ライフサイエンスコーパス: human activity

1 sites in Northeast China which is a proxy of human activity.

2 hic distance and landscape resistance due to human activity.

3 ided refugia in a landscape with substantial human activity.

4 lting from both climate change and increased human activity.

5 that ALAN data provide a dynamic snapshot of human activity.

6 hwater ecosystems differentially affected by human activity.

7 of communities have recently been changed by human activity.

8 e changing at an unprecedented rate owing to human activity.

9 o and Naung Mung, areas with relatively high human activity.

10 e cleanrooms, potentially carried along with human activity.

11 alized somewhere on the globe as a result of human activity.

12 Risk taking is central to human activity.

13 ed, implying a relatively larger impact from human activity.

14 treated as islands in an inhospitable sea of human activity.

15 further due to climate change and increasing human activity.

16 ngrove loss has been attributed primarily to human activity.

17 ly assessing Pb emissions directly linked to human activities.

18 China's vertebrate species are threatened by human activities.

19 ry is attributable to the intensification of human activities.

20 driven from carbon sinks to sources through human activities.

21 will be affected by climate change and other human activities.

22 b ecosystem functioning, and impact multiple human activities.

23 cape trajectory but help the record of these human activities.

24 face of rapid environmental change driven by human activities.

25 South America and Antarctica as a result of human activities.

26 tures of regional hydrological processes and human activities.

27 are poorly understood and are threatened by human activities.

28 their modern-day alteration by N inputs from human activities.

29 ely affected by contamination resulting from human activities.

30 terial form is one of the most satisfying of human activities.

31 tual interaction between natural factors and human activities.

32 re threatened with extinction as a result of human activities.

33 ivers has been incremented by about 15% from human activities.

34 sity, but are under considerable threat from human activities.

35 of the riparian zones have been disturbed by human activities.

36 ost likely shaped by commensalism related to human activities.

37 ious low-frequency motions, such as everyday human activities.

38 ts from elevated levels of contaminants from human activities.

39 Our results unveil a hidden footprint of human activities.

40 ices but are rapidly disappearing because of human activities.

41 tions outside their natural range because of human activities.

42 into the Antarctic environment through local human activities.

43 g to these elements as potential proxies for human activities.

44 l communities that interact most with modern human activities.

45 s, yet species are being rapidly lost due to human activities.

46 in areas threatened by increasing impact of human activities.

47 at alarming rates due to climate change and human activities.

48 gation-induced changes in water demands from human activities.

49 elease of crude oil from natural seepage and human activities.

50 bedrocks particular to this river basin and human activities.

51 onents of the budget as they are affected by human activities.

52 the intensity, diversity and distribution of human activities.

53 ystems already experience higher stress from human activities.

54 of this atmosphere aerosol with intensity of human activities.

55 ger conflicts with more recently established human activities.

56 lations have declined since the 1950s due to human activities.

57 provides an absolute, real-time estimate of human activities.

58 en species are continuing to be disrupted by human activities.

59 a high energy habitat that is threatened by human activities.

60 nce equations as functions of time-dependent human activities.

61 to direct persecution or indirect effects of human activities.

62 ersity patterns are being rapidly altered by human activities.

63 such as pressure and strains associated with human activities.

64 in water vapor can be largely attributed to human activities.

65 ty is threatened by climate change and other human activities [1], but to assess impacts, we also nee

66 nitrogen cycle has been radically changed by human activities(1).

67 nics, lithology, land surface properties and human activities(10,11).

68 greater even than natural selection or other human activities.(3)(,)(4) Natural populations of plants

69 data, we highlight the long-term history of human activities across central African forests and asse

70 nvironment, and in man-made forms created by human activity across a variety of industries.

71 Noise-generating human activities affect hearing, communication and movem

72 osystem-services framework to understand how human activities affect the flow of benefits, to create

73 Bottom trawling is the most widespread human activity affecting seabed habitats.

74 ht that overharvesting effects resulted from human activity alone.

