戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nicity, disease duration, and treatment with immunosuppressive agents).
2 ycophenolic acid (MPA), is widely used as an immunosuppressive agent.
3 ecause FTY720 is generally regarded as a new immunosuppressive agent.
4 e to rapamycin (RAPA), a "tolerance-sparing" immunosuppressive agent.
5 sage to >40 mg/day and/or the addition of an immunosuppressive agent.
6 its and to have filled a prescription for an immunosuppressive agent.
7 many studies currently are ongoing with this immunosuppressive agent.
8 ssive activity and could be beneficial as an immunosuppressive agent.
9 ces the total cumulative dose of this potent immunosuppressive agent.
10      Thus WY14,643, a fibrate, is a profound immunosuppressive agent.
11 tabolite of leflunomide, a recently approved immunosuppressive agent.
12  in combination with the use of conventional immunosuppressive agent.
13 ids, appears to be the single most effective immunosuppressive agent.
14 h-dose corticosteroids plus a broad-spectrum immunosuppressive agent.
15 ng monoclonal antibody being developed as an immunosuppressive agent.
16 l or for the design of an original series of immunosuppressive agent.
17 nabled disease control and tapering of other immunosuppressive agents.
18  cells under stress following treatment with immunosuppressive agents.
19 s (DSA-PCs) appear resistant to conventional immunosuppressive agents.
20 reased with the increased potency of current immunosuppressive agents.
21 rovided new targets for developing potential immunosuppressive agents.
22 ns and further evaluation of action-specific immunosuppressive agents.
23 y T cells, and targets of current and future immunosuppressive agents.
24 ulation and are suppressed by currently used immunosuppressive agents.
25 ssary and potentially harmful treatment with immunosuppressive agents.
26 m antimalarial agents to corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents.
27 uggest that they may have potential as novel immunosuppressive agents.
28 ia) in 528 kidney recipients using different immunosuppressive agents.
29 salicylate and corticosteroids, and on novel immunosuppressive agents.
30 -phosphate (S1P) receptor agonists are novel immunosuppressive agents.
31 idely in the clinic as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents.
32 closely linked with the development of newer immunosuppressive agents.
33 dequately to a number of currently available immunosuppressive agents.
34 ly recognized, and treated with conventional immunosuppressive agents.
35 tary approach to conventional treatment with immunosuppressive agents.
36 ment includes immunoglobulin replacement and immunosuppressive agents.
37 ation with traditional anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents.
38 hniques and the development of more powerful immunosuppressive agents.
39 litis is managed with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive agents.
40 ed, however, that these disorders respond to immunosuppressive agents.
41 n (mTOR) such as rapamycin have been used as immunosuppressive agents.
42 tumor growth and are influenced by different immunosuppressive agents.
43 of renal function if treated with additional immunosuppressive agents.
44 e exposed to higher portal concentrations of immunosuppressive agents.
45 ifficult to control with currently available immunosuppressive agents.
46 es reproducibly induced or inhibited by both immunosuppressive agents.
47  MHC mismatch without the long-term need for immunosuppressive agents.
48 ertensive medications and the institution of immunosuppressive agents.
49 TLs retain their function in the presence of immunosuppressive agents.
50 tiglaucoma medications, and chemotherapeutic/immunosuppressive agents.
51 nologic rejection, despite the use of potent immunosuppressive agents.
52 effectiveness of the drug and possible newer immunosuppressive agents.
53 tructural regions of HLA molecules are novel immunosuppressive agents.
54 iviral therapy and reduced administration of immunosuppressive agents.
55  such as ruxolitinib, have been developed as immunosuppressive agents.
56 plantation (LTx), including the influence of immunosuppressive agents.
57  the safety profile of vismodegib with other immunosuppressive agents.
58  managed with oral corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents.
59 rally modest efficacy, and can interact with immunosuppressive agents.
60 e interval [CI], 89.7%-95.9%) were receiving immunosuppressive agents.
