ライフサイエンスコーパス: glycemic load

1 ed dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, and glycemic load.

2 ercentage of calories from carbohydrates, or glycemic load.

3 ose response, which can be quantified by the glycemic load.

4 one to the adverse effects of a high dietary glycemic load.

5 d orange-red coloured jack flakes with lower glycemic load.

6 for 26 wk a diet with either a high or a low glycemic load.

7 ry lifestyle, obesity, and increased dietary glycemic load.

8 ohydrate and sugar, glycemic index (GI), and glycemic load.

9 ancer risk has been directly associated with glycemic load.

10 A similar pattern was found for glycemic load.

11 istics, with the greatest contrasts seen for glycemic load.

12 index and among those of healthy weight for glycemic load.

13 WMD) intervention with arms having different glycemic loads.

14 -77] kcal/d; overall P = .03; P for trend by glycemic load = .009).

15 ectin was significantly inversely related to glycemic load (-1.3 mg/L per 1-SD increase; P = 0.02) an

16 aracteristics of ancestral hominin diets: 1) glycemic load, 2) fatty acid composition, 3) macronutrie

17 A low-glycemic load (40% carbohydrate and 35% fat) vs low-fat

18 iet (75.8% fat, 10.0% carbohydrate) with low glycemic load (6 g 1,000 kcal(-1)) for 2 weeks followed

19 et (10.3% fat, 75.2% carbohydrate) with high glycemic load (85 g 1,000 kcal(-1)) or a minimally proce

20 pared with the lowest quintile were 1.50 for glycemic load (95% CI: 1.32-1.71, P for trend < .0001) a

21 bohydrates, which is characterized by a high glycemic load (a measure of carbohydrate quality and qua

22 On stepwise multiple regression analysis, glycemic load accounted for 21.1% of the variation in HD

23 The glycemic load (an indicator of a global dietary insulin

24 upport the hypothesis that diets with a high glycemic load and a low cereal fiber content increase ri

25 The combination of a high glycemic load and a low cereal fiber intake further incr

26 Glycemic load and added sugars were not significantly as

27 Reductions in dietary glycemic load and alcohol intake from prediagnosis to ea

28 The association between dietary glycemic load and CHD risk was most evident among women

29 jective was to examine the impact of dietary glycemic load and energy density on total gestational we

30 timate the associations between quartiles of glycemic load and energy density with total gestational

31 Despite expectations that increasing glycemic load and glycemic index would increase the risk

32 95% CI, 1.14-5.51) when compared with a low glycemic load and high cereal fiber intake.

33 Diets low in glycemic load and high in whole grains may have a protec

34 The protective effects of low glycemic load and high whole grains on systemic inflamma

35 vely examine the association between dietary glycemic load and incident age-related cataract.

36 Lowering the dietary glycemic load and increasing protein intake may be advan

37 we evaluated the association between dietary glycemic load and plasma hs-CRP after adjusting for age;

38 ificant positive association between dietary glycemic load and plasma hs-CRP.

39 miological studies on the effects of dietary glycemic load and whole grain foods on systemic inflamma

40 information on GPR119 changes with diabetic glycemic loads and the efficacy of GPR119 agonists as an

41 40% from fat, and 20% from protein; moderate glycemic load), and very low-carbohydrate diet (10% from

42 lycemic index, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.10) for glycemic load, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.11) for fiber.

43 , including energy density, intrinsic fiber, glycemic load, and added sugar.

44 or dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk.

45 Dietary fructose, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake were assessed wit

46 ssessed the association of dietary fructose, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake with fasting C-pe

47 mine the association between glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber and the risk of type 2

48 on of dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber with breast cancer risk

49 e quality including added sugar consumption, glycemic load, and glycemic index have been linked with

50 hat a higher intake of carbohydrate, dietary glycemic load, and glycemic index may enhance risk of ch

51 quality, processed food consumption, dietary glycemic load, and intake of vitamins involved in mainta

52 measure overall dietary glycemic index (GI), glycemic load, and intakes of specific types of carbohyd

53 nvestigate the relations between dietary GI, glycemic load, and other carbohydrate measures (added su

54 analyzed associations among glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of cancer in women and men in th

55 Glycemic load appears to be an important independent pre

56 Among GI studies, observed reductions in glycemic load are most often not solely due to substitut

57 ese findings suggest that glycemic index and glycemic load are not strong predictors of cancer incide

58 d suggest that high carbohydrate intakes and glycemic loads are protective against endometrial cancer

59 lly dietary sugar, fiber, glycemic index, or glycemic load, are associated with adiposity and insulin

60 composition, the role of glycemic index and glycemic load, as well as long-term outcomes.

