ライフサイエンスコーパス: hygiene

1 ntake and poor water quality, sanitation, or hygiene.

2 od income and education, smoking, and dental hygiene.

3 urs mainly related to water, sanitation, and hygiene.

4 endent of active smoking status or poor oral hygiene.

5 simply be explained by the change in public hygiene.

6 f PPE, physical distancing, and hand/surface hygiene.

7 occus faecalis, which are relevant for water hygiene.

8 mmediately after patients had performed oral hygiene.

9 between diarrheal disease and sanitation and hygiene.

10 animal facility using stricter standards of hygiene.

11 opulations varying in age, weight, diet, and hygiene.

12 ttencies, and limited water availability for hygiene.

13 method for biofilm removal and improved oral hygiene.

14 d independent of tobacco consumption or oral hygiene.

15 ed with higher anxiety levels and poor sleep hygiene.

16 ations with waning efficacy of personal oral hygiene.

17 ns and improvements in water, sanitation and hygiene.

18 od products due to improper storage and poor hygiene.

19 nd accessibility for self-performed proximal hygiene.

20 nize circadian rhythms and develop zeitgeber hygiene.

21 years), higher anxiety level, and poor sleep hygiene.

22 workers were more likely to comply with hand hygiene.

23 gulatory approval of instruments for implant hygiene.

24 .98-15.89]), but significantly worse in hand hygiene (0.27 [0.17-0.43]) and waste management (0.25 [0

25 que; 2) smoking; 3) adverse loading; 4) oral hygiene; 5) use of antimicrobial gel/mouthrinse; 6) non-

26 , patient isolation or cohorting (70%), hand hygiene (50%), and environmental cleaning (40%); nearly

27 mbers at the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (7% of the agency) had been involved in the meas

28 of this study was to describe sanitation and hygiene access across the Global Enteric Multicenter Stu

29 ncluded messages about infant feeding, sleep hygiene, active social play, emotion regulation, and gro

30 The odds of having poor oral hygiene (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.26; 95% confidence

31 According to oral hygiene adjuvants use, they were categorized into three

32 and the optimal strategy for improving sleep hygiene and associated effect on patient-centered outcom

33 nd control compliance, particularly for hand hygiene and disinfection, was inadequate in these outpat

34 t SES was also important for predicting oral hygiene and gingival bleeding.

35 cantly increased chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.

36 did not increase chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.

37 focusing on straightforward changes in hand hygiene and household sharing behaviours.

38 Some behaviours improved, notably hand hygiene and keeping the baby skin-to-skin with their mot

39 d trimester and following interviews on oral hygiene and lifestyle habits.

40 s among patients who maintain excellent oral hygiene and low gingival bleeding scores.

41 0%) children aged 1 to 5 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis, respectively.

42 %) children aged 6 to 12 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis, respectively.

43 nd oral H. pylori in patients with good oral hygiene and moderate socioeconomic status is not signifi

44 ngivitis was conducted using simplified oral hygiene and modified Community Periodontal Indices, resp

45 aluate the influence of the devices on sleep hygiene and outcomes.

46 safety regulations have focused on rules of hygiene and prevention of infections.

47 pidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health (now the Bloomberg School of P

48 d, by extension, the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health established and transmitted a

49 t of Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health was founded in 1919, with Wade

50 School of Public Health (then the School of Hygiene and Public Health).

51 -Rose Report and the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, now the Johns Hopkins Bloombe

52 der conditions driven by improved sanitation/hygiene and reduced fecal-oral transmission; and (3) the

53 igh income countries through enhancements of hygiene and sanitation but the disease is still a challe

54 behaviors, such as clean-water use and good hygiene and sanitation practices.

55 found in infants and children born into poor hygiene and sanitation.

56 Addressing FMs related to hand hygiene and the removal of the outermost garment, boot c

57 tious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK'.

58 Gates Foundation to the Liverpool School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

59 At day 21, participants reinstituted oral hygiene and were followed for 4 weeks.

60 Lifestyle factors including diet, hygiene, and exposure to viruses or bacteria, and medica

61 Improvements in water supply, sanitation, hygiene, and food safety are critical for robust long-te

62 cross-border movements of camels, poor hand hygiene, and overnight hospital stays with respiratory c

63 n improvement of vaccination coverage, birth hygiene, and surveillance, with specific approaches in h

64 , education status, household sanitation and hygiene, and urban or rural residence) in nonpregnant WR

65 Sanitation and Hygiene Applied Research for Equity.

66 co usage, alcohol consumption, and poor oral hygiene are established risk factors.

