ライフサイエンスコーパス: incisional hernia

1 oing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for incisional hernia.

2 as been proposed in patients at high risk of incisional hernia.

3 or higher have an increased risk to develop incisional hernia.

4 ransverse and craniocaudal dimensions of the incisional hernia.

5 rnia (DASH) is accurate for the diagnosis of incisional hernia.

6 l anastomotic stenosis, marginal ulceration, incisional hernia.

7 ll patients undergoing laparotomy develop an incisional hernia.

8 e an independent factor for recurrence of an incisional hernia.

9 tric bypass was the reduction in the rate of incisional hernia.

10 was to quantify the risk of incarceration of incisional hernias.

11 A majority of the defects (68%) were incisional hernias.

12 the retromuscular space prevented stoma site incisional hernias.

13 ut also decreases the long-term incidence of incisional hernias.

14 ed to reinforce the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

15 midline laparotomy incisions developed into incisional hernias.

16 of management apply equally to inguinal and incisional hernias.

17 ove outcomes in the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

18 latation, late small bowel obstructions, and incisional hernias.

19 xperienced long-term complications including incisional hernia (1) and anejaculation (3).

20 ortions of patients in the step-up group had incisional hernias (23% vs 53%; P = .004), pancreatic ex

21 cations such as infection (10.5 vs 1.3%) and incisional hernia (7.9 vs 0%) were more common after ope

22 outcome measure was radiological stoma site incisional hernia after 12 months.

23 Patients suffering from an incisional hernia after abdominal surgery have an impair

24 Incisional hernia after TL mirrors the epidemiology and

25 The incidence of incisional hernias after abdominal aortic aneurysm repai

26 There were two donor complications: one incisional hernia and one ileus.

27 has rare but relevant complications, namely incisional hernias and neuralgia at the trocar sites, wh

28 lymer significantly lowered the incidence of incisional hernias and the recurrence rate after repair.

29 steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kid

30 10, including three internal hernias, three incisional hernias, and four nonincisional ventral herni

31 While adhesions and incisional hernias are common and well recognized, other

32 The cumulative incidence of incisional hernias at 2-year follow-up after conventiona

33 The primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernias at 2-year follow-up.

34 Patients with incisional hernia benefit substantially from surgery con

35 terventions; colonic ischemia, bleeding, and incisional hernias caused 30%, 22%, and 22% of OSR reint

36 -LDN was associated with a higher rate of an incisional hernia compared with all other modalities (P

37 Incisional hernias complicate 11% of abdominal wall clos

38 r CNF (18% vs 45%; P = 0.002), mainly due to incisional hernia corrections (3% vs 14%; P = 0.047).

39 sk of surgical reintervention, mainly due to incisional hernia corrections.

40 The estimated "freedom of incisional hernia" curves (Kaplan-Meier estimate) were s

41 he "hernia-treatment" experiments, recurrent incisional hernias developed in 86% of control-rod incis

42 In the "hernia-prevention" experiments, incisional hernias developed in 90% of untreated incisio

43 cluding SSIs, wound healing, dehiscence, and incisional hernia development, were monitored at 1 month

44 recovery at 3 weeks after repair of midline incisional hernias does not differ between LR and OR, bu

45 and effectively prevents the development of incisional hernia during 2 years, with an additional mea

46 studies show that 1 in 3 patients develop an incisional hernia, for which half of the patients receiv

47 toperative day (POD) 7, and the incidence of incisional hernia formation was determined on POD 28.

48 A rat model of chronic incisional hernia formation was used.

49 induce early biomechanical wound failure and incisional hernia formation.

50 ening the follow-up for patients at risk for incisional hernia (IH) after trauma laparotomy (TL), cou

51 c risk factors independently associated with incisional hernia (IH) and demonstrate the feasibility o

52 Incisional hernia (IH) remains a common, highly morbid,

53 tion for a complication or open conversion), incisional hernia in 5 patients (1.8%), and anastomotic

54 P, conversion in 62.2%, surgically repair of incisional hernias in 21% after LDP, or an average 2.3 d

55 the abdominal wall is strengthened to reduce incisional hernia incidence.

56 Incisional hernia is one of the most frequent postoperat

57 on abdominal wall function in patients with incisional hernia is sparse.

58 Incisional hernia is the most frequent surgical complica

59 e usefulness of DASH for characterization of incisional hernia is unknown.

