戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tions through the action of a strongly bound hydration layer.
2 idered along with a Kelvin-Voigt link with a hydration layer.
3 that similarly inhibits interaction with the hydration layer.
4 ssible to probe surface-water motions in the hydration layer.
5 Ts to the charge density fluctuations in the hydration layer.
6 s largely insensitive to the presence of the hydration layer.
7  adhesive to spontaneously penetrate surface hydration layers.
8 by a common, cooperative dehydration of both hydration layers.
9 g of the hydrogen-bonding network of the two hydration layers adjacent to the hydrophilic surfaces.
10 n solution and highlights the fact that both hydration layer and anion-protein binding effects are cr
11 al proteins are unaffected by changes to the hydration layer and bulk water.
12 stance is caused by the strongly bound water hydration layer and characterized by the simultaneous ga
13 the new method we investigated the effect of hydration layer and protein surface topography on the ro
14  catechols and cationic amines that displace hydration layers and adhere to charged surfaces under wa
15 2+) are positioned by electronegative atoms, hydration layers, and a preference for the major groove.
16                                              Hydration layers are defined from radial distribution fu
17 matic global mapping of water motions in the hydration layer around a model protein of apomyoglobin i
18  mostly related to the formation of a strong hydration layer around lactose molecules by hydrogen bon
19 entionally introduced, which restructure the hydration layer around the HbS molecules and thus lower
20 t in the active state water molecules in the hydration layer around the site have a high degree of mo
21 explicit treatment of water molecules in the hydration layer at the surface of the protein, and an en
22 om the barrier provided by the tightly bound hydration layer at their surface, as well as from the ne
23 obes is utilized to explore the evolution of hydration layers at electrode surfaces with the unpreced
24 rize the heterogeneous nature of crystalline hydration layers at the membrane-fluid interface.
25                   The removal of the surface hydration layers causes coarsening of the nanoparticles.
26 omolecules, including proteins, constitute a hydration layer characterized by physicochemical propert
27 we observe that the dynamics of water in the hydration layers close to the protein is dramatically sl
28                              We found that a hydration layer constructed of approximately one monolay
29 an ELP can be tuned to exhibit either of the hydration layer coupling modes.
30 or dark current, and, within a narrow range, hydration layer density, superior fits between experimen
31  and unambiguously validates the slowdown of hydration layer dynamics as shown here again in two muta
32  to determine the activation energy of their hydration layer dynamics.
33            We also observed that the dynamic hydration layer extends to more than 10 A.
34 st that protein clusters, with a distinctive hydration layer, form a protein-rich phase that separate
35                               We observe the hydration layer formed over the particle aggregates and
36 are tested in their ability to reproduce the hydration layer from the simulations for that protein, a
37 e found to have different abilities to evict hydration layers from surfaces-a necessary step for adso
38 s may also provide insights into the role of hydration layers in governing the structure-function rel
39 estions remain about the role of the protein hydration layers in protein fluctuations and how the dyn
40        A major improvement in predicting the hydration layer is found when the protein is held immobi
41 ntact and one for hydrophobes separated by a hydration layer, leads to a marked improvement in protei
42 cts on protein folding, and suggest that the hydration layer may be exploited as a means for short-ra
43                                          The hydration layer model was also compared with a SAXS prof
44    Lattice structure depends on an adaptable hydration layer modulating interactions among CA molecul
45 ging indicates qualitative variations in the hydration layer molecular ordering upon change from wate
46 for characterizing the dynamics of different hydration layers near a prototypical hydrophobic side ch
47                                      Surface hydration layers not only stabilize the SnO2 nanoparticl
48 sumed to increase the water molecules in the hydration layer of Hb and enhance the autoxidation by pr
49 rfacial diffusion coefficient of the surface hydration layer of lipid vesicles in dilute solutions ar
50  water molecules per nucleotide in the first hydration layer of PS and PO respectively.
51 ic distances and implicitly models the first hydration layer of the molecule.
52  reviewed include proton transport along the hydration layer of various membranes and through channel
53 specific complex retain approximately a full hydration layer of water.
54 the enthalpy change owing to the breakage of hydration layers of cations more important in regulating
55 ilic (backbone) and hydrophobic (side chain) hydration layers of elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs), a
56 rminus gradually threads through the surface hydration layers of lipid membranes, with the beginning
57          The release of bound water from the hydration layers of macromolecules and its conversion to
58 solvation, and the disruption of interfacial hydration layers of the calcite surface, which collectiv
59 d two robust, distinct water dynamics in the hydration layer on a few ( approximately 1-8 ps) and ten
60                       Formation of so-called hydration layer on alumina nanoparticles in water was hy
61 the formation of a 7-angstrom-thick stagnant hydration layer on the hydrophilic surfaces.
62 d fluoroalkanes, which greatly perturbed the hydration layers on mineral surfaces and resulted in non
63 rophilic molecules to the well-defined bound hydration layers on the mineral surfaces.
64                                              Hydration layers play a key role in many technical and b
65    Further, it shows that the details of the hydration layer prior to excitation are important for st
66              Inherent structural plasticity, hydration layer rearrangement, and effector binding affe
67 of 'structured' water molecules within their hydration layers, reducing the available 'free' bulk sol
68 of physicochemical surface properties on the hydration layer remains controversial, and systematic ex
69 solvent molecules are found to form a second hydration layer, resulting in a water-water network boun
70  prevention mechanism based on a synergistic hydration layer/steric hindrance.
71  low friction would then be due to the fluid hydration layers surrounding the polar head groups attac
72 tate consists of hydrophobic and hydrophilic hydration layers that respond independently to temperatu
73          At separations of approximately one hydration layer, the attraction is strongly dependent on
74 sulted from Na(+)-CQDs would induce a robust hydration layer to prevent oil from attachment.
75 lysozyme, we first determine that 80% of the hydration layer waters experience a moderate slowdown fa
76    For assessing the accuracy of the modeled hydration layer, we performed contrast variation experim
77 linear function of the overlap volume of the hydration layers, we find that the contact value of the
78 ging to a reasonable value when four or more hydration layers were included explicitly.
79 uling by steric repulsion and formation of a hydration layer which acts as both a physical and energe
80 lk of the perovskite from a newly identified hydration layer which is found to accumulate at the C(60
81 vealed that gammaII-crystallins have a thick hydration layer, which is possibly due to the special ar
82 ith water and hence the formation of a dense hydration layer, which strongly hinders the approach of
83 e used to develop a model for predicting the hydration layer with sub-1-Angstrom resolution without t
84 nt and reveal various water behaviors in the hydration layer with wide heterogeneity.
85               The association of crystalline hydration layers with raft membranes would significantly
86 protein solvation and thereby predicting the hydration layer without additional simulations.