1 -99), respectively, with use of samples from gastric lavage.

2 /-) mice infected with Helicobacter felis by gastric lavage.

3 ntravenous fluids (39.2% vs 22.3%; P = .02), gastric lavage (24.1% vs 9.8%; P = .02), and a specific

4        Direct smear collected from sputum or gastric lavage, as well as HRCT were performed in all ch

5  multidrug resistant (MDR) tuberculosis with gastric lavage aspirate (GLA) samples in children admitt

6  a reference standard using either sputum or gastric lavage for a microbiological test.

7                           The routine use of gastric lavage has recently been questioned because of l

8                                              Gastric lavage in pediatric patients should be limited t

9                                           If gastric lavage is deemed necessary, proper positioning o

10 entral to the care of poisoned patients, and gastric lavage is one common method for gastrointestinal

11 ietary analysis (e.g. gut contents analysis, gastric lavage) makes them inappropriate for such specie

12 onse, we treated R98C mutant mice with daily gastric lavage of curcumin or curcumin derivatives start

13 ted animals infected intraperitoneally or by gastric lavage, suggesting that intracellular bacteria c

14 m temperature water, mechanical fanning, and gastric lavage with iced 0.9% sodium chloride solution (