ライフサイエンスコーパス: injury severity score

1 gender, ethnicity, lactate measurements, and injury severity score).

2 d impact of associated injuries (measured by injury severity score).

3 a Scale, mechanism and intent of injury, and Injury Severity Score.

4 34) greater for every 3-unit increase in the Injury Severity Score.

5 , immediate surgery, severe head injury, and injury severity score.

6 er magnitude of injury as reflected in their Injury Severity Score.

7 , and severity of injury by trauma score and injury severity score.

8 vival is independent of maternal distress or Injury Severity Score.

9 independent of maternal distress or maternal Injury Severity Score.

10 vel I and level II trauma centers had higher Injury Severity Scores.

11 The patients enrolled had similar Injury Severity Scores.

12 F-1 concentrations decreased with increasing Injury Severity Scores.

13 Coma Scales score, -0.73 (p < .001); overall Injury Severity Score, 0.37 (p < .001); Injury Severity

14 re) + .09(age2); y = 454 - 10.87(age) - 2.57(Injury Severity Score) + .09(age2); (R2 = .35, p < .0001

15 n, respectively: y = 414 - 10.87(age) + 1.19(Injury Severity Score) + .09(age2); y = 454 - 10.87(age)

16 7 [81%] vs 277 [57%]) and lower median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (14 [5-29] vs 25 [16-36]).

17 Moderate (Injury Severity Score 15-29) and severe injury (Injury S

18 rs vs 15 [14-16] years), higher median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (16 [9-21] vs 13 [9-18]) and fewer

19 (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [21.3] years; mean [SD] Injury Severity Score, 16.9 [12.3]).

20 edian (interquartile range) age = 11 (6-15), injury severity score = 17 (10-25), 75% blunt mechanism,

21 Among 4542 casualties (mean injury severity score, 17.3; mortality, 10.1% [457 of 45

22 [median age: 41 years (Q1-Q3 24-54), median injury severity score: 17 (Q1-Q3 11-22)].

23 tients had greater anatomical injury (median Injury Severity Score, 18 vs 25; P = .02) and more physi

24 e studied: mean age, 37.7 +/- 17 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 19 +/- 11; 75% of male.

25 [21.1] years; 8799 males [70.5%]; mean [SD] Injury Severity Score, 19.6 [12.0]).

26 ma (15 males and 7 females; age, 45 +/- 3.8; Injury Severity Score, 20.7 +/- 1.8) were matched with 2

27 (20 males and 8 females; age, 46.1 +/- 2.5; Injury Severity Score, 20.8 +/- 1.3).

28 dian (interquartile ranges) age 8 (4-12) and Injury Severity Score 22 (13-34), 73.5% blunt mechanism,

29 High injury severity (Injury Severity Scores 25-75) was significantly associat

30 0% surface area burns and 8 trauma patients (injury Severity Score, 25-57).

31 However, severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score, 25-75) who arrive in severe shock

32 48.5%] with penetrating injury; median [IQR] Injury Severity Score, 26 [17-41]; 591 [87.0%] with seve

33 le patients were enrolled in the study: mean injury severity score, 26; mean age, 35 yrs; mean Glasgo

34 comial pneumonia were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 27 vs. 17, p < .001) and had a lon

35 the head, right chest, and bilateral femurs (Injury Severity Score = 27-41) with captive bolt guns wa

36 PAC were older (45.8+/-21.3 yrs), had higher Injury Severity Score (28.4+/-13.5), worse base deficit

37 s included severely injured patients (median injury severity score, 28 [IQR, 17-34]; median differenc

38 [70%]; mean [SD] age, 46 [19] years; median Injury Severity Score, 29 [IQR, 17-36]) presented with a

39 (88%) sustained severe blunt injury (median Injury Severity Score, 29 [IQR, 21-38]).

40 patient age was 50.1+/-18.7 yrs with a mean Injury Severity Score 30.7+/-11.3).

41 Patients were severely injured (median injury severity score 33); 33% developed sepsis, 6% sept

42 collision (62%) with severe injuries (median injury severity score 36, IQR 25 to 50).

