コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, or urinary incontinence.
2 ng 381 women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence.
3 hy, dysarthria, as well as urinary and bowel incontinence.
4 lling refractory episodes of urgency urinary incontinence.
5 d to new treatments for diseases like faecal incontinence.
6 this tone leads to disorders such as faecal incontinence.
7 ad the skills to manage patients with faecal incontinence.
8 PTNS) is a new ambulatory therapy for faecal incontinence.
9 ary frequency, urgency, and at times urinary incontinence.
10 ation in the treatment of adults with faecal incontinence.
11 electrical stimulation in adults with faecal incontinence.
12 incter muscle as a method for treating fecal incontinence.
13 phenotypes in defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence.
14 ever, this is associated with a high rate of incontinence.
15 sing men with the symptoms of urgency and/or incontinence.
16 Some patients reported symptoms of fecal incontinence.
17 ce regarding the efficacy of PTNS in urinary incontinence.
18 dification can lessen urgency, nocturia, and incontinence.
19 ogic surgery, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence.
20 fashion which minimizes the risk of urinary incontinence.
21 No patient developed fecal incontinence.
22 s for treating patients with refractory urge incontinence.
23 ositive effect in men with postprostatectomy incontinence.
24 management of defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence.
25 treatment of the components of mixed urinary incontinence.
26 ssessment of men with urinary urgency and/or incontinence.
27 about the long-term outcome of SNS for fecal incontinence.
28 l-sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence.
29 eurons, astroglial cells and myelin; urinary incontinence.
30 r group developed ischemic colitis and fecal incontinence.
31 dication or indwelling catheters for urinary incontinence.
32 re < 3), and 6 patients (8.5%) had recurrent incontinence.
33 ing nerve damage to create models of urinary incontinence.
34 olapse are at risk for postoperative urinary incontinence.
35 equency of daily episodes of urgency urinary incontinence.
36 onths, allowing for subsequent treatment for incontinence.
37 ical option in the treatment of severe fecal incontinence.
38 djusted probability of postoperative urinary incontinence.
39 peutic options for women affected by urinary incontinence.
41 1 more cases [95% CI, 3 to 22]), and urinary incontinence (1261 more cases [95% CI, 880 to 1689]).
42 al atrophy (P = .01), nonobstructive urinary incontinence (18.5% vs 3.9%; P = .04), and syncope (37%
43 el movements/week and </= 1 episode of fecal incontinence/2 weeks, from study weeks 5-8 (responders).
45 %] to 15% [12%-20%], p < 0.001), and urinary incontinence (43% [39%-47%) to 29% [24%-35%], p < 0.001)
47 12 points for sexual function, 6 for urinary incontinence, 5 for urinary irritative symptoms, 5 for b
48 o 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritative symptoms, an
49 in the placebo group had a history of fecal incontinence; 60.4% and 55.1% in the prucalopride and pl
51 ke (9 more cases [95% CI, 2 to 19]), urinary incontinence (876 more cases [95% CI, 606 to 1168]), and
53 ender, unable to self-ambulate, all types of incontinence, additional linen layers, longer lengths of
58 CI 0.49-1.79]); an increased risk of further incontinence (aIRR 3.20 [2.06-4.96]) and prolapse surger
59 sults support the use of mesh procedures for incontinence, although further research on longer term o
60 sults support the use of mesh procedures for incontinence, although further research on longer term o
62 gnosis in primary care of urinary and faecal incontinence among people aged 60-89 with dementia, and
67 ulation to treat overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and interstitial cystitis (also known as bl
68 ads to severe bladder dysfunction, including incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms; with the
71 ntegrin signaling from urothelium results in incontinence and overactive bladder due to abnormal mech
72 out the safety of surgery for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse using transvagina
75 rned about the potential for greater urinary incontinence and/or urinary irritation associated with t
76 outcome domains (including fecal urgency and incontinence), and three oncological outcome domains (in
79 urinary obstruction and irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems-each scored from 0 (no
80 swallowing difficulties, tinnitus, and fecal incontinence, and he had undergone cataract surgery at t
81 three times the rate of diagnosis of urinary incontinence, and more than four times the rate of faeca
83 tion of fistula recurrence, residual urinary incontinence, and pregnancy after successful fistula clo
84 ted with lower rates of hemorrhage, maternal incontinence, and rare but serious neonatal outcomes.
