戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 of 113 patients with isolated burn injury or inhalation injury.
2  episodes correlate with injury severity and inhalation injury.
3 - and anti-inflammation early after burn and inhalation injury.
4 ore TBSA burn similar in age, TBSA burn, and inhalation injury.
5 sfunction in sheep subjected to severe smoke inhalation injury.
6 ion in an established, large animal model of inhalation injury.
7  injury secondary to combined burn and smoke inhalation injury.
8 acious therapy for burn patients with severe inhalation injury.
9 ry, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and inhalation injury.
10 lmonary pathology in burn victims with smoke inhalation injury.
11 tion of burn patients with concomitant smoke inhalation injury.
12 cal studies of patients with burns and smoke inhalation injury.
13 lmonary pathology in burn victims with smoke inhalation injury.
14 ding to TBSA burn and presence or absence of inhalation injury.
15 nstriction following combined burn and smoke inhalation injury.
16  ARDS resulting from combined burn and smoke inhalation injury.
17 in sheep with severe combined burn and smoke inhalation injury.
18  in previous studies to reduce the degree of inhalation injury.
19 eaths administered (24, 36, 48) for a graded inhalation injury.
20 hat neutrophils play a pivotal role in smoke inhalation injury.
21  40 percent of body-surface area burned, and inhalation injury.
22 at are used commonly are age, burn size, and inhalation injury.
23 excision, wound healing, scar formation, and inhalation injury.
24 re shrapnel injuries, and 533 (64%) were gas inhalation injuries.
25 = nonsignificant), and clinical diagnosis of inhalation injury (39% vs. 35%, p = nonsignificant).
26            Following combined burn and smoke inhalation injury (40% of total body surface area, third
27 urn size, incidence in sepsis (20% vs. 26%), inhalation injury (46% vs. 27%), or mortality (8% vs. 7%
28 - 11, P < 0.0001), and a higher incidence of inhalation injury (8% vs. 13%, P = 0.024).
29 rface area third-degree flame burn and smoke inhalation injury after tracheostomy.
30                Patients with the most severe inhalation injuries also had a greater requirement for t
31 would mitigate acute lung injury after smoke inhalation injury and burn.
32 ctive and lumenal obstructive response after inhalation injury and identifies low-dose nebulization o
33 s been placed on the early identification of inhalation injury and its impact on fluid resuscitation,
34 ry response is enhanced with worse grades of inhalation injury and that those who die of injuries hav
35 his association is independent of burn size, inhalation injury, and age.
36 concentrate on the pathophysiology of burns, inhalation injury, and edema formation.
37 s, nutritional support, incidence of sepsis, inhalation injury, and mortality were noted.
38 s' demographics, extent of burn, presence of inhalation injury, and mortality.
39 BSA) burned, age > or =40 years, presence of inhalation injury, and ventilator days were found to be
40             The 3-variable model with %TBSA, inhalation injury, and von Willebrand factor could be us
41 idate models, a 3-variable model with %TBSA, inhalation injury, and von Willebrand factor-A2 had comp
42 fering from a 60% TBSA burn with concomitant inhalation injury are more likely to develop sepsis if t
43  underlying lung inflammation in toxic smoke inhalation injury are unknown.
44 were then compared to the graded severity of inhalation injury as determined by Abbreviated Injury Sc
45 in sheep with severe combined burn and smoke inhalation injury by preventing the formation of airway
46                                              Inhalation injury (coefficient -0.622) played a variable
47  controlling for age and % TBSA, presence of inhalation injury continues to be significant.
48                                              Inhalation injury continues to be the most significant c
49                                              Inhalation injury contributes to the morbidity and morta
50 l, regardless of age, burn size, presence of inhalation injury, delay in resuscitation, or laboratory
51     Lower age, larger burn size, presence of inhalation injury, delayed intravenous access, lower adm
52 apoptosis, haemolysis, rhabdomyolysis, smoke inhalation injury, drug nephrotoxicity and sepsis.
53 e aimed to determine whether the severity of inhalation injury evokes an immune response measurable a
54 ep in the sepsis group received cotton smoke inhalation injury followed by instillation of Pseudomona
55                      Combined burn and smoke inhalation injury frequently results in acute lung injur
56     Mortality was associated with TBS, FTBS, inhalation injury, FWI, and age.
57 sma IL-1RA also correlated with % TBSA burn, inhalation injury grade, fluid resuscitation, Baux score
58 ing for the effects of age, % TBSA burn, and inhalation injury grade, plasma IL-1RA remained signific
59                When compared in terms of low inhalation injury (grades 1-2) vs. high inhalation injur
60  low inhalation injury (grades 1-2) vs. high inhalation injury (grades 3-4), we found significant dif
61     Those who presented with worse grades of inhalation injury had higher plasma levels of carboxyhem
62            Total body surface area, age, and inhalation injury had significant effects on the subdist
63         These data reveal that the degree of inhalation injury has basic and profound effects on burn
64 ventilation in the management of early smoke inhalation injury has not been studied.
65                        The severity of smoke inhalation injury has systemically reaching effects, whi
66 found that patients with >60% TBSA burn with inhalation injury have an 8% risk of developing sepsis i
67 hstanding significant % TBSA and presence of inhalation injury, have significantly declined compared
68  gender, total body surface area burned, and inhalation injury (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.18-2.54
69  57.8 +/- 18.2 for children) and presence of inhalation injury in 38% of the adults and 54.8% of the
70 ng effects, which argue in favor of treating inhalation injury in a graded manner.
71 the neonatal and pediatric population, treat inhalation injury in pediatric and adult patients, and a
72 D and ADHD had higher rates of ingestion and inhalation injuries (IRR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.06-2.25] and 1
73                                        Smoke inhalation injury is a serious medical problem that incr
74 ecreased fluid flux in a combined burn/smoke inhalation injury model.
75 e patient demographics, incidence of sepsis, inhalation injury, mortality, serum constitutive protein
76 o patient age, total body surface area burn, inhalation injury, number of units of blood transfused o
77                       One patient died of an inhalation injury on day 7.
78 tient age, total body surface area burn, and inhalation injury on the probability of discharge and de
79 teristics of age, burn size, and presence of inhalation injury, outcome was correctly predicted in on
80                  We recorded age, burn size, inhalation injury, resuscitation, packed-cell volume at
81 ere at their highest in those with the worst inhalation injury scores (grades 3 and 4), the greatest
82 a immune mediators were increased with worse inhalation injury severity, even after adjusting for age
83 e (FTBS, percentage body surface area), age, inhalation injury, sex, and fungal-status category.
84       Patients with severe burn and/or smoke inhalation injury suffer both systemic and pulmonary vas
85                Twenty-four hours after smoke inhalation injury, the animals were reanesthetized and s
86 nderstanding of the pathophysiology of smoke inhalation injury, the best evidence-based treatments, a
87 ose with limited donor sites, those who have inhalation injury, those with delays in resuscitation, a
88 ingly, future investigations should consider inhalation injury to be a graded phenomenon.
89  than 55 years with severe burn injuries and inhalation injury to survive these devastating condition
90 ace area involvement of 54% +/- 4%, 63% with inhalation injury) underwent tracheostomy a mean of 3.9
91 catheters and underwent an LD50 cotton smoke inhalation injury via a tracheostomy under halothane ane
92                                    Of these, inhalation injury was graded into 1 of 5 categories (0,
93                                              Inhalation injury was induced by 48 breaths of cotton sm
94     Age, total body surface area burned, and inhalation injury were also significantly associated wit