61 erved for NMSC and NHL in those treated with immunosuppressive agents.
62 which need to be recognized and managed with immunosuppressive agents.
63 ibody+ sera (in vitro ADCC), with or without immunosuppressive agents.
64 ing systemic corticosteroids and second-line immunosuppressive agents.
65 spitalization, she was treated with multiple immunosuppressive agents.
66  tapering steroids and/or adding nonbiologic immunosuppressive agents.
67 l donor HLA matching and use of prophylactic immunosuppressive agents.
68 ypically caused by cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunosuppressive agents.
69 novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for immunosuppressive agents.
70 g allospecific regulatory effects of diverse immunosuppressive agents.
71                           As with many other immunosuppressive agents, absorption and metabolism vary
72                                   With newer immunosuppressive agents, acute rejection and graft loss
73                                The effect of immunosuppressive agents added in vitro on normal PBL st
74           Although interest surrounds use of immunosuppressive agents added to standard therapy, seve
75 ineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the first-line immunosuppressive agents administered after liver transp
76 without ESRD and without need for additional immunosuppressive agents after TLI was 19% (4 of 21).
77 s recipients of DA liver allografts received immunosuppressive agents after transplantation.
78                                          New immunosuppressive agents allow alterations in drug regim
79                        Recent development in immunosuppressive agents and advances in cardiac surgery
80  potent synergistic interactions between the immunosuppressive agents and antifungal drugs against ma
81  have been developed as antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive agents and are currently undergoing te
82 as been attributed to a novel combination of immunosuppressive agents and avoidance of steroids; howe
83 ncreasingly important with widespread use of immunosuppressive agents and broad-spectrum antibiotics.
84 standard dose glucocorticoids and additional immunosuppressive agents and conversely steroid-sparing
85 Immunosuppression involves the nature of the immunosuppressive agents and individual differences in p
86 osus (SLE) which necessitates treatment with immunosuppressive agents and platelet transfusions.
87 -specific treatments are available, although immunosuppressive agents and terminal complement pathway
88 t physicians, given the increasing number of immunosuppressive agents and the balance between rejecti
89 radox between the antifungal activity of the immunosuppressive agents and the occurrence of fungal in
90 the data available on the risk of individual immunosuppressive agents and their ability to prevent dn
91 isk of cardiovascular events associated with immunosuppressive agents and their combinations.
92 s had been treated with at least 3 different immunosuppressive agents, and 5 patients had previously
93 gs are widely used as antileukemic drugs and immunosuppressive agents, and 6-thioguanosine triphospha
94 rrently being treated using corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and biotherapies.
95 he majority of IBD patients, those receiving immunosuppressive agents, and especially those receiving
96 erapy consists of high-dose corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and intravenous immune globuli
97                         Medications included immunosuppressive agents, antibiotics, and insulin.
98                       Strategies such as new immunosuppressive agents, antileukemia monoclonal antibo
99                              Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive agent approved for prophylaxis of acut
100                                              Immunosuppressive agents are commonly used in the preven
101                                  A number of immunosuppressive agents are currently available for the
102 ase series provides compelling evidence that immunosuppressive agents are effective at providing long
103  responses such as with anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive agents are either ineffective, as the
104              In almost all centers, multiple immunosuppressive agents are given in large doses after
105                                       As new immunosuppressive agents are introduced to the market, c
106 condary infection who are being treated with immunosuppressive agents are most at risk for poor outco
107                                              Immunosuppressive agents are the mainstay of treatment,
108 ctions with other costimulatory pathways and immunosuppressive agents are unclear.
