ライフサイエンスコーパス: home visit

1 UC (n=296) or HBI (n=306, 96% received >/=1 home visit).

2 0 by letter, $43.25 by phone, and $129.88 by home visit.

3 (REGARDS) Study who completed the second in-home visit.

4 he home visit arm, 91% received at least one home visit.

5 nthropometry at birth were collected at each home visit.

6 rolled in the cohort, and 11,193 completed a home visit.

7 se dust and child handwipes sampled during a home visit.

8 articipants within 24 h after the second CHW home visit.

9 Researchers gathered data at home visits.

10 al Statistics Registry database and biennial home visits.

11 would enable accurate categorization without home visits.

12 or the first year of life by every-other-day home visits.

13 latory provider follow-up, and postdischarge home visits.

14 were called three times by phone between the home visits.

15 t primarily reflected changes in the rate of home visits.

16 citate issue, and highlight experiences with home visits.

17 on, followed sequentially by phone calls and home visits.

18 tters, 17 (7%) to phone calls, and 5 (2%) to home visits.

19 ring environments that were conducted during home visits.

20 e randomly selected and enrolled monthly via home visits.

21 ntion period, 43% of CHWs adhered to monthly home visits.

22 me visits arm, and 891 to the mHealth with 2 home visits.

23 tripping hazards) were documented during in-home visits.

24 index patients is an alternative strategy to home visits.

25 orkers under direct observation during daily home visits.

26 5 months, plus informal community-volunteer home visits.

27 contact and exclusive breastfeeding through home visits.

28 no home visits, and 891 to mHealth with two home visits.

29 ng in the study area were interviewed during home visits.

30 and morbidity were monitored weekly through home visits.

31 ded pre-quit sessions, cut down to quit, and home visits.

32 , and followed for 3 years with twice-weekly home visits.

33 were given in monthly group sessions and in home visits.

34 enter, Hershey, Pennsylvania, in addition to home visits.

35 nd middle-income countries implement newborn home visits.

36 isoniazid tests collected during unannounced home visits.

37 included monthly cooking sessions and weekly home visits.

38 s 7.3 [8.3], p=0.033) but fewer primary-care home visits (1.5 [2.8] vs 2.8 [4.6], p=0.037).

39 ers before infants were 6 weeks of age, with home visits 2 weeks prior to when immunizations were sch

40 ervention group) and 586 participants having home visits (267 in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-pip

41 ered intervention in which 20 FCHVs provided home visits 3 times a year (once every 4 months) for hea

42 03, we enrolled, and followed up with weekly home visits, 509 individuals with HIV-1 infection and th

43 patients, respectively, were allocated to a home visit 7 to 14 days postdischarge by a cardiac nurse

44 s at enrolment, and we performed a follow-up home visit about 60 days later to ascertain vital status

45 the child) were independently coded during a home visit (age 3 years).

46 conducted including patients who completed a home visit and had scheduled outpatient follow-up in the

47 ents of home-delivered meals who completed a home visit and three 24-h dietary recalls (n = 345).

48 Limited evidence suggested that home visiting and behavioral counseling interventions ad

49 (14.0%); of these, 826 (59.2%) completed the home visits and 147 (10.5%) completed a telephone diagno

50 led by age 14 days and followed with monthly home visits and every 3-month anthropometry assessments

51 ile to examine the temporal relation between home visits and hospital discharge, as well as the numbe

52 Deaths were ascertained through biennial home visits and linkage with a vital statistics registry

53 Deaths were ascertained by biennial home visits and linkage with vital statistics registries

54 health facility delivery of CHoBI7 plus two home visits and mHealth.

55 nd health facility delivery of CHoBI7 plus 2 home visits and mHealth.

56 out the effect of such a worker carrying out home visits and participatory group meetings on children

57 ion group (receiving group health education, home visits and print health messages alongside usual ca

58 signs and symptoms of influenza using weekly home visits and surveillance in clinics.

