戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ed unimanual typing (moving little finger to index finger).
2  normal and tangential forces applied by the index finger.
3  tap a force sensor mounted above their left index finger.
4 d by self-initiated voluntary flexion of the index finger.
5 of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger.
6 like corpuscles in the distal phalanx of the index finger.
7 echanoreceptor stimulation of the tip of the index finger.
8 tension and flexion movements of the paretic index finger.
9 motor stimulus, and tapping by the nonstroke index finger.
10 ically stimulating the digital nerves of the index finger.
11  10 sighted control subjects using the right index finger.
12 ing stimulation of the digital nerves of the index finger.
13 d cat, a veterinarian was bitten on the left index finger.
14  finger by tapping a sensor with their right index finger.
15  electrical stimulation to the left or right index finger.
16 ng static pressing or sliding contact of the index finger.
17  stimulation at the randomly alternated cued index finger.
18  evoked during unopposed weak flexion of the index finger.
19 iston as strongly as possible with the right index finger.
20 ol of a precision grip between the thumb and index finger.
21 nervated area of the proximal phalanx of the index finger.
22 k a 1 s interval by tapping with their right index finger.
23  delayed reaction times in the contralateral index finger.
24  angular velocity transducer strapped on the index finger.
25 ometric force for 35 s with abduction of the index finger.
26  (2.5 and 10% MVC) with the fingertip of the index finger.
27 ng a rapid passive extension movement of the index finger.
28 uently the same or greater than those of the index finger.
29  throughout the theoretical workspace of the index finger.
30 ing Braille reading with both right and left index fingers.
31 ations were simultaneously presented to both index fingers.
32 l and bimanual movements with right and left index fingers.
33 ask-irrelevant tactile taps on participants' index finger, 105 ms after visual stimulus onset.
34                 Cutaneous stimulation of the index finger (80 Hz, 1.5 s duration, twice sensory thres
35 rtex ipsilateral to the 1DIvol during active index finger abduction compared with the 1DIvol relaxed.
36  spinal motor neuron excitability (F-waves), index finger abduction force and electromyographic activ
37 elve healthy participants performed bimanual index finger abduction force control tasks at 20% of the
38 etween the thumb and index finger and during index finger abduction in uninjured humans and in patien
39  reduced during precision grip compared with index finger abduction in uninjured humans, but was unch
40 phic (EEG) oscillations to self-paced simple index finger abduction movements in patients with writer
41 while performing a power grip but not during index finger abduction or precision grip.
42 le cue while performing a power grip but not index finger abduction or precision grip.
43 quiring different degrees of hand dexterity: index finger abduction, a precision grip, and a power gr
44 (F-waves) in an intrinsic hand muscle during index finger abduction, precision grip and power grip.
45  power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction, suggesting a cortical origin for
46 ential finger-thumb opposition or repetitive index finger abduction.
47  power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction.
48 tude of passive angular displacements of the index finger about the metacarpophalangeal joint and to
49 n which 2 female macaque monkeys moved their index finger against a resisting motor to track an on-sc
50 owing tasks (a) a sustained abduction of the index finger against resistance at 10-20 % maximum volun
51 ance, reached to grasp it with the thumb and index finger along one of its two symmetry axes.
52 tercepted these trajectories by moving their index finger along the surface of a display monitor.
53 es by actively feeling objects with a single index finger and by passively feeling objects that moved
54  small (6 mm) cylinder between the thumb and index finger and during index finger abduction in uninju
55  presented with a swollen, erythematous left index finger and elevated serum markers of inflammation.
56                              The spontaneous index finger and other referential pointing in 3 adult,
57 G) elicited by air puff stimulation of right index finger and recorded using 306-channel MEG from 21
58 atically individuates two finger groups, the index finger and the middle-ring-small fingers combined.
59 ility to retrieve the object by opposing the index finger and thumb in >80% of trials.
60                          Eight subjects used index finger and thumb to grip two levers that were unde
61            Twelve right-handed subjects used index finger and thumb to grip two levers that were unde
62           Three-dimensional positions of the index finger and thumb were recorded while subjects with
63 scles when grasping a 6 mm cylinder with the index finger and thumb while the hand was held in the ne
64  to display force signals to two fingertips (index finger and thumb) as they traveled along collinear
65 g actuators that replicate the motion of the index finger and thumb.