109 e, which are well-established anticancer and immunosuppressive agents, are extensively metabolized by
110               The specific role of different immunosuppressive agents as risk factors for BK virus ne
111 e informed that taking pyridostigmine and/or immunosuppressive agents as well as smoking cessation mi
112 een highly active antiretroviral therapy and immunosuppressive agents as well as the potential for hi
113                       Local expression of an immunosuppressive agent at the site of islet transplant
114  or later were analyzed to determine whether immunosuppressive agents at the time of first transplant
115 teroids or therapy with corticosteroids plus immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide
116                                          The immunosuppressive agents, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine
117 hibitors are imperfect long-term maintenance immunosuppressive agents because of frequent and irrever
118 glucocorticoids represent modern and classic immunosuppressive agents being used clinically.
119 thus, high-dose cyclophosphamide is a potent immunosuppressive agent, but nonmyeloablative.
120 red an entity nonresponsive to prednisone or immunosuppressive agents, but it has become apparent ove
121 phritis seems to be a reduction or change of immunosuppressive agents, but this may increase the inhe
122 cocorticoids are potent antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive agents by virtue of their repression o
123 with corticosteroids and other antirheumatic/immunosuppressive agents can preserve hearing and vestib
124                               Treatment with immunosuppressive agents can reduce the risk of ocular c
125 mbination therapy; and (4) no treatment with immunosuppressive agents (control group).
126 sulfan, cyclophosphamide, or fludarabine and immunosuppressive agents CTLA4-Ig + anti-CD40L or anti-(
127                    Initial pretreatment with immunosuppressive agent cyclophosphamide reduces the per
128 ited by treatment of infected cells with the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A (CsA), HIV-1 infec
129 l of global ischaemia and the effects of the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A (CsA).
130 w, and treatment with a 21-day course of the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A (CsA).
131                                          The immunosuppressive agents cyclosporin A (CsA) and tacroli
132 tle increase was seen in response to another immunosuppressive agent, cyclosporin A.
133 marrow transplantation, and therapy with the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine A.
134                      The currently available immunosuppressive agents cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and
135 peutic modulation of psoriasis with targeted immunosuppressive agents defines inflammatory genes asso
136               Conversely, treatment with the immunosuppressive agent dexamethasone abolished dissemin
137  As LPL may be a target of the commonly used immunosuppressive agent dexamethasone, full elucidation
138 he one transplant recipient not treated with immunosuppressive agents died with anemia and acute vire
139                                              Immunosuppressive agents differ in their ability to cont
140     These findings demonstrate that specific immunosuppressive agents differentially alter the cutane
141                        However, conventional immunosuppressive agents do not control the vigorous cel
142 rednisone (</=10 mg/day), antimalarials, and immunosuppressive agents; dosages were required to be st
143 nd the use of more focused and less globally immunosuppressive agents during established rejections m
144 ich target human T cells, are widely used as immunosuppressive agents during treatment of kidney allo
145                                       Of the immunosuppressive agents (e.g., cyclosporine, FK-506, my
146 and pyrimidine synthesis, is an experimental immunosuppressive agent effective in the prevention/cont
147 osis appears to be influenced by the type of immunosuppressive agent employed.
148 ed cancer risk is associated with the use of immunosuppressive agents, especially calcineurin inhibit
149                                      Certain immunosuppressive agents, especially glucocorticoids and
150 ry experiments reveal that the commonly used immunosuppressive agent FK-506 can inhibit TRPC6 activit
151 and FKBP12.6-deficient mutant T cells to the immunosuppressive agent FK506.
152 city of ethonafide might make it a promising immunosuppressive agent for clinical use in treating MS
153 at ILT3-Fc acts through BCL6 and is a potent immunosuppressive agent for reversing the onset of allo-
154                             RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory
155    The authors sought to find an alternative immunosuppressive agent for this patient.
156 rat islets to various concentrations of five immunosuppressive agents for 48 and 24 hr, respectively,
157 tionale-based selection (and combination) of immunosuppressive agents for clinical application.
158 ft recipients generally need to take several immunosuppressive agents for life.
159          Steroids are the most commonly used immunosuppressive agents for postoperative management an
160 ipients who had previously been treated with immunosuppressive agents for primary renal disease.
