戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  followed a diet suggested for patients with gastroparesis.
2 tinal motility disorders, including diabetic gastroparesis.
3 herapeutic option for patients with diabetic gastroparesis.
4 ebo, in patients with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis.
5 paresis, and 222 any of the 3 definitions of gastroparesis.
6 tained diabetic subjects without symptoms of gastroparesis.
7 es on the morbidity associated with diabetic gastroparesis.
8 e identified county residents with potential gastroparesis.
9 tcomes in diabetic patients with symptoms of gastroparesis.
10 n the gastric wall in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.
11 ts with refractory vomiting, with or without gastroparesis.
12 ost patients with diabetes have a history of gastroparesis.
13 f Kit expression and development of diabetic gastroparesis.
14 tics and other therapeutic interventions for gastroparesis.
15  is a viable option for medically refractory gastroparesis.
16 keted in many countries for the treatment of gastroparesis.
17 ed with a 15-year history of severe isolated gastroparesis.
18 motility disorders, especially patients with gastroparesis.
19 and (3) the pathophysiology and treatment of gastroparesis.
20 oxin A represents a novel technique to treat gastroparesis.
21  to be beneficial in idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis.
22 /- mice, a well-established genetic model of gastroparesis.
23 ociation (AGA) on Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroparesis.
24 oved quality of life in patients with severe gastroparesis.
25 ld contribute to the development of diabetic gastroparesis.
26 accelerate gastric emptying in patients with gastroparesis.
27 tric emptying, and symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.
28 of 4-hour testing in patients with suspected gastroparesis.
29 p gastrointestinal motor problems, including gastroparesis.
30 uded patients who had diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis.
31 s could be utilized to predict patients with gastroparesis.
32 r potential role in the future management of gastroparesis.
33 nowledge gaps in their use for treatment for gastroparesis.
34 en compared in 177 patients with symptoms of gastroparesis.
35  a lesser extent in idiopathic than diabetic gastroparesis.
36 roparesis but is not described in idiopathic gastroparesis.
37 nship with the better-understood syndrome of gastroparesis.
38 ts with symptoms of diabetic or postsurgical gastroparesis.
39 n full-thickness biopsies from patients with gastroparesis.
40 ontrol, and pyloric dysfunction that lead to gastroparesis.
41  cells of Cajal (ICCs) is common in diabetic gastroparesis.
42  gastroparesis, and 7 (18.4%) had idiopathic gastroparesis.
43 patients with FD were reclassified as having gastroparesis.
44 clopramide and erythromycin in patients with gastroparesis.
45 considerable unmet needs in the treatment of gastroparesis.
46  an unmet need for efficacious therapies for gastroparesis.
47 f the underlying pathophysiology causing the gastroparesis.
48 ulceration, gastrointestinal perforation, or gastroparesis.
49 K1R, in patients with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis.
50 nts with diabetes) in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.
51  refractory vomiting, associated or not with gastroparesis.
52 etic dysfunction leading to constipation and gastroparesis.
53 hese findings indicate the chronic nature of gastroparesis.
54 port the use of nortriptyline for idiopathic gastroparesis.
55 placebo for symptomatic relief in idiopathic gastroparesis.
56 s, clinical presentations, and management of gastroparesis.
57 nitiated to delineate the natural history of gastroparesis.
58 n in 12 patients with diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis.
59 astric dysrhythmias are each associated with gastroparesis.
60 vity could contribute to the pathogenesis of gastroparesis.
61 n in ICC may directly contribute to diabetic gastroparesis.
62 s are found in the majority of patients with gastroparesis.
63 mpare findings in idiopathic versus diabetic gastroparesis.
64 ies in patients with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis.
65 sis, 83 met diagnostic criteria for definite gastroparesis, 127 definite plus probable gastroparesis,
66             Of 177 patients with symptoms of gastroparesis, 129 (72.9%) had delayed gastric emptying;
67           Thirty-three patients with chronic gastroparesis (17 diabetic and 16 idiopathic) received c
68 ean ICC counts were reduced in patients with gastroparesis (2.3 vs 5.4 bodies/field; P < .001).
