ライフサイエンスコーパス: imaging finding

1 inical symptoms with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings.

2 mutation and by demonstrating it's specific imaging findings.

3 All patients had typical clinical and imaging findings.

4 to direct the pathological correlation with imaging findings.

5 e how they communicate and manage incidental imaging findings.

6 ers (PCPs) communicate and manage incidental imaging findings.

7 r disease, based on clinical, laboratory, or imaging findings.

8 inography B-wave amplitudes, and qualitative imaging findings.

9 be enhanced by integrating both clinical and imaging findings.

10 0 PCPs on receiving and acting on incidental imaging findings.

11 slowly enlarging VT independent of any other imaging findings.

12 as developed to predict AVF outcome based on imaging findings.

13 and KSHV loads were assessed in relation to imaging findings.

14 ate both common and infrequent but important imaging findings.

15 D-19 infection, with an emphasis on thoracic imaging findings.

16 and histopathology were used to validate the imaging findings.

17 e on lymphoma and the associated spectrum of imaging findings.

18 content (P = 0.006), further supporting the imaging findings.

19 ed for 42-60 mo for evaluation of discrepant imaging findings.

20 and disability data, and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

21 nsplant using a combination of biomarker and imaging findings.

22 ribution of bound and unbound radioiodine to imaging findings.

23 osis in explanted tumors was correlated with imaging findings.

24 sis of osteoid osteoma based on clinical and imaging findings.

25 cal and histopathologic analyses to validate imaging findings.

26 s seen in nearly 40%, with little overlap in imaging findings.

27 ed, a rate similar to patients with positive imaging findings.

28 analyses for MPO and myeloid cells confirmed imaging findings.

29 ic regression controlling for severity of MR imaging findings.

30 nal pathology depends on the child's age and imaging findings.

31 rescence of MGd in CBD walls, confirming the imaging findings.

32 ot inferior to preprocedural cross-sectional imaging findings.

33 f oligometastatic disease is based solely on imaging findings.

34 thalmologic examination results, and retinal imaging findings.

35 ural and Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging findings.

36 en after accounting for APOE, validating our imaging findings.

37 so to obviate biopsy in cases with classical imaging findings.

38 and characteristic brain magnetic resonance imaging findings.

39 g loss, spasticity, and characteristic brain imaging findings.

40 fant with grossly abnormal clinical or brain imaging findings.

41 ty decline rate, and electroretinography and imaging findings.

42 which accounts for the observed symptoms and imaging findings.

43 ormed in 54 hips on the basis of clinical or imaging findings (24% of hips were completely asymptomat

44 ed lactate and/or pyruvate levels (7/7), and imaging findings (7/7), including calcification and abno

45 of two cohorts on the basis of clinical and imaging findings; 76.3% of the patients were included in

46 matory CNV based on the following multimodal imaging findings: a type 2 lesion with the "pitchfork si

47 The relationships among imaging findings, age, and sex were assessed with the t

48 main purpose of this article is to summarise imaging findings and clinical importance of congenital a

49 The relationship between imaging findings and clinical management was assessed wi

50 Comparisons of magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical variables were made betwee

51 er, there is significant discrepancy between imaging findings and clinically overt symptoms, raising

52 ogic reports were reviewed to confirm the MR imaging findings and for hormone receptors (estrogen and

53 Imaging findings and medical records were reviewed.

54 Associations between imaging findings and overall survival were determined by

55 luding radiologists, should be familiar with imaging findings and patient characteristics that may he

56 s to present the surgical anatomy and normal imaging findings and postoperative complications for the

57 eceive inappropriate follow-up of incidental imaging findings and present an opportunity for radiolog

58 dence for ILD (defined by the combination of imaging findings and pulmonary function testing decremen

59 Associations between MR imaging findings and surgery type were tested.

60 emonstrate excellent correlation between MEG imaging findings and the IAP for language lateralization

61 nally, we discuss the implications of recent imaging findings and their impact on future biomarker an

62 s between patients with false-negative MP MR imaging findings and those with correct prospective iden

63 Patient demographics, US and MR imaging findings, and clinical and histopathologic outco

64 ter adjustment for traditional risk factors, imaging findings, and early revascularization (adjusted

65 th FCD2, in six (46%) of 13 with negative MR imaging findings, and in only one control subject.

66 ale for imaging, approach to interpretation, imaging findings, and pitfalls.

