コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 luences from right TPJ to right IPS and IFG (inferior frontal gyrus).
2 ficit was reflected in the activation of the inferior frontal gyrus.
3 ft language-related regions and in the right inferior frontal gyrus.
4 d activation was observed in hippocampus and inferior frontal gyrus.
5 kness measures of the left temporal pole and inferior frontal gyrus.
6 d increased the evoked response in the right inferior frontal gyrus.
7 erns disclosed involved deactivation of left inferior frontal gyrus.
8 vity to anterior language regions around the inferior frontal gyrus.
9 e presenting a decreased volume in the right inferior frontal gyrus.
10 luster encompassing the putamen, insula, and inferior frontal gyrus.
11 s (PCN), bilateral premotor cortex, and left inferior frontal gyrus.
12 the right SMA (and right pre-SMA) and right inferior frontal gyrus.
13 caudate, postcentral gyrus, hippocampus, and inferior frontal gyrus.
14 mulus frequencies, were encoded in bilateral inferior frontal gyrus.
15 nt transcranial DCS administered to the left inferior frontal gyrus.
16 ncreased feedback connectivity from the left inferior frontal gyrus.
17 56080411 had greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus.
18 ical areas that are heteromodal, such as the inferior frontal gyrus.
19 ht anterior temporal cortices, and the right inferior frontal gyrus.
20 ty in the right inferior parietal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus.
21 anterior temporal lobe, before reaching the inferior frontal gyrus.
22 stem activity within ventral premotor cortex/inferior frontal gyrus.
23 temporal sulcus, the temporal pole, and the inferior frontal gyrus.
24 eft amygdala, left anterior insula, and left inferior frontal gyrus.
25 al cortex, the dorsomedial striatum, and the inferior frontal gyrus.
26 in mPFC, superior temporal sulcus (STS) and inferior frontal gyrus.
27 ate; the orbitofrontal cortex; and the right inferior frontal gyrus.
28 ontrol participants in the bilateral ventral inferior frontal gyrus.
29 xic group across a large portion of the left inferior frontal gyrus.
30 al frontal cortex, and pars orbitalis of the inferior frontal gyrus.
31 cortex (ACC; BA24/32), anterior insula, and inferior frontal gyrus.
32 to age-delayed connectivity with the nearby inferior frontal gyrus.
33 , including the intraparietal sulcus and the inferior frontal gyrus.
34 gher-level language processing areas such as inferior frontal gyrus.
35 y of language processing in the brain toward inferior frontal gyrus.
36 ciated with increased thickness of the right inferior frontal gyrus.
37 the striatum, temporoparietal junction, and inferior frontal gyrus.
38 eft dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus.
39 nceptual disambiguation also implicating the inferior frontal gyrus.
40 nisotropy in the white matter underlying the inferior frontal gyrus.
41 in the right orbitofrontal cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus.
42 ing the SMA with the pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus; (4) medial fibres connecting the
43 cluding (n = 8) or not including (n = 9) the inferior frontal gyrus, a core mirror neuron system regi
44 ctivity between the right amygdala and right inferior frontal gyrus, a key region for top-down modula
45 ion and theory of mind deficits in the right inferior frontal gyrus, a region associated with prosodi
46 sociated with increased activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus, a region implicated in speech pr
48 r, we argue that our main finding of greater inferior frontal gyrus activation in both groups with ph
49 tion of potential losses; and increased left inferior frontal gyrus activation when experiencing an a
50 associations of temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal gyrus activation with compassion during
52 There was an inverse relationship between inferior frontal gyrus activity and ADHD symptoms and be
53 -by-time differences revealed increased left inferior frontal gyrus activity in the CD group during a
56 atients also showed greater than normal left inferior frontal gyrus activity, suggesting a possible '
57 volumes in the putamen, globus pailldus, and inferior frontal gyrus after donepezil treatment (p < 0.
58 morphometry confirmed significant atrophy of inferior frontal gyrus, alongside insular, orbitofrontal
60 ation task activated left ventral middle and inferior frontal gyrus, among other regions, to a greate
61 wing committed and observed decisions in the inferior frontal gyrus and a dissociation in the anterio
63 ontrol subjects were identified in the right inferior frontal gyrus and anterior temporal lobe, which
64 associated with phonological recoding (i.e., inferior frontal gyrus and basal ganglia) was predictive
65 e left and right IFG, as well as between the inferior frontal gyrus and brain areas involved in langu
66 emporo-parietal lesion occurred in bilateral inferior frontal gyrus and contralateral superior tempor
68 l-ganglia, thalamus, orbital frontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
69 labeling, participants recruited the dorsal inferior frontal gyrus and exhibited decreased amygdala
70 e (GMV) was significantly higher in the left inferior frontal gyrus and insula, while GMV was signifi
72 combination by highlighting the role of left inferior frontal gyrus and left anterior temporal lobe i
73 t combined concepts evoked responses in left inferior frontal gyrus and left anterior temporal lobe t
75 owed significant activation over left dorsal inferior frontal gyrus and left premotor cortex, childre
76 ions of frontal regions, including the right inferior frontal gyrus and medial frontal cortex, to att
77 nally, we observed greater activation in the inferior frontal gyrus and nucleus accumbens in younger
78 mbiguous cues elicited activity in posterior inferior frontal gyrus and posterior parietal cortex dur
82 r activity and directly correlated with left inferior frontal gyrus and right precuneus activity.