61 Dietary glycemic load before endometrial cancer diagnosis (>=90.

62 ta: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.42; P = 0.006) and glycemic load (beta: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.002, 0.08; P = 0.04

63 as likely attributable to differences in the glycemic load between orange juice and milk and yogurt.

64 vegetables, and reducing the intake of high glycemic load beverages may offer a simple strategy for

65 87 (95% confidence interval: 1.00, 3.53) for glycemic load (both P for trend = 0.03).

66 , current smoking and pack-years of smoking, glycemic load, cholesterol intake, systolic blood pressu

67 Results for glycemic load closely mirrored those for carbohydrate.

68 rate, fat, saturated fat, dietary fiber, and glycemic load derived from self-report of dietary intake

69 ietary glycemic index (DGI) and high dietary glycemic load (DGL) increased the risk of NTDs in nondia

70 A low-glycemic load diet (LGD) has been proposed as an effecti

71 Regardless of insulin secretion, a low-glycemic load diet has beneficial effects on high-densit

72 An ad libitum low-glycemic load diet may be more efficacious than a conven

73 he median (57.5 microIU/mL; n = 28), the low-glycemic load diet produced a greater decrease in weight

74 Participants receiving the low-glycemic load diet reported less hunger than those recei

75 ergy expenditure decreased less with the low-glycemic load diet than with the low-fat diet, expressed

76 ride concentrations improved more on the low-glycemic load diet, whereas low-density lipoprotein chol

77 P < 0.001) more on the high- than on the low-glycemic load diet, whereas normoglycemic individuals re

78 o evaluate the efficacy of an ad libitum low-glycemic load diet, without strict limitation on carbohy

79 ic and diastolic) improved more with the low-glycemic load diet.

80 etary glycemic measures [adherence to a high-glycemic-load diet (HGLDiet) pattern, intakes of sugar a

81 ulting from the hormonal responses to a high-glycemic-load diet-drives positive energy balance.

82 results support beneficial effects of a low-glycemic load dietary pattern characterized by whole gra

83 Low-glycemic load dietary patterns, characterized by consump

84 rt Study to investigate associations between glycemic load, dietary carbohydrates, sucrose, fructose,

85 High-glycemic-load diets may increase colorectal cancer risk

86 study to determine whether persons with high-glycemic-load diets would be at an increased risk of dis

87 It is possible that high-glycemic-load diets, through their hyperinsulinemic effe

88 articularly, EAA was associated with dietary glycemic load (EAA_Horvath: beta: 0.476; P = 9 x 10(-10)

89 regard to estimated glycemic index (eGI) and glycemic load (eGL).

90 compared with the first-quartile group; the glycemic load fourth-quartile group had 1.4 points less

91 We calculated dietary glycemic load from data reported on multiple validated f

92 idemiologic data suggest that a high dietary glycemic load from refined carbohydrates increases the r

93 known about the association between dietary glycemic load (GL) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), prospectiv

94 te that high dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are associated with increased CHD ris

95 nces under which the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are derived do not reflect real-world

96 Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are measures of the quality and quant

97 and nationally representative dietary GI and glycemic load (GL) database from 1999 to 2018 National H

98 men, dietary glycemic index (GI) and dietary glycemic load (GL) have been associated with cardiovascu

99 nsive food tables of glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been published in the American J

100 er a diet with a high glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) is associated with greater oxidative

101 In epidemiologic studies, dietary glycemic load (GL) is positively associated with risk of

102 s with a high glycemic index (GI) and a high glycemic load (GL) may influence cancer risk via hyperin

103 High dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) may promote tumorigenesis by increasi

104 was the only one eliciting low GI of 50 and glycemic load (GL) of 13 while the rest exhibited GI ran

105 Alcohol consumption and the glycemic load (GL) of a meal interact to influence both

106 Reducing the glycemic load (GL) of the diet may benefit appetite cont

107 Glycemic load (GL) reflects the quantity and quality of

108 s on meal or dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) value determinations has remained par

109 lycemic response and glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) value determinations remains unclear.