43 [IQR] age, 10 [4 to 15] years; median [IQR] Injury Severity Score, 4 [4 to 15]) at 417 trauma center

44 28] mm Hg; Glasgow Coma Scale score, 14 [2]; Injury Severity Score, 6.8 [6.5]).

45 Injury severity score (9 +/- 10 vs. 11 +/- 10, P < 0.000

46 After moderate injuries (Injury Severity Score, 9-16), the deficiency was not ass

47 of hemoperitoneum, active extravasation, and injury severity score (a clinical measure of multiorgan

48 raphic data, vital signs, laboratory values, injury severity score, abbreviated injury severity, fina

49 ALI and ARDS, adjusting for trauma severity (Injury Severity Score), Acute Physiology Score, and age.

50 acute lung injury to be independent of age, injury severity score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Heal

51 asgow Coma Scale score, pupillary responses, Injury Severity Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Heal

52 Injury Severity Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Heal

53 val were year of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, age, and pupil reactivity.

54 Scale, presence of hypotension on admission, Injury Severity Score, AIS for all body regions, and pre

55 uated increase in adrenaline with increasing Injury Severity Score and lower platelets and leukocytes

56 When adjusted for injury severity score and time period, the percentage ki

57 Despite greater Injury Severity Scores and packed red blood cell require

58 erity of trauma (eg, mechanism of injury and Injury Severity Score), and TBI-specific variables (eg,

59 talloid/12 hrs, presence of any head injury, injury severity score, and 12 hrs base deficit > 8 mEq/L

60 Data on demography, biochemistry, Injury Severity Score, and 30-day mortality were recorde

61 terval, 0.63-2.43) after adjustment for age, Injury Severity Score, and Acute Physiology Score.

62 disease, injury type, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and admission vital signs.

63 sis, groups were stratified by base deficit, Injury Severity Score, and age to further explore the in

64 ypotension, Glasgow Coma Scale on admission, Injury Severity Score, and AIS for all body regions.

65 Groups were comparable for age, gender, injury severity score, and APACHE II score.

66 The mean age, Injury Severity Score, and APACHE score were 44 +/- 20 y

67 gic and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, Injury Severity Score, and blunt mechanism of injury (od

68 ups, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, Injury Severity Score, and brain injury severity using t

69 r relative to age, admission blood pressure, injury severity score, and chest abbreviated injury scal

70 hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, higher Injury Severity Score, and greater head injury severity,

71 sification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-based injury severity score, and ICU admission MELD score.

72 a Registry provided demographic information, injury severity score, and International Classification

73 obtained for each case controlling for age, Injury Severity Score, and mechanism of injury.

74 gression adjusted for age, injury mechanism, Injury Severity Score, and serious brain and chest injur

75 logy and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score, injury severity score, and the presence of blunt traumat

76 ender, shock (systolic blood pressure < 90), Injury Severity Score, APACHE II, lactate levels, base d

77 re above 8 (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39) or Injury Severity Score below 16 (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-

78 of anatomical injury defined as minor by an injury severity score between 2 and 8 and normal physiol

79 Injury Severity Score, cardiac history, and intubation o

80 Age, gender, number of rib fractures, Injury Severity Score, comorbidities, pneumonia, and mor

81 tients from upper-HDI countries had a higher Injury Severity Score compared with those in middle-HDI

82 lar injury, increased wound size, and higher injury severity score correlated with wound dehiscence.

83 Non-survivor Injury Severity Score exceeded that of survivors (27.5 +

84 Median New Injury Severity Score for DCL patients was 29 (interquar

85 Mean injury severity score for the group was 34, with an aver

86 By Cox analyses adjusted for age, sex, injury severity score, Glascow Coma Scale, base excess,

87 multiple linear regression adjusted for age, injury severity score, Glascow Coma Scale, systolic bloo

88 no difference in presence of midline shifts, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Score, hypotension,

89 patients presenting with acute trauma and an injury severity score greater than 15.