59 d symptoms of influenza illness using weekly home visits and surveillance in designated clinics.

60 months of individual teaching and coaching (home visits and telephone calls).

61 Patients were coached during two follow-up home visits and three phone calls on how to improve thei

62 rbidity data were collected by telephone, at home-visits and at the National Hospital and assessed in

63 ), any in-school visits (no telehealth or in-home visits), and clinic-only visits (reference group).

64 facility delivery of CHoBI7 plus mHealth (no home visits); and health facility delivery of CHoBI7 plu

65 facility delivery of CHoBI7 plus mHealth (no home visits); and health facility delivery of CHoBI7 plu

66 to standard message, 886 to mHealth with no home visits, and 891 to mHealth with two home visits.

67 ery model combining 12 group sessions with 4 home visits, and a control group.

68 military hospitals, an emergency department, home visits, and a homeless shelter in the United States

69 rbidity data were collected by telephone, at home visits, and at the National Hospital and assessed i

70 case detection was performed via semiweekly home visits, and blood was obtained at 3-month intervals

71 Follow-up was done during clinic visits, home visits, and by mobile phone.

72 e components (ie, 3 APC clinic visits, 3 CHW home visits, and Chronic Disease Self-Management Program

73 ing, child social-cognitive skills tutoring, home visits, and classroom social-ecology changes across

74 rt group, and received text messages, calls, home visits, and clinic-based counselling.

75 Supplements were provided during home visits, and intake was supervised on a daily basis

76 ehavior change communication [BCC] sessions, home visits, and integrated community case management of

77 monitored by weekly telephone calls, monthly home visits, and quarterly interviews for 48 weeks.

78 livery combining 12 group sessions with four home visits; and a comparison group.

79 33; P = .04) and 51% greater odds of nursing home visits (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14-2.00; P = .01) with

80 At 6 months among PWH 4 (7.3%) in the home visit arm and 10 (17.9%) in the usual care arm (P =

81 Of those in the home visit arm, 91% received at least one home visit.

82 5 [95% CI, .31-.97]) and the mHealth with no home visits arm (32% vs 45%; OR: 0.54 [95% CI, .31-.96])

83 95% CI: 0.31, 0.97) and the mHealth with no home visits arm (32% vs. 45%, OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.

84 ely to be stunted in both the mHealth with 2 home visits arm (33% vs 45%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.55 [95%

85 y to be stunted in both the mHealth with two home visits arm (33% vs. 45%, Odds Ratio(OR): 0.55, 95%

86 al(CI): 0.61, 0.87)) and the mHealth with no home visits arm (PR: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.97)).

87 rval {CI}, .61-.87]) and the mHealth with no home visits arm (PR: 0.82 [95% CI, .69-.97]).

88 arrhea prevalence in both the mHealth with 2 home visits arm (prevalence ratio [PR]: 0.73 [95% confid

89 rhea prevalence in both the mHealth with two home visits arm (Prevalence Ratio(PR): 0.73 (95% Confide

90 standard message arm, 886 to mHealth with no home visits arm, and 891 to the mHealth with 2 home visi

91 HO and UNICEF issued a joint statement about home visits as a strategy to improve newborn survival.

92 At the follow-up home visit at age 18 years, participants were assessed w

93 collected during hospitalization and during home visits at 1 and 3 mo postdischarge.

94 ical Center, Augusta, Georgia, and completed home visits at 1, 3, 8, and 16 weeks post partum.

95 ssociates delivered the interventions during home visits at 3 and 8 weeks post partum.

96 Research nurses conducted home visits at 3 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, and 40 weeks

97 72 trained volunteer peer counsellors made home visits at five timepoints during pregnancy and afte

98 l and leisure activities closure and nursing home visiting bans were all associated with a median R(e

99 The FC programs includes 1 to 3 nurse home visits beginning at the infant age of 3 weeks desig

100 nt, and mothers' health and life-course with home visits beginning during pregnancy and continuing th

101 recently given birth were recruited through home visits between September 2016 and January 2017 and

102 in the remote group, 16 (19.0%) required in-home visits beyond the first visit.