110 h, monosaccharides, disaccharides, fiber, or glycemic load (GL) were associated with the diversity an

111 whether the dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) were associated with the risk of type

112 intake, starch, sugar, fiber intake, GI, and glycemic load (GL) were correlated with intake of differ

113 s of dietary glycemic index (GI) and dietary glycemic load (GL) with many chronic diseases have been

114 sociation of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with mortality are conflicting.

115 ions between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with psychological disorders remain u

116 ociations of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) an

117 sociation of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with T2D risk.

118 int association between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and alcohol intake with type 2 diabe

119 he aim was to compare average dietary GI and glycemic load (GL), and contributing carbohydrate foods,

120 en midpregnancy dietary glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and sugar-sweetened beverages and th

121 te the relation between glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and total carbohydrate intake with B

122 he risk of colorectal cancer associated with glycemic load (GL), carbohydrate, and sucrose and to asc

123 2D associated with TCF7L2 is modified by the glycemic load (GL), glycemic index (GI), cereal fiber co

124 y with regard to the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL), which identify foods that stabilize

125 ures associated with glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL).

126 ber; and the dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL).

127 carbohydrate-rich foods varying in quality [glycemic load (GL)].

128 eliable tables of glycemic indexes (GIs) and glycemic loads (GLs) are critical to research examining

129 The authors investigated the associations of glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrate intake w

130 e model, subjects in the highest quintile of glycemic load had 14.1% (P for trend = 0.09) and 16.1% (

131 Increased glycemic load has been implicated in the aetiology of di

132 served in the 90th versus 10th percentile of glycemic load (hazards ratio (HR) = 1.45, 95% confidence

133 low glycemic load (LGL) compared with a high glycemic load (HGL) dietary pattern on stool bacterial c

134 ciations between intakes of high-GI and high-glycemic load (high-GL) diets, carbohydrate, and the mai

135 mmendations to consume a reduced-energy, low-glycemic load, high-fiber diet with behavioral change ed

136 intake (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.96), and glycemic load (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.84) when women

137 20-48 y, consumed meals with a high or a low glycemic load in a crossover fashion.

138 staple grains as well as glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to CHD among 117,366 Chinese w

139 Future studies should examine the effect of glycemic load in subjects who have a hyperlipemic respon

140 ive correlations between HDL cholesterol and glycemic load (in relation to white bread), percentage c

141 ate, 60% from fat, and 30% from protein; low glycemic load) in random order, each for 4 weeks.

142 d absorbed carbohydrates with a high dietary glycemic load is associated with an increased risk of is

143 whereas a carbohydrate-rich diet with a high glycemic load is associated with lower adiponectin conce

144 Assessment of glycemic load is not usually included in a standard diet

145 Dietary glycemic load is significantly and positively associated

146 potassium and have a high glycemic index and glycemic load, is associated with the risk of cardiovasc

147 Evaluate the effects of a low glycemic load (LGL) compared with a high glycemic load (

148 e (high body mass, high red meat intake) and glycemic load (low legume intake), a synergism that, if

149 We aimed to examine the effects of a low-glycemic load (low-GL) diet in overweight and obese preg

150 ydrate, 20% from fat, 20% from protein; high glycemic load), low-glycemic index diet (40% from carboh

151 spectively; overall P = .003; P for trend by glycemic load < .001).

152 Reduction in glycemic load may aid in the prevention or treatment of

153 h carbohydrate intake and a diet with a high glycemic load may be associated with breast cancer risk

154 Reducing glycemic load may be especially important to achieve wei

155 ttention to a possible resulting increase in glycemic load may result in an unfavorable influence on

156 We hypothesize that a high-glycemic load meal activates inflammatory cells, and tha

157 ocytes can be activated by both high-and low-glycemic load meals.

158 expressing TNF-alpha with both high-and low-glycemic load meals.

159 ality and quantity, such as whole grains and glycemic load, might interact with transcription factor

160 mption patterns including glycemic index and glycemic load, novel assessments of gluten quantificatio

161 The glycemic load of a single meal did not have a significan

162 The glycemic load of the meal did not influence circulating

163 ts of a hypocaloric diet with an LGI and low glycemic load on anthropometric and metabolic variables,

164 ul effect of high glycemic index and dietary glycemic load on cancer.

165 intake and estimated the glycemic index and glycemic load on the basis of the consumption of seven c

166 on on the potential effect of a high dietary glycemic load on the incidence of age-related cataract.