161 r plasma exchange, often in combination with immunosuppressive agents, for acquired TTP.
162 ce suggests the therapeutic potential of the immunosuppressive agent FTY720 (fingolimod) in hepatocel
163  (S1P) and by a phosphoryl metabolite of the immunosuppressive agent FTY720.
164 hosphamide was ineffective, but noncytotoxic immunosuppressive agents generally produced a good respo
165 ccination was 59% (61/104) in patients using immunosuppressive agents (groups 1-3) vs 81% (30/37) in
166 ng MTX monotherapy, those receiving biologic immunosuppressive agents had neither an increased nor de
167 mmune disease requiring systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents, had no active non-infectious p
168       The treatment of IBM with conventional immunosuppressive agents has been disappointing.
169                         The discovery of new immunosuppressive agents has enhanced short-term graft s
170                                              Immunosuppressive agents have become the standard of the
171                         In addition, current immunosuppressive agents have narrow therapeutic windows
172 ule inhibitors of these kinases as potential immunosuppressive agents have not been identified.
173 the treatment of choice for IgG4-RHP because immunosuppressive agents have shown variable efficacy in
174 (TAC) and sirolimus (SRL), two commonly used immunosuppressive agents, have demonstrated contrasting
175 ors against conversion to GMG were receiving immunosuppressive agents (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.97) and
176         Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in orthotopic liver transplantat
177 phenolate mofetil (MMF) has become a popular immunosuppressive agent in pediatric renal transplantati
178 izumab), which has proven to be a successful immunosuppressive agent in solid organ and bone marrow t
179  proliferation and is well established as an immunosuppressive agent in solid organ transplantation.
180     Anti-CD3 immunotoxins are broad-spectrum immunosuppressive agents in a wide range of organ transp
181 rom treatment with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents in addition to plasma exchange
182 als evaluating the efficacy of antirheumatic/immunosuppressive agents in AVCD.
183 ons also associated with lack of response to immunosuppressive agents in children with steroid-resist
184 morrhagic Retinal Vasculitis with aggressive immunosuppressive agents in collaboration with rheumatol
185 apse; or requirements for steroids and other immunosuppressive agents in Crohn disease or ulcerative
186                                              Immunosuppressive agents in current use are nonspecific.
187 fficacious addition to therapy with standard immunosuppressive agents in patients with refractory chi
188 ew summarizes current patterns in the use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with uveitis.
189 led trials have failed to support the use of immunosuppressive agents in pediatric IgA nephropathy an
190 ients with uveitis, use of noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agents in selected patients with uveit
191 limus (FK506) is one of the most widely used immunosuppressive agents in SOT recipients, and its immu
192 he large increase in the number of available immunosuppressive agents in the past few years mandates
193 gh concurrent administration of conventional immunosuppressive agents including steroids and calcineu
194 ted over the course of 2 years with numerous immunosuppressive agents, including tumor necrosis facto
195                                The choice of immunosuppressive agent is complex, and depends on the c
196  in the development of PVN, judicious use of immunosuppressive agents is indicated to minimize the oc
197 g matter of study, a direct association with immunosuppressive agents is not yet proven.
198            Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent (IS) which is widely prescribed
199                             FTY720, a potent immunosuppressive agent, is phosphorylated in vivo into
200 ical characteristics, drug used (second-line immunosuppressive agent [ISA] or biologicals), and drug
201 teroid treatment have shown good response to immunosuppressive agents known to be effective for artic
202 , 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (3-HAA), and the immunosuppressive agent, L-kynurenine (KYN).
