戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 atory liver and, if unchecked, for promoting hepatocarcinogenesis.
2  molecular interplay between HSC biology and hepatocarcinogenesis.
3 nct roles and are both necessary for AKT/Ras hepatocarcinogenesis.
4 bed HOX genes deregulation to be involved in hepatocarcinogenesis.
5 f mice lacking the AEG-1 gene to DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
6  novel mechanistic insights into PB-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis.
7 aberrantly activated at the initial stage of hepatocarcinogenesis.
8 s a central and ancestry-independent node of hepatocarcinogenesis.
9 53's ability to control tumor cell growth in hepatocarcinogenesis.
10 und in HCC occur in the very early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis.
11  of RXR and RXR/RAR that might contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.
12 the immune response that could contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.
13 y loss of SIRT6 possess oncogenic effects in hepatocarcinogenesis.
14 pa B (NF-kappaB) pathways that contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.
15 he coagulation pathway to augment aggressive hepatocarcinogenesis.
16 ional and post-transcriptional regulation of hepatocarcinogenesis.
17 nt pathways in mediating AKT and Ras induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
18 /beta-catenin signaling that is critical for hepatocarcinogenesis.
19 icient mice after diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
20 HCC of F344 rats, genetically susceptible to hepatocarcinogenesis.
21  signaling, in this model of insulin-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
22  mechanism for the androgen pathway in early hepatocarcinogenesis.
23 oles of CXCR6-dependent immune mechanisms in hepatocarcinogenesis.
24 roach to effectively inhibit insulin-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
25 2; these processes appeared to contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.
26  deregulation and diabetes mellitus in human hepatocarcinogenesis.
27 lopment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and hepatocarcinogenesis.
28 parallels progressive stages of intranodular hepatocarcinogenesis.
29 el cellular target for combating HCV-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
30 naling cascade is a key signaling pathway in hepatocarcinogenesis.
31 V X (HBx) gene, which has been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis.
32 vated gene-1 (AEG-1) plays a seminal role in hepatocarcinogenesis.
33 nterrogated mechanisms of insulin-associated hepatocarcinogenesis.
34  increased RISC activity might contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.
35 e (NAFLD) occurs and progresses sometimes to hepatocarcinogenesis.
36 r injury and intra-hepatic inflammation, and hepatocarcinogenesis.
37 liferation culminating in the development of hepatocarcinogenesis.
38 , thus revealing a potential role of SND1 in hepatocarcinogenesis.
39 dules suggesting that loss of MT accelerates hepatocarcinogenesis.
40 anism for control of hepatic cell growth and hepatocarcinogenesis.
41 dentified as pivotal for NASH and subsequent hepatocarcinogenesis.
42 atrix production, stem cell homeostasis, and hepatocarcinogenesis.
43  activation of ERK and AKT pathways in human hepatocarcinogenesis.
44 n expression has a more critical function in hepatocarcinogenesis.
45 lays important roles in liver physiology and hepatocarcinogenesis.
46 e occur at early stages of CDAA diet-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
47 ntracellular signaling pathways during human hepatocarcinogenesis.
48 nt liver-specific miR-122 at early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis.
49 s acting as a weak oncogene or a cofactor in hepatocarcinogenesis.
50 t early stages of feeding CDAA diet promotes hepatocarcinogenesis.
51 with carcinogen, we examined the AR roles in hepatocarcinogenesis.
52 AzaC-treated HCC cells suggest their role in hepatocarcinogenesis.
53 f FXR in hepatoprotection and suppression of hepatocarcinogenesis.
54  correlated and can concur in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis.
55 than suppressed the early stages of chemical hepatocarcinogenesis.
56 ch also protected male mice from DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
57 iguing link between metabolic regulation and hepatocarcinogenesis.
58 arly stages of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
59 generation, induction of hepatotoxicity, and hepatocarcinogenesis.
60 s among these features, possibly involved in hepatocarcinogenesis.
61 C/EBPalpha in regulation of MT expression in hepatocarcinogenesis.
62 K1 were much less susceptible to DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
63 ceptible to diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
64 initiate HCC and suggest novel mechanisms in hepatocarcinogenesis.