69 (1) Determine prevalence of PN in idiopathic gastroparesis; (2) assess if patients with symptoms of g
70 pecimens were obtained from 40 patients with gastroparesis (20 diabetic) and matched controls.
71          The study included 38 patients with gastroparesis (24 females [63.2%]; mean [SD] age, 46.7 [
72 s decreased in more patients with idiopathic gastroparesis (40%) compared with diabetic patients (20%
73                Among 3604 potential cases of gastroparesis, 83 met diagnostic criteria for definite g
74                         For the detection of gastroparesis, a 30-min study of clear liquid gastric-em
75                                              Gastroparesis, a condition of abnormal gastric emptying,
76  a symptomatic and premalignant disease, for gastroparesis, a less severe and often treatable disease
77 normal gastric retention of food is known as gastroparesis, a syndrome predominated by nausea (>90% o
78               Among patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, abdominal distension (4.43 +/- 0.53 vs. 2
79 sex and prevalence of symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis among patients with T2DM in Israel has not
80  this study is to evaluate the prevalence of gastroparesis among symptomatic patients and assess trea
81                    Dyspepsia may result from gastroparesis and antral distension.
82 clinical profiles in idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis and are defining roles of gastric and extr
83 We identified a correlation between diabetic gastroparesis and cardiovascular disease, hypertension,
84  was to describe histologic abnormalities in gastroparesis and compare findings in idiopathic versus
85  gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunctions, such as gastroparesis and constipation, are prodromal to the car
86 in gastric muscles of patients with diabetic gastroparesis and nondiabetic control tissues.
87 red to be the gold standard for detection of gastroparesis and other disorders of gastric motility; S
88 sis; (2) assess if patients with symptoms of gastroparesis and PN differ in gastric emptying and symp
89 r nausea and other symptoms in patients with gastroparesis and related syndromes.
90 cing seems to be able to improve symptoms of gastroparesis and to accelerate gastric emptying in pati
91 in 70/250 (28%) of patients with symptoms of gastroparesis and was present to a lesser extent in idio
92 ta to help in predicting which categories of gastroparesis and which symptoms could benefit most from
93  underlying impairments in gastric emptying (gastroparesis) and receptive relaxation, but the specifi
94 te gastroparesis, 127 definite plus probable gastroparesis, and 222 any of the 3 definitions of gastr
95 3.2] years), of whom 31 (81.6%) had diabetic gastroparesis, and 7 (18.4%) had idiopathic gastroparesi
96 essary to comprehend derangements leading to gastroparesis, and additional research on human gastric
97 nal diseases including achalasia, refractory gastroparesis, and other esophageal motility disorders (
98 ormation about motor severity, constipation, gastroparesis, and other parameters.
99 ls of patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis; and trials of GE test methods.
100                    Treatments are needed for gastroparesis; antagonists of tachykinin receptor 1 (TAC
101               Promising for the treatment of gastroparesis are clonidine, sildenafil, and intrapylori
102     It is suggested that symptoms related to gastroparesis are more common in female than in male pat
103 nges associated with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are not well described.
104                                       FD and gastroparesis are unified by characteristic pathologic f
105 initial classification, patients with FD and gastroparesis, as seen in tertiary referral centers at l
106 rmed a double-blind trial of 152 adults with gastroparesis at 47 sites in the United States from Nove
107 od of 2.1 years, 28% of patients treated for gastroparesis at centers of expertise had reductions in
108  initiation and propagation of slow waves in gastroparesis because research tools have lacked spatial
109 heral neuropathy (PN) is present in diabetic gastroparesis but is not described in idiopathic gastrop
110 d diabetic subjects with classic symptoms of gastroparesis but negative scintigraphy.