83 lations between neural activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus and SMA and timing performance co
84 between preSMA and the STN, and between the inferior frontal gyrus and STN, also predicted individua
85 al resolution field potentials from both the inferior frontal gyrus and subthalamic nucleus in 21 sub
88 ve to speech was also increased between left inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus in au
91 y retrievals correlated with activity in the inferior frontal gyrus and the anterior cingulate, where
94 comprehension displayed focal atrophy of the inferior frontal gyrus and the anterior temporal lobe.
95 on coefficient (CCC) and identified the left inferior frontal gyrus and the bilateral motor cortex wi
96 and the Language Network, including the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left posterior superior f
97 d neuroanatomical abnormalities in the right inferior frontal gyrus and the posterior part of right i
99 lesions to the left pars opercularis in the inferior frontal gyrus and to the white matter adjacent
100 ive of monosynaptic connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and ventral subthalamic nucleus.
101 rmalities in gray matter volume in the right inferior frontal gyrus and white matter volume in the ca
102 prediction error signals in anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, and anterior cingulate indicate
104 ant users displayed greater anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, and dorsal striatum activation t
105 g cocaine exhibited greater anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, and dorsal striatum activation t
106 junction (IFJ), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus, and intraparietal sulcus correla
108 Activity in left ventrolateral PFC, left inferior frontal gyrus, and left superior temporal sulcu
109 MMN from the left anterior cingulate cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus was sig
110 ainty predicted univariate responses in left inferior frontal gyrus, and multivariate responses in le
111 twork comprising the inferior parietal lobe, inferior frontal gyrus, and posterior superior temporal
112 implicate a key role of dorsal ACC, pre-SMA, inferior frontal gyrus, and STN in computing the trade-o
114 e left superior and middle temporal gyri and inferior frontal gyrus, and there was no significant dif
115 small frontal lesion were found in bilateral inferior frontal gyrus; and (iii) of a large temporo-par
116 exhibited decreased activity with age: left inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula for SI thought ma
118 to the tract connecting the stimulated right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula to the rest of th
119 th the left inferior temporal gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus are involved in processing the se
121 emporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and inferior frontal gyrus as videos were rated as increasin
122 Instead, deactivation was seen in the left inferior frontal gyrus as well as a neural system encomp
124 cluding the medial temporal lobe (MTL), left inferior frontal gyrus, as well as the ventrolateral tem
125 or cortex (BA4), supramarginal gyrus (BA40), inferior frontal gyrus (BA44), precentral gyrus (BA6) an
126 magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the right inferior frontal gyrus, because of its strong associatio
127 the monetary incentive delay task and lower inferior frontal gyrus BOLD response during the stop sig
128 ADHD symptoms are associated with increased inferior frontal gyrus BOLD response during the stop sig
131 ced in patients versus controls in the right inferior frontal gyrus, but not the occipital lobe.
132 ding pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), inferior frontal gyrus, caudate, and subthalamic nucleus
134 oth GABA and glutamate concentrations in the inferior frontal gyrus correlated inversely with stop-si
136 d odour matching to visual cues, whereas the inferior frontal gyrus correlated with both odour naming
137 and planning (e.g., middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus), craving and interoceptive proce
139 erns of activity in auditory cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus distinguished the tone that was m
140 ss activation of the right ventrolateral PFC/inferior frontal gyrus during pre-treatment emotion regu
141 activation in one cluster covering the right inferior frontal gyrus during reward consumption compare
142 face inhibition and greater activity in left inferior frontal gyrus during sad face inhibition, demon
143 r activation in the left anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus during successful inhibitions, an
145 hibition efficiency is associated with right inferior frontal gyrus engagement, potentially implement
146 the supplementary motor area, brainstem, and inferior frontal gyrus, exhibited significant correlatio
147 rtex, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the inferior frontal gyrus extending to the anterior insula.