66 y frequently acquire pointing, both with the index finger and with the whole hand, without explicit t
67 ed tactile stimulation to the right and left index fingers and also while they rested (eyes-closed).
68 n and adduction movements was recorded in 12 index fingers and nine little fingers reinnervated subse
69                      Movements of the thumb, index finger, and little finger typically were more high
70 tify the reorganized region of D1-D3 (thumb, index finger, and middle finger) representation.
71 ous and proprioceptive input from the thumb, index finger, and middle finger.
72  key presses of the little, ring, middle and index fingers, and the 'complex' sequence of a much less
73 e saposin-like domain and in the base of the index finger are better tolerated and permit residual Wn
74 o terminus, the thumb, and at the tip of the index finger are incompatible with secretion and/or acti
75 ssive vibrotactile stimuli delivered to each index finger arrived first as they were preparing to eit
76  contraction (MVC), and (b) abduction of the index finger as in (a) whilst performing self paced low
77  isometric pinch trials with their thumb and index finger at 80% maximum voluntary capacity (MVC) unt
78 l interosseus muscle as the subject held the index finger at a constant position while supporting a l
79                     Participants moved their index finger between two keys.
80 s (14 women) generated touches on their left index finger by tapping a sensor with their right index
81  the same effect was newly generated for the index finger by the same postural change.
82 ical Gaussian noise (0-15 Hz) applied on the index finger can improve the performance during compensa
83 the longitudinal analysis on a single (right index) finger demonstrates that (i) genuine match scores
84 covery of precision grip using the thumb and index finger depends on the survival of afferents innerv
85 amic parameters and the grip aperture (thumb-index finger distance) were calculated.
86 Wnt engages FZD through protruding thumb and index finger domains, which are each assembled from pair
87 during voluntary self-paced abduction of one indexed finger; EMG activity could also be recorded simu
88 finger longer than the ring finger), type 2 (index finger equal to the ring finger), or type 3 (index
89 folds, resembling a "hand" with "thumb" and "index" fingers extended to grasp the Fz8-CRD at two dist
90 three conditions: rest; self-initiated right index finger extension at a variable rate of once every
91 or was quantified using accelerometry during index finger extension.
92  during self-initiated and predictably paced index finger extensions.
93 med flexion-extension movements of the right index finger (finger tapping) at varying rates before an
94  the performance of unconstrained syncopated index finger flexion movements in patients with PD, olde
95                     Two animals performed an index finger flexion-extension task to track a target pr
96 study was to explore motor impairment of the index finger following stroke.
97 nd binding site, the conserved tip of Wnt's "index finger" forms hydrophobic amino acid contacts with
98 analysis, the location of stimulation on the index finger (four distinct sites) could be decoded with
99 gs were actively touched using the thumb and index fingers from the same or different hands.
100 action force of each individual finger), the index finger generated larger force than the little fing
101  self paced low amplitude tapping of the (i) index finger, (ii) thumb, (iii) middle finger, (iv) litt
102 t various intervals during a movement of the index finger in 16 patients with FHD and 20 controls.
103 als of the base to tip representation of the index finger in S1.
104 s were imaged while tapping with their right index finger in synchrony with tones that were separated
105 ne-like domains, including the thumb and the index finger in Wnt folding/secretion and FZD binding.
106 urial of Phe30 and Phe34 from the tip of the index finger into a pocket at the top of the thumb and t
107                            Pointing with the index finger is a species-typical human gesture, althoug
108  our theory that grasping with the thumb and index finger is based on a combination of two goal-direc
109 o suppress (NOGO) or initiate (GO) ballistic index finger isometric voluntary contractions.
110 e 'simple' sequence consisted of 16 repeated index finger key presses, the 'scale' sequence of four t
111 iographs were visually classified as type 1 (index finger longer than the ring finger), type 2 (index
112       Participants performed an out-and-back index finger movement and were instructed that monetary
113  preceding the onset of unilateral voluntary index finger movements (paretic hand in patients, right
114 ometry beamforming analysis of visually cued index finger movements.
115 tor cortex during observation of little- and index-finger movements [11-13].