67 ers and dementia in patients with CKD, brain imaging findings, and traditional and nontraditional ris

68 hics, diagnosis, visual acuity, clinical and imaging findings, and treatment given specifically for M

69 MR imaging findings are a stronger predictor of pathologic

70 Muscle magnetic resonance imaging findings are characteristic and should be consid

71 DT imaging findings are consistent with the known predomina

72 The baseline imaging findings are consistent with those found in pati

73 RCC in our case and the consequent atypical imaging findings are distinctly unusual.

74 al symptoms, time course of the disease, and imaging findings are multifaceted.

75 When characteristic imaging findings are present, the diagnosis is rarely du

76 However, the imaging findings are variable and may occur in other loc

77 gnitive impairment was associated with these imaging findings as well.

78 Purpose To document the imaging findings associated with congenital Zika virus i

79 ions will be described and compared with the imaging findings associated with congenital Zika virus i

80 in 45 HIV- and 11 HIV+ patients to identify imaging findings associated with refractory disease.

81 the groin in pediatric patients and the key imaging findings associated with them helps improve the

82 Imaging findings associated with these disorders, such a

83 spectrum should be included to assess brain imaging findings associated with typical aging.

84 erature review of its clinical presentation, imaging findings, associated conditions and treatment op

85 This case series examines the spectrum of imaging findings at chest radiography, US, CT, and MRI i

86 uent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of

87 There was a disagreement regarding imaging findings between CT and MRI in 21 of 74 (28%) pa

88 ions; moderately probable cases had specific imaging findings but other infections could not be ruled

89 anial aneurysms (UIAs) are common incidental imaging findings, but there are few data in patients wit

90 ot be ruled out; somewhat probable cases had imaging findings, but these were not reported in detail

91 4 male patients) was used to validate the MR imaging findings by assessing the amount of cell death.

92 Ultrasound and MR imaging findings can collectively delineate uterine morp

93 Although his presentation, imaging findings, cerebrospinal fluid investigation resu

94 Imaging findings, clinical management and outcome were e

95 Some imaging findings correlate with known histopathologic fi

96 MR imaging findings corresponding to the 2009 revised Inter

97 These imaging findings, coupled with clinical features consist

98 Imaging findings depend on numerous factors and range fr

99 This study aimed to report lymphatic imaging findings, determine the mechanism of chylothorax

100 e agents may be associated with clinical and imaging findings during treatment suggestive of progress

101 BEST1 mutations, imaging findings, electroretinography amplitudes, and im

102 thod to relate pathology to diffusion tensor imaging findings, elucidates the underlying mechanisms o

103 Imaging findings, epidemiological data, coexisting risk

104 is on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings (excluding DWI).

105 must understand expected treatment-specific imaging findings for each of the local-regional therapie

106 ic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging findings for future cardiovascular events in pat

107 In recent years, new imaging findings for multiple sclerosis have been descri

108 stems) were compared with multiparametric MR imaging findings for predicting AS candidates.

109 Recently we published the initial subset of imaging findings for specific regions in a cohort of ind

110 lectasis was identified as a reliable set of imaging findings for the diagnosis of anthracosis.

111 nce the onset of symptoms and signs, and the imaging findings; for this reason, it sometimes necessar

112 Clinical and multimodal imaging findings from 8 patients with paracentral acute

113 x) of (68)Ga-DOTATATE was correlated with MR imaging findings, histology, and semiquantitative SSTR2

114 dividuals showed variable magnetic resonance imaging findings; however, relative to healthy controls,

115 Architectural distortion was the imaging finding identified in all 36 abnormalities (100%

116 Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare imaging finding in children.

117 Tenosynovitis is an imaging finding in early RA, and its inclusion as a scor

118 The most striking imaging finding in that case was destruction of the sple

119 e diagnostic performance of CTPA vs other CT imaging findings in 100 patients with hematological mali

120 thus conducted a detailed analysis of the MR imaging findings in 45 HIV- and 11 HIV+ patients to iden

121 In this report, we present the imaging findings in a 3-month-old infant that presented

122 We report the initial and follow-up MR imaging findings in a 5year-old with refractory epilepsy

123 CASE REPORT: We present imaging findings in a case of portal annular pancreas in

124 We then correlated the imaging findings in a subset of HIV- subjects (n = 17) t

125 Our previous brain imaging findings in adult offspring in these high-risk f

126 To describe initial and serial multimodal imaging findings in AMN, with attention to choroidal vas

127 is review will describe the pathological and imaging findings in culprit lesions of patients with acu

128 -domain OCT is useful in identifying various imaging findings in DME.