90 injury (aOR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.80-4.20) and an injury severity score greater than 25 (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI

91 However, age more than 75 years, injury severity score greater than 33, Glasgow Coma Scal

92 Analyses were stratified by injury severity score greater than or equal to 15.

93 Patients older than 13 years with an Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16 admitt

94 PATIENTS OR Trauma patients with injury severity scores greater than 20 (n = 10) at days

95 Adult polytrauma patients with Injury Severity Scores greater than or equal to 16 and a

96 rt study of severely injured adult patients (Injury severity score > 15) admitted to a civilian traum

97 cohorts of 167 and 244 severely traumatized (Injury Severity Score > 15) adult (> 18 yr) patients.

98 cytometry in 17 consecutive trauma patients (injury severity score > 20) within 24 hours of injury an

99 nts without isolated head injury and with an Injury Severity Score > or = 16 were evaluated for devel

100 ort study of 273 subjects with major trauma (injury severity score > or = 16).

101 ith an Abdominal Trauma Index > or = 25 or a Injury Severity Score > or = 21 who had early enteral ac

102 enrolled if they met the following criteria: Injury Severity Score > or = 9, intensive care unit (ICU

103 in survival was confined to patients with an injury severity score > or =16.

104 50.1-950.3, 995.55, maximum head abbreviated Injury Severity Score >/= 3) who received tracheal intub

105 ukocytes from patients with multiple injury (injury severity score >/=17 points; n = 81) were analyze

106 es limited to patients with severe injuries (Injury Severity Score >/=25).

107 ury Severity Score 15-29) and severe injury (Injury Severity Score >/=30) had a six-fold and 16-fold,

108 d transport-related deaths and major trauma (injury severity score >12) cases were extracted from pop

109 , we assigned 240 severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score >15 [scores range from 0 to 75, wi

110 Extended) outcomes after blunt major trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) in an organized trauma system

111 rospective cohort study of severely injured (injury severity score >15) patients from the National Tr

112 Inclusion: New Injury Severity Score >16 points, or 3 fractures and Abb

113 In adjusted analysis, severe (injury severity score >= 15) and nonsevere injured septi

114 a lower rate of functional independence were Injury Severity Score >=25 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24 [9

115 Trauma patients with an injury severity score >=9 treated at 3 Level-I trauma ce

116 ge (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20-1.34), and higher Injury Severity Score (>/=9 vs <9: OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.3

117 etrating wounds, physiologic compromise, and Injury Severity Scores>or=34 were associated with fewer

118 After severe injury (Injury Severity Score, > or =16), 50% of the deficient a

119 We identified severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score, > or =9) at centers that contribu

120 included all ED encounters for major trauma (Injury Severity Score, >15) seen at non-trauma centers i

121 Of the clinical criteria, injury severity score had the best correlation with outc

122 olved in motor vehicle accidents, had higher Injury Severity Scores, had fever at admission, and had

123 lved in a motor vehicle accident, had higher Injury Severity Scores, had fever at admission, and had

124 rall Injury Severity Score, 0.37 (p < .001); Injury Severity Score (head component only), 0.53 (p < .

125 e helmets, and had lower Glasgow coma scale, injury severity score, head abbreviated injury scale, re

126 ,475 patients older than 15 years, having an injury severity score higher than 15, and sustaining blu

127 P = 0.02) after adjustment for age, gender, injury severity score, highest lactate level, mechanism

128 y Score scale (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26), Injury Severity Score (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98), Fun

129 nal Classification of diseases ninth Edition Injury Severity Score (ICISS) is the best-known risk-adj

130 ut attenuated adrenaline release with higher Injury Severity Score, impaired platelet and leukocyte m

131 e significant interaction between gender and Injury Severity Score in predicting transthyretin concen

132 The mean injury severity score increased from 10.1 +/- 9.1 (stand

133 lasma nitrite and nitrate concentrations and injury Severity Score independently predicted cerebrospi

134 Data included age, Injury Severity Score, injury mechanism, survival, labor

135 s were stratified based on survival outcome, Injury Severity Score, insurance status, and length of s

136 d cohort further accounting for patient sex, Injury Severity Score, insurance status, and potential c

137 As the Injury Severity Score is not accurately known at the tim

138 y of cardiac disease, especially when a high Injury Severity Score is present.