111 nists were more efficacious than placebo for gastroparesis, but confidence in the evidence was low to
112                                              Gastroparesis can lead to food aversion, poor oral intak
113                                              Gastroparesis can produce various symptoms in patients w
114 severity of gastroparesis symptoms using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and presence
115             Symptom scores measured with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and the tota
116 oms, based on a decrease of 1 or more in the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) score after
117 ened for symptoms of gastroparesis using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI).
118 ompleted a demographic questionnaire and the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI).
119  moderate to severe symptom scores using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI).
120        A greater than 1-point improvement in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score was observed
121 toms were assessed by a daily symptom dairy, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index scores, and other p
122 normal, 85.75 minutes), recent vomiting, and gastroparesis cardinal symptom index-daily diary scores
123                                     Although gastroparesis carries a considerable health care and pat
124 pment for esophageal sensorimotor disorders, gastroparesis, chronic diarrhea, chronic constipation (i
125 f Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium (GpCRC), comp
126 f Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium Gastroparesis
127 f Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium Registry.
128 ion in symptom severity (measured by the 0-5 Gastroparesis Clinical Symptom Index) for nausea (1.8 vs
129         Screening for PN may help identify a gastroparesis cohort with peripheral neuropathy who are
130 and also improved other symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis compared with placebo.
131                          The pathogenesis of gastroparesis comprises abnormalities of gastric motilit
132            The section on pathophysiology of gastroparesis considers neuromuscular diseases that affe
133  nutritional consultation after the onset of gastroparesis; consultation was more likely among patien
134  in average nausea severity, measured by the Gastroparesis Core Symptom Daily Diary.
135 ong 148 patients with symptoms of idiopathic gastroparesis, defined as non-diabetic, non-postsurgical
136                                     Diabetic gastroparesis (delayed gastric emptying) is a well-recog
137 agnostic definitions were used: (1) definite gastroparesis, delayed gastric emptying by standard scin
138        Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) causes gastroparesis, delayed intestinal transit, and constipat
139   Several conditions have been correlated to gastroparesis: diabetes, post-surgical sequelae, medicat
140  that Kit expression is lost during diabetic gastroparesis due to increased levels of oxidative stres
141          Furthermore, patients with diabetic gastroparesis express mRNA for a previously unknown vari
142  This review provides updated information on gastroparesis focusing on new findings from the past few
143 cidence per 100,000 person-years of definite gastroparesis for the years 1996-2006 was 2.4 (95% confi
144                                              Gastroparesis (Gp) is a poorly understood chronic gastro
145                                              Gastroparesis (GP) is defined as delayed gastric emptyin
146 ring a 12-year period, 720 (76%) were in the gastroparesis group and 224 (24%) in the FD group.
147                                Patients with gastroparesis had an overall Charlson Comorbidity Index
148                      Dietary deficiencies in gastroparesis have been clarified.
149                           Many patients with gastroparesis have diets deficient in calories, vitamins
150           Patients were classified as having gastroparesis if gastric emptying was delayed; if not, t
151                                   Idiopathic gastroparesis (IG) is a common but poorly understood con
152 asma specimens from patients with idiopathic gastroparesis (IG).
153 ne the incidence, prevalence, and outcome of gastroparesis in the community.
154 ology, diagnostic evaluation, and therapy of gastroparesis in the past several years has offered insi
155 lence, patient demographics, and etiology of gastroparesis in the US general population.