129 reconstructed FMT signal correlated with MR imaging findings in intensity and spatial, transverse pr

130 retrospectively review clinical features and imaging findings in intraoperatively confirmed cases of

131 Radiologists should raise their awareness of imaging findings in intussusception and keep in their mi

132 idespread cognitive impairment and different imaging findings in lvPPA.

133 In this review, the imaging findings in multiple causes of large-bowel obstr

134 ents with suspected breast cancer and normal imaging findings in one breast (BI-RADS 1), whose cases

135 Purpose To report abdominal imaging findings in patients with coronavirus disease 20

136 This article describes the key imaging findings in pediatric groin injuries, placing sp

137 e functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging findings in relation to cerebrospinal fluid biom

138 among the most consistent large-scale brain imaging findings in schizophrenia.

139 The imaging findings in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

140 , will be discussed, while emphasizing their imaging findings in the clinical context and illustratin

141 our understanding of COPD resulting from the imaging findings in the COPDGene study.

142 B) and both IPF and the presence of abnormal imaging findings in the general population.

143 clinical interpretation of diffusion tensor imaging findings in the injured brain.

144 giography, which provided required excellent imaging findings in the terms of the number, size and lo

145 Based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in these patients, we selected addition

146 This review focuses on the imaging findings in three distinct clinical scenarios: a

147 be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic evaluation

148 Other abnormal imaging findings included anterolisthesis, osteophytic s

149 The imaging findings included gross enlargement of the left

150 We also report novel brain imaging findings including delayed myelination with whit

151 ographic images for the presence of abnormal imaging findings, including capsular adhesions at the fe

152 s computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings, including diffusion weighted images al

153 relevance, and a discussion of known related imaging findings, including existing radiogenomics data

154 Multimodal imaging findings, including fundus photography, fluoresc

155 ous complex (PEVAC) by describing multimodal imaging findings, including optical coherence tomography

156 These imaging findings indicate reduced structural integrity o

157 of cancer by extending whole-body diagnostic imaging findings into the surgical suite.

158 ect brain-wide structure and account for NF1 imaging findings is unknown.

159 Assessment of MR imaging findings led to a correct diagnosis of no breast

160 diagnosis of Fabry disease, certain cardiac imaging findings may be highly suggestive of the diagnos

161 Although not diagnostic, certain imaging findings may suggest a particular microbial caus

162 Among patients who demonstrate imaging findings meeting RANO criteria for progressive d

163 her etiologies must be eliminated, and chest imaging findings must be abnormal.

164 ular maculopathy, and to describe multimodal imaging findings never before described including optica

165 es, respiratory rate >22/min, abnormal chest imaging findings, O2 saturation lower than 90%, and aspa

166 Clinical characteristics, MR imaging findings (obtained 6 hours after IRE and before

167 TARP (CHOP-ROP alarm initiates imaging, and imaging finding of severe ROP initiates diagnostic exami

168 MR imaging findings of 29 patients with 43 HCAs were assess

169 CASE REPORT: We are presenting multimodal imaging findings of 4 cases of caudal regression syndrom

170 Findings were compared with imaging findings of 48 demographically similar healthy c

171 We present the imaging findings of a giant congenital pelvic AVM that w

172 This unique case presents unusual imaging findings of a rare dual abdominal emergency cond

173 We describe the clinical course and imaging findings of a similar AMN-like retinopathy after

174 pathology on explant or necrosis along with imaging findings of ablation after transarterial chemoem

175 is unique report adds, precious clinical and imaging findings of acute appendicitis coexisting with m

176 Signs and symptoms and laboratory and imaging findings of children who met definitional criter

177 to ascertain the utility of cross-sectional imaging findings of chronic pancreatitis for diagnosis a

178 view is to discuss and differentiate typical imaging findings of COVID-19 from those of other disease

179 considerable overlap in the cross-sectional imaging findings of cystic pancreatic lesions, and becau

180 que, normal imaging anatomy, and most common imaging findings of disorders of tendons, labrum, and li

181 Radiologists should be aware of imaging findings of interventricular septal aneurysm, be

182 Radiologists should be aware of imaging findings of interventricular septal aneurysm, be

183 The imaging findings of leiomyomatosis peritonealis dissemin

184 ed to pursue costly follow-up for incidental imaging findings of limited clinical importance.