103 The 3-year intervention consisted of home visits (birth to 3 years), child development center

104 The wider societal benefits of home visiting by nurses and the impact of this on long t

105 ion to enable CHWs to screen for SSIs during home visits by administering a questionnaire, obtaining

106 Regular perinatal home visits by community health workers (CHWs) have help

107 blood) were identified through twice-weekly home visits by fieldworkers over a follow-up period of 2

108 health care program, consisting primarily of home visits by nurses and health aides, was conceived as

109 d with the control group, women who received home visits by nurses had fewer subsequent pregnancies (

110 -randomised controlled trials estimated that home visits by trained community members in programme se

111 The intervention involved home visits by trained government community health worke

112 intervention that was centered on proactive home visits by trained government community health worke

113 ll contact types (face-to-face, telephone or home visit), by a general practitioner or nurse.

114 telephone calls and field tracing (including home visits), by a team of outreach workers within 3 mon

115 pid-based nutrient supplementation (LNS) and home visits can be effective approaches to preventing ch

116 Home visits collected floor dust and documented occupant

117 longer, contacts over 6 months or longer, or home visits), complexity (defined as addressing multiple

118 for parents and preschoolers and 10 biweekly home visits conducted during a 6- to 8-month period.

119 February 2003, the intervention comprised 16 home visits delivered to 220 mother-infant dyads by spec

120 pregnant individuals with low income, nurse home visiting did not increase use of routine postpartum

121 Although home visiting does not have a single clearly defined met

122 he mental health indicators were assessed at home visits done between May 12, 2011, and May 15, 2013.

123 ree days if the mother received at least one home visit during pregnancy (OR2.18, CI1.46-3.25), the b

124 Research nurses conducted 4 home visits during infancy and research center visits at

125 ome visits had an average of 9 (range, 0-16) home visits during pregnancy and 23 (range, 0-59) home v

126 Families received a mean of 9 home visits during pregnancy and 23 home visits from the

127 An average of 7 (range, 0-18) home visits during pregnancy and 26 (range, 0-71) from b

128 Nurses made an average of 7 (range, 0-18) home visits during pregnancy and 26 (range, 0-71) visits

129 ant women in their community and to make two home visits during pregnancy and three in the first week

130 y only (n = 100), or routine care plus nurse home visits during pregnancy and through the child's sec

131 Reaching mothers and babies with home visits during pregnancy and within three days after

132 pated in follow-up), routine care plus nurse home visits during pregnancy only (n = 100), or routine

133 sociation between three factors - receipt of home visits during pregnancy, birth place, birth notific

134 e and neglect, and find time to advocate for home visits, early intervention programs, and education

135 03, 95% CI, 2.36-10.71) and nursing facility/home-visit encounters (IRR, 34.89, 95% CI, 14.82-82.13).

136 nd older in 1982-1983 and followed them with home visits every 3 years until 1988-1989.

137 Staff masked to allocation made home visits every week from enrolment to 6 months after

138 receive physician care remotely (initial in-home visit followed by daily video visit facilitated by

139 CHWs completed home visits for 30 days after an operation for all parti

140 Eggs were provided during twice-weekly home visits for 6 mo.

141 adverse events after each dose during daily home visits for 7 days.

142 nity-based surveillance volunteers undertook home visits for 7848 pregnant women who gave birth to 77

143 Home visits for assessment minimized loss to follow-up.

144 e obtained at admission for cases and during home visits for controls.