85 sociodemographics, cognitive status, urinary incontinence, and self-reported ability to do activities
88 en were eligible if they had current urinary incontinence, and were excluded if they had a third degr
90 normal sphincter function without history of incontinence, any pretreatment staging or adenoma, expec
91 Group exercise-based programmes for urinary incontinence appear to be promising low-cost interventio
94 tance: Women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence are treated with sacral neuromodulation and
95 y tract symptoms (LUTS), such as urgency and incontinence, are common, especially among the elderly,
97 timulation in the treatment of men with urge incontinence, as well as evaluates the financial implica
98 r nerve damage, such as urinary retention or incontinence, as well as for the development of strategi
100 second primary end point was the presence of incontinence at 12 months, allowing for subsequent treat
101 surgery resulted in a lower rate of urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months but higher rates of adve
102 statectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence at 5 years (adjusted mean difference, -10.9
103 of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for fecal incontinence at 5 years after implantation and to identi
104 ean difference, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.2-18.7]) and incontinence at each time point through 5 years (adjuste
106 in men compared with women, despite urinary incontinence being relatively common and burdensome in m
107 =65 years), gallbladder disease, and urinary incontinence; benefits included decreased hip fractures,
108 men with normal stool consistency and faecal incontinence bothersome enough to seek treatment, we wer
109 have complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence but had higher rates of transient urinary r
110 ts only modest relief of male stress urinary incontinence, but may be recommended in some patients.
111 may benefit a subset of patients with fecal incontinence, but more controlled studies are needed.
112 ith weight loss, for treating stress urinary incontinence by performing anti-incontinence procedures
113 ntified, and studies have shown that urinary incontinence can have substantial negative impacts on va
114 rganizational factors that influence urinary incontinence care quality controlling for patient level
115 impact of organizational factors on urinary incontinence care quality defined as the improvement of
116 e (p=0.014), dysphagia (p=0.003) and urinary incontinence/catheterisation (p=0.000) were at higher ri
117 able as judged by the clinical team and with incontinence classified as stress, urge, mixed or 'funct
118 are common first-line treatments for faecal incontinence, clinicians could consider combining lopera
119 macological treatment of male stress urinary incontinence, confirming that duloxetine had a modest po
122 nd anal cancers; inflammatory bowel disease; incontinence; diverticulitis; hemorrhoids; fistulas; and
123 nt data on the medical treatment of men with incontinence due to overactive bladder or to stress urin
126 tive predictors included improvement of urge incontinence episodes during percutaneous nerve evaluati
127 aseline mean number of daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months, was measured with m
128 Deferment time and average number of weekly incontinence episodes were also estimated from a prospec
130 ded 24 cases of post-repair residual urinary incontinence, equivalent to a cumulative incidence of 23
131 cted defecation syndrome (ODS) in 40%, fecal incontinence (FI) in 22%, combination of ODS and FI in 2
132 spectively from patients implanted for fecal incontinence (FI) in 7 French centers between January 19
133 evels can contribute to development of fecal incontinence (FI) in women after menopause by altering n
136 agement of common anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), functional anorectal pain and functio
140 ed 18 years or older with substantial faecal incontinence for whom conservative treatments (such as d
141 or pulmonary arterial hypertension, urinary incontinence, gastrointestinal and neuropsychiatric dise
142 man in his 30s with paraparesis and urinary incontinence had a long-segment thoracic lesion on spina
144 ontinence, including both stress and urgency incontinence, has adverse effects on a woman's quality o
147 (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.09-3.50; p = 0.02), and incontinence (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 0.95-5.57; p = 0.07).
148 alls in 76%, pyramidal signs in 54%, urinary incontinence in 50% and dementia in 39%.Visual hallucina
150 adder, reduced maximal voiding pressures and incontinence in IgG control, but not sham or cis mAb tre
151 Void spot assays revealed age-dependent incontinence in IgG controls 8 months after injury, whil
152 Recent research has focused less on urinary incontinence in men compared with women, despite urinary
153 xcellent options for managing stress urinary incontinence in men, and recent data have allowed us to
155 rvention has the potential to manage urinary incontinence in older women in communities largely outsi
156 TS) including urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence in patients with benign prostatic hyperplas
161 The rates of first diagnosis for faecal incontinence in the dementia cohort were 11.1 (10.4-11.9
162 t risk (95% confidence interval) for urinary incontinence in the dementia cohort, among men and women
164 ed frequency, nocturia, with or without urge incontinence; in the absence of proven infection or othe
167 examined risk factors and impact of urinary incontinence, including lifestyle, comorbidities and med
179 ce for treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence is lacking, as are clear diagnostic criteri
182 a condition of both stress and urge urinary incontinence, is prevalent in 20% to 36% of women and is
184 Concerning urinary function, the grade of incontinence measured 1 year after the intervention was
186 d as first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence; midurethral-sling surgery is generally rec
188 inal surgery for prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, neither ULS nor SSLF was significantly sup
190 should focus on understanding the effect of incontinence on quality of life, the patient's goals and
195 symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, urinary incontinence, or both) at diagnosis (n=62) had a worse p
197 participants received a standardised faecal incontinence patient education pamphlet and were followe
198 n 6-month mean number of episodes of urgency incontinence per day than did the 174 in the sacral neur
199 Women with at least one episode of faecal incontinence per month in the past 3 months were randoml
200 eduction in the number of episodes of faecal incontinence per week compared with 32 (31%) of 102 pati
204 [8 constipation predominant (group 1) and 5 incontinence predominant (group 2)] had a 3-week trial o
205 h uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence, preoperative office evaluation alone was n
206 20 years or older undergoing a first, single incontinence procedure or prolapse procedure during 1997
207 2016, 16 660 women underwent a first, single incontinence procedure, 13 133 (79%) of which used mesh.