65 n of the IGF-I/ERK/MAPK pathway during human hepatocarcinogenesis.
66 e identified at an early dysplastic stage of hepatocarcinogenesis.
67 ponse, should be tested for their effects on hepatocarcinogenesis.
68  may shed additional light on the process of hepatocarcinogenesis.
69 -promoting signaling that may play a role in hepatocarcinogenesis.
70 gration, which may contribute importantly to hepatocarcinogenesis.
71 poietic-derived cells that promotes chemical hepatocarcinogenesis.
72 e contribution of HCV structural proteins to hepatocarcinogenesis.
73 us may play a key role in ethanol-associated hepatocarcinogenesis.
74 y and high levels of Se compounds suppressed hepatocarcinogenesis.
75 ting that these markers may reflect stepwise hepatocarcinogenesis.
76 gh shared steps in the multistage process of hepatocarcinogenesis.
77 ent in HCC and may play an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis.
78 ly methylated or amplified during multistage hepatocarcinogenesis.
79 ocellular carcinoma (HCC) in mouse models of hepatocarcinogenesis.
80 le mouse model may provide new insights into hepatocarcinogenesis.
81 ying an important role in the suppression of hepatocarcinogenesis.
82 e liver confers intrinsic resistance to AFB1 hepatocarcinogenesis.
83 ed for the high susceptibility of BR mice to hepatocarcinogenesis.
84 oid insufficiency is an early event in human hepatocarcinogenesis.
85  proliferation and apoptosis increase during hepatocarcinogenesis.
86 dicates a reciprocal control of NQO genes in hepatocarcinogenesis.
87 es mellitus may suggest a common pathway for hepatocarcinogenesis.
88  hepatocyte proliferation, thereby promoting hepatocarcinogenesis.
89 K2gamma antagonizes mTORC1 activation during hepatocarcinogenesis.
90 ational spectra (HRMS) during the process of hepatocarcinogenesis.
91 e apoptosis determine and predict subsequent hepatocarcinogenesis.
92 of TNFR1-mediated inflammation, resulting in hepatocarcinogenesis.
93 ays a critical role in viral replication and hepatocarcinogenesis.
94 n as to why autophagy is required to promote hepatocarcinogenesis.
95 e, we further demonstrate that Gab2 mediates hepatocarcinogenesis.
96 ression and protected against obese/diabetic hepatocarcinogenesis.
97 ein kinases II gamma isoform (CAMK2gamma) in hepatocarcinogenesis.
98 on in the context of the immune responses in hepatocarcinogenesis.
99 ndent functions of RIPK1 promote DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
100  reconstruct the molecular etiology of human hepatocarcinogenesis.
101 ated liver cancer, significantly accelerates hepatocarcinogenesis.
102 ew molecular mechanisms at play in Mongolian hepatocarcinogenesis.
103 (EGFR) pathway during liver regeneration and hepatocarcinogenesis.
104  and HBV X protein (HBx) acts as cofactor in hepatocarcinogenesis.
105 ar ATP and P2Y(2) receptors (P2Y(2)R) during hepatocarcinogenesis.
106 ontribute to epigenetic dysregulation during hepatocarcinogenesis.
107 CD8(+) T lymphocytes, leading to accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis.
108  bile acid signaling, inhibits NAFLD-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
109 quired for liver regeneration, survival, and hepatocarcinogenesis.
110 abolism, as well as promotes cell growth and hepatocarcinogenesis.
111 EBP1, significantly delayed, AKT/Ras-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
112 wo oncogenes and other molecules involved in hepatocarcinogenesis.
113 g as a highly oncogenic driver mechanism for hepatocarcinogenesis.
114 ) and diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced mouse hepatocarcinogenesis.
115 odel enables the dissection of all stages of hepatocarcinogenesis.
116 ak is required for c-Met/beta-catenin-driven hepatocarcinogenesis.
117 cin and 4EBP1A4 completely inhibited AKT/Ras hepatocarcinogenesis.
118 exhibits important yet opposing functions in hepatocarcinogenesis.
119 iliary compartment and hepatocytes in murine hepatocarcinogenesis.