67 hy honey bee brood and/or brood targeted for hygiene, are triggers of honey bee hygienic behavior ind

68 d increased access to water, sanitation, and hygiene as drivers of stunting reduction.

69 provements in water quality, sanitation, and hygiene, as well as in the clinical treatment of cholera

70 awing test score indicates the need for oral hygiene assistance, but it is not suitable as a single t

71 sment tool for determining the need for oral hygiene assistance.

72 adults (N = 97) judged to have moderate oral hygiene attended a primary dental care setting for a sta

73 of an individual by highlighting the type of hygiene/beauty products the person uses, diet, medical s

74 Hand hygiene before and during mask-wearing, choosing an appr

75 urther support flossing as an important oral hygiene behavior to prevent oral disease progression in

76 ims to identify predictors of performed oral hygiene behaviors (OHBs) based on the Theory of Planned

77 focus on water and sanitation, coupled with hygiene behaviour, should be emphasised to sustain the c

78 ng in families with lower SES had worse oral hygiene (beta = -0.101; P = 0.01) and gingival bleeding

79 d by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene between 13 March 2013 and 30 June 2013.

80 and water installations as the focus of our hygiene bundle.

81 nd American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene/Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

82 lcohol-based hand sanitiser, a national hand-hygiene campaign, national auditing and inspections of h

83 ren younger than 2 years to support feeding, hygiene, care, and stimulation, as well as monthly women

84 The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene challenged Wisconsin laboratories to examine the

85 e evaluated for their water, sanitation, and hygiene characteristics.

86 Mean hand hygiene compliance appears notably lower than internatio

87 nguage, peer-reviewed studies measuring hand hygiene compliance by healthcare workers in an ICU setti

88 ose evaluating, and seeking to improve, hand hygiene compliance in ICUs internationally.

89 ontrol measures, such as increasing the hand hygiene compliance of HCWs and disinfection rate of envi

90 e in an adult ICU setting, and reported hand hygiene compliance rates collected via observation, were

91 Mean hand hygiene compliance was 59.6%.

92 Challenging periods of low oral hygiene compliance were expected.

93 Poor water, sanitation, and hygiene conditions are the primary routes of exposure an

94 Poor hygiene conditions likely obscure effects of individual

95 stewardship should be coupled with improving hygiene conditions.

96 the applicability of the traceable molecular hygiene control method (TMHCM) was tested in 60 food sam

97 iquid soap, chlorine, infant play space, and hygiene counseling (53 clusters); or (4) feeding plus WA

98 , liquid soap, chlorine, and play space plus hygiene counselling; 53 clusters), or IYCF plus WASH (53

99 ions, liquid soap, chlorine, play space, and hygiene counselling; 53 clusters); or IYCF plus WASH (53

100 mized informational interventions, including hygiene data-sharing and peer-based exposure to latrine

101 s "passed" if an appropriate quality of hand hygiene, defined as a minimum 97% coverage of hand surfa

102 s of the University of Bari who attended the Hygiene Department for a biological risk assessment (Apr

103 Hygiene differences between households had a greater imp

104 Poor access for proximal hygiene displayed tendency towards statistical significa

105 ory from NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) patients, pri

106 ived the same general nutrition, health, and hygiene education (NHHE) at enrollment and throughout th

107 e gluconate bathing of all patients and hand-hygiene education and adherence monitoring may have cont

108 andomized, controlled trial of postdischarge hygiene education, as compared with education plus decol

109 individual-level interventions (e.g., sleep hygiene education, incentives for behavioral change), su

110 The 5-day regimen included hygiene education, twice-daily intranasal mupirocin, and

111 underscores that improvements in nutrition, hygiene, education, and health care have an important ro

112 ngival status (bleeding on probing) and oral hygiene effectiveness (dental calculus) were evaluated b

113 Worse socioeconomic status and poor oral hygiene effectiveness directly predicted gingival bleedi

114 ealth beliefs, toothbrushing frequency, oral hygiene effectiveness, and gingivitis in low social stat

115 e latter was directly linked to greater oral hygiene effectiveness.

116 leeding via toothbrushing frequency and oral hygiene effectiveness.

117 and the PAPR helmet assembly; repeated hand hygiene (eg, with hand sanitizer); and a final handwashi

118 ct precautions, private room/cohorting, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic stewards

119 Control measures included isolation, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and rapid diagnostic te

120 plore the association between sanitation and hygiene exposures and MSD.