203  were closely monitored for trough levels of immunosuppressive agents, laboratory values, and potenti
204 nesis, as shown by successful treatment with immunosuppressive agents, leading to transfusion indepen
205 reviously demonstrated that the experimental immunosuppressive agent leflunomide inhibits production
206 ression of innate and adaptive immunities by immunosuppressive agents limits immunological defense, i
207                       It was determined that immunosuppressive agents may be protective.
208 ulatory diseases such as psoriasis, targeted immunosuppressive agents may confer risks of both enhanc
209 oids may further increase damage, but use of immunosuppressive agents may protect against disease dam
210                    Although the use of other immunosuppressive agents may reduce the rate of reintrod
211 rolimus, a novel proliferation inhibitor and immunosuppressive agent, may suppress cardiac-allograft
212 sphate (MZP) is the active metabolite of the immunosuppressive agent mizoribine and a potent inhibito
213 Here, we demonstrate that, in the absence of immunosuppressive agents, monotherapy with clinical-grad
214                                              Immunosuppressive agents must not only be effective in i
215                                          The immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate is used extensivel
216 ding NTZ duration >/=2 years (n = 13), prior immunosuppressive agents (n = 8), and reported anti-JC v
217 e has produced an ideal antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive agent, namely glucocorticoids, and it
218 nocompromised hosts, with discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents necessary to prevent morbidity.
219 The renal function and degree of exposure to immunosuppressive agents of patients shedding polyomavir
220          The addition of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents often allows corticosteroid tap
221 xtensive systemic illness and treatment with immunosuppressive agents often require patients with rhe
222 orticosteroids, antiplatelet drugs and other immunosuppressive agents often used in combination with
223             This study reports the effect of immunosuppressive agents on antibody-mediated NK cell ac
224 id organ allografts; however, the effects of immunosuppressive agents on NK cells are not clearly est
225       Unlike naive T cells, the influence of immunosuppressive agents on the de novo generation of me
226                            The impact of new immunosuppressive agents on the incidence of RLN remains
227 5% CI 0.3-2.0; and with biologics plus other immunosuppressive agents, OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-2.2).
228 e might be used alone or in combination with immunosuppressive agents, or as salvage therapy for pati
229 but many patients do not tolerate first-line immunosuppressive agents, or experience ongoing relapses
230 risk may be due to preexisting risk factors, immunosuppressive agents, or older age.
231 one of the study participants were receiving immunosuppressive agents other than low-dose steroids an
232                                    Cytotoxic immunosuppressive agents other than MTX (azathioprine, c
233 e adhesion could be used in conjunction with immunosuppressive agents, potentially leading to safer a
234                                          The immunosuppressive agent, rapamycin, induces a prompt act
235 hic data; transplant date, type, and source; immunosuppressive agents received at diagnosis; and type
236 roid pulse therapy followed by PSL 45 mg and immunosuppressive agent resulted in a resolution of his
237 ts were treated with immunomodulators and/or immunosuppressive agents, resulting in temporary remissi
238                                     Although immunosuppressive agents, rituximab, autologous cytotoxi
239 ent of the macrocyclic domain present in the immunosuppressive agent sanglifehrin A.
240                                   The potent immunosuppressive agent (-)-sanglifehrin A (5), initiall
241 ctive of TF, including previous transplants, immunosuppressive agent selection, and almost all recipi
242 monotherapy as the reference group, biologic immunosuppressive agents showed neither protective nor d
243                                       Use of immunosuppressive agents significantly reduces ocular co
244                                          The immunosuppressive agent sirolimus exerts an antiprolifer
245 l, followed by lower dose prednisone plus an immunosuppressive agent such as azathioprine or methotre
246                               Although newer immunosuppressive agents, such as mTOR (mammalian target
247 ; thus, the incorporation of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, may provide
248     Relatively limited experience with other immunosuppressive agents, such as tacrolimus, has been r
249  remission, or receiving the same associated immunosuppressive agents, superiority of PTCY over ATG w
250 y in conjunction with the most commonly used immunosuppressive agents tacrolimus and mycophenolate, a
251                                              Immunosuppressive agents taken by pregnant organ transpl
