戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 S increased MEPs in flexors and an intrinsic hand muscle.
2 , and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), a hand muscle.
3  the ipsilateral silent period in an arm and hand muscle.
4 patterns of activity from those of a typical hand muscle.
5 while CSE was measured from a task-unrelated hand muscle.
6 eurons innervating the most distal intrinsic hand muscles.
7 otor evoked potential (MEP) in two intrinsic hand muscles.
8 d projects to spinal motoneurons controlling hand muscles.
9 ing the primary motor cortex (M1) outputs to hand muscles.
10 rearm flexor, forearm extensor and intrinsic hand muscles.
11 rons also innervate motoneurons of intrinsic hand muscles.
12 ect cortico-motoneuronal (CM) connections to hand muscles.
13 seen across motor nuclei supplying extrinsic hand muscles.
14 d 16 years, followed by atrophy of intrinsic hand muscles.
15 t was suppressed during contraction of right hand muscles.
16 occipital cortex evoked contraction of right hand muscles.
17   Responses were recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles.
18 ving the opposite effect on the non-vibrated hand muscles.
19 roprioceptive feedback in the control of the hand muscles.
20 steady contractions of contralateral arm and hand muscles.
21 led to evoke ipsilateral responses in arm or hand muscles.
22  pools innervating homologous left and right hand muscles.
23 on (pdTES), in both preactivated and relaxed hand muscles.
24 we found two distinct neural modules for the hand muscles.
25 ) coherence with electromyogram from a right hand muscle; 2) a typical sensorimotor Mu rhythm at rest
26 e digits in 13/45 sites (including intrinsic hand muscles, 5/45 sites).
27  but suppressed MEPs in the two non-vibrated hand muscles (72 +/- 9 %).
28 uding in motoneurons projecting to intrinsic hand muscles (9 cells).
29 During grasp there was a specific pattern of hand muscle activity according to the object grasped.
30                Furthermore, in a motor task, hand-muscle activity and the associated desynchronizatio
31 urons innervating 14 intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles and analyzed the dimensionality of control
32  project to spinal motor neurons controlling hand muscles and extensively sprout into gray matter str
33  low amplitude vibration to single intrinsic hand muscles and measuring motor cortex excitability wit
34  part, by altered muscle activity from three hand muscles and out-of-plane forces.
35 ectromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from four hand muscles, and reflexes were averaged during each tas
36 ns, we tested the hypothesis that aspects of hand muscle architecture that are known to be influenced
37                    We show that when the two hand muscles are concurrently activated, synaptic input
38  properties of motor units residing in human hand muscles are described.
39 nterval intracortical inhibition in the same hand muscle as above.
40 e short latency Hoffmann reflex to a treated hand muscle as well as low threshold polysynaptic spinal
41              Here, we tested motor maps in a hand muscle at rest and during voluntary contraction of
42 itude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a hand muscle before and after kTMP.
43 measuring motor-evoked potentials in a small hand muscle before and after the TMS procedures.
44                      EMG responses evoked in hand muscles by transcranial stimulation over the motor
45 rticomuscular conduction delay for intrinsic hand muscles calculated from the phase-frequency regress
46 n of vibration applied simultaneously to two hand muscles can lead to long-term (> 30 min) changes in
47 hat correlated input to motor neurons of two hand muscles can occur even during tasks not belonging t
48 influential cortical supply to the intrinsic hand muscles compared with the axial musculature.
49 of spinal motor neurons innervating multiple hand muscles could be accounted for by a modular organiz
50          Interhemispheric inhibition between hand muscles decreased during INB.
51 spinal motoneurons (F-waves) in an intrinsic hand muscle during index finger abduction, precision gri
52 (TMS) and H-reflexes were recorded from left hand muscles during choice reaction time tasks.
53 y of cortical pathways controlling different hand muscles during grasping.
54 lation in coherence between motor cortex and hand muscles during precision grip tasks.