121 and South Asia and to assess sanitation and hygiene exposures, including shared sanitation access, a

122 nities with inadequate water, sanitation, or hygiene facilities including those with intermittent wat

123 transmission because of crowding and shared hygiene facilities.

124 We also evaluated the role of hygiene factors (e.g., house cleaning, shoe removal).

125 ation methods, reinforcing the need for hand hygiene following glove removal.

126 itoring decreased bone quality and good oral hygiene for promoting the periodontal-systemic health of

127 g these relationships include deficient oral hygiene, gingival bleeding, and bone and tooth loss.

128 nd control practices into four domains: hand hygiene, glove use, disinfection of reusable equipment,

129 artners such as the WHO Water Sanitation and Hygiene Group, UNDP, and UN-Habitat, in order to face th

130 Full-mouth periodontal examination and oral hygiene habits were evaluated at two time points: T1 (af

131 Oral hygiene habits were recorded using a self-administered q

132 ant for understanding the health conditions, hygiene habits, agricultural practices and the diet of t

133 trolling for age, sex, education level, oral hygiene habits, and hyperlipidemia (P = 0.049).

134 s regarding background characteristics, oral hygiene habits, and recent dental procedures, but not cu

135 We aimed to compare oral hygiene habits, orodental status, and dental procedures

136 onclusion, FA patients that showed poor oral hygiene harbored higher proportions of the genera of bac

137 Improved hygiene has reduced the risk of traveler's diarrhea from

138 ession defects in individuals with good oral hygiene have a high probability of progressing during lo

139 cluding these adjuvants to conventional oral hygiene have shown to improve biofilm control during PMT

140 ational cleaning system in place (to improve hygiene); having a solid door on the toilet used by tena

141 Hand hygiene (HH) is an important patient safety measure link

142 The current approach to measuring hand hygiene (HH) relies on human auditors who capture <1% of

143 The hygiene hypothesis attempts to link the increased excess

144 The hygiene hypothesis has been formulated to explain the in

145 The hygiene hypothesis implicates childhood microbial exposu

146 These results support the hygiene hypothesis in its broad sense.

147 These results support a model of the hygiene hypothesis in which certain individuals are gene

148 The hygiene hypothesis is the leading concept to explain the

149 The hygiene hypothesis proposes that reduced exposure to inf

150 and allergic diseases led to the so-called 'hygiene hypothesis'.

151 llergy-protective effect, as proposed by the hygiene hypothesis, is discussed.

152 According to the hygiene hypothesis, the increasing incidence of autoimmu

153 This finding extends the original hygiene hypothesis.

154 seem to provide new evidence supporting the hygiene hypothesis.

155 rther strength to the role of B cells in the hygiene hypothesis.

156 microbial resistance, water, sanitation, and hygiene improvement is highly recommended to prevent the

157 in isolation or as part of a bundle of sleep hygiene improvement, is associated with a significant re

158 at evaluated an intervention to improve hand hygiene in an adult ICU setting, and reported hand hygie

159 reby indicating the importance of good sleep hygiene in averting AD onset.

160 trates that best practice for improving hand hygiene in ICUs remains unestablished.

161 ure describing interventions to improve hand hygiene in ICUs, to evaluate the quality of the extant r

162 Fostering zeitgeber hygiene in the general population as the development and

163 n control interventions included strict hand hygiene, including glove use; isolation precautions; enh

164 in infectious agents as a result of improved hygiene, increased antibiotic use and vaccination, and c

165 adjustment for: 1) age; 2) sex; and 3) oral hygiene index (OHI).

166 iety Disorder-7 Scale (GAD-7), and the Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI).

167 rity of gingivitis using the simplified oral hygiene index and the gingival index, respectively.

168 index (PI); 2) gingival index (GI); 3) oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S); and 4) microbiologic c

169 atistically related to the dental or denture hygiene index.

170 resulted in higher compliance with both hand hygiene indications and technique, as compared to the 6

171 Overall, 2923 hand hygiene indications were observed, and compliance was 70

172 e abilities and related to tooth and denture hygiene indices, which were assessed using the approxima

173 qually, it is clear that the consequences of hygiene, indoor entertainment, and changes in diet or ph

174 , electronics, environmental, cosmetics, and hygiene industries.

175 D) among children enrolled in the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial in rural

176 ions on enteric infections in the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial in rural

177 children aged 0-18 months in the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial.

178 d randomized interventions of the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy trial in Zimbabwe.

179 portant connection between FGS and menstrual hygiene initiatives in Africa is highlighted.

180 d the duration and thoroughness of each hand hygiene instance.