148 anisotropy correlated with activity in left inferior frontal gyrus for both speech and song conditio
149 data showed spatial convergence in the left inferior frontal gyrus for covert or overt generation ve
150 marginal gyrus or opercular part of the left inferior frontal gyrus has been reported to transiently
151 tral attentional system, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, has been shown to respond to une
152 itive control (anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus) helped dishonest participants to
153 connectivity in a network involving the left inferior frontal gyrus, hippocampus and visual associati
154 rning in the human brain, and that the right inferior frontal gyrus hosts a confidence-based statisti
156 s in functional connectivity, with the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) a critical region for execu
158 recent study found reduced rsFC between left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and clusters in the left in
159 ion in a left-lateralized network, including inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and inferior parietal corte
160 Comparison of superadditive responses in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and IPL (supramarginal) reg
161 n this system, particularly between the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and left subcortical region
162 , left middle temporal gyrus (MTG), and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and of semantic competition
163 left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)/inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and posterior cingulate cor
164 interhemispheric functional symmetry of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus
165 in this putative stopping network, the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the primary motor corte
166 irror neuron system (MNS) which includes the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the somotosensory relat
167 hat the right intraparietal cortex (IPC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) are jointly activated by du
171 dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) have all been implicated in
172 theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in healthy volunteers, then
173 ual lesions' over left anterior or posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in post-stroke patients wit
174 e lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in subjects performing this
178 exia, iReadMore increased feedback from left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) region to the left occipita
179 with greater activity in the portion of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) specific to the ventral att
180 ideation, and that impairments in a DPFC and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) system may be important in
181 e pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) to the subthalamic nucleus
182 oding was selectively impaired when the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was driven at beta (18.7 Hz
183 connectivity between the vmPFC and the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was reduced when listening
184 ic resonance imaging, (rs-fcMRI)] with right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), an anterior component of t
185 ion, including the auditory cortex, the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and the bilateral superior
186 ng the anterior and posterior cingulate, the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and ventral and lateral te
187 mentalizing and language networks [bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), bilateral medial prefronta
190 dysregulatory dynamic signatures within the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which our prior work has l
191 gulated neurocognitive function in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)-one node in a corticothalam
196 onnecting language pathways occurred in left inferior frontal gyrus; (ii) of a small frontal lesion w
197 sly reported enhanced activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus in both deaf and dyslexic adults
199 evidence to support a critical role for the inferior frontal gyrus in interference control processes
200 ocessing and underline a distinctive role of inferior frontal gyrus in natural speech comprehension.
201 rietal lobe, posterior cingulate cortex, and inferior frontal gyrus in response to a high-fat/low-sug
202 e for the essential contribution of the left inferior frontal gyrus in syntactic analysis and highlig
205 en primary auditory cortex, hippocampus, and inferior frontal gyrus in the process of discovering the
206 g the critical role of the temporal pole and inferior frontal gyrus in transmodal linking and verbali
207 of a subregion of the prefrontal cortex, the inferior frontal gyrus, in children aged 6 to 12 years;
208 , orbital frontal cortex, and two regions of inferior frontal gyrus, including pars opercularis and p
209 been advanced regarding the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and poste
210 vation of different regions within the right inferior frontal gyrus/insula to infrequent stimuli asso
211 ], and attention [anterior cingulate cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, intraparietal sulcus (IPS)].
212 healthy participants to ask whether the left inferior frontal gyrus is essential for syntactic proces
213 how that activity in the auditory cortex and inferior frontal gyrus is specific to the maintained ton
214 is unknown, although its human homolog, the inferior frontal gyrus, is known to be important in inte
215 a region of white matter medial to the right inferior frontal gyrus, lateral and superior to the stri
216 activation for methylphenidate in the right inferior frontal gyrus, left anterior cingulate/suppleme
217 ntral gyrus, bilateral opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus, left hippocampus, and left middl
218 t supramarginal gyrus, right striatum, right inferior frontal gyrus, left thalamus, bilateral insula,
219 tant findings on the functional role of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) in phonological and semant
220 tion affects the selection process, the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) responds to competition am
222 m with this dorsal decoding system, anterior inferior frontal gyrus may coordinate control over concr
223 cross the anxiety spectrum suggests that the inferior frontal gyrus may have a more complex role in e
225 semantic cognition, including bilateral ATL, inferior frontal gyrus, medial prefrontal cortex, angula