145 wn community with the key task of conducting home visits for health education and community mobilizat

146 toring and nutrition education (T0); T0 plus home visits for intensive nutrition counselling through

147 or patients testing antigen positive, weekly home visits for the first 4 weeks on ART by lay workers

148 d) was done by a nurse in the household, and home visits for TPT follow-up were done by community hea

149 assessing the benefit of multiple perinatal home visits found a significant reduction in IPV (standa

150 domized to the intervention group received 5 home visits from a bilingual, bicultural lay patient nav

151 ted of patient monitoring of blood pressure, home visits from a community health worker (CHW) for dat

152 -based accompaniment (characterized by daily home visits from a community health worker, directly obs

153 ted to the emergency department and received home visits from a nurse or physician.

154 Both groups received 2 to 3 home visits from a physical therapist weekly for 16 week

155 ed significantly longer if they had received home visits from a volunteer.

156 visits during pregnancy and 23 (range, 0-59) home visits from birth through the child's second birthd

157 original intervention in phase 1 comprised 8 home visits from community nurses delivering a staged ho

158 in England that involves up to 64 structured home visits from early pregnancy until the child's secon

159 ean of 9 home visits during pregnancy and 23 home visits from the child's birth through the second bi

160 e intervention group received a median of 18 home visits from the study occupational therapists.

161 violence against women and children through home visits, group meetings, day care, community events,

162 Families in the groups that received home visits had an average of 9 (range, 0-16) home visit

163 CHVs' home visits had no statistically significant effect on d

164 Intensive nurse home visiting has been proposed as an intervention to im

165 m outcomes and related cost-effectiveness of home visiting has not been established.

166 Population-based data from home visits have been collected for 369 consecutive unex

167 nal and newborn care programs with postnatal home visits have been tested in Bangladesh, Malawi, and

168 on asthma outcomes of an intervention using home visits (HVs) by community health workers (CHWs) plu

169 Home visits, implemented only in Texas, most likely acco

170 tervention cluster, a worker carried out one home visit in the third trimester of pregnancy, monthly

171 Participants from Gulf states completed a home visit in which biological and environmental samples

172 f New Haven, Conn, and followed them with in-home visits in 1982, 1985, 1988, and 1994.

173 the costs and cost-effectiveness of newborn home visits in a programme setting.

174 HIVST to one test per year were monitored by home visits in a systematic quality assurance (QA) sampl

175 This paper examines coverage and content of home visits in pilot areas and factors associated with r

176 hospital stay of one postpartum night plus a home visit) in a health maintenance organization (HMO) a

177 completed validated questionnaires during a home visit, including information about daily NSAID use.

178 Primeiros Lacos is a home visiting intervention delivered by trained nurses t

179 n during a 3-y cluster-randomized trial of a home visiting intervention in Cape Town, South Africa.

180 se Partnership (FNP) is a licensed intensive home-visiting intervention developed in the USA and intr

181 the paraprofessional-delivered Family Spirit home-visiting intervention for American Indian teen moth

182 ative American mothers who participated in a home-visiting intervention had substantially lower SSB c

183 The significant effect of this early life home-visiting intervention on child BMI and BMI z score

184 The paraprofessional home-visiting intervention promoted effective parenting,

185 The remaining 3 trials provided a perinatal home-visiting intervention to pregnant Native American y

186 Newhints trial, which tested the effect of a home-visits intervention in seven districts in rural Gha

187 Effective integration of home visit interventions focused on early childhood deve

188 ts to disseminate and sustain evidence-based home-visiting interventions in at-risk populations.

189 care at home, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring,

190 Home visiting is a promising strategy for promoting opti

191 Home visiting is recommended to address maternal and inf

192 participants completing 30-day follow-up and home visits made on time.

193 effect of the early stimulation messages and home visits might be due to little take-up of behaviour-

194 idents of domestic violence (79% of sample), home-visited mothers had significantly fewer child maltr

195 ommunity settings offered by sites included: home visits (n = 3), HIV support organizations (n = 2),

196 cilitation (n=437), lay counsellor follow-up home visits (n=449), or standard clinic referral (n=439)

197 and prenatal, postpartum, and infant/toddler home visiting [n = 228]).

