コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tant visual cues in social perception (right fusiform).
2 hippocampus, parahippocampus, thalamus, and fusiform.
3 get-evoked activation decreases in the right fusiform.
4 y related to cortical thickness in the right fusiform.
5 aped abdominal aortic aneurysms (SaAAAs) and fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysms (FuAAAs) regarding p
6 ing thoracic aortic aneurysms (n=10 total, 5 fusiform and 5 saccular) underwent 3-dimensional reconst
8 from the undiseased portion) and small SMCs (fusiform and growing in multilayers, from the undiseased
12 rCBF in the right parahippocampus, thalamus, fusiform and middle temporal gyri, as well as the left a
14 gender, race, and emotion categories in the fusiform and orbitofrontal cortices were stereotypically
15 roups showed differential hypo-activation of fusiform and posterior temporo-occipital junctional cort
19 ivation to SS in the precentral, prefrontal, fusiform, and posterior cingulate cortices before CBT-I.
21 hinner cortex in various frontal regions and fusiform, and reduced FA in inferior longitudinal fascic
22 us, hippocampus, posterior cingulate cortex, fusiform, and visual cortex (P < .05 significance thresh
23 aortic repair (1993-2013), predominantly for fusiform aneurysm (n = 144), saccular aneurysm (n = 94),
24 form dilations of cerebral vessels and giant fusiform aneurysm in supraclinoid segment of the interna
27 domain or the kinase activation loop in 4/6 fusiform aneurysms (and 0/38 saccular aneurysms; Fisher'
28 , 178 aneurysms) with unruptured saccular or fusiform aneurysms or recurrent aneurysms after previous
29 n the internal carotid artery were included; fusiform aneurysms, infundibulae, and vascular segments
31 olgi-impregnated neurons had round or ovoid, fusiform, angular, and polygonal cell bodies (10-30 mum
32 ss) of the right inferior parietal and right fusiform areas was shown to play a key role in ET charac
34 05 [0.02], P = .07, P for interaction = .04; fusiform: beta>50 [SE], 0.09 [0.03], P = .002, beta</=50
36 uatic locomotion, including development of a fusiform body and reduction of hindlimbs [8-11], but the
37 (FFA), occipital face area (OFA), amygdala, fusiform body area (FBA), retrosplenial complex (RSC) an
39 ns in the bilateral cerebellum and bilateral fusiform body-area, with power suppression during a more
40 s have shown that in normal hearing animals, fusiform cell activity can be modulated by activation of
42 ereas deep afterhyperpolarizations following fusiform cell spike trains potently inhibited stellate c
43 onstrate increased synchrony and bursting of fusiform cell spontaneous firing, which correlate with f
44 artwheel cell) and principal output neurons (fusiform cell) were compared before and after manipulati
45 synapses on bushy cells (AN-BC synapses) and fusiform cells (AN-FC synapses) and PF synapses on FC (P
46 mably reflecting direct excitatory inputs to fusiform cells and an indirect inhibitory input to fusif
47 eveal that 5-HT exerts a potent influence on fusiform cells by altering their intrinsic properties, w
48 rm cells and an indirect inhibitory input to fusiform cells from the granule cell-cartwheel cell syst
49 , a reduction in KCNQ2/3 channel activity in fusiform cells in noise-exposed mice by 4 days after exp
50 taneous firing (hyperactivity) is induced in fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) foll
51 several higher auditory stations but not in fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), key
53 Optogenetically activated populations of fusiform cells reliably enhanced interneuron excitabilit
54 e of increased synchrony and bursting in DCN fusiform cells suggests that a neural code for phantom s
56 o suppress tinnitus-related hyperactivity of fusiform cells using the cholinergic agonist, carbachol.