156 (type 1 and type 2) with classic symptoms of gastroparesis (including early satiety, postprandial ful
157 etiology, pathophysiology, and management of gastroparesis, including novel pharmacological agents, e
158 patient outcomes for trials of therapies for gastroparesis, including potential additional trials for
159 d it protect from PAN-PDE4 inhibitor-induced gastroparesis, indicating that gastric retention may res
160 CUNV were observed to be similar to those of gastroparesis, indicating that they could be spectra of
161 ts associated with colonic aganglionosis and gastroparesis, indicating their therapeutic potential as
162 fficacy of drugs based on global symptoms of gastroparesis; individual symptoms, including nausea, vo
163  US adults, whereas prevalence of "definite" gastroparesis (individuals diagnosed within 3 months of
164  death, and adverse gastrointestinal events (gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, gallstones, acute
165 d to severe conditions, including achalasia, gastroparesis, intestinal pseudo-obstruction and chronic
166 gic disorders include sialorrhea, dysphagia, gastroparesis, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, constipati
167 ge was associated with a higher incidence of gastroparesis, intra-abdominal fluid collection, intra-a
168                                     Diabetic gastroparesis involves neuropathy, myopathy, and depleti
169                                              Gastroparesis is a chronic clinical syndrome characteriz
170                                              Gastroparesis is a chronic functional disorder character
171                                              Gastroparesis is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder cha
172                           PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroparesis is a common disorder that produces symptom
173                                              Gastroparesis is a complex gastric motility disorder cha
174                           BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroparesis is a complication of diabetes with few tre
175 e importance of glycemic control in diabetic gastroparesis is a focus of current investigation.
176                                              Gastroparesis is a well-recognized complication of diabe
177                                              Gastroparesis is an important complication of diabetes.
178                                              Gastroparesis is an uncommon condition in the community
179             The potential cellular basis for gastroparesis is attributed to the effects of oxidative
180                                              Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggestive of
181                                              Gastroparesis is delayed gastric emptying in the absence
182        The gold standard test for diagnosing gastroparesis is gastric scintigraphy (GS) using a solid
183                                              Gastroparesis is increasingly recognized as a complicati
184 ed to reduce the aspiration risk of diabetic gastroparesis is likely over-utilized and may only be in
185 lence and severity of symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis is particularly high among obese females w
186     The pathophysiological basis of diabetic gastroparesis is poorly understood, in large part due to
187                               The therapy of gastroparesis is primarily medical, with prokinetic or a
188  date, the definition of clinical success in gastroparesis is still not standardized, the correlation
189                                              Gastroparesis is therefore likely to be a heterogeneous
190                          The epidemiology of gastroparesis is unknown.
191 usea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome, aprepitant did not reduce t
192 usea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome.
193                       Symptomatic benefit in gastroparesis may derive more from improved accommodatio
194 ted in patients with CUNV than in those with gastroparesis (mean, 3.5 vs 2.3 bodies/field, respective
195               We studied adult patients with gastroparesis (of diabetic or idiopathic type) enrolled
196 slow-wave initiation and conduction occur in gastroparesis, often at normal frequency, which could be
197                                Patients with gastroparesis on oral intake (N = 305) were enrolled in
198 ently cross the blood-brain barrier, induced gastroparesis only at significantly higher doses (>=1 mg
199 l interventions for patients with idiopathic gastroparesis or gastroparesis related to diabetes.
200 s with chronic nausea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome, aprepitant
201 s with chronic nausea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome.
202 ish it from its offshoots such as G-POEM for gastroparesis or Z-POEM for Zenker's diverticula) is the
203 atients with ED visits related to pregnancy, gastroparesis, or chemotherapy were excluded.
204 mptying has added value for the diagnosis of gastroparesis over a study of solid emptying alone.
205                           Nine patients with gastroparesis participated in this study.
206 role of the GCSI in assessing and monitoring gastroparesis, particularly in resource-limited settings
207      The age-adjusted prevalence of definite gastroparesis per 100,000 persons on January 1, 2007, wa
208 any of these subtypes in mice did not induce gastroparesis per se, nor did it protect from PAN-PDE4 i
209                                              Gastroparesis poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenge
210 hilic esophagitis, functional dyspepsia, and gastroparesis, posing a challenge for patient management
211 strointestinal tract that include dysphagia, gastroparesis, prolonged gastrointestinal transit time,
212  determine how often pediatric patients with gastroparesis receive dietary education (from a gastroen
213     Only a little over half of children with gastroparesis receive dietary education and use of a die
214 ive treatment is available for patients with gastroparesis refractory to standard medical therapy.
