戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ining period for individualized feedback and group discussion.
2 g, and those readings were then the topic of group discussion.
3 pertise presented on each topic, followed by group discussion.
4  Strength-of-evidence assessment was done by group discussion.
5  interactive orientation followed by a small group discussion.
6 0 semi-structured interviews and three focus group discussions.
7  review, appraisal of guidelines, and expert group discussions.
8 e main barriers for vaccination mentioned in group discussions.
9 his paper are distilled from two 1.5-h small group discussions.
10 from 340 informants (77 interviews, 45 focus group discussions, 83 observations of community members'
11  tool that engages patients with diabetes in group discussions about diabetes-related topics, has ove
12 ors consisting of didactic presentations and group discussions about suicide risk factors, warning si
13  patients' insights obtained through focused group discussions across the BIG-NABCG networks.
14   The social support intervention involved a group discussion after CPR training with regular telepho
15               In qualitative part, the focus group discussion among the patients with DR presented to
16                                       Weekly group discussions among research team members were admin
17 ce-based information, followed by structured group discussion and anonymous consensus voting.
18 ved at best-practice recommendations through group discussion and voting.
19 -sectional qualitative design using 12 focus group discussions and 20 in-depth-interviews with predom
20 ded an online 2-round Delphi survey, 3 small group discussions and a consensus meeting with health se
21                        Through virtual small group discussions and a consensus meeting, 13 core outco
22 protocols and guidelines availability, focus group discussions and administration of a structured que
23 t observation, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions and analyzed using NVivo 12 software w
24 rsonal coursework over the rest of the week, group discussions and continuous close mentorship and as
25 ese research needs through facilitated focus group discussions and identified priority research quest
26 ients, families, and providers through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews.
27 viduals' (TLC) Study, using a combination of group discussions and interviews with patient partners a
28                  Qualitative data from focus group discussions and key informant interviews were them
29                                We held focus group discussions and key informant interviews with pare
30 n lie detection comes through the process of group discussion, and is not a product of aggregating in
31 a were developed using Delphi surveys, small group discussions, and a consensus meeting.
32 the MPWG following review of the literature, group discussions, and a structured Delphi method consen
33 ntify its components using interviews, focus-group discussions, and a survey.
34 hoeducational videos, online facilitator-led group discussions, and electronic brochures in December
35   Data gathered from an online survey, focus group discussions, and previously collected data from in
36 d through key informant interviews and focus group discussions; and policy and program review.
37 opic areas and related issues informed focus group discussions at an in-person workshop held in Anahe
38  and simple synergistic approach of enabling group discussion before rendering a judgment.
39 earch, comprising in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, behavior trials, and a combination of
40 d resources were detailed and vetted through group discussion, broader Committee review and critique,
41 Baseline survey, study visit notes and focus group discussions characterized treatment challenges.
42 aseline survey, study visit notes, and focus group discussions characterized treatment challenges.
43                    Consensus was achieved by group discussion confirmed by a voice vote.
44 itative study that centered on patient focus group discussions, conversations with IBD healthcare pro
45 discuss progress and challenges; and a focus group discussion (FGD), consisting of trial staff, sough
46                                        Focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (K
47 sively selected participants for eight focus group discussions (FGDs) in 5 health facilities in Kampa
48                                        Focus group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted with CHWs,
49  MAIN FINDINGS: During 2010-11 over 25 focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with clan leaders, tr
50 g with maximum variation to conduct 13 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 163 participants (8-13 per
51 verbal autopsy analysis; (3) community focus group discussions (FGDs); (4) community photovoice; (5)
52                                        Focus groups discussions, guided by a structured interview gui
53  with input from all members, summarizes the group discussion, identified key areas, and research pri
54 (ii) to obtain a consensus opinion following group discussions (iii) to capture complementary qualita
55 used semistructured questionnaires and focus group discussions in 1 rural and 1 urban local governmen
56 t a 2-day meeting were followed by extensive group discussions in which consensus emerged.
57 ehold heads of the new houses and five focus group discussions including neighbours of each group of
58 who influenced peers through small and large group discussions, informal consultations, and revisions
59 llection using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, informed by the Capability, Opportuni
60                                        Focus group discussions, interviews, recipe documentation, foo
61            For the qualitative aspect, focus-group discussion involving twenty-four participants was
62 cted via interviews with older people, focus group discussions involving staff, suggestion box commen
63 ng of grand rounds, a chart reminder system, group discussion of case scenarios, monitoring, and feed
64 were of moderate duration and involved small group discussion of dilemmas.
65                                              Group discussion of the topics engaged students in the l
66 ntists are periodically recalibrated through group discussions of the clinical measurements' definiti
67 rial to attend in-depth interviews and focus group discussions on the factors influencing adherence t
68          Participants were assigned to small-group discussions on the subjects of bias, searching and
69  We propose that heart rate synchrony during group discussion provides a biomarker of interpersonal e
70 approximately 60 researchers participated in group discussions that aimed to provide a critical self-
71            We report themes from the 4 focus group discussions that are most closely linked to policy
72 rom an application's preliminary ratings and group discussion to final ratings provided by all panel
73          Individual ratings were compared in group discussions to achieve consensus about the classif
74 t observation, interviews, story telling and group discussions to actively engage older people, relat
75  in July 2021, along with subsequent working group discussions to address how and when to stop finite
76 surveys, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions to investigate the adoption of NCS wit
77 The control condition, STAR, is a supportive group discussion treatment.Main Outcome Measure The prim
78 axi drivers, and persons with HIV; and focus group discussions using semi-structured guides with comm
79 oding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describi
80                               From the focus group discussions, we gathered that farmers perceived WC
81                           Audiotapes of four group discussions were analysed.
82                                        Focus group discussions were conducted to explain the quantita
83    Additionally, online-based interviews and group discussions were conducted with 30 national and fo
84  in-depth individual interviews and 23 focus group discussions were conducted.
85                                        Focus group discussions were facilitated using an in-depth, se
86                                    Six focus group discussions were held with patients with advanced
87         Surveys were captured using tablets; group discussions were recorded.
88                                        Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and coded.
89                                        Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim.
90                                        Focus group discussions were undertaken with 18 males; 40+ yea
91                       Case reviews and focus group discussions were used to determine feasibility of
92                In-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 62 participants were conducted be
93 patient interviews (n=82) and unlinked focus-group discussions with community members (n=44 groups) s
94 -depth patient interviews and unlinked focus-group discussions with community members.
95  and conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with key stakeholders in Mexico.
96                               Based on focus group discussions with midwifery students, we refined a
97 Initial framework development included focus group discussions with multidisciplinary clinicians (n =
98 rts, 40 face-to-face interviews, and 5 focus group discussions with multiethnic and multilingual wome
99 alyses include in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with national, subnational, and commun
100               Thematic analysis of two focus group discussions with pregnant women and 57 semi-struct
101 nalysis, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions with stakeholders to identify and unde
102 litative data was obtained through six focus-group discussions with the women's groups, three with wo
103 3) stakeholder in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with WRA and community members; and 4)

 
Page Top