57 we show that excitatory projection neurons (fusiform cells) and inhibitory stellate interneurons of
58 nitus, we recorded spontaneous activity from fusiform cells, the principle neurons of the DCN, in nor
61 a novel mechanism in the pathophysiology of fusiform cerebral aneurysms and suggest a potential role
62 vident in both face-selective regions of the fusiform cortex and domain-general regions of the prefro
63 ial expressions in amygdala, as well as left fusiform cortex and right middle frontal gyrus (cluster-
65 isorders, for example, aberrant amygdala and fusiform cortex structure and function occurring in the
67 Thinner left inferior temporal and right fusiform cortex were associated with the UNC13A single n
68 lume in the hippocampus, parahippocampus and fusiform cortex, and a white-matter index for the fornix
69 including the amygdala, anterior insula, and fusiform cortex, even after accounting for prescan state
71 al discriminability in lateral occipital and fusiform cortices, suggesting that activation patterns w
72 was detected in right inferior temporal and fusiform cortices, which correlated negatively with CGG
76 esent a rare case of a patient with multiple fusiform dilations of cerebral vessels and giant fusifor
77 only occurring, and 'other types', including fusiform/dolichoectatic, dissecting, serpentine, posttra
79 in the occipital and temporal lobe, and the fusiform face area (FFA) and anterior temporal lobe play
80 houses enhanced the sensory responses in the fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area
81 Mirroring the arrangement of human regions fusiform face area (FFA) and PPA (which are adjacent to
82 gory-selective visual regions, including the fusiform face area (FFA) and the parahippocampal place a
83 sulcus (pSTS) and its connectivity with the fusiform face area (FFA) during eye contact with a speak
84 presenting architectural styles included the fusiform face area (FFA) in addition to several scene-se
89 the amplitude of gamma oscillations, in the fusiform face area (FFA) of individuals diagnosed with A
90 e fMRI responses in the right face-selective fusiform face area (FFA) was closely associated with ind
91 ng hypothesis, this dedifferentiation in the fusiform face area (FFA) was driven by increased activat
92 functional network connectivity of the left fusiform face area (FFA) with the hippocampus and inferi
93 dial category-selective areas, including the fusiform face area (FFA), occipital face area (OFA), amy
95 r superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and to the fusiform face area (FFA), using a searchlight approach t
96 nd race of faces, it remains unclear whether fusiform face area (FFA)-the portion of fusiform gyrus t
99 ells the story behind our first paper on the fusiform face area (FFA): how we chose the question, dev
102 han responses to nonsymmetrical views in the fusiform face area and superior temporal sulcus, but not
105 iarity in the model, whereas activity in the fusiform face area covaries with the prediction error pa
106 nitude of repetition suppression (RS) in the Fusiform Face Area is influenced by the probability of r
109 cial identity and provides evidence that the fusiform face area responds with distinct patterns of ac
111 ctional connectivity between the ACC and the fusiform face area that was disrupted by stress odors un
112 nd unexpected face and house stimuli in the "fusiform face area" (FFA) could be well-described as a s
113 ncluding the "proto" occipital face area and fusiform face area) and scene selectivity (including the
116 ccur without normal functioning of the right fusiform face area, an area proposed to mediate greeble
117 (PPA) compared with adjacent regions (e.g., fusiform face area, FFA) within the temporal visual cort
118 al areas, including the occipital face area, fusiform face area, lateral occipital cortex, mid fusifo
120 we show that (1) the VWFA, compared with the fusiform face area, shows higher connectivity to left-he
129 entorhinal cortical thickness, greater right fusiform gyral activity during emotional face processing
132 ipital complex, the parahippocampal, and the fusiform gyri did not predict target presence, while hig
133 p deprivation caused decreased activation in fusiform gyri for angry faces and decreased ratings of h
134 amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal, and fusiform gyri in 30 of 31 subjects compared with normal
135 t posterior hippocampus, parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, and predominantly left hemisphere extra-t
136 ial/pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus, and the fusiform gyri, as well as the medial and lateral dorsal
137 -wise differences in the cuneus, lingual and fusiform gyri, middle occipital lobe, inferior parietal
138 stimuli resulted in greater deactivation in fusiform gyri, possibly reflecting greater suppression o
139 eam, particularly the inferior occipital and fusiform gyri, remained selective despite showing only 9
140 icularly strong in the inferior temporal and fusiform gyri, two areas important for object recognitio
143 the inferior frontal, inferior parietal, and fusiform gyri; the precuneus; and the dorsomedial prefro
144 parahippocampus (0.032 vs 0.037; p<0.0001), fusiform gyrus (0.036 vs 0.041; p<0.0001), inferior temp
145 0.001), anterior vermis (40%, P < 0.001) and fusiform gyrus (20%, P < 0.001) compared with controls o
146 iculum, and entorhinal cortex), and anterior fusiform gyrus (corrected P < .05; uncorrected P = .001)
147 s (Cohen's d=-0.293; P=1.71 x 10(-21)), left fusiform gyrus (d=-0.288; P=8.25 x 10(-21)) and left ros
150 le of face-selective neural responses of the fusiform gyrus (FG) in face perception in a patient impl
151 Recent research indicates that the human fusiform gyrus (FG), which is a hominoid-specific struct
153 show that the strength of rsFC between left fusiform gyrus (L-FG) and higher-order language systems
156 ctivity, was correlated with GMV in the left fusiform gyrus (r = -0.19, P(uncorrected) = 0.049) and r
157 contact modulated BOLD activity in the right fusiform gyrus (rFG) and left inferior occipital gyrus (
159 zed beta coefficient (SBC) = -0.26) and left fusiform gyrus (SBC = -0.25) in sample 1 were replicated
161 uperior Temporal Gyrus (t=1.403, p=0.00780), Fusiform Gyrus (t=1.26), and Parahippocampal Gyrus (t=1.