181 We observed 354 hand hygiene instances across 41 healthcare workers doffing p

182 provision of sequential interventions, oral hygiene instruction, and subsequent professional prophyl

183 self-regulation manual, and individual oral hygiene instruction.

184 Patients were then managed by oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing of sites

185 rol group was treated with MI and given oral hygiene instructions.

186 We conducted a systematic review of hygiene intervention effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2, i

187 Sanitation and hygiene interventions are estimated to generate a 36% an

188 omparability; and (4) a need for research on hygiene interventions besides surfaces, particularly han

189 controlled trials of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have raised questions about curren

190 on decreased with the water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions implemented in the WASH Benefits T

191 were unchanged by the water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.

192 t, accessibility for self-performed proximal hygiene is associated to the peri-implant condition.

193 ty providers), holistic care (n = 4; patient hygiene, kindness and respect, family access to patient,

194 quintiles among individuals with a good oral hygiene level.

195 cian from four functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position, and pain).

196 ted and sham) remained affected by poor anal hygiene, lower resting pressure, and reduced RAIR throug

197 t characteristics, experimental design, hand hygiene measurement, intervention characteristics, and o

198 management of health and quarantine; general hygiene measures (including wearing masks indoors); prin

199 related to self-reported assessment of oral hygiene measures (P = 0.015) and to patient perception o

200 this regard, professional-administered oral hygiene measures have been suggested to play a dominant

201 ent study confirms a critical effect of oral hygiene measures on restoration of microbial eubiosis in

202 against biofilms on tooth surfaces, and oral hygiene measures such as brushing and flossing are requi

203 e various activities like water, sanitation, hygiene measures.

204 Poor oral hygiene mediated the associations between psychosocial f

205 Even with good oral hygiene, microbial communities accumulate on teeth in ar

206 que could be implemented for routine surface hygiene monitoring for targeted cleaning interventions a

207 allows to verify microbial contamination for hygiene monitoring in hospitals, food processing and in

208 e diseases (n=8), and water, sanitation, and hygiene (n=6).

209 Compliance was 6.9% for hand hygiene (n=8655 indications), 74.8% for glove use (n=491

210 that these mechanisms were developed through hygiene norms, which were piggybacking on pathogen disgu

211 For hand hygiene, nurses and midwives (odds ratio 5.80 [95% CI 3.

212 oups, probably due to the worse home control hygiene of patients with DG.

213 ys 7, 14, and 21, during stent-mediated oral hygiene (OH) abstention; and at day 42, after resumption

214 le regarding the impact of anxiety and sleep hygiene on insomnia and related sleep complaints among c

215 o examine the effects of poor sanitation and hygiene on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bac

216 ves were sampled at room exit (prior to hand hygiene or glove removal) and then evaluated for the pre

217 = 1.05, 95% CI 1.0-1.10) and SHI (poor sleep hygiene) (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26) scores.

218 lved but well-identified causes such as hand hygiene, overuse of catheters, and to a lesser extent, t

219 ngival/mucosal bleeding when performing oral hygiene (P = 0.026).

220 One hygiene patient and 106 dental patients were recruited.

221 ommunication (BCC) on nutrition, health, and hygiene practices (both study arms) and SQ-LNSs (one stu

222 are associated with anxiety, age, and sleep hygiene practices among a sample of university students

223 ommunication (BCC) on nutrition, health, and hygiene practices and a monthly supply of small-quantity

224 to 14.5; p<0.0001), and health workers' hand hygiene practices during childbirth increased by 12.9% (

225 duce direct skin absorption and standardized hygiene practices implemented at different regional fire

226 ect information about water, sanitation, and hygiene practices in rural India.

227 bservational data on sanitation and domestic hygiene practices were collected.

228 Television viewing, parental stress, and hygiene practices were inversely associated with the ser

229 improvements in poverty, women's education, hygiene practices, and accessibility to health services

230 , the following were observed: improved hand hygiene practices, increased utilization of insecticide-

231 matory parameters after refraining from oral hygiene practices.

232 king water, properly managed sanitation, and hygiene practices.

233 L-E in ICUs with high compliance to standard hygiene precautions and no ongoing outbreak of ESBL-prod

234 stigating the influence of adjuvants to oral hygiene procedures on the recurrence of periodontitis (R

235 s were instructed to resume proper home oral hygiene procedures.

236 of EBOV/Mak by DAL suggests that use of this hygiene product could help prevent the spread of Ebola v

237 o plastic, PBs-diethyl phthalate to personal hygiene products, and OPs to food.

238 concentrations found in foods and commercial hygiene products.

239 daily routines, including the application of hygiene products.

