コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 "soft tissue") to bone (a stiff, structural "hard tissue").
2 ective reparative process that generates new hard tissue.
3 them were blue-green colored that indicates hard tissue.
4 p, which later leads to uneven deposition of hard tissue.
5 mmatory response in the periodontal soft and hard tissues.
6 profound effects on the biomineralization of hard tissues.
7 There were no harmful effects to soft or hard tissues.
8 g stream of water effectively removes dental hard tissues.
9 ing osseous alterations and anomalies within hard tissues.
10 expression of PIEZO1/2 in the dentoalveolar hard tissues.
11 four orders of magnitude higher than that of hard tissues.
12 challenging in the biomimetic engineering of hard tissues.
13 progression were confirmed for both soft and hard tissues.
14 systemic impact on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues.
15 uring cell differentiation and production of hard tissues.
16 ival toward optimal preservation of soft and hard tissues.
17 ession presents destruction of both soft and hard tissues.
18 reference to Clopton Havers, a 17th Century hard tissue anatomist, and Franz Halberg, a long-time ex
23 gmentation was able to rebuild stable facial hard-tissue and soft-tissue contours that were esthetica
26 ntal procedures is the creation of soft- and hard-tissue architecture that is consistent with periodo
27 study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged
28 palaeometabolomes from fossilized mammalian hard tissues as a molecular ecological strategy to provi
29 ires the coordinated responses from soft and hard tissues as well as the soft tissue-to-bone interfac
30 ls to treat tooth defects involving multiple hard tissues, as in the case of noncarious cervical lesi
31 sed as an interface or surface for soft- and hard-tissue attachment and integration are commercially
32 notype modification therapy (PhMT) involving hard tissue augmentation (PhMT-b) or soft tissue augment
34 GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), dental hard tissues, basic medical history data and oral hygien
35 t differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the m
41 ols and a superior stability of peri-implant hard tissue compared with immediate implant placement.
42 sue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at
43 ue height over time, and 3) whether marginal hard-tissue could be detected on the implant platform at
45 e challenge comes with the analyses of their hard tissues: current methods are time-consuming, destru
50 ole in the biological mechanisms controlling hard tissue development, but the details of molecular re
51 e of diagnostic disagreement, progression of hard tissue diagnoses in the right TMJ occurred in 15.2%
52 Of 794 joints with baseline joint-specific hard tissue diagnoses of DJD, progression was observed i
55 e soft tissue diagnoses were associated with hard tissue diagnostic changes at follow-up ( P < 0.0001
56 ective compares the preservation of soft and hard tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge pre
60 overing, the other a morphologically diverse hard tissue distributed at over 200 sites in the body.
61 cal and precisely orchestrated deposition of hard tissue during tooth formation in acrodont dentition
64 ation preclinical model is an ideal tool for hard tissue evaluation by micro-computed tomography, his
68 le that statherin plays in the regulation of hard tissue formation in humans, the surface recognition
71 derstanding this process would shed light on hard-tissue formation and guide efforts to develop bioma
73 sive picture of the development of a complex hard tissue, from the secretion of its organic macromole
75 oactive peptide ligands direct both soft and hard tissue growth in a hierarchically organized manner.
76 hat these proteins play in the regulation of hard tissue growth in humans, the exact mechanism used b
82 oning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal har
83 oning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard-tissue height over time, and 3) whether marginal ha
91 first time the ultrastructure of the dental hard tissues in an archival case of intrinsically pigmen
94 However, stability of peri-implant soft and hard tissues indicates the need to take measures that mi
97 ryloyloxy) ethyl] phosphate (BMEP) of dental hard tissue, interfacial characteristics, and inhibition
99 sis of the biopsied specimen revealed dental hard tissue interspersed in a field of odontogenic epith
100 for dealing with conditions where healing of hard tissues is compromised by bacterial contamination.
102 ingiva do not contribute to the formation of hard tissue, it is theoretically possible that under app
104 sthetic restoration as well as the degree of hard tissue loss on 7-y clinical performance of ETT rest
108 of mineral leading to dissolution of dental hard tissues may result in a caries lesion that can be s
113 at surgical reentry (9 to 13 months later), hard tissue measurements included: stent to defect base,
120 assembly of matrix proteins is a key step in hard tissue mineralization, developing an understanding
124 ations and suggesting that patterning of the hard tissues of the mandible is instructed by the epithe
131 d similar favorable improvements in soft and hard tissue parameters in the treatment of human intraos
133 t using conservative flap reentry surgeries; hard tissue parameters were also assessed at this time.
134 indicate that there may be an enhancement of hard tissue parameters when enamel matrix derivative is
135 d trial was to compare peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters, esthetic ratings of, and patient
136 herefore comparison of peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters, esthetic ratings, and patient-re
138 ar origin of the instructive information for hard tissue patterning of the jaws has been the subject
141 s in structures that can be used as soft and hard tissue-regenerating materials, biosensors, and ener
142 ising findings in various models of soft and hard tissue regeneration such as myocardial infarction,
146 recession, probing, clinical attachment) and hard tissue (resorption, defect fill) parameters 6 month
148 omposites in combination with bonding to the hard tissue result in stress transfer and inward deforma
150 cium sulphate (CS) based cement to produce a hard tissue scaffold with the ability to inhibit bacteri
154 he root canal, uninterrupted by the soft and hard tissues surrounding the teeth in an ex vivo model.
155 the cellular/molecular integrity of mini pig hard tissues, then demonstrated that the results of thes
156 erative medicine is to restore oral soft and hard tissues through cell, scaffold, and/or signaling ap
157 signal to noise ratio) and aHTMCNR (apparent hard tissue to muscle contrast to noise ratio) in both s
158 In Biology, this process enables soft and hard tissues to coexist in the same organism with relati
159 lysis and mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) of hard tissues (tooth and hair) for the detection and mapp
160 2 mm, without loss of interproximal soft and hard tissue, treated with the CAF procedure and evaluate
164 al and radiographic measurements of soft and hard tissues were recorded by means of a stent before an