198 t 3 (transportation plus prenatal/postpartum home visiting [n = 230]), and treatment 4 (transportatio

199 rch about health visiting actions focuses on home visiting, needs assessment and parent-health visito

200 Disease management clinics, nurse home visits (NHVs), and nurse case management.

201 alth services via telehealth (<=50%), any in-home visits (no telehealth), any in-school visits (no te

202 53 (40.0%) of the wound infections required home visiting nurse services on discharge, and 73 (29.1%

203 Data were collected during seven home visits occurring during the 3rd trimester (weeks 32

204 by the community health workers during their home visits; of these, 1018 participants (526 [51.7%] me

205 ge of health outcomes; and for the impact of home visiting on improving function and other health ser

206 effective strategies to increase coverage of home visits on the day of birth could lead to the achiev

207 We found no effect of CHVs' home visits on the prevalence of child diarrhea or fever

208 articipants (94.9%) and completed 107 of 117 home visits on time (91.5%).

209 ipants in the standard care group received a home visit or a cryptococcal antigen screen rather than

210 o receive NFP, an established model of nurse home visiting, or usual care.

211 e provision (via a combination of telephone, home visits, or clinic visits) from an interprofessional

212 nkage facilitation, lay counsellor follow-up home visits, or standard-of-care clinic referral, and th

213 ng, parent behavior-management training with home visiting, peer coaching, reading tutoring, and clas

214 Family Spirit, a paraprofessional-delivered, home-visiting pregnancy and early childhood intervention

215 ty and broad reach, a brief postpartum nurse home visiting program can reduce population rates of chi

216 ignment to participate in an intensive nurse home visiting program did not significantly reduce the i

217 onnects (FC) program, a community-wide nurse home visiting program for newborns, has been shown to pr

218 d how different staffing models affect early home visiting program outcomes.

219 Participation in a home visiting program provided by community health worke

220 trial was designed originally to assess the home visiting program's effect on pregnancy outcomes and

221 data from a randomized controlled trial of a home-visiting program delivered by community health work

222 At 30 days, a high-intensity home-visiting program reduced all-cause readmission and

223 children's language development, and not all home visiting programmes achieve positive language outco

224 is to systematically summarise how effective home visiting programmes are at improving young children

225 Most of the home visiting programmes had been established in America

226 This review highlights that not all home visiting programmes measure the impact that the pro

227 Home visiting programmes often report multiple outcomes.

228 Future evaluations of home visiting programmes should explore this finding fur

229 Home visiting programmes targeted at socially disadvanta

230 This review examines home visiting programmes that specifically provide home

231 To enable comparisons between home visiting programmes, relevant data was extracted us

232 the evidence base for enhanced prenatal care home visiting programs and informs state and federal inv

233 Although the effectiveness of some home visiting programs to prevent child maltreatment is

234 s toward child abuse prevention, focusing on home visiting programs, abusive head trauma primary prev

235 le with high risk and inform harm reduction, home visiting programs, and other interventions.

236 Home-visiting programs and MDS-HF clinics reduced all-ca

237 Over 3 to 6 months, home-visiting programs and multidisciplinary heart failu

238 Several randomized, controlled trials of home-visiting programs by professionals have demonstrate

239 Home-visiting programs reduced HF-specific readmission a

240 The Affordable Care Act provides funding for home-visiting programs to reduce health care disparities

241 Home-visiting programs, MDS-HF clinics, and STS interven

242 Home visits provided from pregnancy through child age 2

243 Parent education (12 core sessions, 1 home visit) provided information about autism but no beh

244 2 optional sessions; 2 telephone boosters; 2 home visits) provided specific strategies to manage disr

245 orkers over a 12-month period, comprising of home visits (psychoeducation, adherence support, family

246 Participants underwent clinic and home visits randomized to order of completion.

247 he association was modified by the number of home visits received during pregnancy.