75 Increasing human activity along the coast has amplified the extinct

76 The extent to which human activities alter SOA formation from biogenic emiss

77 tmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) emitted by human activities alters the seawater carbonate system.

78 for ~25% of the atmospheric CO(2) emitted by human activities, an amount in excess of 2 petagrams of

79 re in rapid decline on a global scale due to human activities and a changing climate.

80 s they support, are facing severe threats by human activities and climate change.

81 in the course of various natural events and human activities and converts to methylmercury by anaero

82 are incomplete without information on local human activities and ecological context.

83 Regime shifts triggered by human activities and environmental changes have led to s

84 explicitly includes the combined effects of human activities and fire regimes.

85 s vital to quantify how they are impacted by human activities and gain insights into population dynam

86 The impacts of local human activities and global environmental change nonethe

87 to major ion composition have resulted from human activities and have degraded freshwater resources.

88 ion in vegetation growth was also related to human activities and natural disturbances.

89 systems to encourage greater harmony between human activities and nature.

90 This study also shows that the increase of human activities and nutrient release is leading to hypo

91 Human activities and population growth have increased th

92 l and aquatic surfaces and supplemented with human activities and use of lotions and sunscreens, cont

93 anographic forcing, and other pressures from human activities and use.

94 ight the profound and far-reaching impact of human activity and call for identifying and protecting t

95 ted by environmental stressors brought on by human activity and climate change, threatening the extin

96 The long-term interaction between human activity and climate is subject to increasing scru

97 and their occasional mutations owing to the human activity and climate/ecological changes by the man

98 pronounced relationship between prehistoric human activity and cyclical climate change.

99 ities, and ecosystems to stressors driven by human activity and inform future management strategies.

100 es whose populations have been fragmented by human activity and is protected wherever it is considere

101 Our findings clearly show that human activity and life history interact to influence ra

102 datasets and thus, quantifies the effect of human activity and natural processes on [Formula: see te

103 Human activity and related land use change are the prima

104 closely to the intensification/weakening of human activity and the flourishing/decline of prehistori

105 is needed to determine sustainable limits of human activity and to predict recovery time frames.

106 ve impact on ocean ecosystems from expanding human activities - and the patterns, locations and drive

107 the pause in circulation trends is forced by human activities, and has not occurred owing only to int

108 The COVID-19 pandemic is impacting human activities, and in turn energy use and carbon diox

109 ts and interactions with landscape settings, human activities, and other factors.

110 rcadian biological timing with the timing of human activity, and is caused by rapid transmeridian tra

111 Underwater noise from human activities appears to be rising, with ramification

112 Ignitions caused by human activities are a substantial driver of overall fir

113 Given the speed and extent with which human activities are altering marine risk landscapes, it

114 ic rescaling (STAR) hypothesis suggests that human activities are altering the scales of ecological p

115 Human activities are causing a global proliferation of c

116 Human activities are causing rapid environmental change

117 f evidence that collectively suggest diverse human activities are changing marine ecosystems, includi

118 e and dynamics of recipient communities, but human activities are disrupting these links.

119 Simultaneously, human activities are drastically reducing biodiversity.

120 hemical cycles and the climate system due to human activities are expected to change the quantity and

121 Human activities are fundamentally altering biodiversity

122 These results demonstrate the effects that human activities are having in an area of high global co

123 Species extinction rates due to human activities are high, and initial extinctions can t

124 Timings of human activities are marked by circadian clocks which in

125 (90%) in multiple use areas where extractive human activities are permitted, and were poorly represen

126 At the global scale, human activities are threatening the extinction of many

127 Human activities are threatening to push the Earth syste

128 Human activities are thus modifying the small mammal com

129 Human activities are transforming grassland biomass via

130 les can be studied due to the fact that many human activities are usually recorded in the present dig

131 Patterns of daily human activity are controlled by an intrinsic circadian

132 Indirect, risk-based effects of human activity are known to be important in structuring

133 redominate and that isolated reefs, far from human activities, are generally healthier and more resil

134 review is organized around four themes: (i) human activities as drivers of change; (ii) variability

135 Agricultural weeds can adapt rapidly to human activities as exemplified by the evolution of resi

136 ommunity of species, human institutions, and human activities at a given location have been shaped by

137 o incidental harm from an expanding array of human activities at sea.