120 an, Meg-3, and Mirg, which are implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis.
121                                         Upon hepatocarcinogenesis, a noteworthy increase of cytoplasm
122 ce our understanding of the role of AEG-1 in hepatocarcinogenesis, a transgenic mouse with hepatocyte
123  nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis after 84 weeks.
124      miRNAs have recently been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis, although the actions and mechanism
125 ted protein (YAP) plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis, although the potential role of YAP
126 tic IKK-complex subunits, thereby regulating hepatocarcinogenesis and cholestasis.
127 e role of c-MYC as a master regulator during hepatocarcinogenesis and establish a new gatekeeper role
128 the notion that Dlc-1 protein is involved in hepatocarcinogenesis and has oncosuppressive activity in
129 cle, a mechanistic link between HBx-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis and host cell DNA replication remai
130 r the TAL-mediated branch of the PPP against hepatocarcinogenesis and identify NAC as a promising tre
131          Loss of TAK1 has been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis and is a biologically plausible tar
132 ) is one of the major factors in HBV-induced hepatocarcinogenesis and is essential for the establishm
133 n performed to evaluate the role of SALL4 in hepatocarcinogenesis and its potential as a molecular ta
134  the incidence of diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis and malignant progression are suppr
135  contradiction underscores the complexity of hepatocarcinogenesis and predicts uncertainty in targeti
136 ral and molecular mechanisms responsible for hepatocarcinogenesis and should have substantial value f
137 targets implicate their role in NASH-induced hepatocarcinogenesis and suggest their use in the diagno
138 V1 on human outcomes and experimental murine hepatocarcinogenesis and to elucidate its mechanism of a
139 del to scrutinize the molecular mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis and to evaluate the efficacy of nov
140 al cross talks among multiple pathways along hepatocarcinogenesis and to test the therapeutic potenti
141 (WAF1/Cip1) signaling cascade that regulates hepatocarcinogenesis and tumor progression.
142 by targeting PTEN and SMAD7, contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis and tumor recurrence in HCC.
143  can provide insight into the role of HCV in hepatocarcinogenesis and, conversely, the effect of HCC
144 oor prognosis, suggesting their relevance in hepatocarcinogenesis and/or tumor evolution.
145 1q, 8p, 8q, and 17p occur as early events in hepatocarcinogenesis, and 12q, 17q25 and 20q occur as la
146  are resistant to diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, and Akt2(-/-) mice display a high
147 protects against DNA damage, acceleration of hepatocarcinogenesis, and cholestasis.
148 el insights on the function of lncRNA-driven hepatocarcinogenesis, and paves the way for further inve
149  removal of senescent hepatocytes to prevent hepatocarcinogenesis, and that this process required CXC
150 -1 is essential for NF-kappaB activation and hepatocarcinogenesis, and they reveal new roles for AEG-
151 ain insight into the molecular mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis, and to identify potential HCC mark
152       Liver fibrosis and fibrosis-associated hepatocarcinogenesis are driven by chronic inflammation
153 (miRNA) dysregulation in the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis are hampered by the difficulty of d
154 ion capability of the initiated cells during hepatocarcinogenesis are still largely unclear.
155 gulatory mechanisms of IL-6 signaling during hepatocarcinogenesis are still poorly defined.
156 tis C virus (HCV)-induced liver fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis are still poorly recognized.
157 ults established the iAST model of inducible hepatocarcinogenesis as a robust and versatile preclinic
158 nisms involved in obesity- and NAFLD-induced hepatocarcinogenesis as well as potential early markers
159 sed diethylnitrosamine-induced (DEN-induced) hepatocarcinogenesis, as an increased number of large tu
160  tools for models of cellular plasticity and hepatocarcinogenesis, as well as lines for use in cellul
161 f GCIP in mouse liver suppressed DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis at an early stage of tumor developm
162 ports the hypothesis that HBx contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis, at least in part, by promoting cha
163  with beta-catenin mutations contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis, AXIN1 and AXIN2 mutations appear t
164 tations were highly related to the step-wise hepatocarcinogenesis because mutations were identified i
165  the rates of chromosomal aberrations during hepatocarcinogenesis, but only telomerase-proficient mic
166  virus (HBV) X protein (pX) is implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis by an unknown mechanism.