185 embles the characteristic magnetic resonance imaging findings of linear perivascular enhancement in p

186 Imaging findings of MR lymphangiography and lymphoscinti

187 Unfamiliarity with imaging findings of paratesticular fibrous pseudotumor m

188 ide an up-to-date review of the clinical and imaging findings of pediatric MIS-C associated with COVI

189 l deviation in Parkinson's disease (PD), the imaging findings of Pisa syndrome in PD have not been pr

190 angiographic procedure are reflected in the imaging findings of the (99m)Tc-MAA hepatic perfusion st

191 stmenopausal women with breast cancer and MR imaging findings of the contralateral unaffected breast,

192 Radiologists need to be familiar with the imaging findings of the different disease entities and t

193 cribe and illustrate the most characteristic imaging findings of the disorder, some of which are incl

194 With the aim of illustrating the main imaging findings of this entity and reviewing its most r

195 In this imaging review, we highlight the imaging findings of this intriguing entity.

196 E REPORTS: We present ultrasonography and MR imaging findings of this rare anomaly in two cases.

197 uses, clinical presentation and particularly imaging findings of toxic leukoencephalopathy is critica

198 g lower limb weakness without any history or imaging findings of trauma or spinal canal abnormalities

199 rticle presents clinical data and diagnostic imaging findings of two newborn babies with chondrodyspl

200 tions in association with magnetic resonance imaging findings of vascular brain injury or cerebral at

201 This study sought to relate imaging findings on positron emission tomography (PET) t

202 on the basis of clinical or conventional MR imaging findings only.

203 d to have grossly abnormal clinical or brain imaging findings or both, including 4 infants with micro

204 e study had a histologic correlation with MR imaging findings or they were excluded.

205 but without clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings outside the optic nerves and 142 contro

206 d clinicopathologic information and baseline imaging findings outside the skeleton.

207 s reduced from 11.2 to 2.7 days for critical imaging findings (P < .001) and from 7.6 to 4.1 days for

208 < .001) and from 7.6 to 4.1 days for urgent imaging findings (P < .001) in the simulation compared w

209 is to illustrate and discuss the spectrum of imaging findings, particularly computed tomography (CT),

210 Two independent readers masked to other imaging findings performed a qualitative analysis on OCT

211 on of performance showed that the model with imaging findings performed significantly better than did

212 Although a distinct set of clinical exam and imaging findings permit recognition of this disease, mis

213 Each imaging finding, progesterone receptor (PR) and human ep

214 guing overlaps in biochemical, clinical, and imaging findings question the concept of distinct entiti

215 The imaging findings, radiation dose estimates, and image qu

216 Parallel human imaging findings relative to ELS also reveal enhanced am

217 authors summarize some of the most important imaging findings relevant to clinical practice in the pa

218 ostic 4-dimensional computerized tomographic imaging findings, resolution of imaging abnormalities, a

219 The patient's clinical symptoms and imaging findings responded to treatment with a high dose

220 fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, with imaging findings reviewed as part of the systematic chec

221 this condition should be considered when the imaging findings reviewed in this article are encountere

222 logy categories A-D) and normal conventional imaging findings (screening mammography with or without

223 Here we describe imaging findings secondary to a supralevator perianal ab

224 Of interest, expected imaging findings seen after radiation-based therapies (t

225 Sixty patients with normal cardiac MR imaging findings served as control subjects.

226 nt was a single encounter whose clinical and imaging findings showed longstanding inactive disease.

227 Correlation of the histologic and MR imaging findings showed that MR imaging could correctly

228 MR imaging findings significantly associated with whiplash

229 orted in association with a variety of brain imaging findings such as ischemic infarct, hemorrhage, a

230 MRI findings were evaluated considering the imaging findings such as mass effect, swelling, contrast

231 Our quantitative imaging findings suggest impairment in functional cerebr

232 diographic and/or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis, card

233 Patients with symptoms or conventional imaging findings suggestive of distant metastases or wit

234 oms versus in 11 patients (controls) with no imaging findings suggestive of pancreatic disease and no

235 familiarise the reader with the spectrum of imaging findings that are encountered at different stage

236 Identification of imaging findings that predict adverse cardiac events is

237 Of the 403 patients, 67 had MR imaging findings that were positive for acute appendicit

238 Given differences in expected posttreatment imaging findings, the current radiologic treatment respo

239 Because of the imaging findings, the patient was referred for surgery.

240 By comparing cognitive assessments to imaging findings, the presence of any imaging feature as

241 ent with prior functional magnetic resonance imaging findings, these results further intimate neurome

242 The addition of imaging findings to demographic and clinical variables i

243 have been too small to be able to correlate imaging findings to genetic and clinical data.