167 c carcinogenesis, studies that have examined glycemic load or individual dietary components that infl

168 ceived an energy-restricted diet, either low-glycemic load or low-fat.

169 erweight patients consuming diets with a low glycemic load or with large amounts of fiber and whole g

170 and maintenance through diets with different glycemic loads or different fiber and whole-grain conten

171 al Study, investigating the relations of GI, glycemic load, other carbohydrate measures (added sugars

172 ated microsimulation of caloric consumption, glycemic load, overweight/obesity prevalence, and type 2

173 Compared with the LFD, the LGD decreased the glycemic load per kilocalories of reported food intakes

174 t support the hypothesis that a high dietary glycemic load, primarily a result of consumption of refi

175 Glycemic load reduction by >17 g glucose equivalents/d w

176 valuate the effects of an ad libitum reduced-glycemic-load (RGL) diet on body weight, body compositio

177 ion to body weight reduction related more to glycemic load than to GI.

178 gic studies, both the glycemic index and the glycemic load (the glycemic index multiplied by the amou

179 r magnesium intake, cereal fiber intake, and glycemic load, the association between whole grains and

180 there was no significant relation of dietary glycemic load to risk of cataract extraction (P for tren

181 ween carbohydrate intake, glycemic index and glycemic load, total dietary fiber intake, and breast ca

182 the manner in which high glycemic index and glycemic load track with overall diet and lifestyle patt

183 rch digestibility reflected with high GI and glycemic load values.

184 ght change compared with lower-fiber, higher-glycemic-load vegetables (p < 0.0001).

185 the highest and lowest quintiles of dietary glycemic load was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.11; P for hetero

186 entration for the lowest quintile of dietary glycemic load was 1.9 mg/L and for the highest quintile

187 ndex was 81.7 (standard deviation, 5.5), and glycemic load was 197.8 (standard deviation, 105.2).

188 Among studies reporting on GI, variation in glycemic load was approximately equally explained by var

189 We examined whether a high dietary glycemic load was associated with elevated hs-CRP concen

190 Each participant's dietary glycemic load was calculated as a function of glycemic i

191 Glycemic load was calculated by multiplying the glycemic

192 Dietary glycemic load was directly associated with risk of CHD a

193 Dietary glycemic load was inversely associated in men with visce

194 Glycemic load was not associated with total gestational

195 Glycemic load was not significantly associated with risk

196 Likewise, dietary glycemic load was positively associated with total strok

197 A higher glycemic load was strongly associated with an increased

198 A higher dietary glycemic load was strongly associated with an increased

199 In a multivariate regression analysis, the glycemic load was the only significant dietary predictor

200 sugar intake, rather than glycemic index or glycemic load, was associated with higher adiposity meas

201 isks from the lowest to highest quintiles of glycemic load were 1.00, 1.01, 1.25, 1.51, and 1.98 (95%

202 hydrates with high glycemic indexes (GI) and glycemic load were linked to risk of coronary heart dise

203 egetables having both higher fiber and lower glycemic load were more strongly inversely associated wi

204 Dietary fiber, glycemic index, and glycemic load were not significantly correlated with adi

205 n and women, increases in glycemic index and glycemic load were positively associated with weight gai

206 fractions, carbohydrate, glycemic index, and glycemic load were prospectively assessed five times ove

207 The results with respect to glycemic load were similar to the findings regarding the

208 ures (sugar intake, carbohydrate intake, and glycemic load) were also positively associated with glob

209 d)=0.217) and 1.04 (P(trend)=0.012) and, for glycemic load, were 0.90 (P(trend)=0.024) and 0.93 (P(tr

210 polyunsaturated fat and low in trans fat and glycemic load (which reflects the effect of diet on the

211 er risk of pancreatic cancer, a high dietary glycemic load, which is based on an empirical measure of

212 d to saturated fat, and low in trans fat and glycemic load, which reflects the extent to which diet r

213 of carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, and glycemic load with endometrial cancer risk in the US Pro

214 e associations of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with predictors of type 2 diabetes in olde

215 of dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, and glycemic load with stroke risk were examined among 78,77

216 ern, intakes of sugar and carbohydrates, and glycemic load] with cerebral amyloid burden (measured by

217 We hypothesized that higher GI and glycemic load would be associated with greater odds of i

218 We hypothesized that higher dietary GI and glycemic load would be associated with greater odds of t

219 etables with a higher fiber content or lower glycemic load would be more strongly associated with a h