167 itis B virus X protein (pX) is implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis by an unknown mechanism.
168  cooperation of AEG-1 and c-Myc in promoting hepatocarcinogenesis by analyzing hepatocyte-specific tr
169 a potential new marker for HCC and regulates hepatocarcinogenesis by directly targeting CDKN1A/p21 ex
170     Down-regulation of hSulf1 contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis by enhancing heparin-binding growth
171           Here, we show that CCN1 suppresses hepatocarcinogenesis by inhibiting carcinogen-induced co
172  fibrosis in the liver, but also to suppress hepatocarcinogenesis by inhibiting EGFR-dependent hepato
173 ively, these results show that NEMO prevents hepatocarcinogenesis by inhibiting RIPK1 kinase activity
174 1 (PITX1) functions as a tumor suppressor in hepatocarcinogenesis by regulating the expression level
175            Experimentally, aflatoxin-induced hepatocarcinogenesis can be inhibited by over a score of
176  able to reduce HCC incidence; nevertheless, hepatocarcinogenesis can occur in the absence of active
177 ltahep) mice) exhibited a marked increase in hepatocarcinogenesis caused by diethylnitrosamine (DEN).
178 displayed severely enhanced chemical-induced hepatocarcinogenesis compared with wild-type controls.
179 it results in the development of HCC tumors (hepatocarcinogenesis) concomitantly with liver cirrhosis
180  malignant transformation and progression in hepatocarcinogenesis, consequences of c-MYC activation f
181 ts considered immune tolerant indicated that hepatocarcinogenesis could be underway-even in patients
182 ocyte proliferation and apoptosis, and hence hepatocarcinogenesis, could be regulated.
183            In an experimental mouse model of hepatocarcinogenesis (diethylnitrosamine-induced), tumor
184 chemical (DEN treatment) and genetic-induced hepatocarcinogenesis (disruptions in LKB1, p53, MST1/2,
185  from animals modeling HBx- and HBV-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis, downregulation of chromatin regula
186                                As a model of hepatocarcinogenesis driven by accumulation of HBV envel
187 chanistic studies suggested that accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis driven by AKT and N-Ras resulted fr
188 arly and sensitive biomarker for TAA-induced hepatocarcinogenesis due to its consistent elevation dur
189 ges in hepatic gene expression that underlie hepatocarcinogenesis following hepatitis C virus (HCV) i
190                                       During hepatocarcinogenesis, genetic events likely occur that s
191 atocellular carcinoma (HCC), and spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis has been observed in FXR-null mice.
192 ver, the contribution of these two routes to hepatocarcinogenesis has not been determined, partly bec
193 ponse to TGF-beta during different stages of hepatocarcinogenesis (HCG).
194 ist (BID) for chronic liver injury (CLI) and hepatocarcinogenesis (HCG).
195 at in a rat model of inflammation-associated hepatocarcinogenesis, heterozygous deficiency of p53 res
196    We focus on the role of these pathways in hepatocarcinogenesis, how they are altered, and the cons
197                            Here, we analyzed hepatocarcinogenesis in a mouse model of inducible telom
198  and p8-mediated ER stress contribute to the hepatocarcinogenesis in ACOX1(-/-) mice.
199 eveloped and validated an inducible model of hepatocarcinogenesis in adult mice.
200                          The pathogenesis of hepatocarcinogenesis in AHP is unknown and needs further
201 so suppressed spontaneous liver fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis in animals with hepatocyte-specific
202 esting therapeutic targets for prevention of hepatocarcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis C.
203                                              Hepatocarcinogenesis in chronically injured livers depen
204 ignaling via YAP on chromosome stability and hepatocarcinogenesis in humans and mice.
205 ther increased susceptibility to DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in Ikkbeta(Deltahep) mice requires
206 vely studied the extent of liver disease and hepatocarcinogenesis in immunocompromised versus immunoc
207 mation in the United States, but its role in hepatocarcinogenesis in Japan is unclear.
