ライフサイエンスコーパス: higher-order aberration

1 rier and Zernike expansion might disagree in higher order aberrations.

2 t sensitivity, glare acuity, pain score, and higher-order aberrations.

3 minating chromatic aberration and correcting higher-order aberrations.

4 did not achieve the elimination of residual higher-order aberrations.

5 , patient questionnaires, and total residual higher-order aberrations.

6 treatments for those who have above average higher-order aberrations.

7 ed to treat spherical, cylindrical and other higher-order aberrations.

8 ) changed more with accommodation than other higher-order aberrations.

9 tudy was designed to evaluate the changes in higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided ablation

10 s with corneal dystrophy with visual acuity, higher order aberrations and corneal astigmatism, and no

11 Higher-order aberrations and coma-like aberrations decre

12 tions can achieve a reduction in preexisting higher-order aberrations and less induction of new highe

13 f at the present time plus the correction of higher-order aberrations and restoration of accommodatio

14 values, optimized ablations still increased higher-order aberrations and wavefront-guided treatments

15 ean square of front and back corneal surface higher order aberrations, and thinnest corneal point wer

16 Peripheral defocus, higher-order aberrations, and accommodation interact wit

17 isual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, higher-order aberrations, and endothelial cell density w

18 ards to vision, induced astigmatism, induced higher-order aberrations, and enhancement rates are seen

19 stigate the effect of near-work on lower and higher-order aberrations, and its progression over a 9-m

20 Large vitreous length, higher-order aberrations, and surgical interface haze ma

21 er, if the lens decenters or tilts modestly, higher-order aberrations are created, and the lens may u

22 and Scheimpflug imaging parameters, such as higher order aberrations as well as corneal astigmatism,

23 ctive error, CDVA, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations at 12 months.

24 A significant induction of higher-order aberration attributable to increase of sphe

25 s undergoing ciliary nerve section have more higher-order aberrations but do not become myopic implie

26 The refractive surgeries induce corneal higher order aberrations (C-HOAs).

27 Refractive errors and most higher-order aberrations decreased with development in b

28 Corneal higher-order aberrations did not change after the proced

29 e, the defocus term (Z2(0)), astigmatism, or higher-order aberrations did not change systematically w

30 pherical equivalent, refractive astigmatism, higher-order aberrations, endothelial cell density, intr

31 tively and NCVA, while the trefoil, internal higher order aberration (HOA) and total HOA were associa

32 However, no significant higher order aberration (HOA) compensation effects were

33 To characterize anterior corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) excimer ablation map patte

34 us distances, defocus curves, internal total higher-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration (SA)

35 Higher-order aberrations (HOA's) are exaggerated in eyes

36 uity (BCVA), and corneal aberrations such as higher-order aberrations (HOA), spherical aberrations (S

37 included refraction, corneal structure, and higher-order aberrations (HOA).

38 mean square (RMS) aberrations (P = .024) and higher order aberrations (HOAs) (P = 0.043).

39 keratometry, thinnest corneal thickness, and higher order aberrations (HOAs) after CAIRS were analyze

40 ifferences between postoperative mean RMS of higher order aberrations (HOAs) among AO and SO groups (

41 ose of the study was to assess monochromatic higher order aberrations (HOAs) in highly myopic eyes wi

42 Ablation profile, Visual acuity (VA), and higher order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated.

43 Serial measurements of ocular and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after blink were perform

44 ), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (CS), higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and patient satisfaction

45 l acuity, monocular defocus curves, internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberration

46 Root mean square (RMS) of internal optical higher-order aberrations (HOAs) changed significantly to

47 To compare the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) due to the anterior and

48 To evaluate changes in corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) following epithelium-off

49 We compared corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes after Descemet's

50 ry to visual gain and posterior corneal (PC) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) may assist optimizing vi

51 tometry, central corneal thickness (CCT) and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) over a 6 mm pupil, were

52 udy (ETDRS) protocol; total anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were derived from cornea

53 examinations, serial measurements of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and vision-related qual

54 The evaluated aberrations include total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), horizontal coma (HC), v

55 cluding maximum curvature and first-surface, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), were compared to those

56 6 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs, third to sixth order, 6-

57 s wavefront technology to detect and correct higher order aberrations in addition to spherocylindrica

58 ertical trefoil (Z3(-3)) was the predominant higher-order aberration in the Crystalens group and sign

59 tter understanding and targeted treatment of higher-order aberrations in ametropic human eyes, and in

60 Wavefront-guided ablations reduce higher-order aberrations in comparison with traditional

61 - 0.38, P > .05); there was no difference in higher order aberrations, including coma, trefoil, and s

62 9 0.38, P > .05); there was no difference in higher order aberrations, including coma, trefoil, and s

63 The corneal front surface higher-order aberrations, including spherical aberration

64 ess stromal regrowth, and lower nonspherical higher order aberration induction than in control eyes.

65 Induction of higher-order aberrations is still present in the correct

66 te the effects of decentration on lower- and higher-order aberrations (LOAs and HOAs) and optical qua

67 The benefit of full correction of all higher-order aberrations measured by wavefront analysis

68 e contact lenses are also assessed alongside higher-order aberrations obtained from 65 eyes, measured

69 r optical blur compensates for the impact of higher-order aberration on visual performance in keratoc

70 ces were identified in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related qu

71 ferences were found in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related qu

72 rration (P = .018), coma (P = .23) and total higher order aberrations (P = .31).

73 ls of residual astigmatism (P = 0.798) or in higher order aberrations (P = 0.869).

74 astigmatic correction but whether it induces higher-order aberrations remains controversial.

75 -order aberrations and less induction of new higher-order aberrations, resulting in improved outcomes

76 Corneal higher-order aberrations (SA, coma, trefoil, and corneal

77 y offers better acuity and less induction of higher order aberrations than wavefront-guided laser in

78 ving enlarged pupils, were exposed to larger higher-order aberrations, their growth pattern was simil

79 uch as coma, spherical aberration, and other higher order aberrations to changes in optical quality.

80 on (SA), and total root mean square (RMS) of higher order aberrations (total HOA) were measured using

81 The root mean square of total higher order aberrations, trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, seco

82 ant difference between 2 groups in total and higher-order aberrations up to the fifth order (P>0.05 f

83 root mean square (RMS) postoperative ocular higher-order aberrations were 1.07 +/- 0.34, 0.67 +/- 0.

84 eratometry, thinnest pachymetry, and corneal higher-order aberrations were 60.89 +/- 10.9 D, 396.05 +

85 eratometry, thinnest pachymetry, and corneal higher-order aberrations were 60.89 10.9 D, 396.05 95.03

86 d surgically induced astigmatism) as well as higher-order aberrations were analyzed.

87 % contrast best-corrected visual acuity, and higher-order aberrations were collected preoperatively a

88 cy, safety, stability, cylinder vectors, and higher-order aberrations were evaluated, together with s

89 Significantly higher levels of higher-order aberrations were found in the DALK group (P

90 nformation may be obtained regarding induced higher-order aberrations with aberrometry.

91 f a period in which customized correction of higher-order aberrations with intraocular lenses may bec