227 x (aMCC), anterior insula, precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and opercu
228 t during successful response inhibition, the inferior frontal gyrus modulates an excitatory influence
229 ics from producing biased choices, the right inferior frontal gyrus, often implicated in inhibiting p
231 gyrus (SMG), anterior intraparietal sulcus, inferior frontal gyrus opercularis (IFGo), and triangula
232 n can be seen by either direct damage to the inferior frontal gyrus, or via damage to dorsal lateral
234 on was seen in the right precuneus and right inferior frontal gyrus (P = .013 and P =.019, respective
235 c amygdala (p = 0.010), caudate (p = 0.008), inferior frontal gyrus (p = 0.004), and supramarginal gy
236 cortex, middle and anterior temporal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, and orbit
237 tivation was found in the left putamen, left inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis), left temporal
239 -hemispheric language network, including the inferior frontal gyrus (pars orbitalis and triangularis)
241 ars), differences were observed in bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis and pars triang
242 latency causal interactions of the posterior inferior frontal gyrus (pIFG) and pre-supplementary moto
243 idely accepted that Broca's area in the left inferior frontal gyrus plays an important role in this p
245 id not implicate traditional language areas (inferior frontal gyrus, posterior temporal regions) in s
246 DLPFC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and inferior frontal gyrus, precommitment engaged lateral fr
247 and STN, and the degree of modulation by the inferior frontal gyrus, predicted individual differences
248 tegral to fluent speech production including inferior frontal gyrus, premotor cortex, and superior te
249 esented alternative interactions between the inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area (pre
250 rials showed common recruitment of the right inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area, and
251 three prefrontal-limbic regions, wherein the inferior frontal gyrus provides evaluation of stimulus m
252 ght precuneus (r = 0.57; P = .026) and right inferior frontal gyrus (r = 0.60; P = .019) and poor WM
253 g evidence suggests that activation of right inferior frontal gyrus (r-IFG) and right presupplementar
255 a (AI), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and inferior frontal gyrus, regions associated with empathy
256 ty in left anterior intraparietal sulcus and inferior frontal gyrus, regions involved in the simulati
257 nificantly higher activation within the left inferior frontal gyrus relative to nonanxious controls d
258 d the probability of a risky choice, whereas inferior frontal gyrus responses showed the inverse rela
259 arly in the course of BD showed larger right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) volumes than control subje
260 s, less stop-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG), and weaker functional con
261 refrontal cortex, left orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, v
262 at included the presupplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, subthalamic nucleus, and inferio
263 aration for selective inhibition engages the inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, and st
264 ted areas including the sensorimotor cortex, inferior-frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, and th
265 rk contained three modules, including a left inferior frontal gyrus/supplementary motor area, which w
266 e error [FWE]-corrected P = .003), the right inferior frontal gyrus (t168 = 3.65; peak MNI coordinate
267 38, z = 12; FWE-corrected P = .04), the left inferior frontal gyrus (t168 = 4.09; peak MNI coordinate
268 onnectivity of the BLA complex with the left inferior frontal gyrus than the PTSD group (p<0.05; corr
269 l cortex (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus), the medial prefrontal cortex, a
270 frontal gyrus, the middle frontal gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus, the anterior cingulate, the prec
272 included classic language areas such as the inferior frontal gyrus, the posterior superior temporal
273 o 30 Hz) at ~120 ms, likely a proxy of right inferior frontal gyrus; then, at 140 ms, there was a bro
276 (i) atomoxetine increases sensitivity of the inferior frontal gyrus to afferent inputs from the pre-s
277 rgence of "coarse" speech representations in inferior frontal gyrus typically associated with high-le
278 ing the function of the left (but not right) inferior frontal gyrus using transcranial magnetic stimu
279 ntal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex)
281 tween pre-supplementary motor cortex and the inferior frontal gyrus was absent in Parkinson's disease
283 nnectivity between homologous regions of the inferior frontal gyrus was associated with reduced neura
284 mptom analysis showed resection of the right inferior frontal gyrus was associated with slower postop
285 ent with a feedback process: activity in the inferior frontal gyrus was modulated by prior knowledge
287 the right posterior hippocampus to the right inferior frontal gyrus was significantly decreased in bo
288 stimulation experiment: subjects whose right inferior frontal gyrus was temporarily disrupted made bi
289 om posterior superior temporal cortex toward inferior frontal gyrus were associated with linguistic f
290 al terminations of the arcuate fasciculus in inferior frontal gyrus were indistinguishable between au
291 ourses along the superior temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus were remarkably similar for spoke
292 In contrast, frontal regions, including left inferior frontal gyrus, were only engaged when listeners
293 gions of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus when elicited by emotional stimul
294 c and significant lack of recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus when inhibiting responses to fear
295 Both signals were combined in the right inferior frontal gyrus, where they operated in agreement
296 n BD was associated with greater activity in inferior frontal gyrus, which also correlated with the p
297 m sLORETA identified cortical sources in the inferior frontal gyrus, which is a part of dorsolateral
298 ecruiting right inferior parietal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus, which may contribute to their in
299 on quality is selectively represented in the inferior frontal gyrus, while option quantity correlates
300 d with fractional anisotropy measures of the inferior frontal gyrus white matter and corpus callosum