240 n, Family Planning, and Water Sanitation and Hygiene Program Strategy Teams (Bill and Melinda Gates F

241 child spaces, improving veterinary care, and hygiene promotion.

242 Patient hand hygiene protocols should be considered to reduce transmi

243 Health Organization's "Five Moments for Hand Hygiene," published since 2009, were included.

244 or long-term ESBL-E carriage were travel and hygiene related .

245 r long-term ESBL-E carriage were travel- and hygiene-related.

246 At all hospitals, hand hygiene, removal of the outermost garment, and removal o

247 Hand hygiene, removing the outermost garment, boot covers, an

248 cost of the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene response was $8.4 million.

249 tact tracing and quarantine) and mitigation (hygiene, sanitation, ventilation, and social distancing)

250 < 0.001) for every unit of improvement of a hygiene scale.

251 ed on risk-based culling decisions and three hygiene scenarios.

252 Our Meat Hygiene Service model estimated that cattle classified a

253 Flossing, an important oral hygiene skill, is technique-sensitive and challenging fo

254 hildren of smoking parents with poor smoking hygiene (smoking parents whose children had detectable s

255 ildren whose parents exercised good "smoking hygiene" (smoking parents whose children had nondetectab

256 odontal disease to provide education on oral hygiene, smoking, and DM.

257 ptoms in Western Siberia, with lifestyle and hygiene standards of a developed country.

258 ing practices) had a negative effect on oral hygiene status (beta = 0.044; P = 0.07), and also had an

259 atus, presence of digit-sucking habits, oral hygiene status (OHS), and gingivitis among a group of Ni

260 Clinical examination of oral hygiene status and gingivitis was conducted using simpli

261 extent of gingival bleeding via a worse oral hygiene status of children, but SES was also important f

262 he additive interaction between TBS and oral hygiene status was also analyzed.

263 Oral hygiene status was positively associated with the extent

264 es of oral health-related behaviors and oral hygiene status.

265 ssessing the efficacy of earplugs as a sleep hygiene strategy in patients admitted to a critical care

266 and has a synergistic effect with poor oral hygiene, suggesting monitoring decreased bone quality an

267 ironmental factors related to lifestyles and hygiene, surgeries, drug exposures, diet, microorganisms

268 isk factors for pneumonia (ie, impaired oral hygiene, swallowing difficulty) were enrolled.

269 erimental setting, a simplified, 3-step hand hygiene technique for applying alcohol-based hand rub wa

270 In a clinical setting, the simpler hand hygiene technique, consisting of 3 steps, resulted in hi

271 s could be safely replaced by a simpler hand hygiene technique.

272 d microbiological efficacy between both hand hygiene techniques in routine clinical practice.

273 fter patients had been asked to perform oral hygiene to the best of their abilities.

274 ealth, has been to "cultivate the science of hygiene" to bring about exponential growth in the eviden

275 oral microbiome were observed with poor oral hygiene, tobacco smoking, and oral cancer.

276 and reveal (Z)-10-tritriacontene as a novel hygiene trigger.

277 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Pfizer, UK Department of He

278 & Melinda Gates Foundation, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

279 titute of Public Health and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

280 born Lives programme to The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

281 ing to accessibility for self-performed oral hygiene using a 0.5 mm interproximal brush.

282 ew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was calculated.

283 d effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and improved infant and young child feedi

284 ssessed the impact of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and infant and young child feeding (IYCF)

285 20 Global Strategy on water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) en

286 lution (HAP) and poor water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) conditions.

287 e sought to develop a water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention to minimize fecal-oral trans

288 protective effect of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions without presenting ethical

289 Poor water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) may contribute to reduced oral vaccine im

290 s (STHs) suggest that water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) might reduce their transmission.

291 g (IYCF) and improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) on child linear growth and haemoglobin co

292 d effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), and improved infant and young child feed

293 ir pollution (HAP) and water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH), working in poor parts of the world, rare

294 feces transmitted via water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)-related pathways in low- and middle-incom

295 tors of presence of gingivitis and poor oral hygiene were determined using multivariate logistic regr

296 pable of maintaining a high standard of oral hygiene were randomly allocated to one of four treatment

297 Adulthood behaviors (smoking, dental hygiene) were the mediators, and adulthood SEP (educatio

298 llowed proper access for performing proximal hygiene whereas 54% of the prostheses precluded proper a

299 interface [BGI] groups) abstained from oral hygiene while using an acrylic stent.

300 uring outdoor activities and improvements in hygiene within households could prevent future sporadic