116 b muscle, and flexor digitorum profundus, an index-finger muscle) was just as large as that for pairs
117 s with wrist posture were most prominent for index finger muscles, while the EMG activity of all fing
118 intramuscular electromyograms from all seven index finger muscles.
119 uced corticospinal excitability in the right index finger of 8/16 participants.
120 brotactile stimulation of sites on the right index finger of a single human subject.
121 etect H. pylori from beneath the nail of the index finger of each subject's dominant hand.
122 ted with forces varying from 1 to 3 N on the index finger of their left hand.
123 ermal stimulators are placed on the ring and index fingers of one hand, and a neutral-temperature sti
124 as mirror movements (moving little finger to index finger on both hands), and the third task compared
125 a target object from a clamp using thumb and index finger opposition.
126 0-25 constant-velocity contractions with the index finger over a 10 deg range of motion by using 6 s
127 dot arrays, applied to the immobilized right index finger pad using a computer-controlled, MRI-compat
128 oxidase was then injected into the thumb and index finger pads bilaterally to label the central termi
129 braille-like' patterns to the left and right index fingers; participants are asked to respond to pre-
130 otor cortical cells in monkeys responding to index finger perturbations.
131                                              Index finger pointing was more frequent with the subject
132 hat a rubber right hand pressing on the left index finger produced somatosensory attenuation but only
133 ss during maximal force application with the index finger-quicker than feedback latencies-which sugge
134 otlets that enervate the macaque's thumb and index finger (segments C6-C8), the cortical representati
135  directed towards roughness at the thumb and index finger sensations were to be ignored.
136                                              Index finger sensory function correlated with MEP size d
137 dian nerve, and the recording sites were the index finger (sensory studies) and abductor pollicis bre
138            A weak electrical stimulus to the index finger served as the prepulse, delivered 100 ms be
139 finger equal to the ring finger), or type 3 (index finger shorter than the ring finger).
140 sustained co-extension of the left and right index fingers, simultaneous finger tremor and extensor i
141 ter moved the blindfolded participant's left index finger so that it touched the fake hand, and simul
142 humb varied with the textures touched by the index finger suggesting integration of roughness cues fr
143  we used a random intensity continuous right index finger tactile stimulation (white noise), which en
144 gaged in three tasks: synchronization (right index finger tapping in synchrony with a tone presented
145 tion using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the index finger tapping test.
146 lant users, a tactile aid was applied to the index finger that converted voice fundamental frequency
147   Further, a double cysteine mutation at the index finger tip results in a Wnt3a with normal secretio
148  which of 2 surfaces was rougher using their index finger to make static contact with gratings of spa
149 o use the fingertip of their dominant hand's index finger to rub or tap three textured surfaces (smoo
150              Here, subjects used their right index finger to tap a force sensor mounted above their l
151 ts was recorded in 3D during 15-s repetitive index finger-to-thumb tapping trials.
152  to movement onset, IHI targeting the moving index finger turned into facilitation in controls but re
153 ensory cortex (iS1) to sensory gating during index finger voluntary activity.
154 inhibition) the iS1 at rest and during tonic index finger voluntary activity.
155  a need to suppress but not to execute rapid index finger voluntary contractions in individuals with
156                                          The index finger was most frequently affected, with the dist
157 imulating four sites along the length of the index finger, we were able to identify and locate map re
158 ifically, the kinetics and kinematics of the index finger were analysed throughout its workspace.
159                      The touches on the left index finger were delivered close to the time of contact
160  Intraepidermal nerve fibre densities at the index finger were not significantly different between gr
161 In addition, scans (both wavelengths) of the index finger were performed prior to and during 2 minute
162  that bedside tests for hypoaesthesia at the index finger were prognostic for whiplash-related upper
163 ene product+ myelinated nerve bundles at the index finger were reduced 6 months post-injury in WADII
164 entified axons projecting from the thumb and index finger were then cut in two monkeys (Group 1).
165 ed an irregular "maze" line pattern with the index finger while viewing their hand and the maze in a
166 in the distal pads of the opposing thumb and index finger, with the greatest concentration on the thu
167 humb" and a disulfide-stabilized C-terminal "index finger," yet how these binding events trigger rece

 
Page Top