ライフサイエンスコーパス: frontopolar

1 Greater increases in frontopolar activation were associated with improvement

2 ng oscillatory desynchronization between the frontopolar and -parietal cortex leads to more inaccurat

3 Thinner frontopolar and language cortex correlated with immune s

4 s showed significant activation in the right frontopolar and right inferior prefrontal cortices, alth

5 The apex transmodal network comprises frontopolar and rostral temporal association cortex, par

6 gions with the ventral prefrontal cortex and frontopolar and sensory cortices; and decreased connecti

7 Frontopolar and temporal increases observed in our study

8 agues shed new light on the roles of lateral frontopolar and ventromedial prefrontal cortices in task

9 subjects, and between cortical regions BA10 (frontopolar) and BA20 (inferior temporal).

10 ctive monitoring (posterior dorsolateral and frontopolar), and phonological maintenance/rehearsal (po

11 tic regions were localized in left inferior, frontopolar, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in contr

12 lt mode-like network, one orbitofrontal, one frontopolar, and one network resembling the human salien

13 cortex but increased activity in precuneus, frontopolar, and premotor cortex, compared to those of c

14 implicate orbitofrontal, medial prefrontal, frontopolar, and ventrolateral cortical networks in the

15 has a key role in working memory tasks, and frontopolar area 10 is recruited in complex multitask op

16 w highlights the importance of targeting the frontopolar area and tailoring the treatment according t

17 etwork linking aMCC to the frontoinsular and frontopolar as well as some subcortical regions.

18 Convergent evidence indicates that frontopolar Brodmann area 10, and more generally the ant

19 hic maturational coupling was found within a frontopolar-centered prefrontal system involved in compl

20 Given that frontopolar connectivity with ventromedial regions durin

21 oarchitectonically defined regions including frontopolar cortex (area 10), Broca's area (area 45), fr

22 oup showed greater gray matter volume in the frontopolar cortex (BA9/10) compared with those in the l

23 The dorsomedial frontopolar cortex (dmFPC) tracks reliability of social

24 nnectivity (CFC) increased in domain-general frontopolar cortex (for both word and face matching) but

25 Frontopolar cortex (FPC) contains area 10, an anterior s

26 The frontopolar cortex (FPC) contributes to tracking the rew

27 ncentives suggests causal involvement of the frontopolar cortex (FPC) in effort-based decision-making

28 The frontopolar cortex (FPC) is, to date, one of the least u

29 We suggest that the frontopolar cortex (FPC) keeps track of and evaluates al

30 Lateral frontopolar cortex (FPC) may also adjudicate response co

31 Here, we investigate the role that the frontopolar cortex (FPC) plays in motivating cognitive a

32 cement-learning model and fMRI, we show that frontopolar cortex (FPC) tracks the relative advantage i

33 eory regarding the most anterior sector, the frontopolar cortex (FPC), is that it is involved in expl

34 most anterior part of the prefrontal cortex [frontopolar cortex (FPC)], and is believed to sit atop a

35 nding initial choices and another in lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC), which was only engaged by dem

36 frontal gyrus, precommitment engaged lateral frontopolar cortex (LFPC).

37 earning is additionally supported by lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC).

38 k change and area under the curve) of medial frontopolar cortex (mFPC), lateral prefrontal cortex (lP

39 ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and frontopolar cortex (p(FDR) < 0.05).

40 Psychotherapy increased lateral frontopolar cortex activity and connectivity with the ve

41 The frontopolar cortex also displayed a greater variety of t

42 magnetic resonance imaging to show that the frontopolar cortex and intraparietal sulcus are preferen

43 wledge about the anatomy and connectivity of frontopolar cortex and provides an integrative summary o

44 In particular, the human frontopolar cortex and the frontoinsular cortex had a si

45 ntal cortex, accumulating data highlight the frontopolar cortex as a promising therapeutic target for

46 answer the question: what, if anything, does frontopolar cortex contribute to goal-directed cognition

47 ranial direct current stimulation over right frontopolar cortex during a reward-learning task.

48 how that the inferior lateral prefrontal and frontopolar cortex encode both reliability signals and t

49 ards as individual utility while the lateral frontopolar cortex encodes group utility (i.e., pending

50 y participants demonstrated that the lateral frontopolar cortex exerts downstream influence on the ve

51 on is enhanced by psychotherapy and that the frontopolar cortex exerts downstream influence on ventro

52 we observed quadratic confidence effects in frontopolar cortex for detection but not discrimination.

53 This suggests a causal role for right frontopolar cortex in directed, but not random, explorat

54 We hypothesize that frontopolar cortex mediates abstract relational integrat

55 Bilateral lesions within the frontopolar cortex or within the mid-dorsolateral prefro

56 , OFC, vmPFC, anterior cingulate cortex, and frontopolar cortex was associated with threat exposure.

57 in cognitive control (anterior cingulate and frontopolar cortex) brain regions following oxytocin adm

58 nction of one of its largest subregions (the frontopolar cortex) remain enigmatic and underspecified.

59 n prefrontal and parietal regions, including frontopolar cortex, and parallel encoding of these compu

60 in the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), the frontopolar cortex, and temporal regions in subjects wit

61 n) of (18)F-FEAnGA was most increased in the frontopolar cortex, frontal cortex, bulbus olfactorius,

62 al lobule and premotor cortex, and also left frontopolar cortex, significantly discriminated intended

63 al magnetic stimulation to inhibit the right frontopolar cortex, we were able to selectively inhibit

64 nodes of the default mode network, including frontopolar cortex-a region thought to modulate LPFC con

65 dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus, and medial frontopolar cortex.

66 ncluded the orbitofrontal, ventromedial, and frontopolar cortex.

67 ncluding white matter association tracts and frontopolar cortex.

68 , with the notable exception of sulci in the frontopolar cortex.

69 ciety for Neuroscience minisymposium Primate Frontopolar Cortex: From Circuits to Complex Behaviors w

70 ized neural modules within the human lateral frontopolar cortices (LFPCs) support "relational integra

71 connectivity of the dorsolateral frontal and frontopolar cortices.

72 sleep had increased sleep spindle density in frontopolar electrodes, suggesting the involvement of di

73 cingulate (ACC), anterior insular (AI), and frontopolar (FP) cortices of small odontocetes, includin

74 ibited heightened alpha power at the midline frontopolar (Fpz) and beta power at the midline occipita

75 Changes in frontopolar function during deliberate regulation of neg

76 otivation, and mentalizing network involving frontopolar-medial-prefrontal and temporo-parietal circu

77 The frontopolar N350 has been implicated in processes that c

78 ients in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontopolar prefrontal cortex, left orbitofrontal cortex

79 tosensory (areas 3b/3a/1/2), motor (area 4), frontopolar (prefrontal area 10), and visual (areas 17/1

80 The results confirm that the right frontopolar region plays a role in control of attention

81 rATL (active and sham condition) or the left frontopolar region while participants attempted to solve

82 bition, as well as in anterior cingulate and frontopolar regions implicated in other executive functi

83 the left anterior cingulate gyrus, bilateral frontopolar regions, bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal

84 lateral (starting at the central sulcus and frontopolar regions, sweeping toward the mid and superio

85 mental rotation and showed linear trends at frontopolar sites from 200 to 700 ms and centrofrontal s

86 l connectivity and the electric field at the frontopolar stimulation site (r = 0.42, p corrected = 0.

87 The effects of frontopolar stimulation were dissociated from those indu

88 e-stimulation, and compared to sham and left frontopolar stimulation.