162 nterior cytoarchitectonic areas (e.g., areas fusiform gyrus [FG]1-FG4) and another that contains a se
163 l thickness in the right parahippocampal and fusiform gyrus across both time points was found in both
164 was inversely correlated with the change in fusiform gyrus activation in the fasted state but not in
165 d connections to the occipital lobe from the fusiform gyrus along with longer association fibers that
168 s in the pars orbitalis, paracentral lobule, fusiform gyrus and inferior temporal gyrus was lowest in
172 ion and the ankle DF/PF tasks, the bilateral fusiform gyrus and middle temporal gyrus, right inferior
175 l sulcus encoded response complexity and the fusiform gyrus and precuneus organized its activity acco
176 in right lateral occipital cortex and right fusiform gyrus and sources in a control region (left V1)
177 in ReHo between the two bands were found in fusiform gyrus and superior frontal gyrus (slow-4> slow-
178 hippocampus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, fusiform gyrus and superior frontal gyrus-583 subjects)
180 ted by visual semantic loops within the left fusiform gyrus and that these neural processes may be me
181 uced and increased fMRI responses in the mid-fusiform gyrus and the lateral occipital cortex, respect
182 in the left inferior prefrontal cortex, the fusiform gyrus and the medial temporal lobe including bo
183 amage to the inferior temporal gyrus, to the fusiform gyrus and to a white matter network including t
184 l resolution imaging techniques identify the fusiform gyrus as subserving processing of invariant fac
186 temporal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus during memory encoding reduced odds of re
188 in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) and fusiform gyrus emphasized a human-nonhuman distinction.
192 ese findings indicate that the right lateral fusiform gyrus is critically involved in object recognit
195 ortical dysfunction in the temporal lobe and fusiform gyrus may be related to epileptic activity in I
197 bust face-selective responses in the lateral fusiform gyrus of individual blind participants during h
198 work and that a right anterior region of the fusiform gyrus plays a central role within the informati
201 ons, the lateral section of the right middle fusiform gyrus showed the largest face-selective respons
203 ateral occipito-temporal sulcus and adjacent fusiform gyrus shows maximal selectivity for words and h
204 the visual word-form area (part of the left fusiform gyrus specialized for printed words); and persi
206 wer spectra in the primary visual cortex and fusiform gyrus that are maximally discriminative of data
207 ther fusiform face area (FFA)-the portion of fusiform gyrus that is functionally-defined by its prefe
208 eralized hyperactivation in the amygdala and fusiform gyrus that was subject to intersession habituat
210 ediated the association with inattention and fusiform gyrus thickness mediated the association with i
211 found positive correlations between the left fusiform gyrus to amygdala connectivity and different st
212 , and may serve in concert with amygdala and fusiform gyrus to modulate visual attention toward motiv
214 ced modulation of connectivity from the left fusiform gyrus to the left amygdala and from the right a
215 ophy of the bilateral temporal poles and the fusiform gyrus were associated with prosopagnosia in rtv
216 ing, whereas PrC, anterior HC, and posterior fusiform gyrus were recruited during discrimination lear
217 ocampal gyrus, left orbitofrontal cortex and fusiform gyrus whereas patients with left hippocampal sc
218 ed fMRI to measure neural responses from the fusiform gyrus while subjects observed a rapid stream of
220 s placed over high-order visual areas (e.g., fusiform gyrus) showed both effects of spatial and objec
221 s in orthographic processing circuits (i.e., fusiform gyrus) was predictive of smaller gains in fluen
222 h brain regions with foveal tendencies (e.g. fusiform gyrus), and activations of layer-units with sel
223 as well as the insula, cingulate cortex, and fusiform gyrus, a regional distribution that was nearly
224 cus functional connectivity localized to the fusiform gyrus, a visual processing region also identifi
225 la, middle occipital, anterior cingulate and fusiform gyrus, amygdala, striatum, pulvinar, and substa
228 ippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and choroid plexus but not in other brai
229 rome group was found in the cingulate gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and frontal cortex in response to all fa