138 Rs were observed inside KNP, possibly due to human activity at research camps near the protected fore

139 ystem services, but landscape degradation by human activity at their edges may compromise their ecolo

140 But why has human activity become increasingly concentrated?

141 past variations in climate, disturbance, and human activity before European colonization.

142 or continuous or discontinuous monitoring of human activity, biological signals such as Electroenceph

143 may be the most conspicuous manifestation of human activity, but biodiversity declines in undisturbed

144 eltas of Greenland are largely unaffected by human activity, but increased freshwater runoff and sedi

145 Human activities can also influence the global distribut

146 Human activities can alter aquatic ecosystems through th

147 Supplemental food provided to wildlife by human activities can be more abundant and predictable th

148 Human activities can create noise pollution and there is

149 presents new and timely evidence of the role human activities can play in shaping evolutionary trajec

150 Human activities can produce extinctions of large, diver

151 However, beyond direct exploitation, human activities can produce indirect or sub-lethal effe

152 Natural and human activities can result in both high temporal and sp

153 zed that environmental degradation caused by human activities can result in dramatic losses of specie

154 footprint and ultimate cumulative impacts of human activities can threaten ocean ecosystems and have

155 Here we assess whether it is plausible that human activity caused these earthquakes.

156 Human activity causes vibrations that propagate into the

157 Novel selective pressures derived from human activities challenge the persistence of animal pop

158 apid change from ocean warming and nearshore human activities, compromising a myriad of services prov

159 However, human activity could strongly exacerbate certain landsca

160 es, along with relevant exposure factors and human activity data, are then used by the model to rapid

161 change, and are especially significant when human activities decrease biodiversity.

162 ctic, a region under increasing influence of human activities due to increased land and sea use.

163 ring and extreme heat events, and can inform human activities, e.g. the safe operation of airports an

164 his environment is increasingly disturbed as human activity encroaches on previously unexposed region

165 Human activities, especially conversion and degradation

166 gh coastal zones have been affected by local human activities for centuries, how local human impacts

167 river waters and city sources suggested that human activities foster the spread of ARGs, some of whic

168 exposure of bare soil in the 1930s, suggest human activity fueled stronger and more frequent heatwav

169 re subject to considerable alteration due to human activities globally, including widespread changes

170 Over the past 100 years, human activity has greatly changed the rate of atmospher

171 The degree to which human activity has impacted the natural plant communitie

172 Human activity has sent many measures of biodiversity in

173 ple lines of evidence to understand how past human activity has shaped long-term animal diversity in

174 Human activities have altered the biogeochemical cycle o

175 Across North America, human activities have been shown to cause river incision

176 Human activities have changed the acoustic environment o

177 ence is not always straightforward, but some human activities have clear impacts.

178 Human activities have dramatically altered global patter

179 Human activities have dramatically altered rates and sca

180 For example, human activities have increased supplies of biologically

181 d without anthropogenic forcings reveal that human activities have increased the probability that dry

182 Human activities have increased the range, intensity, an

183 However, human activities have increased the supply of biological

184 amatically on Earth over the past century as human activities have intensified.

185 system models, analogous feedbacks involving human activities have not been systematically quantified

186 namata convention seeks to reduce the impact human activities have on Hg releases to the environment.

187 Human activities have placed populations of many endange

188 Human activities have resulted in significant release of

189 Human activities have resulted in the loss of over 90% o

190 Rapid climate change and intensified human activities have resulted in water table lowering (

191 Human activities have substantially changed the world's

192 l nanomaterials (produced unintentionally by human activity) have been continuously produced and dist

193 ent of insecticide resistance, together with human activities, have made these insects global pests.