252                              Whereas all the immunosuppressive agents tested inhibited the expansion
253 neurin inhibition, ISATX247 is a more potent immunosuppressive agent than cyclosporine in this nonhum
254   Radiation is generally considered to be an immunosuppressive agent that acts by killing radiosensit
255 gs suggest that Dp44mT may serve as a potent immunosuppressive agent that could complicate its use as
256                         A safe and effective immunosuppressive agent that does not predispose to vira
257         Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a well-known immunosuppressive agent that gained considerable importa
258                              RAD is a potent immunosuppressive agent that has been shown to be effect
259 Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a potentially immunosuppressive agent that has been suggested to act a
260  ethyl]-1,3-propanediol hydrochloride) is an immunosuppressive agent that inhibits allograft rejectio
261                              SRL is a potent immunosuppressive agent that inhibits SMC proliferation
262 CR signaling, has long been recognized as an immunosuppressive agent that inhibits T cell receptor ac
263                       Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent that provides higher freedom fro
264 nalog DCB-3503 is a potential anticancer and immunosuppressive agent that suppresses the translation
265 duals currently requires potent, nonspecific immunosuppressive agents that are neither completely suc
266                   Glucocorticoids are potent immunosuppressive agents that block upstream signaling e
267    Solid organ transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive agents that make them more susceptible
268 e anti-non gal antibody barrier will require immunosuppressive agents that preferentially inhibit thi
269 erance is giving rise to a new generation of immunosuppressive agents, that can exploit these mechani
270 on of a soluble Gal glycoconjugate and other immunosuppressive agents, the survival of pig hearts in
271 dly important class of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents, their actions in dendritic cel
272                Widely used as anticancer and immunosuppressive agents, thiopurines have narrow therap
273 ipient age, donor age, Child-Pugh class, and immunosuppressive agent to be associated with acute reje
274    Patients requiring a second-line systemic immunosuppressive agent to control their PSII were treat
275            The development of more selective immunosuppressive agents to mitigate transplant rejectio
276 on is incomplete or while they are receiving immunosuppressive agents to prevent or treat graft-versu
277 on to the concomitant and alternative use of immunosuppressive agents to steroid therapy, disease rem
278 mits is recommended, and the contribution of immunosuppressive agents to the development of PTDM is a
279 ted against human T lymphocytes, is a potent immunosuppressive agent used to reverse and more recentl
280                                          The immunosuppressive agents used are nonspecific and have s
281 ed that autoimmunity was not resolved by the immunosuppressive agents used.
282                                 Postgrafting immunosuppressive agent was cyclosporine or tacrolimus a
283                 Given the full chimerism, no immunosuppressive agent was prescribed except a short (2
284 as use of oral glucocorticoids and cytotoxic immunosuppressive agents was associated with significant
285                    However concurrent use of immunosuppressive agents was prohibited in most CAR-T tr
286 temic corticosteroid and >/=1 other systemic immunosuppressive agent were enrolled from January 2007
287 ystemic corticosteroids and at least 1 other immunosuppressive agent were enrolled from January 2007
288 long-term safety for this approach, when the immunosuppressive agents were antimetabolites or calcine
289                  Moreover, mice treated with immunosuppressive agents were prone to more severe and f
290         No interactions with any concomitant immunosuppressive agents were reported.
291                                              Immunosuppressive agents were required in 11 patients (8
292 th active SLE that was resistant to standard immunosuppressive agents were treated with B cell deplet
293 ithout any autoimmune disease, not receiving immunosuppressive agents were used as controls.
294                                     No other immunosuppressive agents were used.
295 of patients without alterations responded to immunosuppressive agents), whereas clinical features, ag
296 tanding of the interactions between Treg and immunosuppressive agents will be valuable to the effecti
297                              Rapamycin is an immunosuppressive agent with antiproliferative propertie
298 porphyrin, and butylated hydroxytoluene), an immunosuppressive agent with antivascular endothelial gr
299 3 are a family of potent macrocyclic polyene immunosuppressive agents with a novel mode of action.
300 ceeding to Tier 2, which comprises a host of immunosuppressive agents with relatively lower response

 
Page Top