55 trast, the modulation of reflex responses of hand muscles during rhythmic movement is poorly document
56     Electromyographic recordings of neck and hand muscles during scanning ensured compliance with the
57 ion grip, coherence between motor cortex and hand muscle EMG oscillatory activity in the 15-30 Hz ran
58 f primates and relies on the fine control of hand muscles exerted by a highly specialized region of t
59     Fine motor skills rely on the control of hand muscles exerted by a region of primary motor cortex
60  motor units were identified in an intrinsic hand muscle (first dorsal interosseous, FDI) or an axial
61 s medialis and lateralis, eight men) and two hand muscles (first dorsal interossei and thenars, seven
62 in turn to each of three different intrinsic hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; abductor po
63 S responses were recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles: flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and e
64 d reliably activated extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles, generating multiple functional grips, hand
65 of corticospinal outputs towards forearm and hand muscles governing imagined grasping actions of diff
66 s in motor cortical output has the gradient: hand muscles > flexors > extensors.
67 Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from a hand muscle in 12 patients with PD (7 patients were test
68 ork output in contractions of a single human hand muscle in vivo and of the ATP cost of that work to
69 shortening and lengthening contractions of a hand muscle in young adults.
70 acilitates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in hand muscles in a manner that varies with the role of th
71 ver, while there was broad excitation in the hand muscles in Go trials, suppression in NoGo trials wa
72 sorimotor EEGs and EMGs from three intrinsic hand muscles in human subjects performing a precision gr
73 in the size of the representation of paretic hand muscles in the ipsilesional motor cortex after CIMT
74 on in the hand is focal, with input from one hand muscle increasing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), d
75                                    Intrinsic hand muscle innervation was present by 7-10 months after
76 ility in WC, it strongly reduced SICI in all hand muscles irrespective of spatial organization in MD.
77 c inputs to motor nuclei supplying different hand muscles is outlined.
78 ory influence of the human M1 on ipsilateral hand muscles is to a significant extent mediated below t
79 ons innervating forearm flexor and intrinsic hand muscles, not in forearm extensor motor neurons.
80 ction strength, and modulation in an arm and hand muscle of healthy (n = 15) and chronic stroke (n =
81 ns serving paretic and non-paretic intrinsic hand muscles of humans with longstanding motor impairmen
82  we assessed CReST projections to an arm and hand muscle on the same side of the body in healthy and
83 nctional recovery tends to favour flexor and hand muscles over extensors.
84 nction scores, electromyography from arm and hand muscles, placebo-expectancy effects, and functional
85  core of distal (wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand) muscle representation surrounded by a "horseshoe"-
86                                      Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation
87                                      Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more se
88 ) to modulate motor responses in ipsilateral hand muscles seems to be important for normal motor cont
89               Increases were greatest in the hand muscles, smaller in FDS and non-significant in EDC,
90                                    A typical hand muscle spans over 3 degrees of freedom (DOF), wrapp
91 r sensory deficits in the hand and 10 min of hand muscle-tendon vibration increased motor map area.
92                               Ten minutes of hand muscle-tendon vibration increased the motor map are
93 8 % of control) and more in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 27 +/- 5 % of con
94 17 +/- 3 % control) than in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 80 +/- 11 % contr
95 ncreases in output were greater in intrinsic hand muscles than in the finger flexor.
96 increase was observed for both of the tested hand muscles, the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and th
97          We used focal vibration of a single hand muscle to produce sensory input whilst the excitabi
98 tudies, we used a task that required the two hand muscles to exert matched or un-matched forces in di
99 s muscles during tasks that required the two hand muscles to exert matched or un-matched forces in di
100 ticospinal outputs to the vibrated and other hand muscles was evaluated with transcranial magnetic st
101 hat is linked to maximal voluntary output of hand muscles weakened by stroke.
102 k distance and maximal ATP production in the hand muscle were not significant in the urolithin A grou
103  amplitudes and motor output curves in small hand muscles were depressed and motor thresholds were el
104         STIR MR images of selected intrinsic hand muscles were obtained 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months aft
105  subcortical pathways targeting an intrinsic hand muscle when grasping a small (6 mm) cylinder betwee
106 nd spinal motoneurons (F-waves) in intrinsic hand muscles when grasping a 6 mm cylinder with the inde
107 ted by the coupled activation of forearm and hand muscles which is associated with high levels of gri
108 urons, and motor neurons supplying intrinsic hand muscles, which all play important roles in mediatin
109 bserved preferential weakness of the lateral hand muscles, which is unexplained.

 
Page Top