戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 divided into four categories, based on their gross morphology.
2  animals had no detectable effect on retinal gross morphology.
3 ast with Cambrian taxa in both lifestyle and gross morphology(2,6).
4 itter stripes contain cell types with shared gross morphologies and transcription factor markers.
5 bolic activity and dry weight, whereas their gross morphology and architecture are evaluated using fl
6                                          The gross morphology and behaviour of these two species indi
7                                              Gross morphology and histology of 12-month-old wild-type
8                                 Although the gross morphology and structure of the pwi larval inner e
9 o populations developed differences in their gross morphology and the test microstructure.
10 portant for establishing many aspects of the gross morphology and topology of the brain, there are ma
11 on of the murine ileum led to changes in the gross morphology and ultrastructure of the tunica muscul
12 ctrophysiological criteria, correlated their gross morphology, and classified them into distinct cate
13 g rods retain their outer segments and their gross morphology appears relatively normal.
14           Conversely, nuclear volume and its gross morphology are regulated by intracellular outward
15                Benthic forms with a frondose gross morphology, assigned to the morphogroups Rangeomor
16                                          The gross morphology, biochemical content, and compressive a
17 utant mice had normal neonatal viability and gross morphology, but their cells had the expected chrom
18  flow cytometry analysis illustrate that the gross morphology, cell numbers, and cell populations in
19 agnostic modalities are primarily defined by gross morphology, cytogenetics, and to an extent, by dee
20 e mutant plants were analyzed for changes in gross morphology, development, and responses to selected
21 nd definitive method for delineating cardiac gross morphology, global and regional cardiac function,
22                                      Cardiac gross morphology, histology, and function (assessed by w
23 ct to clinical features, time from stenting, gross morphology, histology, presence of bile fistulae,
24                    Esophagi were assessed by gross morphology, histopathology, protein expression, an
25  are seen when hindbrain patterning and CN V gross morphology is altered, but not when it is normal o
26                            While the cardiac gross morphology is normal, suggesting a structurally no
27 ns and contralateral axonal branching, their gross morphology is similar to that of cricket omega cel
28 ficit was followed by disruption of synaptic gross morphology, localization of pre- and post-synaptic
29 h degree of similarity, as judged by overall gross morphology, molecular marker analysis and cardiac
30                                  Tumor size, gross morphology (n = 27), histologic features, and prop
31 n deficiency and/or treatment influences the gross morphology, neutral lipid content, and fatty acid
32                                    Thus, the gross morphology of 100-thousand-year (100-kyr) glacial
33                                 Although the gross morphology of 435/BRMS1 cells is similar to the pa
34                                 Although the gross morphology of amyloid fibrils is fairly well under
35  suggest that, despite the relatively normal gross morphology of cerebellum, stargazin mutation resul
36 tion, tmc triple-mutant larvae retain normal gross morphology of hair bundles and proper trafficking
37 nd androgens did not appear to influence the gross morphology of meibomian tissue or to exert a demon
38 act gp13 (sus13(342) and sus13(330)) had the gross morphology of phi 29 but were not infectious.
39 t that deletion of IGF2 gene does not affect gross morphology of the brain but does selectively alter
40 lar disorganization in the ventricular zone, gross morphology of the cortex was unaffected during los
41 alleles reveal no discernible disruptions in gross morphology of the nervous system.
42 I receptor blocker, preserved renal mass and gross morphology of the obstructed kidneys.
43 rain size does not require plasticity in the gross morphology of the olfactory system.
44        No differences were discovered in the gross morphology of the pancreatic islets or in the isle
45 rked effect on endocytic trafficking and the gross morphology of the peripheral membrane system.
46 ffect of the light-rearing conditions on the gross morphology of the retina.
47 enous GABA, but no differences in abundance, gross morphology, or spontaneous synaptic activity were
48 erties) and translatability (construct size, gross morphology, passage number, cell source, and cell
49  not show any significant differences in the gross morphology, such as thickness of retinal layers or
50 rvation of the type of T. danica goes beyond gross morphology to include ultrastructural details and
51 ally related to its function, extending from gross morphology to individual neuron types, where soma
52                    The analysis was based on gross morphology (tube or foliose) rather than species-l
53  pathway perturbations, including defects in gross morphology, vein differentiation, and overall size
54 g atlas from zygote to hatched worm based on gross morphology, with accompanying bulk transcriptome d