248 To determine whether home visits replaced hospital services, we calculated po

249 Among children who participated in a home visit, serum PBDE was positively correlated with ha

250 This plan includes conducting a home visit soon after ED discharge combined with close o

251 t mortality reductions achieved by a newborn home-visit strategy might in fact be cost effective.

252 e best evidence for the likely effect of the home-visits strategy delivered within programmes in sub-

253 In the Newhints trial, we aimed to test this home-visits strategy in sub-Saharan Africa by assessing

254 es, and the dramatic geographic variation in home visits suggests a lack of consensus about their app

255 The home visit team used a structured assessment algorithm t

256 ghtly in pairs (instead of individual weekly home visits that were specified in the original programm

257 endances, recent antibiotic prescribing, and home visits, the odds of BSI were equivalent in patients

258 ost studies failed to report the duration of home visits, though studies which started prenatally sho

259 enhanced prenatal care programs that provide home visiting to guide improvements and inform future in

260 Data were collected during home visits to all resident women of reproductive age (1

261 nd newborn-care preparedness, made postnatal home visits to assess newborns on the first, third, and

262 trained community health volunteer conducted home visits to ensure retention in the study and learn a

263 n both groups, community health workers made home visits to identify pregnant women and girls and pro

264 men regardless of HIV status: (i) conducting home visits to identify pregnant women and refer them to

265 The intervention consisted of a package of home visits to pregnant women and their babies in the fi

266 lactating women (T3); or T1 plus fortnightly home visits to promote and encourage early stimulation (

267 dentified pregnant women, made two antenatal home visits to promote birth and newborn-care preparedne

268 mized to either CrAg screening plus 4 weekly home visits to provide adherence support or to standard

269 trained 824 female volunteers to make three home visits to women and their families during pregnancy

270 omen on maternal health, and (iii) providing home visits to women who missed an ANC or PMTCT appointm

271 10th to August 16th, 2020 (or received an in-home visit) to provide a finger pin-prick sample.

272 Capsules were distributed during home visits undertaken every 4 weeks, when data were gat

273 vaccination, we monitored children in weekly home visits until Dec 31, 2013, with study clinic survei

274 Outcome was assessed during a home-visit using the Paediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (

275 enteropathogens at enrolment; one follow-up home visit was made about 60 days later to ascertain vit

276 The mean time spent per home visit was similar across study arms, but the interv

277 Nurse home visiting was associated with reduced ED use.

278 ne interview or clinician interview whenever home-visit was not possible.

279 hold salt disappearance, measured at monthly home visits, was 6.0 g/adult female equivalent/day [95%

280 During yearly home visits, we assessed dust accumulation in housing un

281 Home visits were conducted at 2 (HV1), 6 (HV2), 12 (HV3)

282 Home visits were conducted at the same time points for a

283 Home visits were conducted for families who were unable

284 Home visits were conducted to obtain nasal swabs from pe

285 Home visits were conducted with consenting caregivers to

286 Home visits were less common (N = 7) than in LMICs, and

287 Home visits were made during pregnancy and early post pa

288 Several home visits were made to enhance the patients' self-care

289 At least 3 home visits were performed during 4-6 weeks of follow-up

290 Follow-up home visits were undertaken every 4 weeks, when data wer

291 Patients underwent clinic and home visits, were aged 55 to 90 years, were consecutivel

292 Mothers were interviewed during home visits when children were ages 5, 7, 10, and 12 on

293 nagement involved monthly group meetings and home visits where communication and problem-solving skil

294 the challenges they encountered when making home visits while implementing a research intervention i

295 d activities, for use during regular monthly home visits with caregivers of children under 2 years of

296 y of 50 884 women, at baseline and follow-up home visits, with a mean (SD) follow-up interval of 7.6

297 Home visit within 7 days of discharge and twice-monthly

298 orns were more likely to receive a postnatal home visit within three days if the mother received at l

299 proportion of mothers and newborns receiving home visits within three days after birth was 57% in Ban

300 h place, birth notification - and receipt of home visits within three days after birth.