ライフサイエンスコーパス: frontal pole

1 human-specific patterns of expression in the frontal pole.

2 ex, right inferior temporal gyrus, and right frontal pole.

3 eft rostral middle frontal regions, and left frontal pole.

4 stinctively human component in ventrolateral frontal pole.

5 unterexamples to conclusions recruited right frontal pole.

6 BOLD activation in left cerebellum and right frontal pole.

7 3) in which SD was repeatedly evoked in the frontal pole.

8 egative functional connectivity to the right frontal pole.

9 efined by negative connectivity to the right frontal pole.

10 udate, left inferior frontal gyrus, and left frontal pole.

11 atter between the anterior cingulate and the frontal poles.

12 olume reductions in deep GM and parietal and frontal poles.

13 nd dorsal to the principal sulcus and in the frontal pole; 3) a caudolateral network (CLPFC) in and r

14 al anterior cingulate, insula, thalamus, and frontal pole) across upregulation and downregulation.

15 e to which the latter two regions influenced frontal pole activity correlated with participant-specif

16 nt was mediated by gray matter volume in the frontal pole and anterior cingulate gyrus.

17 and left nucleus accumbens as well as right frontal pole and left caudate.

18 connect with largely separate regions of the frontal pole and more medial premotor and dorsal prefron

19 ilateral reductions of cortical thickness in frontal pole and superior frontal gyrus, and similar eff

20 d decreased with the orbital frontal cortex, frontal pole and the dorsal ACC, suggesting a down-regul

21 n in bilateral precentral gyri, dorso-medial frontal poles and the precuneus.

22 dence for a precise cortical region (lateral frontal pole) and a structural pathway (the ventral amyg

23 ral gyrus, middle and superior frontal gyri, frontal pole, and cingulate gyrus in S-allele carriers c

24 (FDG-PET) glucose metabolism values from the frontal pole, anterior cingulate cortex, and temporal po

25 t cortex was reciprocally connected with the frontal pole (area 10), rostral principal sulcus (area 4

26 s consolidate the left medial portion of the frontal pole as particularly altered in major depression

27 related with left dorsal anterior insula and frontal pole atrophy.

28 y, recurrent connectivity within the lateral frontal pole becomes more inhibitory, while backward con

29 ostructurally informed subdivisions of human frontal pole between depressed patients and comparison s

30 rtex (Brodmann's area 8), the right inferior frontal pole (Brodmann's area 10), and the right lateral

31 ization of neurons in four cortical regions (frontal pole [Brodmann's area 10], primary motor [area 4

32 ribe their comparison of transcriptomes from frontal pole, caudate nucleus, and hippocampus of multip

33 ulo-opercular control network, including the frontal pole, cingulate cortex, and anterior insula.

34 t support the hypothesis that neurons in the frontal pole compute an evaluation of different alternat

35 The frontal pole cortex (FPC) expanded markedly during human

36 l activation than comparison subjects in the frontal pole, dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal

37 thout SB showed less activation in the right frontal pole during emotion regulation attempts.

38 he size of two prefrontal brain regions, the frontal pole (FP) and the dorso-lateral prefrontal corte

39 that, compared to other primates, the human frontal pole (FP) contains a unique lateral subdivision

40 Our hypothesis of reduced frontal pole (FP) recruitment in gamblers was not suppor

41 Prior work suggests that the lateral frontal pole (FPl) is uniquely positioned to integrate a

42 division of prefrontal cortex - with lateral frontal pole (FPl) supporting the context-dependent mapp

43 task-defined frontal regions to the lateral frontal pole (FPl), an anatomically defined portion of t

44 This circuitry comprised the lateral frontal pole (FPl), which represented integrated emotion

45 The heterogeneous human frontal pole has been identified as a node in the dysfun

46 nalysis found a significantly smaller medial frontal pole in depressed patients, with a negative corr

47 microstructurally defined medial area of the frontal pole in depressed patients.

48 The growth of the frontal pole in humans has pushed area 25 and area 32pl,

49 scribe the intracerebral hemodynamics at the frontal pole in the circumscribed period between wakeful

50 occurred in the medial prefrontal cortex and frontal pole in the patients who responded positively to

51 ent PFC territories (dorsal, medial, orbital/frontal pole, inferior frontal) showing structural conne

52 We found that the frontal pole integrates effort and risk costs through fu

53 to clarify the basic circuit anatomy of the frontal pole, its functional involvement during performa

54 r with grey matter volume asymmetries in the frontal pole, lateral occipital pole or temporal pole.

55 pars opercularis, rostral middle frontal and frontal pole), left supramarginal gyrus, and right trans

56 their functional coupling patterns with the frontal pole, medial prefrontal, and dorsal prefrontal c

57 mplicating the bilateral anterior cingulate, frontal pole, medial temporal lobe, opercular cortex and

58 ral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), medial frontal pole (mFP) and periaquiduct grey (PAG) are signi

59 ciated with increased activation in the left frontal pole, middle temporal gyrus, inferior temporal g

60 uman region sometimes referred to as lateral frontal pole more closely resembled area 46, rather than

61 Frontal pole ODI mediated the negative relationship of a

62 A left-sided region of the frontal pole of the brain (BA 9/10) was selectively acti

63 Group 2 animals (n = 9), the (non-ischemic) frontal pole of the ipsilateral hemisphere was electrica

64 triangularis and in the pars opercularis and frontal pole of the right hemisphere during the OCP arm

65 e closely resembled area 46, rather than the frontal pole, of the macaque.

66 e bilateral insula and larger volumes in the frontal pole (p < 0.05(adjusted)).

67 ferior parietal (p = 0.04) and contralateral frontal pole (p = 0.04).

68 y within a common network bilaterally (e.g., frontal pole, paracingulate gyrus, medial frontal cortex

69 ntal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontal pole, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior cingu

70 ectivity between left angular gyrus and left frontal pole predicted better response to CBT in the OCD

71 y in the right superior, medial orbital, and frontal pole regions of the prefrontal cortex (p < .01).

72 ns between temporoparietal junction area and frontal pole.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT What we know about t

73 cingulate cortex, parahippocampal gyri, and frontal pole, that exhibited activity uniquely associate

74 ate cortex, the subcallosal cortex, the left frontal pole, the caudate, and the left nucleus accumben

75 ntral prefrontal regions including the right frontal pole, the medial and lateral orbitofrontal gyrus

76 cortical pain network comprising the lateral frontal pole, the primary somatosensory cortex, and post

77 as well as increased thickness of the right frontal pole, the right lateral parietal lobules, and th

78 analysis showed that hippocampal volume and frontal pole thickness differed between patients who ach

79 (socio-affective) versus lateral (cognitive) frontal pole to major depression pathogenesis is current

80 atosensory (S2), bilateral insula, bilateral frontal pole, visual, precuneus, paracingulate, and ante

81 ds, subregion specificity in the left medial frontal pole volume in depressed patients was demonstrat

82 In a second approach, frontal pole volume was compared by subdivision-naive mu

83 Frontal pole volume was first compared between depressed

84 -0.40, P=0.002) between serum VEGF and total frontal pole volume was found in patients with schizophr

85 ater activation in the left caudate and left frontal pole was associated with abstinence-induced subj

86 Indeed, the frontal pole was shown to structurally and functionally

87 tion of emotion (inferior frontal cortex and frontal pole) was negatively correlated with both the nu