139 /- 5 days vs. 6 +/- 5, P < 0.0001), a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS 5 +/- 8 vs. 9 +/- 11, P < 0.0

140 Moderate to severely injured [injury severity score (ISS) > 8] adult patients (age >/=

141 h included patients >14 years of age and had injury severity score (ISS) >15, were alive on admission

142 tients below the age of 16 years and with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >=10, treated by a Major Tra

143 Over 30 months, major trauma patients [Injury Severity Score (ISS) >=9] admitted to 3 Level-I t

144 The TRAN group had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (17.5 versus 11.0, P < 0.05)

145 4% vs. 73% male), age (44 vs. 43 years), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) (26 vs. 25).

146 TnT levels significantly correlated with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (r = 0.275, p = 0.001), GCS

147 Blunt injury occurred in 80% with a median injury severity score (ISS) 34 (21, 43).

148 ic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score or injury severity score (ISS) and previous antibiotic use.

149 y prediction in trauma is assessed using the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Revised Trauma Score usi

150 ated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and injury severity score (ISS) as independent predictors fo

151 Outcomes were compared per incremental Injury Severity Score (ISS) bins.

152 Patients 18 years or older with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 15 and who carr

153 erest were death, spinal cord injury, and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 25.

154 nit with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI), Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, and Glasgow

155 and 2015 aged 16 years or older and with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of >= 9.

156 Subgroups included children with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or above, indicating o

157 efined as the proportion of patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or greater who were in

158 Subgroups included those with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or more; any Abbreviat

159 rs, range 18-90 years, 75 males) with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 24 (range 9-66), from who

160 We included patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9-24 excluding patients w

161 d Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS] of 1-6) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 9 were included.

162 ance was observed for the negative impact of injury severity score (ISS) on mortality (P = 0.071).

163 They used the Injury Severity Score (ISS) to classify 84 severely inju

164 The median injury severity score (ISS) was 13 (interquartile range

165 46 years (29-61 years), and the median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 24 (17-34).

166 Higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) was associated with abnormal

167 on from the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) which may be inaccurate or d

168 Mean age, injury severity score (ISS), and APACHE score were 43 +/

169 Injury severity score (ISS), associated injury, and pati

170 patient age, injury mechanism and location, Injury Severity Score (ISS), presenting systolic blood p

171 prevalent metric to quantify injury severity-Injury Severity Score (ISS)- is impractical to use in re

172 ed on the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and injury severity score (ISS).

173 , loss of limb, abdominal trauma, and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS).

174 sex, trauma center, mechanism of injury, and injury severity score (ISS).

175 utcome was trauma severity as defined by the Injury Severity Score (ISS).

176 imilar in age (31 +/- 8 vs. 30 +/- 8 years), Injury Severity Score (ISS; 12 +/- 11 vs. 12 +/- 11), sy

177 Very severe injury severity scores (ISS > 24) (OR = 19.19; P < 0.001

178 t patients (35.1 +/- 16.3 years of age) with Injury Severity Scores (ISS) 36.6 +/- 13.9 on days 1 and

179 n a total of 70 critically injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] >/= 25) at The Royal London

180 ter with a minor injury (survival >24 hours, Injury Severity Score [ISS] <16, and absence of an Ameri

181 uman blunt trauma patients (n = 472, average injury severity score [ISS] = 20.2) exhibited elevations

182 Injury types and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), timing and location of de

183 nations with positive BAPT-related findings, injury severity score, length of hospital stay, and numb

184 risk range after exclusion of patients with Injury Severity Score less than 16.

185 ter who did not require an operation, had an Injury Severity Score lower than 15, and were discharged

186 e in mothers with mild to moderate injuries (Injury Severity Score < 16).

187 atients were excluded with no signs of life, Injury Severity Score <9, hospitalization <3 days, or wh

188 survivors and decedents with respect to the Injury Severity Score (mean [SD], 23.4 [12.4] vs 37.7 [1

189 yrs with complete data on base deficit, and Injury Severity Score (n=53,312).

190 Baseline cervical SCIs, higher Injury Severity Scores, neurogenic shock, and mechanical

191 nts who were treated invasively had a higher injury severity score (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI: 1.

