-reactive amino acids.

253 RcnR(S2P), respectively, impair and enhance formaldehyde reactivity in vitro Formaldehyde detoxifica

254 Our results showed that formaldehyde reduced mouse transalveolar fluid clearance

255 ADH scavenger, thereby preventing reversible formaldehyde reduction.

256 rtainty and spatial smearing in the isoprene-formaldehyde relationship.

257 We find that the isoprene-formaldehyde relationships measured from space are broad

258 ctly by formaldehyde in vitro Sensitivity to formaldehyde requires a cysteine (Cys(35) in FrmR) conse

259 hylene oxide) (PDMS-b-PEO) BBCPs with phenol-formaldehyde resin yielding ordered precursor films, fol

260 plus CstR, which responds to persulfide, and formaldehyde-responsive FrmR.

261 how that crosslinking mammalian tissues with formaldehyde results in significant EV loss, which can b

262 a sphere attached to a mesoporous resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) sphere.

263 Here, we perform formaldehyde RNA immunoprecipitation (fRIP-Seq) to surve

264 roup is readily removed by reaction with the formaldehyde scavenger 1,3-cyclohexanedione, whereas the

265 o for the real-time monitoring of endogenous formaldehyde secretion in HeLa cells.

266 Formaldehyde selectively depletes BRCA2 via proteasomal

267 ysical data suggests a mechanistic model for formaldehyde-sensing and derepression of frmRA(B) expres

268 A crystal structure of metal- and formaldehyde-sensing FrmR(E64H) reveals that an FrmR-spe

269 Cys(35), and these residues form the deduced formaldehyde-sensing site.

270 M and remove (137)Cs by spherical resorcinol-formaldehyde (sRF) ion-exchange resin.

271 tabolite and ubiquitous environmental toxin, formaldehyde, stalls and destabilizes DNA replication fo

272 In situ trapping of NO(x) and formaldehyde suggest an oxidative Nef process reminiscen

273 H(2)C(OSiPh(3))(2) thus serves as a formaldehyde surrogate and provides a means to incorpora

274 modified and frmRA is derepressed at lower [formaldehyde] than required to generate S-(hydroxymethyl

275 Protonation of 3(-) liberates H2 gas and formaldehyde, the latter of which is rapidly consumed by

276 odel reactions, cycloaddition of ethylene to formaldehyde, thioformaldehyde, and formaldimine is also

277 ing space-based measurements of isoprene and formaldehyde to constrain atmospheric oxidation over iso

278 ling of branched allylic acetates 1a-1o with formaldehyde to form primary homoallylic alcohols 2a-2o

279 A satellite-retrieved ratio of formaldehyde to NO(2) (HCHO/NO(2)), developed from theor

280 mary amine groups were reacted with isotopic formaldehydes to synthesize ISs and standards.

281 r masses of two well-known reagents, DSS and formaldehyde, to accuracies of a few parts per million.

282 The X-ray structure of the formaldehyde-treated Escherichia coli FrmR (EcFrmR) prot

283 3.8 to 4.8 V, users were predicted to inhale formaldehyde (up to 49 mg day(-1)), acrolein (up to 10 m

284 was applied for the successful detection of formaldehyde using NAD(+) dependent formaldehyde dehydro

285 re found at higher levels than those of free formaldehyde via an orthogonal sample collection protoco

286 The sensor limit of detection for formaldehyde was 0.2 mg L(-1), and the limit of quantifi

287 The first order loss coefficient for formaldehyde was 0.47 +/- 0.06 h(-1) at 0.08 h(-1) ACH a

288 on where the free and total concentration of formaldehyde was determined in car exhaust using a porta

289 Glyoxal enhancements relative to formaldehyde were 30 times lower than previously reporte

290 ratios of other species such as methane and formaldehyde were consistent with previous measurements,

291 resence of propionaldehyde, acetaldehyde and formaldehyde were correlated, corroborating previous wor

292 s (e.g., acetic acid, methanol, ethanol, and formaldehyde) were synthesized in a one-step process fro

293 ndirect approach using its oxidation product formaldehyde, which is affected by non-isoprene sources

294 endent methanol dehydrogenase XoxF1 produces formaldehyde, which is lethal if allowed to accumulate.

295 three to seven times those obtained without formaldehyde, which prevented lignin condensation by for

296 which is consumed by alcohol oxidase to form formaldehyde while simultaneously reducing oxygen to hyd

297 potential for complexity in the reaction of formaldehyde with biomedicinally relevant molecules.

298 ic ranges of 0.12-1000 muM and 0.09-3 mM for formaldehyde with detection limits of 48.2 nM and 31.6 m

299 Methanol is oxidized on alpha-Fe2O3 to formaldehyde with near unity Faradaic efficiency.

300 tor that modulates H. influenzae response to formaldehyde, with two cysteine residues (Cys54 and Cys7