244 We used connectivity imaging findings to guide TMS targeting and compared the

245 ccount patient age, clinical parameters, and imaging findings to identify the likely etiology of a cy

246 data exist to definitively connect abnormal imaging findings to IPF, and genetic studies assessing e

247 of this approach to link magnetic resonance imaging findings to their histopathological origins.

248 n in patients requiring biopsy of suggestive imaging findings, to further evaluate its ability to dis

249 Cerebellar dysplasia with cysts (CDC) is an imaging finding typically seen in combination with cobbl

250 ed prostate cancer and negative conventional imaging findings underwent PET/CT with (11)C-acetate.

251 On the basis of the imaging findings, US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytol

252 The most common imaging finding was increased hepatic echogenicity on ul

253 on between clinical, serological markers and imaging findings was undertaken.

254 Stability of diffusion tensor imaging findings was verified by repeat scans 1-3 years

255 s by 2 experienced oncologists masked to PET imaging findings, was used as a reference standard.

256 Guided by these imaging findings, we undertook a focused postmortem inve

257 ative scoring of FMT correlated well with MR imaging findings (weighted kappa coefficient = 0.90).

258 rticularly useful in those cases in which MR imaging findings were abnormal but no epileptogenic lesi

259 Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings were abnormal in 10 of 22 patients (45%

260 The imaging findings were abnormal, and the patient underwen

261 characteristic TTD clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings were absent.

262 ce similarity coefficients (DSC) between the imaging findings were calculated.

263 Positive imaging findings were classified into 3 categories: loca

264 Imaging findings were compared with endoscopic findings,

265 Biomicroscopic and multimodal imaging findings were compared with the histopathology o

266 Presentation and imaging findings were compared, and outcomes were evalua

267 The initial diagnostic imaging findings were concordant with the biopsy results

268 Consenting patients underwent surgery and imaging findings were confirmed histologically.

269 Imaging findings were correlated to histology with marke

270 Imaging findings were correlated with clinical data.

271 Interobserver agreement was determined; imaging findings were correlated with intraoperative fin

272 assessment was performed with MR imaging; MR imaging findings were correlated with radiographs.

273 Diffusion-tensor imaging findings were correlated with symptom severity,

274 MR imaging findings were corroborated with intravital fluor

275 Disease course, laboratory results, and imaging findings were extracted.

276 The imaging findings were found to be specific for bilateral

277 The imaging findings were found to be specific for Kimura di

278 The imaging findings were found to be specific for leiomyoma

279 Those diagnosed with MacTel by clinical and imaging findings were included.

280 Almost half of the abnormal imaging findings were missed on STIR-hiBW compared with

281 ging-guided biopsy (no standard biopsy if MR imaging findings were negative) led to the highest NHB g

282 y guided MR biopsy (no standard biopsy if MR imaging findings were negative) was the most cost-effect

283 sy, with a standard biopsy performed when MR imaging findings were negative.

284 geted biopsy, with no biopsy performed if MR imaging findings were negative; and (c) diagnostic MR im

285 Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings were normal.

286 All imaging findings were rated blinded to clinical details.

287 Abnormal imaging findings were recorded.

288 Anatomic correlates for multimodal imaging findings were then defined.

289 Critically, eMSOT imaging findings were validated directly by histopatholo

290 gher frequency of potential violence-related imaging findings when compared with age- and sex-matched

291 nds on the presence of pain and radiographic imaging findings, which generally do not present until l

292 rging condition and the expected multi-organ imaging findings will aid radiologists in the assessment

293 optimize the imaging protocols and important imaging findings will be discussed.

294 ladder, further work is planned to correlate imaging findings with histopathology in patients with hi

295 ubjects and to correlated magnetic resonance imaging findings with histopathology.

296 d in matching gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging findings with pathologic findings.

297 e clinical variables including serum LDH and imaging findings with progression-free and overall survi

298 miliar with the complex anatomy and expected imaging findings with such examinations.

299 ARIA consist of a spectrum of imaging findings with variable clinical correlates, and

300 ) images in 37 patients (13 with negative MR imaging findings) with histologically proven FCD2 of the