194 sunset is a form of fasting practiced during human activity hours.

195 s issue is to observe particular features of human activities, i.e., cultural traits, such as names g

196 ding how natural environmental variation and human activity impact cancer risk, with potential implic

197 On land, human activities impede the capacity of terrestrial spec

198 mes the annual atmospheric Hg emissions from human activities in Oregon.

199 pace of environmental degradation caused by human activities in the Anthropocene.

200 nimals can support both ocean ecosystems and human activities in the future.

201 The need for better governance of human activities in the ocean space has been widely reco

202 n interevent times for a range of nonviolent human activities in the real world.

203 cluding farming, atmospheric deposition, and human activities in urban areas, causing concerns of pot

204 findings contribute to our understanding of human activity in ice-marginal environments and have imp

205 hows that there were two distinct periods of human activity in the cave, one from 37 to 33,500 y ago,

206 on dates, mainly related to the rock art and human activity in the cave.

207 The significant increase in traces of human activity in the environment worldwide provides evi

208 om ca. 5000 years ago until the present, and human activity in the watershed was revealed through the

209 smission very recently, likely the result of human activities, including recurrent migration, domesti

210 mass will outstrip wild herbivore control as human activities increase elemental nutrient supply, wit

211 event, evidence shows a dramatic decline in human activity, indicating extensive negative impacts on

212 large herbivores on ecosystems before modern human activities is an open question in ecology and cons

213 Global expansion of human activities is associated with the introduction of

214 of pollutants in aquatic systems impacted by human activities is mandatory for a correct assessment o

215 Habitat loss and fragmentation due to human activities is the leading cause of the loss of bio

216 e importance of ecosystems in sustaining all human activities is well-known, methods for sustainable

217 Human activity is changing climatic conditions at an unp

218 Human activity is creating a global footprint by changin

219 s of lake systems to past climate change and human activity is critical for assessing and predicting

220 Human activity is leaving a pervasive and persistent sig

221 itive to increasing risks arising from local human activities, land subsidence, regional water manage

222 ID-19) pandemic caused widespread changes in human activity, leading to a months-long reduction in se

223 We hypothesize that human activities likely contributed to the gene flow and

224 This fragmentation by human activities limits species' ability to track suitab

225 ehaviourally mediated pathways through which human activities may affect different ecosystem function

226 Human activities may have facilitated further local colo

227 her disturbances that simultaneously curtail human activities may promote recovery.

228 lest number of scavenger species, suggesting human activity may be overriding other macroecological p

229 Increasing urbanization and human activity may further degrade alligator habitats an

230 It has been hypothesised that such human activity may have been restricted to brief periods

231 Beginning at least 2000 years ago, human activities might have started to overtake natural

232 Potential disruption of vital cues by human activities must be understood in order to mitigate

233 n hemisphere (NH) aerosol sources shows that human activities must have accounted for most of the ins

234 The climate varies due to human activity, natural climate cycles, and natural even

235 Positive interactions are sensitive to human activities, necessitating synthetic approaches to

236 air pollution derived from traffic and other human activities not only has a direct negative effect o

237 Online traces of human activity offer novel opportunities to study the dy

238 literature has documented myriad effects of human activities on animal behaviour, yet the ultimate e

239 ecological outcomes of PAs, the influence of human activities on biodiversity, and PA governance issu

240 ncreasing impact of both climatic change and human activities on global river systems necessitates an

241 spite increasing concern over the effects of human activities on marine ecosystems, extinction in the

242 ssential for determining the impacts of past human activities on marine environments.

243 The impact of human activities on our planet's natural systems has bee

244 easts are likely to reflect the influence of human activities on structural genome evolution.

245 bi, Kenya, are used to explore the impact of human activities on the biodiversity of wildlife and liv

246 Understanding the importance of human activities on TOC changes requires knowledge of pa

247 introductions, and the effect of increasing human activity on vectors and pathways of introduction.