208                               In conclusion, hepatocarcinogenesis in male mice with chronic hepatitis
209 stsurgical mechanisms that drive accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis in Mdr2(-/-) mice by perioperative
210 R-122 depletion facilitates cystogenesis and hepatocarcinogenesis in mice on DEN challenge by up-regu
211 ne expression patterns in liver cells during hepatocarcinogenesis in mice with homozygous, heterozygo
212  hepatocyte proliferation, thereby promoting hepatocarcinogenesis in mice.
213 ls, many deletion-specific pools accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis in mice.
214  of IL-6 abolished the gender differences in hepatocarcinogenesis in mice.
215  androgen receptor (AR) was increased during hepatocarcinogenesis in normal female or male mice, resp
216 t that rs738409 exerts a marked influence on hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with cirrhosis of Europ
217 -dependent hepatocyte apoptosis, and blocked hepatocarcinogenesis in Taldo1-/- mice.
218 first report addressing the role of a MMP in hepatocarcinogenesis in the corresponding genetic mouse
219 rm of Spry2 cooperates with c-Met to promote hepatocarcinogenesis in the mouse liver by sustaining pr
220  events involved in the multistep process of hepatocarcinogenesis in the resistant-hepatocyte rat mod
221 xamined the relationship of gamma-OHPdG with hepatocarcinogenesis in two animal models and its potent
222 KLF6 depletion on human HCC and experimental hepatocarcinogenesis in vivo.
223 hepatitis, hepatic stem cell activation, and hepatocarcinogenesis in wild-type mice.
224                                     Of note, hepatocarcinogenesis induced by AKT/c-Met was fully inhi
225 e the current understanding of mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis induced by HCV infection.
226 atitis B virus X protein (pX), implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis, induces DNA damage because of re-r
227               The viral core protein induces hepatocarcinogenesis induction as a tumor initiator unde
228          However, it can efficiently promote hepatocarcinogenesis initiated by the carcinogen diethyl
229                                              Hepatocarcinogenesis is a multistage process in which pr
230                                              Hepatocarcinogenesis is a slow process during which geno
231                                              Hepatocarcinogenesis is a stepwise process.
232    Furthermore, the role of Bid in promoting hepatocarcinogenesis is in contrast to its reported role
233       Elucidating mechanisms of HBV-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis is needed to gain insights into cla
234 chanisms of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis is needed to gain insights into the
235 ular carcinoma (HCC), the role of mPGES-1 in hepatocarcinogenesis is not well established.
236                                              Hepatocarcinogenesis is tightly linked to liver fibrosis
237 , the role of Hh-dependent myofibroblasts in hepatocarcinogenesis is unknown.
238 sposes it to another type of injury, such as hepatocarcinogenesis, is not yet known.
239 iche, which contributes to liver disease and hepatocarcinogenesis, is poorly understood.
240 NA binding protein that enhances MYC-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, is predictive of NELFE/MYC-driven
241 mage to macromolecules likely contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis later in life.
242       To examine whether loss of MT promotes hepatocarcinogenesis, male Mt-1 and Mt-2 double knockout
243 genetic variants associated with HBV-related hepatocarcinogenesis may already play an important role
244     The foci of the Solt-Farber experimental hepatocarcinogenesis model have identical morphological
245 approach has been applied to an experimental hepatocarcinogenesis model to discover early individual
246    (2) These results were confirmed in a rat hepatocarcinogenesis model.
247 of liver damage; in the case of HBsAg-driven hepatocarcinogenesis, NF-kappaB in hepatocytes acts as a
248  virus (HBV) X protein (pX) is implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis of chronically infected HBV patient
249 assessment and to determine the mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis of peroxisome proliferators.
250 ive stimulation and/or a growth advantage in hepatocarcinogenesis of woodchucks with chronic WHV infe
251            Conclusion: AATF drives NAFLD and hepatocarcinogenesis, offering a potential target for th
252  were linked to early genomic alterations in hepatocarcinogenesis, particularly gains of 1q and 8q.