60 Prosthetic reinforcement of critically sized incisional hernias is necessary to decrease hernia recur

61 Patients with an incisional hernia larger than 3 cm and smaller than 15 c

62 Among 30,998 patients with an incisional hernia (mean age 58.1 +/- 15.9 years; 52.7% f

63 36, 9%), bacterial infections (n = 49, 12%), incisional hernia (n = 22, 6%), pleural effusion requiri

64 5 stomal stenoses, 3 bowel obstructions, 26 incisional hernias (nonlaparoscopic), and 1 pulmonary em

65 One mucosal perforation and one incisional hernia occurred in the open group.

66 : Patients from 7 centers with a midline incisional hernia of a maximum width of 10 cm were rando

67 Compared with laparoscopic IPOM incisional hernia operation, the MILOS repair is associa

68 Propensity score matching of incisional hernia operations comparing the results of th

69 Six hundred fifteen MILOS incisional hernia operations were included.

70 was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who di

71 espectively), wound complications (abdominal incisional hernia or infusion port dehiscence/inflammati

72 ormed on a second group of rats with chronic incisional hernias or acute anterior abdominal wall myof

73 Three-year incisional hernia rates were 13.2% and 39.6%, respective

74 Incisional hernia rates were also significantly lower in

75 Postoperative incisional hernia rates were expectedly higher in open (

76 ts in highly favorable outcomes with reduced incisional hernia rates.

77 f 10,822 Washington state patients underwent incisional hernia repair (mean age 58.7 +/- 15.6, 64% fe

78 However, rates of emergent incisional hernia repair among older men rose significan

79 : Laparoscopic and open techniques for incisional hernia repair are recognized treatment option

80 These increasing rates of emergent incisional hernia repair are troublesome owing to the si

81 re primary umbilical/epigastric (umb/epi) or incisional hernia repair from a regional area of 2 milli

82 moking and morbid obesity before ventral and incisional hernia repair improves outcomes, as many as 2

83 Incisional hernia repair is associated with high cumulat

84 months after primary umbilical/epigastric or incisional hernia repair underestimated overall risk of

85 Incidence of incisional hernia repair was higher after open AAA repai

86 Rates of emergent incisional hernia repair were high but relatively stable

87 residents assigned ICD9 procedure codes for incisional hernia repair with or without synthetic mater

88 n 5 patients underwent another parastomal or incisional hernia repair within 5 years of surgery.

89 nderwent at least one subsequent reoperative incisional hernia repair within the first 5 years after

90 ry bypass, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair) between 2014 and 2018.

91 nd reoperation for recurrence (parastomal or incisional hernia repair) up to 5 years after surgery.

92 Of patients undergoing incisional hernia repair, 12.3% underwent at least one s

93 stay, 1-year readmission, repeat AAA repair, incisional hernia repair, and lower extremity amputation

94 ) and major surgical procedures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bar

95 outcome measure was the rate of reoperative incisional hernia repair, length of hospitalization, and

96 After umb/epi and incisional hernia repair, the cumulative risks of reoper

97 zation among patients undergoing ventral and incisional hernia repair.

98 assessing surgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia repair.

99 Laparoscopic or open ventral incisional hernia repair.

100 patients with umb/epi and 256 patients with incisional hernia repair.

101 rotomy wound failure rate observed following incisional hernia repair.

102 ed an additional surgical procedure: midline incisional hernia, repair ureteral fistula, and repair e

103 tionwide cohort study including all elective incisional hernia repairs in Denmark from January 1, 200

104 bdominal wall closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional hernia repairs in the United States each year

105 The use of synthetic mesh in incisional hernia repairs increased from 34.2% in 1987 t

106 ring incisional herniation and its effect on incisional hernia repairs.

107 AWR for incisional hernia specifically improved long-term abdomi

108 rgical risk (pulmonary embolus, leak, death, incisional hernia) than in other patients who underwent

109 To prevent stoma site incisional hernias, the placement of a synthetic mesh du

110 study of 18 consecutive patients with large incisional hernia undergoing AWR with linea alba restora

111 ws minimally invasive transhernial repair of incisional hernias using large retromuscular/preperitone

112 reduce the high incidence of abdominal wall incisional hernias using sustained release growth factor

113 The rate of stoma site incisional hernia was 17.9% (n = 7) in the conventional

114 inth Revision or Tenth Revision diagnosis of incisional hernia was conducted from 2010 to 2017 in 15

115 A rat model of chronic incisional hernia was used.

116 A total of 109 adults with incisional hernia were enrolled between July 1, 2010, an

117 In a second group, incisional hernias were repaired with either bFGF or con

118 imilar between groups except for the rate of incisional hernia, which was significantly greater after

119 ven patients underwent repair of inguinal or incisional hernias with no mortality.

120 ehiscence, impaired healing, lymphocele, and incisional hernia) with the use of these agents.