192 predictors of in-hospital mortality were the Injury Severity Score (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.

193 ients after severe injuries as defined by an Injury Severity Score of > or =16.

194 an (SD) age of 49 (20) years and a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score of 10 (9).

195 sustained a femur fracture, with a mean (SD) injury severity score of 10.4 (5.8).

196 a mean (SD) age of 77.9 (8.1) years, median Injury Severity Score of 15 (range, 9-18), median Glasgo

197 tality risk in adult trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher.

198 and penetrating trauma victims with a median injury severity score of 17.5 (interquartile range, 9.25

199 <17 years and 3 were aged >60 years]; median injury severity score of 19 admitted patients, 9 [range,

200 ere evaluated, including 16 trauma patients (injury Severity Score of 20 +/- 8) and 11 general surgic

201 The patient cohort demonstrated a mean Injury Severity Score of 23.7 and an overall 30-day mort

202 the following severe injury characteristics: Injury Severity Score of 25-75, base deficit of less tha

203 with arrival base deficit worse than -11 and Injury Severity Score of 25-75, had a decrease in the ri

204 ale individuals [81.9%]) with a median (IQR) Injury Severity Score of 29 (18-50) were included.

205 Patients with a head Injury Severity Score of 3 or greater, an out-of-state a

206 ts had a median age of 45 years and a median injury severity score of 43 (interquartile range, 34-50)

207 included primary trauma room admissions with Injury Severity Score of 9 or more into the analysis.

208 ustaining blunt/penetrating injuries with an Injury Severity Score of 9 or more were included.

209 ), transferred patients had a similar median Injury Severity Score of 9, but 24% of transferred adult

210 same age groups (P < 0.001), even though the Injury Severity Score of the women was significantly hig

211 ers aged >/= 15 years with serious injuries (injury severity scores of >/= 9).

212 OS was observed in patients with PAI and New Injury Severity Scores of 16 or higher (difference in ad

213 5% CI, 1.79-2.46; P < .001), and very severe Injury Severity Score (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.88-2.62; P <

214 The median Injury Severity Score overall was 24 (range, 1-75).

215 Patients with PNM had higher Injury Severity Scores (P < .001) and chest Abbreviated

216 DLs were affected strongly by depression and Injury Severity scores (p < 0.01), whereas IADLs were si

217 patients (p = .04) and tended to have higher injury Severity Scores (p = .09).

218 risk of mortality III scores (p=0.0003), and injury severity scores (p=0.02) were reliably associated

219 hypotension, Head Abbreviated Injury Score, Injury Severity Score, PO(2), and base deficit.

220 hile controlling for pre-training behaviors, Injury Severity Score, postgraduate training year, and d

221 al 1.01-1.07], p = .005) after adjusting for Injury Severity Score, prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale, a

222 +/- 25 vs. 134 +/- 25 mm Hg), TRISS (Trauma Injury Severity Score; probability of survival (94% +/-

223 Age, GCS score, injury severity score, pupillary light reflex, CT findin

224 mponent of the Glasgow Coma Scale score, the Injury Severity Score, pupillary reactivity, and presenc

225 umatic Brain Injury (r = 0.51; p = 0.01) and Injury Severity Score (r = 0.49; p = 0.01), but not with

226 In this diverse group of patients, Injury Severity Score ranged from 1 to 45 (11.5 +/- 10.3

227 In this heterogeneous group of patients, Injury Severity Score ranged from 1 to 45 (11.5 +/- 10.3

228 arable to known risk factors such as age and injury severity score, regarding development of organ dy

229 Logistic regression identified Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, lower admis

230 Both groups had similar Injury Severity Scores, Revised Trauma Scores, baseline

231 logy and Chronic Health Evaluation II or new injury severity score scoring systems.