253 esults demonstrate a direct role of HBV in a hepatocarcinogenesis pathway that involves the interacti
254 ignaling and Smad adaptor ELF suppress human hepatocarcinogenesis, potentially through cyclin D1 dere
255 rlying molecular mechanisms leading to human hepatocarcinogenesis, providing the scientific rationale
256 t sterilization restricted to late stages of hepatocarcinogenesis reduced HCC, suggesting that the in
257 ptible to spontaneous and chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis relative to females of other inbred
258 alignancies, but the molecular mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis remain unclear.
259                  However, the role of FAK in hepatocarcinogenesis remains elusive.
260 ective treatment, yet the molecular basis of hepatocarcinogenesis remains largely unknown.
261 role of the transcriptional repressor FIR in hepatocarcinogenesis remains poorly delineated.
262 However, the link between gut microbiota and hepatocarcinogenesis remains to be clarified.
263  the mechanism of virus infection-associated hepatocarcinogenesis remains unclear.
264             How these cascades contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis remains unknown.
265 ogenic pathway is significantly modulated in hepatocarcinogenesis, resulting in altered levels of glu
266                                              Hepatocarcinogenesis results from the accumulation of ge
267                         Estrogen accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis specifically in male zebrafish.
268 level increased in male liver tissues during hepatocarcinogenesis, starting from the precancerous sta
269 t therapy inhibits or delays immune-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis suggests that platelets may be key
270         In the Resistant Hepatocyte model of hepatocarcinogenesis the onset of Nrf2 mutations is a ve
271 ion links partial hepatectomy to accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis; this suggests a new therapeutic ap
272 n of SPD protects against liver fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis through activation of microtubule a
273 1/PUMA-dependent apoptosis promotes chemical hepatocarcinogenesis through compensatory proliferation,
274 eta over-expression, thereby contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis through global transcriptional repr
275  reduced the N-nitrosodiethylamine-initiated hepatocarcinogenesis to the levels of Cre-Ctrl mice.
276       Current evidence indicates that during hepatocarcinogenesis, two main pathogenic mechanisms pre
277 quirement of lipogenesis in AKT/c-Met driven hepatocarcinogenesis using conditional Fatty Acid Syntha
278 e we examine androgen receptor (AR) roles in hepatocarcinogenesis using mice lacking AR in hepatocyte
279 ivation of the c-Met protooncogene to induce hepatocarcinogenesis via in vitro and in vivo approaches
280 stic dissection suggests that AR may promote hepatocarcinogenesis via increased cellular oxidative st
281                       AKR1B10 is involved in hepatocarcinogenesis via modulation of fatty acid and li
282                                    Decreased hepatocarcinogenesis was also found in mice lacking IKKb
283 nexpectedly, however, liver regeneration and hepatocarcinogenesis was impaired in p21-deficient mice
284                         We demonstrated that hepatocarcinogenesis was significantly less efficient in
285            To identify genetic mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis, we characterized copy number alter
286         To delineate factors contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis, we compared the severity of early
287 n the diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced mouse hepatocarcinogenesis, we demonstrated that overexpressio
288 ution of additional Wnt pathway molecules to hepatocarcinogenesis, we examined beta-catenin, AXIN1 an
289 ole in hepatocyte growth, proliferation, and hepatocarcinogenesis, we generated transgenic mice with
290 urther understand the molecular mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis, we have investigated the promoter
291             To probe the common mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis, we interrogated temporal gene expr
292  mediator of c-Met- and beta-catenin-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, we investigated the genetic intera
293 uppressor gene candidates relevant for human hepatocarcinogenesis, we performed genome-wide methylati
294 RNAs (miRNAs) that may have a causal role in hepatocarcinogenesis, we used an animal model in which C
295 of antioxidant treatments on gamma-OHPdG and hepatocarcinogenesis were examined.
296 act telomeres, p53 mutation had no effect on hepatocarcinogenesis, whereas in the setting of telomere
297 tanding on the molecular mechanisms inducing hepatocarcinogenesis, which almost never occurs in healt
298                                 Unlike early hepatocarcinogenesis, which depends on paracrine IL-6 pr
299 e proliferation and define a murine model of hepatocarcinogenesis with direct relevance to human HCC.
300 es 63 and 73 impedes inflammation-associated hepatocarcinogenesis, yet deleting c-Jun only in hepatoc

 
Page Top