208 ress urinary incontinence by performing anti-incontinence procedures of both traditional and mid-uret
211 inence Score (CCIS)], quality of life [Fecal-Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQL)], bowe
213 luded complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence, quality of life, use of catheters, and adv
215 n the modified International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symp
216 viours and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Sy
217 ethral bulking and oral medicines for stress incontinence remains low because of inconsistent results
218 he MSC secretome in models of stress urinary incontinence, renal disease, bladder dysfunction and ere
223 95% CI: 1.72-132; P = 0.036), improvement of incontinence scores at 6 months from baseline (OR: 6.29;
226 4.3; P = 0.025), particularly improvement of incontinence scores from 3 to 6 months (OR: 41.5; 95% CI
229 ostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary incontinence scores were similar at baseline as and 12 m
233 oint was change in St Mark's (Vaizey) faecal incontinence severity score between baseline and 24 week
234 n-group differences in secondary measures of incontinence severity, quality of life, patient satisfac
236 (0.19) in the RN ratio, the odds of urinary incontinence status improvement or maintenance of contin
237 uality defined as the improvement of urinary incontinence status or maintenance of continent status p
238 There are an increasing number of urinary incontinence studies outside Europe and North America.
239 a preclinical canine model of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and no measurable functional agonism
240 shes used in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have
241 ntify risk factors related to stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and postnatal depression (PD) after b
242 ngs for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has increased over the last decade.
244 gan prolapse (POP) repair and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) to augment and strengthen weakened ti
247 [0.24-0.39]), and a similar risk of further incontinence surgery (0.90 [0.73-1.11]) and later compli
252 tistically significant difference in urinary incontinence symptoms at 12 months that did not meet the
253 oderate or severe stress and urgency urinary incontinence symptoms for at least 3 months, and at leas
254 ange between baseline and 12 months in mixed incontinence symptoms measured by the Urogenital Distres
255 lower urinary tract symptom, nearly 50% had incontinence symptoms, 40% had filling symptoms, and 18%
256 statectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence than EBRT (-18.0 points; 95% CI, -20.5 to -
257 ater decrease in sexual function and urinary incontinence than either EBRT or active surveillance aft
258 ostatectomy were more likely to have urinary incontinence than were those undergoing radiotherapy at
259 nificant portion of whom report urge urinary incontinence that is inadequately treated with first-lin
260 neurologic disease) associated with urinary incontinence, the clinician should initiate unsupervised
262 High-quality, level 1 evidence for urinary incontinence therapy can guide clinicians in the treatme
263 e have not changed significantly for urinary incontinence, there have been recent advances with minim
264 tectomy reported clinically meaningful worse incontinence through 5 years compared with all other opt
266 d with hypervirulent ribotypes or with stool incontinence, to determine the rate of transmission.
267 ing regarding the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence, treatment generally begins with conservati
268 Among women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence, treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA compared
270 or over with a diagnosis of stroke; urinary incontinence (UI) as defined by the International Contin
277 sures to assess functional outcomes (urinary incontinence, urinary irritation and obstruction, bowel,
278 ndomised controlled trial (CONtrol of Faecal Incontinence using Distal NeuromodulaTion [CONFIDeNT]) i
279 on issues for these patients include urinary incontinence, vaginal stenosis, clitoral pain, and cosme
280 tio for pharmacological treatment of urinary incontinence was 2.2 (1.4-3.7) for both genders, and for
281 ed rate ratio for first diagnosis of urinary incontinence was 3.2 (2.7-3.7) in men and 2.7 (2.3-3.2)
282 n and 2.7 (2.3-3.2) in women, and for faecal incontinence was 6.0 (5.1-7.0) in men and 4.5 (3.8-5.2)
283 e surveillance at 3 months, worsened urinary incontinence was associated with radical prostatectomy (
284 h apical vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence was conducted between 2008 and 2013 at 9 US
291 nent patients (16.6%) reported postoperative incontinence (Wexner Score < 3), and 6 patients (8.5%) h
292 the pathophysiology of urinary retention and incontinence where sensory feedback may engage these ref
293 e, pain (spinal and peripheral), and urinary incontinence, whereas NOP antagonists have been investig
295 developed orthostatic hypotension or urinary incontinence with the requirement for urinary catheters
296 lity (level 1) evidence for treating urinary incontinence with weight loss, for treating stress urina
297 A review of the diagnosis of male urinary incontinence, with particular reference to studies publi
298 surgical options for the treatment of fecal incontinence within the context of established therapies
299 299 scenarios, including urinary retention, incontinence, wounds, urine volume measurement, urine sa
300 women residing in nursing homes have urinary incontinence, yet only 25% seek or receive treatment.