232 adjusted for underlying mortality risk (age, Injury Severity Score, serious brain or chest injury, an

233 Age, Injury Severity Score, serum osmolality, time since inju

234 The further addition of Injury Severity Score significantly improved the predict

235 nitrate concentrations were associated with injury Severity Score, suggesting that increased nitric

236 d assessed using an established histological injury severity scoring system and a comprehensive immun

237 Trauma patients having the highest injury severity score tended to have the most severe apo

238 The level of Vo2 was not related to Injury Severity Score, the number or combination of orga

239 Age, injury severity score, thoracic abbreviated injury score

240 Interpretation was expressed in tubular injury severity scores (TISS) that ranged from 1 (a norm

241 n, assisted respirations, chest tube status, Injury Severity Score, total volume of blood products re

242 urrent severity measures like the Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) and revised trauma score (

243 (ISS) and Revised Trauma Score using Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology.

244 uOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and composite Injury Severity Score (uOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04) wer

245 Mean injury severity score varied by center from 22 to 40; th

246 mean (SD) age was 15.9 (20.6), the mean (SD) Injury Severity Score was 10.9 (9.6), and 8397 (50.7%) w

247 The mean patient age was 93 years, the mean Injury Severity Score was 12, and the mean number of com

248 rs (interquartile range [IQR] 24-50), median injury severity score was 13 (IQR 9-22), median 24-hour

249 Median Injury Severity Score was 13 (IQR9-25).

250 Mean Injury Severity Score was 13.1.

251 age, 50 [31-65] years; 73% male; and median Injury Severity Score was 14 [9-22]).

252 The median injury severity score was 17 [interquartile range 9-26];

253 The median composite Injury Severity Score was 21 (11-30) in the no ARDS grou

254 5 randomized), 43% had penetrating injuries, injury severity score was 23 +/- 16, 20% had admission s

255 The median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 24 (14-34), with a 24-hour mor

256 .7% were men, 15.2% were black, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.4 (on a scale from 0 to 75,

257 The median Injury Severity Score was 25 (interquartile range, 17-34

258 jury was 51.1% and increased to 73.2% if the Injury Severity Score was 25 or higher and to 78.7% if m

259 to the head and bilateral chests (estimated injury severity score was 25-32) was followed by hypoven

260 ge of the children was 9.2 yrs, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 27 +/- 9.

261 of the patients was 39 years, and the median Injury Severity Score was 27.

262 Mean injury severity score was 28 +/- 1; associated injuries

263 The mean (SD) Injury Severity Score was 28.4 (16.2), the mean (SD) bas

264 55) years, 1251 (79%) were men, median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 29 (18-43), 36% had penetratin

265 t mechanisms of injury, and the median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 29 (19-43).

266 Median injury severity score was 30 (interquartile range 22-51)

267 The mean injury severity score was 30.

268 Mean Injury Severity Score was 32 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD).

269 R) age of participants was 39 (27-56) years, Injury Severity Score was 36 (26-50 [major trauma]), and

270 9 years]; 62 [69%] were male; and the median Injury Severity Score was 41 [IQR, 29-50]) randomized, 8

271 The average injury severity score was 9.3.

272 other factors, each 5-point increment in the injury severity score was associated with a 6%, 13%, 13%

273 Increasing injury severity measured by Injury Severity Score was associated with increased inci

274 Injury Severity Score was similar (33 no bypass, 31 bypa

275 ds from 8.72 to 7.06 days, while the average injury severity score was unchanged.

276 Increasing injury severity, measured by Injury Severity Score, was a significant independent pre

277 adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, weekend admission and month of vi

278 age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Injury Severity Score were 36 years, 13.7, and 13.5, res

279 stic regression models incorporating age and injury severity score were developed on a test set of pa

280 ched controls, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and Injury Severity Score were entered into a multivariable

281 Plasma and platelet to RBC ratios and injury severity score were predictors of death at 6 hour

282 In a multivariate model, age and Injury Severity Score were significantly associated with

283 Demographics and injury severity score were similar.

284 ing for multiple known risk factors, age and Injury Severity Score were the only important predictors

285 Injury severity scores were highest in the cryoprecipita

286 ders (eg, age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Injury Severity Score) were significantly higher than fo

287 adjusted for age, sex, injury mechanism, and injury severity score] were used to calculate risk ratio

288 with higher rates of hypotension and higher Injury Severity Score, when compared with publicly and p

289 outcome and in developing the Relative Head Injury Severity Score, which can assess severity of trau