215 f Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Registry and completed diet questionnaires
216 s Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium Gastroparesis Registry, seen every 16 weeks and treated
217 n a clinical trial of patients with diabetic gastroparesis, relamorelin (10 mug twice daily) signific
218 or patients with idiopathic gastroparesis or gastroparesis related to diabetes.
219                                              Gastroparesis remains a challenging syndrome to manage,
220             Finally, given that the cause of gastroparesis remains largely idiopathic, our findings o
221                             The diagnosis of gastroparesis requires the use of 4-hour gastric emptyin
222 tric electrical stimulation in patients with gastroparesis, reserving these treatments for select pat
223 y of full thickness gastric tissue in severe gastroparesis shows heterogeneous enteric neuronal, smoo
224  electrical mapping to quantify and classify gastroparesis slow-wave abnormalities in spatiotemporal
225 d include gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, in
226 of diabetic patients with moderate to severe gastroparesis symptoms (DG).
227 P alone, resulting in greater alleviation of gastroparesis symptoms and a reduction in hospitalizatio
228 nswered questionnaires including severity of gastroparesis symptoms using the Gastroparesis Cardinal
229                             Medical history, gastroparesis symptoms, answers to the Block Food Freque
230 e nausea, satiety, constipation, and overall gastroparesis symptoms.
231 and more severe loss of appetite and overall gastroparesis symptoms.
232 dies are more sensitive for the detection of gastroparesis than are liquid studies; thus, liquid stud
233 d splicing of Ano1 in patients with diabetic gastroparesis that alter the electrophysiological proper
234               Among patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, the use of nortriptyline compared with pl
235 ugh there have been multiple drugs tested in gastroparesis, their relative efficacy and safety are un
236  of CUNV substantially overlap with those of gastroparesis, therefore the diseases may share pathophy
237 NTS: The NORIG (Nortriptyline for Idiopathic Gastroparesis) trial, a 15-week multicenter, parallel-gr
238 r upper gastrointestinal study; (3) possible gastroparesis, typical symptoms alone or delayed gastric
239 ymptoms for more than 3 months; (2) probable gastroparesis, typical symptoms and food retention on en
240                250 patients with symptoms of gastroparesis underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy an
241                     Patients with refractory gastroparesis underwent simultaneous implantation of GES
242 stimulation for the treatment of symptomatic gastroparesis unresponsive to standard medical therapy.
243  disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, gastroparesis, urinary incontinence and cardiac arrhythm
244 for any reason were screened for symptoms of gastroparesis using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom i
245 ere is a consensus for standards to diagnose gastroparesis utilizing a gastric emptying study as the
246       The overall standardized prevalence of gastroparesis was 267.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26
247       To provide new real-world evidence for gastroparesis, we estimated disease prevalence, and inve
248  One hundred thirty patients with idiopathic gastroparesis were enrolled between March 2009 and June
249 's or connective tissue disease, symptoms of gastroparesis were more severe in PN than nPN: bloating
250 42% of patients with an initial diagnosis of gastroparesis were reclassified as FD based on gastric-e
251                                  Symptoms of gastroparesis were substantially reduced at the end of t
252 patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms of gastroparesis were the population of this study.
253  the most frequent condition associated with gastroparesis, which has been reported in up to 50% of p
254                                Patients with gastroparesis who do not respond to medical therapy may
255 h those of controls as well as patients with gastroparesis who were studied previously by identical m
256  quantify GES IMD; and correlate symptoms of gastroparesis with IMD and gastric emptying.
257 5 y; 88% with type 2 diabetes) with diabetic gastroparesis with moderate to severe symptoms and delay
258 s were found between diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis with the exception of nNOS expression, whi
259 tandard deviation, 45 +/- 12 years; 133 with gastroparesis) with chronic (>12 months) of refractory v
260  professionals in recognizing and diagnosing gastroparesis would benefit future studies and improve u

 
Page Top