248 high intrinsic risk are strongly affected by human activity or climate change.

249 Human activities over the last several centuries have tr

250 l, compelling evidence that at least one key human activity, overfishing, can lead to distinct, casca

251 The role human activities play in reshaping biodiversity is incre

252 Our results suggest that human activities played a dominant role in deduction in

253 Increasing human activity, pollution, biological invasions and the

254 e countries are mostly or fully allocated to human activities (predominately agriculture and forestry

255 ) predictive DNA sequence analysis and (iii) Human activity recognition (HAR).

256 eless system based on magnetic induction for human activity recognition to tackle these challenges an

257 The best-fitting model entails a change in human activity regarding contacts not related to househo

258 Here, we link PM(2.5) exposure to the human activities responsible for PM(2.5) pollution.

259 Increasing human activity restricts animal movements and isolates f

260 , to the mid-20th century when unprecedented human activities resulted in exponential increases in po

261 re consistent with the expectation that some human activity should correlate better with the populati

262 Human activities significantly influence these physical

263 Increases in noise-generating human activities since the Industrial Revolution have ch

264 h sea turtles face significant pressure from human activities, some populations are recovering due to

265 shift in isoprene photooxidation, sparked by human activities, speaks to ongoing and possible future

266 ta have been substantially altered by direct human activities such as soil sealing, agricultural land

267 patially explicit manner and then co-mapping human activities such as the placement of renewable ener

268 Physical attacks depended on human activities such as unhygienic waste management, ri

269 mine the extent of overlap with area-focused human activities, such as fishing.

270 Human activities, such as research, innovation and indus

271 Human activities, such as trade, move organisms between

272 lso subject to indirect impacts arising from human activity, such as acid deposition (sulphur and nit

273 tem scale even under the higher intensity of human activities than global average level in coastal ec

274 nd reclamation under the higher intensity of human activities than the global average level.

275 ity that life histories may be influenced by human activities that alter environmental conditions in

276 arth's history, and are strongly affected by human activities that have modified more than half of th

277 Human activities that influence microbial communities an

278 , that quantifies the cumulative exposure to human activities that organisms may encounter as they sh

279 With the increasing intensity of global human activities, the ecosystem function, which is suppo

280 test these predictions on four data sets of human activity: the edit events of Wikipedia pages, the

281 As an indirect product of human activity, these Fe oxides can be classified as inc

282 Indirectly produced by human activities, they are released into the environment

283 -restricted, degraded wetlands are caused by human activity, they are anthropogenic emissions, and re

284 The rapid expansion of human activities threatens ocean-wide biodiversity.

285 standing contributions of climate change and human activities to changes in streamflow is important f

286 thropogenic mortality, and the potential for human activities to slow population growth in expanding

287 e have arisen concerning the contribution of human activities to the warming observed in previous dec

288 ittle empirical evidence that directly links human activities to urban biodiversity in the tropics.

289 etected, which might have been introduced by human activities, transported by birds or wind, and/or r

290 onnes) of mercury (Hg) have been released by human activities up to 2010, 73% of which was released a

291 maxima in the 1990s, reflecting intensified human activities, wastewater treatment plant upgrades an

292 e and resilience of microbial communities to human activities, we chose two typical types of human di

293 (N) and phosphorus (P) to ecosystems due to human activities, we lack a predictive understanding of

294 It is also noted that the human activities were identified as the dominant driving

295 Prehistoric human activities were likely influenced by cyclic monsoo

296 ions using data from tree rings confirm that human activities were probably affecting the worldwide r

297 gs increased in locations highly impacted by human activities, while the diverse microbial communitie

298 e selected aquifers in Iran are dominated by human activities, while the selected aquifers in Germany

299 ndirect response of soils to past and future human activities will play a major role in human prosper

300 amics have focused on the normal patterns of human activities, with the quantitative understanding of