230 ed decreased activity in the right amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and inferior occipital gyrus compared wi
231 eral temporal lobe, including temporal pole, fusiform gyrus, and insula, and extending into occipital
233 lts showed that the visual cortex, bilateral fusiform gyrus, and right parahippocampal gyrus were act
234 more consistent activation of the amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and thalamus than emerging adults, who s
235 ly increased in temporal regions, insula and fusiform gyrus, consistent with those areas known to be
236 with ASD had lower FC than TC in cerebellum, fusiform gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus and posterior i
237 ed abnormal hyperactivation in the amygdala, fusiform gyrus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and d
239 the left parahippocampal gyrus and the left fusiform gyrus, recruited during facial expression proce
240 gyrus and bilateral middle/inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus, respectively) that showed reversed effec
241 laims have been made, and within the lateral fusiform gyrus, they are restricted to a small area (200
242 as the amygdala, hippocampus, temporal pole, fusiform gyrus, visual primary cortex, and motor areas (
243 wed that repetition suppression in bilateral fusiform gyrus, was selectively correlated with priming
244 cal area in the collateral sulcus and medial fusiform gyrus, which was place-selective according to b
245 us, left temporoparietal junction, and right fusiform gyrus, with patients showing relative hypoactiv
258 ties in the right temporal pole and anterior fusiform gyrus; while in the Alzheimer's disease group,
259 , ventral IPS, lateral occipital region, and fusiform gyrus], which was accompanied by activation tha
264 diagnosis interaction was found in the left fusiform/inferior temporal cortex: participants with aut
265 to represent the information being encoded (fusiform/lateral occipital cortex), they each exerted op
266 uron numbers as well as the total numbers of fusiform (migrating) and round (differentiating) DCX neu
267 gic features, such as wide neck, large size, fusiform morphology, incorporation of side branches, and
271 more bilateral or right-sided inferotemporal/fusiform object recognition network, which remained rela
272 eous fibrillar echotexture; grade 2, a focal fusiform or diffuse enlarged tendon; and grade 3, a hypo
274 orm face area, lateral occipital cortex, mid fusiform, parahippocampal place area, and extending supe
275 GA-HRP into the anteromedian nucleus labeled fusiform premotor neurons within the OPt, as well as mul
276 t 5-HT directly enhances the excitability of fusiform principal cells via activation of two distinct
278 y a region within the left occipito-temporal/fusiform region (L-OT/F) often referred to as the visual
279 his is consistent with an involvement of the fusiform region in both early and midlatency face-proces
280 These analyses confirm a role for the right fusiform region in early to midlatency responses consist
281 he N/M170-as having a major generator in the fusiform region; however, this evoked component is not b
282 rior and superior parietal, hippocampus, and fusiform regions was stronger in individuals older than
283 posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI
284 e ventral aspects of the form pathway (e.g., fusiform regions, ventral extrastriate body area) are no
288 o predict polygenic (height) and oligogenic (fusiform rust resistance) traits in a structured breedin
289 e and motile circular shape to a contractile fusiform shape show changes in the location of the sarco
290 umbrella cells a subapical pool of discoidal/fusiform-shaped vesicles (DFVs) undergoes Rab11a-depende
292 Additionally, we identified the posterior fusiform site (pFUS) as causally the most relevant node
293 corded multiunit spontaneous activity in the fusiform soma layer (FSL) of the DCN in control and tone
294 olved in sensory processing and integration (fusiform, somatosensory cortex, and thalamus), salience
295 al in predicting face selectivity within the fusiform, suggesting a possible mechanistic architecture
296 n one object-selective region, the posterior fusiform sulcus, and a strong sensitivity to these rever
297 ontains a tertiary, longitudinal sulcus (mid-fusiform sulcus, MFS) that bisects the FG into lateral a
299 knockout in vivo led to the accumulation of fusiform vesicles in mouse urothelial superficial umbrel
300 the hinge areas in the uroplakin-delivering fusiform vesicles, as well as at the apical surface; and